Slashdot Mirror


Jurassic Web

theodp writes "It wasn't so long ago, but Slate's Farhad Manjoo notes that The Internet of 1996 is almost unrecognizable compared with what we have today. No YouTube, Digg, Huffington Post, Gawker, Google, Twitter, Facebook, or Wikipedia. In 1996, Americans with Internet access spent fewer than 30 minutes a month surfing the Web and were paying for the Internet by the hour. Today, Nielsen says we spend about 27 hours a month online (present company excepted, of course!)." I thought in 1996 all we did was idle in IRC channels while we wrote code in other terminals.

38 of 430 comments (clear)

  1. "Wasn't So Long Ago?!" by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It wasn't so long ago ...

    It was 13 years ago. Maybe I'm just young but that is an eternity in the world of computer technology.

    I would argue that you should really be looking at the hardware & communication infrastructure because internet usage (in my opinion) is really a product of how cheap the hardware makes the connection and usage.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:"Wasn't So Long Ago?!" by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was 13 years ago. Maybe I'm just young

      See my sig, kid.

      But you're right, I didn't get on the internet until a year later. It only cost me $12.95 per month, with "unlimited access" which really was unlimited. It even included an unlimited amount of personal web space that I abused horribly, trying to find the limit to my unlimited access and never could. I think all the game demos, patches, etc I posted was part of what made my Quake site so popular; once I got them uploaded to my ISP's server (which took quite a while to download, then to upload) others could download them from my site FAST.

      I wasn't paying by the hour as TFS says; I had paid Compuserve by the hour ten or so years earlier, but I never was on AOL. I did appreciate all the free floppies they mailed me, though.

      I would argue that you should really be looking at the hardware & communication infrastructure because internet usage (in my opinion) is really a product of how cheap the hardware makes the connection and usage.

      The infrastructure was mostly the phone line and modems. They really weren't that expensive, and neither were computers so long as you built your own.

  2. IMDB was up by LotsOfPhil · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first (non obvious) big site that pops to mind is IMDB. Other than that I just remember IRC and BBSes.

    --
    This post climbed Mt. Washington.
    1. Re:IMDB was up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sadly, GeoCities existed then, and even scarier is: it still does.

    2. Re:IMDB was up by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of the current stuff is either refined, or regressed versions of what we had back then.

      Digg => Slashdot
      Huffington Post => There wasn't any shortage of bullshit artists back then either
      Google => Yahoo, AltaVista, etc..
      Twitter => IRC > Twitter. Twitter is like IRC, except there's only one channel, and everybody's on ignore by default.
      Wikipedia => Everything (up to the reader whether this was progress or regression)
      And there's the things that social networks and tag clouds replaced..... AOL, Web Rings, Geocities, etc...

      What should be more shocking is that in 12 years, there isn't actually all that much out there that is truely new.

    3. Re:IMDB was up by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nah, we were trading files back then too. The only thing that's changed is the protocols.

    4. Re:IMDB was up by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Remember Angelfire?

    5. Re:IMDB was up by neomunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I met my wife back in '96 on a telnet BBS. shadow.scc(or acc).iit.edu to be specific.

      I was getting internet access back then via a hole in the library dial-up information access system. Mostly used for gopher access, some links to other libraries would allow you to escape out to a telnet prompt. From there it was just a matter of knowing where to telnet. BBSs came first, then after I learned the magic of a shell, it wasn't long until I figured out how to implement PPP. By summer '95 I had slackware installed and (thanks to a friend of mine) access at an early-adopter local dial-up ISP. Even though the whole web was "mine" at that point, I retained a special love for shadow, and ended up meeting my wifey there...

      Ahh, nostalgia.

    6. Re:IMDB was up by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Scarier still: Yahoo still exists.

      I remember fondly the first time I loaded Google's search page. No ads, no weather report, no links to personal ads. Just a search box, as Al Gore himself intended it.

      I swore off garbage portal sites right then and I've never looked back.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
  3. Ah, the era of homepages by Nursie · · Score: 5, Informative

    With terrible blinking text and eyesore backgrounds.

    They were all on geocities then. Now they're all on facebook/myspace.

    It was a nicer, gentler internet. Less advertising, less malware. Less crap and less people too... e-Commerce was a rarity. Naive users and online shops would transact via card-detail containing emails.

    There was still all the porn you could imagine though.

    1. Re:Ah, the era of homepages by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is myspace fundamentally different to the homepage?

      They are still gaudy shrines to the ego, constructed of copy-pasted crappy code.

    2. Re:Ah, the era of homepages by Xest · · Score: 4, Funny

      "There was still all the porn you could imagine though."

      There was also all the porn I couldn't imagine too.

    3. Re:Ah, the era of homepages by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Informative

      Funny how porn was one of the first major uses of the 'net.

      Not really. Porn is often one of the first major uses of a new media. Videotape built its success on porn.

    4. Re:Ah, the era of homepages by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Funny

      They were all on geocities then. Now they're all on facebook/myspace.

      Yep. Those awful 90's Geocitites user-generated content pages get my vote for worst use of disk space EVAH. Here's my resume (identical to every 90's college student CIS rez) here's my girlfriend (identical to every 90's college student g/f pics), here' my Honda Civic (ditto), here's pics of my g/f's cats.

      =Smidge=

      They were literally the same pictures. For disk space reasons they only had a few pictures of girlfriends/cat/civics and they just generate a page by picking one of each at random. Most people had so little individuality that they didn't notice.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:Ah, the era of homepages by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 4, Funny

      THIS PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION

  4. 1996 nothing... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember seeing Mosaic in 1992 or 1993 and saying, "this will never replace Gopher."

    1. Re:1996 nothing... by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Funny

      Spyglass corporation's Mosaic was licensed by a company called Microsoft as the basis for a browser which they named Internet Explorer --- Spyglass had an absolutely fantastic deal where they got royalties on _every sale_ of the browser.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:1996 nothing... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You remember the MIT coffee pot cam? Some joker who worked upstairs put a digital camera next to the coffee pot so he could point his browser at the link and see if there was any coffee made, without having to get his ass up and walk to the pot.

      Now that was entertainment. I knew people who didn't even go to MIT who checked that thing ALL THE TIME.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  5. IRC channels? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I thought in 1996 all we did was idle in IRC channels while we wrote code in other terminals."

    Yet another person who does not know he can find porn on the net.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:IRC channels? by epiphani · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I thought in 1996 all we did was idle in IRC channels while we wrote code in other terminals."

      Yet another person who does not know he can find porn on the net.

      Yet another person who is apparently unfamiliar with DCC. Why do you think we idled on IRC to begin with? It sure as hell wasn't for the intelligent conversation.

      --
      .
  6. Spam? by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And what the hell is Huffington Post and Gawker to put it inside this list?

    1. Re:Spam? by Silverhammer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I could understand citing the political blogosphere as a whole, but to specifically mention the Huffington Post is just creepy. It's neither revolutionary nor reputable.

  7. When I think about the internet in 1996 by mandark1967 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think about what was there, then, I think about what we have lost since then.

    So many sites that were popular in that timeframe are no longer around. Internet Archives doesn't capture all those funny, cool sites that used to be there and are, sadly, no longer around.

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:When I think about the internet in 1996 by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What, like Hamster Dance? Shrines to music stars? MIDI background music that sounded awful on the hardware of the day? Streaming RealPlayer files so blurry you needed to be half-blind to make them out? Web Rings containing hundreds of links pointing to nothing at all? Personal homepages consisting of an export of Netscape bookmarks? Company web pages that were little more than brochures? (Often less than that!) Everyone on the interwebz thinking they're 1337 h4x0rz? (The 'z' was real popular back then.) XTrek competitions? MSN-only Startrek.com? Pages that would only render in Netscape or IE? (Complete with a "this page looks best in X" buttons.) Frames?!?

      The web was definitely a more innocent place back then, but it was in no way a more useful place. What you are remembering is the subculture that went with the web of the day. If you had Internet access... man, you had something special. This crazy ability to make friends from around the world, to meet people who like the same shows or games as you, the ability to load up your computer with all the shareware it could hold, to access amateur content like MODs, MIDIs, animations done in GIFs, fan fiction, web comics, and even Java Applet games!

      It was an exciting and fun time to be alive and I'm glad I was a part of it. But like all things, its time has passed and very little content of value was lost. In fact, most of the truly interesting content is still around. It simply doesn't shine very well in the face of what the modern Internet can do.

  8. Ugh by sean_nestor · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's 1996, and you're bored. What do you do? If you're one of the lucky people with an AOL account, you probably do the same thing you'd do in 2009: Go online. Crank up your modem, wait 20 seconds as you log in, and there you areâ""Welcome." You check your mail, then spend a few minutes chatting with your AOL buddies about which of you has the funniest screen name (you win, pimpodayear94).

    I can't believe I read this and immediately thought "...but AOL didn't allow screen names over 10 characters until 1999..."

    I'm a loser.

  9. In some ways it was much better in 1996 by owlnation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No Google, true -- but choice of search engines. While Google was great between about '97 and '03 or so, it's become so gamed to be as bad as Altavista was in 1996 -- but now there's no real choice.

    No Facebook, no MySpace, no Wikipedia, less spam and far less Flash-based sites -- yes, those were better days. Not to mention a lot less Buzzwordery and fuckwittery.

    There was more porn, and it was more extreme and less restricted -- not so much video based, of course. And if you were a producer you could throw a site up and make money easily, now it's so hard as to be really not worthwhile.

    While there's definitely improvements, I can't help looking back fondly to a lot of things that are no longer with us. And the massive intrusion that some things on the web have become.

  10. Web? by Chih · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In 96, I was still a teenager. All I did was play doorgames on BBSs. LoD, LORD, etc.. I suppose you could say I surfed the web, but it was really only for pron :D

    --
    For best results, avoid doing stupid things.
  11. Re:No Huffie Post!?! Oh My GOSH!!! by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nerds were nerds long before the web. What is this "outside" of which you speak?

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  12. Its not too late. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With a little work we can get rid of Huffington Post, Digg,Twitter and Myspace. The rest can stay, but only if they behave themselves.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  13. Re:Paying for Internet by the hour? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Multiplayer Quake was too slow.

    It was okay for 2 players. QuakeWorld was released in 1996, however, and made things a lot better. 4-8 player games were quite playable over my modem in '96.

    IRC was getting flooded by clueless n00bs

    It still is. People with a clue have moved to SILC.

    Instant messaging == AIM. Without file transfers, voice, etc.

    In 1996? Really? AIM was released in 1997. Back in '96, ICQ was the only option for IM.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  14. Re:No Huffie Post!?! Oh My GOSH!!! by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is this "outside" of which you speak?

    It's where you had to go when you were traveling to the dungeon masters house ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  15. Re:No Huffie Post!?! Oh My GOSH!!! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

    News flash: amateur astronomers are nerds, as are geologists and peleontologists. You can hardly do any of thet that without going outside.

    Uh, yes you can:
    astronomers: Bedroom window
    geologists and paleontologists: Hole in the basement floor

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  16. Re:No Huffie Post!?! Oh My GOSH!!! by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Funny

    You should see the mess that kid made in the basement with his research on geothermal energy!

    On the plus site, his parents unplugged the hot water heater and the water still stays at a toasty 2,000F.

  17. 1996? by Burnhard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In 1996 I was spending a lot of my time out of lectures surfing The Hun's Yellow Pages. I was awarded first class honours, thus proving that porn makes you clever.

  18. Re:No Huffie Post!?! Oh My GOSH!!! by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's the place where the T-Rex ambushed you in the middle of an open plain whenever you were going in the opposite direction from what the DM wanted you to go.

  19. All I did was NOT work by wsanders · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in the last century, Usenet was alive and well and not yet overwhelmed by f-tards. You could actually make friends on alt.sysadmin.recovery or your local [a-z]*.singles group, or ask a technical question on comp.sys.something or other and get an intelligent response instead of a death threat from a fanboy.

    That my friend is the biggest change in the net for me.

    Google News is trying to keep the flame alive but it's a lost cause.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  20. Re:No Huffie Post!?! Oh My GOSH!!! by harry666t · · Score: 3, Funny

    > It's where you had to go when you were traveling to the dungeon masters house ;)

    Aaaah, you mean the caves under the basement...

    I think that "outside" is that thing with sun and stuff. I saw it on a photo, it's incredible.

  21. Our memories are faulty devices by freeweed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Starcraft was released March 31, 1998.

    Posted not to be a pedantic douche, but to point out that our memories are often imperfect. Starcraft, a revolution in online gaming in many respects, did not come out until 2 years after this article describes.

    Everyone posting in this thread about how they had all this unlimited, highspeed, MMO-full gaming with massive multimedia collections in 1996 - I'm sorry, but you're not remembering things very well. And it's easy enough to find examples that show why.

    1996 might not have been the $10/hr CIS days (that was 1994 for me), but it sure as hell wasn't anything like today. In 1996 we saw the very first TCP/IP games that weren't IPX tunneled through something like Heat.net. Web browsers existed, yes - and 95% of the pages out there were about someone's cat. Napster (ie: mp3 sharing of any large scale) was 3 years in the future. Software mp3 players had just appeared in the fall of 1995. Winamp, the first truly popular player, was a year away. Hardware players were at least 2 years away. Flash didn't really exist until the end of 1996.

    Anyway, that's just pulled from the first few posts I could find. Y'all are remembering 1999 at earliest. 1996 was a very different online beast. Splitting hairs? No, showing just how much changed in such a short period of time.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.