I think you're talking about Cyber Warfare, which I agree is a great way to end a war.
However the article here is about Robot Warfare, mostly unmanned machines engaging in battles.
My question is still the same -- If we want safety of the Three Laws, how do we, in your word, dominate the enemy with these robots?
You can have Ravens flying overhead all day, but if it's not going to destroy lives, it can hardly achieve anything, it can't even destroy buildings with lives in them.
If something goes wrong on this mission, Atlantis's astronauts will not be able to shelter on the International Space Station (ISS). The station orbits at around 350km (220 miles) above Earth, while Hubble occupies an orbit about 560km (350 miles) up.
Can someone speculate the feasibility of "dropping" to meet ISS?
I mean, does NASA have equipments/knowledge/training to do such maneuver?
Does anyone know if managing the twins is still cheaper than sending a new rover?
This occurs to me recently when I had to copy a 600MB file via USB1.0 port to thumb drive, which would have taken about 20 minutes.
I decided to stop the copying, took out my laptop, connected to the network, mapped drive and copied that file in 2 minutes, altogether less than 10 minutes.
North Korea and Belarus (in the top 5 according to the PDF) are not even mentioned anywhere in the raw data XLS
Covert Hacking State operatives removing - or adding! - digital evidence to/from private computers covertly. Covert hacking can make anyone appear as any kind of criminal desired.
Unlike other social networking services, Twitter is a lot more talkative, thus a person is more likely to reveal more information in a more timely manner.
And the timing of information would play a significant part in tracking things.
However if TPB has set up a bank account with the same bank with account number similar to "79 31 21-5", then it might be possible to claim that it was a genuine typing mistake.
The money still has to go somewhere so that your intention is unchanged.
Hmmm... Maybe someone should put a 'Googlert' somewhere, so that residents know when Google's coming and put GIB boards all over the area, making anything taken useless.
Or just have people running alongside the car blocking its camera.
Wow! There are so many "says" and "states" that I almost lost track of what's going on.
Anyhoo, someone said this, maybe it was Masnick, maybe Griffin, maybe someone else:
it's just a covenant for the labels not to sue, rather than a license, it doesn't cover all of the other rightsholders, such as songwriters and the music publishers -- meaning that those who file share will still be wide open to lawsuits from those parties.
I don't think the labels care if other rightsholders get a fair share, they only care about their own pockets and as long as they get paid, they don't sue. Similarly other rightsholders only care about their own pockets, as long as they get paid, they don't sue.
So I guess the question is, will this kind of covenant work? If it will, why not extend to other rightholders?
"I'm a high school student and my physics teacher always comes up with ideas to get us to participate in or donate to real science projects. He even encourages us to help out with things like Galaxy Zoo (which has just released a new version, grrrr, dreadful updates again) and even gets us to install BOINC on our PERSONAL computers. Do Slashdotters out there have any suggestions that would be appropriate to satisfy this 35-year-old physics teacher? Extra credit if you can think of a way that I can fake my progress so that I can get extra credit."
Slashdot Mirror
Pet's first name?
Are you implying that pets have first names, middle names and family name? Maybe we can also throw in a maiden name for that bitch?
Most if not all social networking services are free, and they have to somehow making a living.
So users are like batteries and they will think of million ways to squeeze the last juice out of us.
Same thing is happening to YouTube and Twitter. Once they have enough users, they will start thinking how to make money off those users.
I think you're talking about Cyber Warfare, which I agree is a great way to end a war.
However the article here is about Robot Warfare, mostly unmanned machines engaging in battles.
My question is still the same -- If we want safety of the Three Laws, how do we, in your word, dominate the enemy with these robots?
You can have Ravens flying overhead all day, but if it's not going to destroy lives, it can hardly achieve anything, it can't even destroy buildings with lives in them.
What's the point of fighting wars with robots if they are to follow the three laws?
I mean, how is a battle won and how does a war end?
If you can win by destroying enough robots, countries might as well just play a game of C&C to determine the outcome.
Is this like quarantine without isolation?
Depends when Intel has to pay for it.
In 2020, this "Record Fine" is probably worth 2 CPUs.
Which is why all these records are meaningless.
Can someone speculate the feasibility of "dropping" to meet ISS?
I mean, does NASA have equipments/knowledge/training to do such maneuver?
Does anyone know if managing the twins is still cheaper than sending a new rover?
This occurs to me recently when I had to copy a 600MB file via USB1.0 port to thumb drive, which would have taken about 20 minutes.
I decided to stop the copying, took out my laptop, connected to the network, mapped drive and copied that file in 2 minutes, altogether less than 10 minutes.
North Korea and Belarus (in the top 5 according to the PDF) are not even mentioned anywhere in the raw data XLS
Covert Hacking
State operatives removing - or adding! - digital evidence to/from private computers
covertly. Covert hacking can make anyone appear as any kind of criminal desired.
Additionally, is "Enforcement Ability" as(or more, or less) significant as "Financial Tracking"?
Every item gets a score between 1 and 5, but do they all carry the same weight in the study?
I downloaded the raw data. Some countries are missing, and the results are quite different from the PDF:
59-China
54-United Kingdom: England & Wales
53-Singapore
53-United States of America
52-France
52-Germany
51-Malaysia
50-Ireland
49-Netherlands
49-United Kingdom: Scotland
48-Israel
48-Russia
45-Australia
45-Belgium
45-Japan
44-Austria
44-New Zealand
43-Norway
41-Italy
40-Denmark
40-Taiwan
39-Canada
39-Greece
39-Hungary
39-Switzerland
38-Finland
38-Poland
38-Slovenia
38-Sweden
37-Cyprus
37-Estonia
37-Latvia
37-Lithuania
37-Malta
36-Czech Republic
36-Iceland
36-Luxembourg
36-Portugal
36-Spain
36-South Africa
34-Argentina
33-Romania
32-Thailand
31-Bulgaria
30-Brazil
28-Philippines
27-India
Maybe it's more about privacy than epidemic.
Unlike other social networking services, Twitter is a lot more talkative, thus a person is more likely to reveal more information in a more timely manner.
And the timing of information would play a significant part in tracking things.
However if TPB has set up a bank account with the same bank with account number similar to "79 31 21-5", then it might be possible to claim that it was a genuine typing mistake.
The money still has to go somewhere so that your intention is unchanged.
people don't die from playing sports for 18 hours a day.
Actually they can die from playing sports for 18 hours a day, but they won't because they will get tired before they can kill themselves.
Like smoking, it's a slow death because it's so subtle and enjoyable. I don't think any smokers would enjoy living in a room full of smokes though.
Hmmm... Maybe someone should put a 'Googlert' somewhere, so that residents know when Google's coming and put GIB boards all over the area, making anything taken useless.
Or just have people running alongside the car blocking its camera.
Well, at least it shows determined villagers are out there patrolling and protecting their village.
Moral of the story?
Burglars should still target this area but bring some weapons and keep an eye for angry and alert villagers.
If taking a cigarette break, coffee break or gossip break is allowed, I cannot see any difference in internet break or game break.
Just grow barley next to the beer plant:
1. Plants absorb CO2
2. Less transportation
So how long was it before you regained consciousness?
Wrong question. Should be:
How long was it before he woke up?
Obviously it was a dream because we don't have girlfriends.
I tried to read the friendly article but got distracted by a Swedish bird-flipping girl and some chicks running in bikinis.
You've been warned.
Wow! There are so many "says" and "states" that I almost lost track of what's going on.
Anyhoo, someone said this, maybe it was Masnick, maybe Griffin, maybe someone else:
it's just a covenant for the labels not to sue, rather than a license, it doesn't cover all of the other rightsholders, such as songwriters and the music publishers -- meaning that those who file share will still be wide open to lawsuits from those parties.
I don't think the labels care if other rightsholders get a fair share, they only care about their own pockets and as long as they get paid, they don't sue. Similarly other rightsholders only care about their own pockets, as long as they get paid, they don't sue.
So I guess the question is, will this kind of covenant work? If it will, why not extend to other rightholders?
"I'm a high school student and my physics teacher always comes up with ideas to get us to participate in or donate to real science projects. He even encourages us to help out with things like Galaxy Zoo (which has just released a new version, grrrr, dreadful updates again) and even gets us to install BOINC on our PERSONAL computers. Do Slashdotters out there have any suggestions that would be appropriate to satisfy this 35-year-old physics teacher? Extra credit if you can think of a way that I can fake my progress so that I can get extra credit."
Southern Alberta Balloon Launch Experiment did that in August 2007.
Screw the snakes.
In this economy climate, how many Pied Pipers will be laid off?
If I was an AdWords user, I would pull all of my bids now and let other advertisers exhausted theirs first.
Then a "word" will be easier and cheaper to get.