Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Santangelo Case 'Settled In Principle'

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The RIAA's long-running war against Patti Santangelo, her children, and even her children's schoolmates has been 'settled in principle,' with final settlement documents expected to be submitted by March 18th. Patti Santangelo is believed to be the first RIAA defendant to have made a motion to dismiss the RIAA's 'making available' complaint. The case first caught the attention of the Slashdot community back in 2005, when a transcript of Ms. Santangelo's first court appearance became available online. The case attracted national attention in December of 2005. According to the Associated Press report of the settlement, neither side was able to comment on the terms of the settlement."

13 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Introduced me to Slashdot by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was also the case that introduced me to Slashdot. One day I discovered that people on some crazy place called "Slashdot.org" were going nuts analyzing the transcript of Patti's court appearance. I couldn't understand what I was seeing. It looked like an online Talmudic debate. The people seemed a little like lawyers -- but they clearly were not lawyers -- and many of them seemed to be smarter than lawyers. So I asked a few people, and eventually found one -- my youngest son who is a techie -- who explained it to me.

    Since discovering Slashdot, my life hasn't quite been the same.

    --
    Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    1. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by areusche · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry to hear that your marriage has suffered. It's been difficult finding a date personally. Hopefully I can find one of those many elusive slashdottettes that lurk around here.

    2. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have just two things to say (basically)

      1 - I have high hopes that the RIAA settles in such a way that it damages all their other cases, and Patti is both vindicated and compensated - even if we never known what that compensation was.

      2 - I wish that there were some way for Slashdot and readers were able to label NewYorkCountryLawyer's posts as a news service rather than just another post. Yes, I realize I can go and list all his posts, but I wish there were a way to quickly do so from the front page so that all users could easily benefit from this hugely beneficial information source. Lets not forget groklaw either.

      Many of us like to assume we know something about the law here. These two people (perhaps others) have done much to keep such discussions and news both current and held in a view that does not stray very far for very long from goodness. I believe that they have done more to educate the public than anyone else and their efforts deserve some recognition here.

    3. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by vadim_t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you by chance ever been to kuro5hin?

      These days it's cesspit, but during its best days it was a site where users published long, well thought, and often technical articles about interesting subjects, some of which had effect beyond the website. For instance, Opennic (alternative root DNS servers) got started at an article on K5. Users submitted stories, and other users offered criticism during an editing period and collectively approved or rejected the story.

      See for example a few links in the hall of fame to see what it used to be like.

      I'd really like to find another place like that, its degeneration was very unfortunate.

    4. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wish that there were some way for Slashdot and readers were able to label NewYorkCountryLawyer's posts as a news service rather than just another post. Yes, I realize I can go and list all his posts, but I wish there were a way to quickly do so from the front page so that all users could easily benefit from this hugely beneficial information source. Lets not forget groklaw either. Many of us like to assume we know something about the law here. These two people (perhaps others) have done much to keep such discussions and news both current and held in a view that does not stray very far for very long from goodness. I believe that they have done more to educate the public than anyone else and their efforts deserve some recognition here.

      Thank you very much, for your kind words, zappepcs, and especially for mentioning me in the same breath as PJ who is a real professional journalist; I am just an amateur.

      I would remind you that Groklaw's main feed is available on Slashdot as a "Slashbox"; I know because I (of course) subscribe to it.

      Also I recently figured out (I'm a little slow, sometimes, I know) how to find out the RSS Feed for my Submissions on Slashdot, so you can pop it into a feed reader, or "follow" me on Twitter. The feed is: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=rss&content_type=rss&fhfilter=%22author%3A+NewYorkCountryLawyer%22+submission&orderdir=DESC&orderby=createtime&color=black&duration=-1&startdate=&logtoken=912032%3A%3ADbgOV9ng3HbPRRrcloMyqC

      Thanks again.

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    5. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 5, Funny

      We all love you here.

      You must be new here.

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    6. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Umm, you didn't specify if your life had improved or degraded.

      I didn't, did I?

      Hmmm... I guess I could argue either proposition.

      I will assume improved, afterall who wouldn't want to hang out with a bunch of nerds who all have an opinion but no credentials to fall back on.

      I, for one, welcome the opinions of my Nerd Overlords, especially those with no credentials. (Credentials, it seems to me, are an overpraised attribute. What matters is that the opinion be formed through rigorous reasoning, based on provable facts, advance human thought, and prove to be empirically infallible -- i.e., that it should be in agreement with mine.)

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    7. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

      What matters is that the opinion... should be in agreement with mine

      So I've noticed

      Or that it be contrary to yours, in which case it is also likely to be correct.

      Ai, it buuuurrrrrns....

    8. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by NewYorkCountryLawyer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry to hear that your marriage has suffered. It's been difficult finding a date personally.

      Tell me about it. I haven't been able to find a date with anyone other than my wife for 40 years now.

      And then, when I started getting involved with Slashdot, I noticed that even my wife began finding me less attractive.

      --
      Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful
    9. Re:Introduced me to Slashdot by Anpheus · · Score: 4, Funny

      In case you missed the recent news, you can really impress her if you say during a prominent trial, "No, I don't need any compensation. But you could send my wife some flowers." Or mix it up, say chocolate, for example.

  2. 3 stressful years by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For 3 stressful years the RIAA was able to hold this citizen in fear.

    Such extortionate practices should not be allowed.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  3. Ban Confidential Settltments by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Confidential settlements should be illegal - entirely! The courts are a public institution and once you drag people into them it affects the public. The public deserves to know who won and who lost here - and in all such cases!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  4. Re:Time to stop RIAA's misuse of legal systems by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Time to stop RIAA corporate conglomerate racketeering. There misuse of legal systems and there use of gangster like methods has completely gone wild. It can't be accepted anymore in a democratic society. Corporations are not higher ranked entities, we citizen must act.

    Yes, corporations are higher ranked entities here in the land of the free.

    As long as we have a system where politicians are allowed to receive money from corporations, the politicians will, of course, pass laws favoring their campaign contributors.

    And, as long as we have a system where corporations are given all the rights of, but not all the duties of a citizen, the individual will always have to fight a pitched fight.

    One day, the average American will figure out that if he doesn't want to give power to the government because a government might not have your best interest at heart, the alternative is invariably that corporations seize the power, and corporations will never have your best interest at heart.