Slashdot Mirror


New Laser System Targets Mosquitoes

An anonymous reader writes "In the Cold War the so-called 'Star Wars defense system' proposed using lasers to destroy incoming Soviet missiles. In a 2007 brainstorming session aimed at combating malaria, Dr. Lowell Wood, the architect of that system, proposed modifying his original idea to kill mosquitoes. The cover of today's Wall Street Journal contains an article that highlights this initiative as well as a few others, like using a giant flashlight to disrupt mosquitoes' vision and using the insects to vaccinate, in the war against malaria. The system is intelligent enough to avoid noncombatants like humans and butterflies and can even tell the difference between females, the blood-drinkers, and males. My favorite quote: 'We'd be delighted if we destabilize the human-mosquito balance of power.'"

15 of 354 comments (clear)

  1. And then? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a little concerned by this. Suppose you disrupt the vision of mosquitoes. If it turns out to have permanent effects on the mosquitoes, they'll be easy prey for predators. Fewer mosquitoes... but then perhaps fewer predators, or more pressure on other potential prey. Suddenly other species go unchecked or apex predators have less food because that ecological niche filled by mosquitoes is empty. Am I the only one who thinks that humans need to stop fucking around the with the order of things and deal with it? Finding a cure for malaria (in our own bodies, which we're at liberty to fuck with) makes a lot more sense than disrupting ecosystems that were doing perfectly fine before we came along.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:And then? by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, we were much better off when rats roamed the streets unchecked. Think of the poor snakes!

      --
      a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
    2. Re:And then? by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, instead of just disrupting her vision with a laser, I divorced her...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:And then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Although bats and Purple Martins can be prodigious consumers of insects, many of which are pests, less than 1% of their diet typically consists of mosquitoes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosquito

      There are no known mosquito predators that eat only mosquitoes.

    4. Re:And then? by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I understand what you're saying, -- seriously, we would probably agree on a lot of things -- but where mosquitoes are a real health hazard, there tend not to be adequate predators. The two issues kind-of go hand in hand.

      It's much easier to have these concerns in a first world country where the issue has been controlled. I hope you appreciate that someone living in the Sahel may feel differently.

      I'm a little concerned that we'll reach a point where we tell a third world country, where significant numbers of people are dying of malaria, "We have this technology that will make a profound difference in the mosquito vector, but we're not going to allow you to use it because we're concerned about potential, but as-yet unspecified damage to your environment. Hope the fever gets better."

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:And then? by Chees0rz · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've obviously never been to Maine. I am willing to take the risk so that I can go camping in the summer time!
      Now that I've moved out to California- whenever I hear "It's buggy"- I just have to laugh.
      You don't know "buggy" until you've seen a giant mosquito eat a small child... in fact...

      THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

  2. Cost/Benefit? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    TFA is a bit thin on details, I wonder how the performance of this system compares to one of the numerous CO2+odor attractant trapping systems already in use. Frickin lasers(pew pew pew) are certainly cooler; but the whole exercise is rather silly if a simple mechanical system that runs on propane and pheromones is more efficient.

  3. I saw this before... by raijinsetsu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you read David Brin's "Earth", you will note that there is an explanation of how "Star Wars" technology was modified to control infestations of africanized bees(killer bees) in local apiaries. The book was published in May of 1991.
    The premise was that honey bees flapped their wings at a lower frequency. Targeting the higher frequency enabled the device to precisely target only the invading killer bees.

  4. What The Fuck? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a 2007 brainstorming session aimed at combating malaria, Dr. Lowell Wood, the architect of that system, proposed modifying his original idea to kill mosquitoes.

    There are 2 morals to this little story:

    1: Who the fuck invites anti ballistic missile system developers to brainstorming sessions on how to fight malaria?
    2: If the only tool you know how to use is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

     

    --
    Deleted
  5. they're next to worthless by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wonder how the performance of this system compares to one of the numerous CO2+odor attractant trapping systems already in use.

    My folks have two- and despite that, they still have tons of mosquitoes and the traps take weeks to fill up.

    They have $$$ odor cartridges that last barely a week or two, the traps are really gross to empty (and usually full of really angry, hungry mosquitoes), you have to go to the hardware store often to fill the tanks, people steal the machines (they're expensive), the traps are ridiculously unreliable (they don't like getting wet...the idiots used exposed circuit boards and freakin' PC COMPUTER FANS). Nevermind they're burning LNG/propane 24x7 and use at least 30W-40W of electricity; not exactly enlightened from a climate/environmental perspective these days.

    If you don't like mosquitoes, build/buy some bird and bat shelters and put 'em up.

  6. Breeding Mosquitoes by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course surrounding your lair with a water filled moat might not be the best idea if you are wanting to get rid of mosquitoes.

  7. Re:First post? by thrillseeker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Caution ... do not look into mosquito killing device with remaining eye.

  8. Re:You realize, this means laser resistant mosquit by mea37 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First off, evolution isn't magic. The scenario you're describing assumes that some mosquitos could survive this weapon today. If we get away from the "one breeding season" assumption and allow a longer timeframe, it still assumes that a solution is within the range of biological adaptation, which is not a sure thing.

    So the odds are we're not moving toward "laser-proof" mosquitos any moreso than we have bullet-proof deer running around. You might get mosquitos that evade the targeting system -- females that beat their wings like males, or individuals that present a profile that looks more like a butterfly to the computer. And if so... then you're back where you started, having played out a temporary repreive from the mosquito problem.

    In other words, it's only better to pass if the adaptation in the mosquitos actually makes the problem worse.

    "Can't be wiped out by lasers" isn't worse in the context that your alternative is to not wipe them out with lasers anyway.

  9. Actually I think this is dangerous for other reaso by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Funny

    The basic issue is that you have a laser system capable of reaching down into the atmosphere to kill things close to or on the ground. There are two basic problems:

    1) That takes a LOT of power. If refueling the original star wars system was likely to be a problem, this is a million times worse.
    2) Theoretically such a system could be revised to hit other targets. Who would control it? Suppose terrorists hacked it. Suppose the military co-opted it. All manner of bad things could happen with such a system. For example, imagine if you could blind even a small fraction of New Yorkers, especially those driving on the roads on rush hour.... The effect might be far worse than 9/11.....

    I smell a cover for a new more powerful and destabilizing weapons platform in space. The thing simply can't be useful against mosquitos and the only real use I can see would be on the battlefield.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  10. I'm the Shark by pablos · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work at the Intellectual Ventures Lab where this system is being created. Just wanted to respond to a few points in the comments:

    DDT is non-discriminatory. It does kill mosquitoes, but it harms lots of other life forms as well. Because of its abuse, there are bans and economic sanctions that prevent its use. Changing that is a political problem.

    Using lasers, we don't expect to eradicate mosquitoes entirely, but they can be a way to help reduce their populations enough that malaria can't survive. In particular, the laser system can help create a perimeter to keep people safe.

    As far as we know, there aren't any species that rely solely on mosquitoes as a food source.

    Thanks, I will try to respond if there are further questions here.