Slashdot Mirror


Australian Internet Censorship Plan Torpedoed

An anonymous reader writes "The Australian Government's plan to introduce mandatory internet censorship has been scuttled, following an independent senator's decision to join the Greens and Opposition in blocking any legislation needed to start the scheme. Anti-Gambling Senator Nick Xenophon previously supported the filter because it could also block gambling web sites, but today withdrew support saying 'the more evidence that's come out, the more questions there are on this.' This week surveys found only less than 10% of Australians supported the censorship. Censorship Senator Stephen Conroy has consistently ignored advice from technical experts saying the filters would slow the internet, block legitimate sites, be easily bypassed and fall short of capturing all of the nasty content available online. Conroy expanded the list to block Adult R18+ and X18+ web sites, and this week said it would also block sites depicting drug use, crime, sex, cruelty, violence or 'revolting and abhorrent phenomena' that 'offend against the standards of morality.' Last week an anti-abortion website was added to the blacklist, and Conroy said he was considering expanding the blacklist to 10,000 sites and beyond."

7 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Censorship by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Censorship is a "revolting and abhorrent phenomena" that "offends against the standards of morality".

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. Re:Block The Internet by moose_hp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Conroy expanded the list to block Adult R18+ and X18+ web sites, and this week said it would also block sites depicting drug use, crime, sex, cruelty, violence or "revolting and abhorrent phenomena" that "offend against the standards of morality".

    So the filter would block the Internet?

    If they applied the same filter to television, most channels would only display white noise.

    --
    DON'T PANIC.
  3. Re:I am not an Aussie... by the-empty-string · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So why in the hell would you spend money to meddle in foreign politics that don't affect you in any way?

    Because people outside Australia may very well end up being affected by it. Western governments have a habit of citing other governments' policies as a way to make those policies more palatable to their own citizens. The British have CCTV cameras at every street corner, let's also put them on our streets. Software patents are allowed in the U.S., let's harmonize the legislation. Australia thinks of the children and censors the Net, we should do the same!

    For instance, even though I'm not in the U.S., I donate to the EFF. It's a global world. We're running out of places where we can hide from these things.

    That makes you just as bad as the us in the US, always wanting to tell other nations what they can and can't do with their sovereignty.

    Yeah, it's exactly like that. Only completely different.

  4. It all makes my head hurt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "If it offends me, I want it banned for everyone." seems to be the mentality of so many. I understand the general intent of blocking that stuff, but it'll never, ever truly work. Besides, people like him will never listen to any other opinions, let alone listen to numerous experts telling them their ideas are wrong.

    Heck, you could tell him that water was wet while soaking him in a bathtub floating in the ocean during a rain storm. But if his mind is set on water not being wet, he'll never listen.

  5. Re:Block The Internet by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly - so if you keep it vague and fuzzy you can block things you don't like without having to publicly declare discriminatory prejudices.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  6. The Frightening Aspect... by Zancarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is sad about this, sadder than even Australia coming within an inch of this level of censorship, is that a government could let itself get so out of control.

    What's frightening about this, though, is that other Western governments are probably using this as a test case to determine the efficacy of such censorship (and whether public opinion will effectively bend over and take it).

    Make no mistake about it, there are forces in the US and UK alike that would very much appreciate this level of censorship, perhaps even under the guise of limiting/preventing piracy.

    --
    He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
  7. Re:I am not an Aussie... by wdef · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I do blame the post-war Baby Boomers for the wave of nanny state repression we are all enduring in the UK, Australia, the US, and elsewhere.

    That generation have been running things now for almost 20 years. This was the same generation that benefited so from the emancipation of youth culture in the 60s and into the 70s. They enjoyed sex, drugs and rock and roll, inventing a whole new cultural paradigm out of the Beat Movement of the 50s, tearing down boring conventions, raising hell. When they became politicized, they demanded accountability from authorities and youth participation. Some refused to go to Vietnam and get killed. They demanded the lowering of the drinking age and the age at which you could get a license. They wanted to be treated as adults at 18 or before. They wanted free love, meaning no social restrictions on sexual intercourse. They reveled in the contraceptive Pill. They got all of their demands.

    But as they grew a bit older, they got married. As their kids hit teenage years, they panicked, knowing from experience just what they could get up to, because - remember - this generation had already done it all.

    Steadily, they began to pull up the ladder they themselves had climbed. They decry the promiscuity of young teenagers, saying it is harmful. What killjoys they became. In many cases, they want to raise the drinking age and the age at which kids can get a drivers license because young people are too "irresponsible". Having themselves fought for 18 to be regarded as the age of majority, now many want to increase that upwards. Having fought to lower the age of consent for themselves, many now want it raised.

    This is the ex-free love generation that now wants censorship.