Slashdot Mirror


New Graphics Firm Promises Real-Time Ray Tracing

arcticstoat writes "A new graphics company called Caustic Graphics reckons it's uncovered the secret of real-time ray tracing with a chip that 'enables your CPU/GPU to shade with rasterization-like efficiency.' The new chip basically off-loads ray tracing calculations and then sends the data to your GPU and CPU, enabling your PC to shade a ray-traced scene much more quickly. Caustic's management team isn't afraid to rubbish the efforts of other graphics companies when it comes to ray tracing. 'Some technology vendors claim to have solved the accelerated ray tracing problem by using traditional algorithms along with GPU hardware,' says Caustic. However, the company adds that 'if you've ever seen them demo their solutions you'll notice that while results may be fast — the image quality is underwhelming, far below the quality that ray tracing is known for.' According to Caustic, this is because the advanced shading and lighting effects usually seen in ray-traced scenes, such as caustics and refraction, can't be accelerated on a standard GPU because it can't process incoherent rays in hardware. Conversely, Caustic claims that the CausticOne 'thrives in incoherent ray tracing situations: encouraging the use of multiple secondary rays per pixel.' The company is also introducing its own API, called CausticGL, which is based on OpenGL/GLSL, which will feature Caustic's unique ray tracing extensions."

11 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. 2009 by stonedcat · · Score: 5, Funny

    2009 is the year of the ray traced desktop.

    --
    You can't take the sky from me.
    1. Re:2009 by Slumdog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Seems we've been waiting forever for Duke.

      I think in Soviet Russia, Duke Nukem waits for YOU!

    2. Re:2009 by Nemyst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ya, my bluescreen never looked so pretty!

    3. Re:2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ray-traced BSD is dying.

  2. "Caustic"? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do they get their chips from Flammable Systems, and their capacitors from Toxic Components Inc?

  3. Surely they could have chosen a better name. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Caustic" Graphics? Would you want to do business with a video company that names itself after a chemical that damages your eyes?

  4. Re:cant wait. by Goaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know! This is totally going to solve the problem of the utter lack of glass spheres and infinite checkerboards in today's games!

  5. Re:Unanswered questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hate to burst your academic bubble, but MLT has approximately zero use to any production-quality renderer.

  6. Re:No video, no pictures. It smells like hoax. by citizenr · · Score: 2, Funny

    they are the next BitBoys
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitBoys_Oy
    zero product, some IP, waiting to get wads of money and run away with it

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  7. Re:nVidia sits around killing kittens? by x2A · · Score: 2, Funny

    He obviously likes kittens.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  8. Re:Redundant? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't OpenGL always support real-time raytracing if you throw it enough hardware? Unfortunately "enough hardware" to render complex scenes in real time has not existed yet.

    Can you magine what kind of 3D modeling rig god has? Somehow I don't think it's based on an ATI or nVidia chipset. ;)

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50