Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Says IE Faster Than Chrome and Firefox

An anonymous reader writes "According to its own speed tests, Microsoft's Internet Explorer loads most websites faster than both Chrome and Firefox when looking at the top 25 websites on the Internet. 'As you can see, IE8 outperforms Firefox 3.05 and Chrome 1.0 in loading 12 websites, Chrome 1.0 places second by loading nine sites first, and Firefox brings up the rear by loading four sites faster than the other two browsers. Also, in case you missed it, IE loads mozilla.com faster than Firefox, and Firefox loads microsoft.com faster than IE, just for kicks.'"

8 of 532 comments (clear)

  1. Oh well by arndawg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A more useful test would perhaps be testing firefox 3.5 vs ie8 and chrome 2.0? Firefox 3 is already getting "old".

  2. So half the time they are better? by forand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How is this "good" they test 25 sites (who only views 25 sites?) and IE is faster 12/25. This doesn't seem very compelling at all. They don't even have a simple majority on their side.

  3. What it shows by William+Robinson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that..Microsoft can no longer ignore Firefox, and has to come up with some such FUD. A healthy sign about status of Firefox.

  4. Re:mozilla.com by rvw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ofcourse IE loads mozilla.com faster, that's the only site you'd ever need to open with IE...

    Strangely enough FF opens microsoft.com faster, and they publicly admit this.

  5. Javascript ? by eulernet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And what about Javascript ?
    Frankly, GMail is super slow on IE7, not because of page loading, but because any Javascript in IE is super slow.
    In TFA, there is no site with Javascript !

  6. Re:speed is everything? by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You bring up an interesting point. It seems that we're approaching territory where the marginal increase in speed really isn't that significant. At this point the need for the greater marginal increase in accuracy would be much more appreciated than speed.

    That's why I have a hard time taking *any* of these software companies seriously when the only thing they can brag about is how incremental their speed increases are.

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
  7. Re:you are not looking by stewbacca · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IE sluggishness is so bad, that even though we aren't allowed to have any other browser on our computers, I use Firefox. That's right, IE is so bad, I risk disciplinary action to avoid having to use IE. The best part about the "You will use IE7 or higher only" mantra of our idiot IT department is that our time card website doesn't work with anything beyond IE6, so we all have to run a stupid little script that fools IE7 into thinking it is IE6.

  8. Re:What about rendering ? by lhoguin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is indeed funny but that's quite possibly one of the reasons that makes it be faster. The more you support, the slower it gets and the more you have to optimize to get the same speed as a less complete implementation.

    Their claims won't have much value until they get to the same level of standard support as the other browsers.