Slashdot Mirror


White House Ditches YouTube

An anonymous reader writes to tell us that in an apparent response to privacy complaints, the White House has quietly moved off of YouTube as a method for serving the President's weekly video address. Choosing instead to use a Flash-based solution and Akamai's content delivery network, this comes just days after YouTube began to roll out their own new policies regarding privacy of visitors.

6 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. What's the Secret Service's problem! by Samschnooks · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is, the site would be free to keep logs on the videos viewed by visitors to its own site as well as those embedded on blogs, but it would opt to immediately forget all identifying information associated with requests from government sites.

    First I watched some hairy milf porn, then some stuff on how ot win on "Call of Duty", then I watched some heavy metal and cop killing rap music videos, a Joel Osteen sermon, then I watched this guy with an Uzi with a silencer knock off a bunch of targets (way cool!), and then I watched Obama's weekly address.

    A few hours later, this black helicopter lands in my front yard and a bunch of guys kick my door down! I mean, WTF!?!

  2. Re:Wise choice by Chabo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh yes, and I'd also like to see a .torrent on the site, but I know that'll never happen.

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  3. Re: by Captain+Spam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, but they want something they can use for THIS presidential term.

    Thank you! Thank you! I'm here all week! Try the veal!

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  4. Re:Wise choice by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I just hope they block overseas views so our taxes don't pay for that bandwidth. Just like the the BBC does with it's feeds.

    I am an American citizen but I live overseas, I wouldn't like having it blocked, I try to stay up to date on things happening in the US and I still have to pay US taxes on all of my income.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
  5. Re:Wise choice by easyTree · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps you've not heard, p2p is illegal, even if the content holder uploads the torrent themselves...

  6. Re:Wise choice by fczuardi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice so it can be re posted on YouTube with little effort. Still think using a free service that everybody and their dog uses makes a lot more sense than paying for it.

    Yes it Can... be reposted to Youtube or Vimeo, or Archive.org or Blip.tv or even your preferred P2P network, you can even host it yourself because as far as I know this videos are all public domain.

    But you don't need to re-post them to Youtube and Vimeo at least, because whitehouse folks already do that for you:

    They only stopped embedding youtube videos on the whitehouse gov site (maybe to stop advertising google's service for free on a tax-payer funded website, although the link to Vimeo is still there), but they are still publishing copies of the weekly videos on youtube and other free services that everybody and their dog uses...