Slashdot Mirror


Dinosaurs Could Hold Basketballs, But Not Dribble

Gre7g writes "Long before the invention of the photocopier, mud was the ideal way to preserve an image of your butt. 'We got lucky with this one [sitting] on a slope,' which brought its hands closer to the ground, said study author Andrew Milner of the St. George Dinosaur Discovery Site at Johnson Farm. Full disclosure: My wife did the artistic reconstruction."

73 comments

  1. Use Cases by fm6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Long before the invention of the photocopier, mud was the ideal way to preserve an image of your butt.

    Some of us still consider mud to be far superior. Photocopiers may be more convenient, but they really can't compare with mud for capturing detail without distortion.

    Now I'm going to be flamed by a lot of Xerox fan boys. For the last time: the best technology is the technology that works best for you!

    1. Re:Use Cases by knapper_tech · · Score: 1

      Flatulence could become entrapped in the mud, adding porosity to the surface and totally losing a portion of the information. For butt self-portraits, xerox copiers will not produce this defect...assuming it's a defect. The user may consider it to be an indicator of healthy digestive activity and even strive to achieve the effect. Of course, it seems like some unfair stereotyping to say that people who sit in mud are likely to have this problem anyway. Maybe it's insensitive to say it's even a problem for mud-butt-pressers.

      --
      "There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." ~ Louis Armstrong
    2. Re:Use Cases by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mud would also obscure any, ahem, solid farts.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    3. Re:Use Cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see the fish with the transparent head? We're talking frikkin' sharks with frikkin' lasers inside its frickin' head.

      http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/02/photogalleries/fish-transparent-head-barreleye-picture/index.html

    4. Re:Use Cases by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      This is the most absurd post I've ever read. Maybe this was true 15 years ago. You moronic mudophiles think that because you hear a squishy sound when you sit in the mud it's superior to Xerox. This really insults the BCT (Butt Capture Technology) advances that Xerox's researchers have made in recent years. It's really gotten to a point where mud just can't compete. Anyone who does Butt Captures professionally has known this for years now.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    5. Re:Use Cases by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      But consider the distribution problems that mud presents. With a scanner/copier I can scan my butt and send it round the world in seconds, lets see mud do that!

      Plus, you insert a mud imprint of your butt into your boss's presentation.

    6. Re:Use Cases by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      you insert = you cannot insert

    7. Re:Use Cases by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Oh, right, your fancy BCT can unflatten your butt. Get real!

      I think you just like having your posterior irradiated. Hope you're not planning to have kids!

    8. Re:Use Cases by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Go write for TV. What would you rather have, a quality product, or a big audience?

    9. Re:Use Cases by somersault · · Score: 1

      you insert = you cannot insert

      You sound like my girlfriend.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Use Cases by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      I love the smell of irradiated posterior in the morning.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  2. Casting of Body parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Casting of Body parts by symes · · Score: 1

      Clearly there are a lot of openings in body casting

    2. Re:Casting of Body parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep ... even the dear wife's middle name is KY ... Gre7g, does she buy the lube or manufacture it?

    3. Re:Casting of Body parts by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Excellent, it was about time I changed my desktop wallpaper.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Dinos Basketball Team by whtmarker · · Score: 1

    This looks like research from the University in Alberta (Edmonton) that the U of C Dinos are guilty of a traveling violation.

  4. Man, by Paranatural · · Score: 1

    These people put waaay too much effort into making fund of dinosaurs.

    1. Re:Man, by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      Was that the most subtle pun today or a typo?

      The world may never know.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
  5. Clever girl by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yet another reason to fear raptors....

    1. Re:Clever girl by reverseengineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Speaking of which, what does this mean for the Toronto Raptors?

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Clever girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That they can't play basketball?

    3. Re:Clever girl by antdude · · Score: 1

      Oh they can, but not very well. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Clever girl by dem0n1 · · Score: 1

      Oh they can, but not very well. ;)

      Isn't that also the answer to "Anyone can sing."

      --
      Why save your soul when you can sell it for a profit?
  6. Where's the basketball? by biocute · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I did read the friendly article and no where could I see any reference to basketball.

    1. Re:Where's the basketball? by Gre7g · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry. National Geographic reduced the content way down to just the highlights. The original research is about the angles of their wrists and how we could see that in the mud imprints, but I thought it would be better to post the big name link rather than the high detail one.

    2. Re:Where's the basketball? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Unless you have to pay for the research, please keep in mind that in future submissions, you can have more than one link in the body of your submission. Even if it's just <a href="...">More details here</a>

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Where's the basketball? by jd · · Score: 1

      Well, where's the more detailed reference in the comments, then? :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Where's the basketball? by Gre7g · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Where's the basketball? by Peeet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Basically it is saying that Dinosaurs held their hands in a palms inward fashion rather than a palms down fashion. Palms in can hold a basketball but you need to put your palm facing down to dribble it. Obscure, not in the original link, and citing basic sports knowledge - I know, not usual Slashdot fare, eh?

    6. Re:Where's the basketball? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Yet here, where people are asking for high detail, you still forgo linking it.

    7. Re:Where's the basketball? by Gre7g · · Score: 1

      I posted it a little earlier in this thread. Here it is again: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004591

    8. Re:Where's the basketball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically the headline writer has spent too much time on Fark.

    9. Re:Where's the basketball? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Didn't see it, hadn't been moderated high enough, my apologies.

    10. Re:Where's the basketball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically the headline writer has spent too much time on Fark.

      THIS.

  7. But wait... by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 1

    How do you explain Yao Ming then?

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
  8. it is satan himself by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    who wishes us to believe dinosaurs could evolve to hold a basketball. the holy truth is of course intelligent dribbling, probably taught by 3 point all star jesus himself to intelligent basketball playing dinosaurs on jurassic half courts

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:it is satan himself by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      You owe me a keyboard and my dignity. Soda just came out my nose. And thank you sir.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    2. Re:it is satan himself by fractoid · · Score: 1

      "intelligent dribbling"? I thought that was less the domain of Raptor Jesus and more the domain of Stephen Hawking...

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  9. A triumph for science! by Inf0phreak · · Score: 1

    They are beginning to puzzle the events of Godzilla vs Barkley (*) together at least!

    *: Warning! Contains flash video and may make you laugh uncontrollably at horrible plot.

    --
    ________
    Entranced by anime since late summer 2001 and loving it ^_^
    1. Re:A triumph for science! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to check this after work...

      This site is blocked by the Your Web Content Filter Policy.

      URL: http://www.thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/linkara/at4w/3459-gozilla-vs-barkley

      Reason for restriction: Forbidden Category "Gay and Lesbian Issues"

  10. New Extinction theory! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are plenty of theories about how the dinosaurs met their near-simultaneous end, but with the information provided in the article, I think I have an idea worth investigating!

    Dinosaur Dodgeball Elimination Deathmatch!

    If they can hold basketballs, then they can hold dodgeballs. And dribbling is not needed for dodgeball! So it all makes sense now!

    1. Re:New Extinction theory! by betterpc · · Score: 1, Funny
  11. Wait, what... by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the hell do the dinosaur, the basketball and the mud have in common here?

    Am I the only one to whom this reads like a kind of dadaist ramble?

    1. Re:Wait, what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have nothing in common. It's just a shitty summary written by a furry. Seriously, check his website.

    2. Re:Wait, what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked myself the same question.

      Idunno. If the dinosaur was dribbling on the beach that could be muddy. But TFA doesn't say anything about dribbling or basketballs. Those are only mentioned in TFS.

      This looks like another one of those slashdot mysteries where TFS has evident relationship to TFA.

    3. Re:Wait, what... by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Fossilized mud-print -> angle of wrists -> palms up not down -> could hold basketball.

      --
      Azural - instrumentals
    4. Re:Wait, what... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      So, let me get this straight. One individual dinosaur leaves some palm up hand prints in the mud, and suddenly the thousands of species of therapods spread out over the millions of years can't play basketball? They don't have any bones, just a mudprint, so how could they tell it would dislocate its shoulder to make a palm down print? You can't tell range of motion of a limb from a single print in the mud.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Wait, what... by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      "So, let me get this straight. One individual dinosaur leaves some palm up hand prints in the mud, and suddenly the thousands of species of therapods spread out over the millions of years can't play basketball?"

      That's right, the global conspiracy to deny the fact that dinosaurs could dribble isn't science, hell it's not even sport, it's politics - specifically the IOC, NBA, and the Chinese government are to blame.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Wait, what... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      That's right, the global conspiracy to deny the fact that dinosaurs could dribble isn't science, hell it's not even sport, it's politics - specifically the IOC, NBA, and the Chinese government are to blame.

      Sadly, that's a better explanation than what's in the National Geographic article.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  12. Could hold a basketball but couldn't dribble? by dreemernj · · Score: 1

    Yet another thing I have in common with dinosaurs.

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
    1. Re:Could hold a basketball but couldn't dribble? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Take a heavy dose of pain medication. You'll be dribbling in no time.

  13. how dare you laugh at by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    what god has revealed, in his infinite wisdom, to an internet troll ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  14. They may not have been able to dribble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But they really could drool.

  15. Utah by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Happened in Utah. Tagged as 'mormons'

  16. extinction via weak back court by roesti · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we know why the dinosaurs went extinct. You can't survive in this world without a decent guard rotation.

    Still, England's guard rotation is still methodical and precise, and their empire is slowly diminishing. There's no accounting for team chemistry, I suppose.

  17. Toronto Raptors! by antdude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fear these Toronto Raptors because they can hold basketballs, dribble, and sometimes shoot!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Toronto Raptors! by Iorek · · Score: 1

      I was ready to post a "Cue the Raptors jokes" comment... Nice. :-)

  18. In other words ... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...they're a lot like the Oklahoma City Thunder.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:In other words ... by gangien · · Score: 1

      you steal a crappy NBA team, what ya expect?

  19. whoa... by MrPinstripeCom · · Score: 1

    biggest. puffin. ev3r. and I for one welcome our new Mega-Puffin-saurus overlords.

  20. Well ofcourse! by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

    Dribble is much harder to hold than a basketball. It drips out of your hands!

  21. Worst artistic reconstruction ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you married to an intellectually challenged chimpanzee? Seriously, the average monkey could do a better job drawing the scene than the pathetic waste of space your wife created.

  22. Yes, but... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    What the world really wants to know is: could they slam dunk?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Yes, but... by thewils · · Score: 1

      Depends if they were able to make the baskets.

      This would seem to be evidence that they could...

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  23. You forgot to add . . . by SpeedyGonz · · Score: 1

    who wishes us to believe dinosaurs could evolve to hold a basketball. the holy truth is of course intelligent dribbling, probably taught by 3 point all star jesus himself to intelligent basketball playing dinosaurs on jurassic half courts

    ... that he teached those dinos just before the tournament finals of 5500 bc

  24. Goddamnit timothy by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

    Stop hurting Slashdot.

  25. Worse abstract ever by tsa · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh boy that must be the worst abstract ever. I couldn't make anything of it. It's about dinosaurs who want to preserve images of their bottoms, an one of them put its hands closer together? I have to read the fine article to find out what this is all about. I guess this is a scheme concocted by Taco to get more people to read the articles.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  26. Irrelevant by j_166 · · Score: 1

    Basketballs would have been relatively tiny in giant dinosaur hands, so they would probably have gripped them in their dinosaur fists rather than in the palms like modern man. So it doesn't really matter which way their wrists were oriented.

    Also, the dinosaurs would have eaten the basketballs, thinking they were cleverly shaped poppy air eggs. To the primitive dinosaur palette, this would have been something of a delicacy or novelty, like pop rocks are to modern man.

    1. Re:Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so they would probably have gripped them in their dinosaur fists rather than in the palms like modern man

      But if they took two[1] steps like that, they'd be called for travelling.

      [1] Or whatever. Not my favourite sport.

    2. Re:Irrelevant by j_166 · · Score: 1

      Would *you* want to be the one who calls the penalty on the T-rex?

  27. Put down the crack pipe by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

    I had the same reaction. Ass... mud... dinosaur... basketball... *headasplode*

    Seriously, how did this get approved? It has nothing to do with the article.

    The actual newsworthiness of the article is that the fossil prints are the first found of a meat-eating dinosaur's front limbs. No fucking basketballs anywhere in the article.

    The find has shaken up paleontologists' understanding of how dinosaurs evolved into modern birds.

    Please don't approve any more submissions from "Gre7g" until he gets his substance abuse problem under control.