Slashdot Mirror


Google Returns Chrome To Beta, Touts Speed Boost

CWmike writes "Google yesterday reversed its decision to ditch the beta label from its Chrome browser, saying it is restoring the moniker to some builds to get faster feedback to developers. 'Since we took the 'beta' tag off Google Chrome in December, we've been updating two release channels: developer and stable,' said Brian Rakowski, a Chrome product manager, in a new blog Google kicked off on Tuesday. 'With our latest release, we're re-introducing the beta channel for some early feedback.' The first beta, Chrome 2.0.169.1, includes several new features, said Rakowski, and it boasts a significant speed increase over the current stable version of the browser, 1.0.154.48. According to Google's tests, the beta is 35% faster than the stable build when measured by the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark suite, and 25% faster on the company's own V8 tests." Reader Al notes too that "Google has launched Chrome Experiments, a site where Javascript coders can upload projects that make use of Chrome's speed and processing abilities. The site already features a handful of cool 'experiments' including a balls that jump between browser windows, a gravitationally-challenged version of the Google homepage and a game that runs through nine different browsers. It's cool stuff alright, but some experts wonder whether browser security might be a more important thing to focus on."

110 comments

  1. Phirst Post Tsarkon Reports YODA GREASE IN ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Tsarkon Reports 9 Step Yoda Grease 9 steps to greasing your anus for Yoda Doll Insertion!
    v 4.50.3
    $YodaBSD: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/yodanotes/9stepprocess.sgml,v 4.50.3 2009/03/12 05:52:25 tsarkon Exp $
    1. Defecate. Preferably after eating senna, ex lax, prunes, cabbage, pickled eggs, and Vietnamese chili garlic sauce. To better enhance the pleasure of this whole process, defecation should be performed in the Return of the Jedi wastebasket for added pleasure.
    2. Wipe ass with witch hazel, which soothes horrific burns. (Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda certifies that his lips, raw like beaten flank steak from nearly continuous analingus with dogs, are greatly soothed by witch hazel.)
    3. Prime anus with anal ease. (Now Cherry Flavored for those butthole lick-o-phillic amongst you - very popular with 99% of the Slashdotting public!)
    4. Slather richly a considerable amount of Vaseline and/or other anal lubricants into your rectum at least until the bend and also take your Yoda Doll , Yoda Shampoo bottle or Yoda soap-on-a-rope and liberally apply the lubricants to the Doll/Shampoo/Soap-on-a-rope.
    5. Put a nigger do-rag on Yoda's head so the ears don't stick out like daggers!
    6. Make sure to have a mechanism by which to fish Yoda out of your rectum, the soap on the rope is especially useful because the retrieval mechanism is built in.
    7. Pucker and relax your balloon knot several times actuating the sphincter muscle in order to prepare for what is to come.
    8. Slowly rest yourself onto your Yoda figurine. Be careful, he's probably bigger than the dicks normally being shoved up your ass!
    9. Gyrate gleefully in your computer chair while your fat sexless geek nerd loser fat shit self enjoys the prostate massage you'll be getting. Think about snoodling with the Sarlaac pit. Read Slashdot. Masturbate to anime. Email one of the editors hoping they will honor you with a reply. Join several more dating services - this time, you don't select the (desired - speaks English) and (desired - literate). You figure you might get a chance then. Order some fucking crap from Think Geek. Get Linux to boot on a Black and Decker Appliance. Wish you could afford a new computer. Argue that cheap-ass discount bin hardware works 'just as well' as the quality and premium hardware because you can't afford the real stuff. Make claims about how Linux rules. Compile a kernel on your 486SX. Claim to hate Windows but use it for World of Warcraft. Admire Ghyslain's courage in making that wonderful Star Wars movie. Officially convert to the Jedi religion. Talk about how cool Mega Tokyo is. Try and make sure you do your regular 50 story submissions to Slashdot, all of which get rejected because people who aren't fatter than CowboyNeal can't submit. Fondle shrimpy penis while making a Yoda voice and saying, use the force, padawan, feeel the foooorce, hurgm. Yes. Yes. When 900 years you reach, a dick half as big you will not have.

    All in a days work w

    1. Re:Phirst Post Tsarkon Reports YODA GREASE IN ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      lol c00l :)

    2. Re:Phirst Post Tsarkon Reports YODA GREASE IN ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      This is one of the best trolls I've seen in some time. Cheers.

    3. Re:Phirst Post Tsarkon Reports YODA GREASE IN ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Troll or not, this thing took a lot of work. Best troll I've seen in a long time. The Major Tom song had me laughing my ass off...

  2. Is it going to come to Linux? by SultanCemil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It'd be nice if a company that prided itself on not being evil released the browser for more than one platform (dare I say, the evil one?)....

    --
    Cemil.
    1. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's an unofficial Linux build called Chromium:

      http://code.google.com/p/chromium/

      A story ran on it yesterday on a familiar website... I think it's called "Slashdot" or something:

      http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/17/2345216

    2. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What does the platform have to do with evil or not? 90% of the software out there only works on one platform, and surely you're not going to say they're all evil. Chrome is open source and has been from day one; if it doesn't work on another platform, do the work yourself to get it there. As it is, they're releasing for the platform that has far and away the most users and not diluting their development efforts.

    3. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by IceFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares about 90% of software, we are talking about browsers. Browsers come on all platforms these days. And to top this Chome is advertising on slashdot which is known for have tons of Windows Loving users and users who like to talk about windows only software in positive ways. As long as Chrome does not exist on LInux or exists in a form that is a joke expect it to get trashed on slashdot. And for the second part I have contributed to Chrome to help get it to compile on Linux, but it is a long way off before these is anything close to what a user would expect. Chrome really has a PR problem with Linux which a lot of early adopters use.

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    4. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by basementman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I tried Chromium and at this stage it is so buggy and slow that it is totally unusable. At this point I am forced to run FireFox with a bunch of add ons to try and mimic chromium's functionality, but that won't help you get to the speed of Google Chrome.

    5. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Aeolien · · Score: 1

      Downloaded and ran it as a result of that story. Ironically, going to code.google.com in Chromium caused a segfault. It's definitely not ready for primetime, something the devs are the first to admit!

    6. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Chromium, although not for Linux, because they offer a portable version which doesn't pollute my registry with useless entries.

    7. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Just because they don't release the browser on the platform nobody cares about doesn't mean they're evil.

    8. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

      Well fix it yourself, why don't you? You've got all the code at your hands after all. And it's not like there's some secret Linux APIs that favor some other browser.

    9. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Hey, it crashed on me on mail.google.com - I think I see a trend there.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    10. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by andypflueger · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if anyone else had the same problems I had with Chromium, but my instance compiled and was able to run Chrome. However, SSL was non-functional as was combo boxes with HTML forms. Maybe it's a specific issue on my system (Ubuntu 8.10). I've not yet attempted to track down the issue though since I have the source. ;)

      --
      Long live the penguin...Linux rulez!
    11. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      I was just gonna bring that up. Posting from it now actually :)

      It doesn't really work well - I have no tabs, it crashes whenever I try to create a tab, it crashes whenever I click a link from my google homepage, it crashes...well, it crashes a lot. But I'm still debating using it over firefox - the speed boost and fact that it doesn't eat up all my system resources all the time are making it a rather pleasent experience.

      Oh, it also needed 10GB of hard drive space to compile everything. And took about an hour to get all the dependancies, another hour to download the sources, and a good hour or two to compile it. Plus about 6 hours wasted due to it being too damn big to fit on my hard drive (dual booted a dirt cheap Dell...don't have much space)

    12. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by nschubach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You could show your interest and give them an email list of Linux hopefuls...

      http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/linux.html

      Who knows, maybe that actually look at the count of email addresses to decide on the proper resources to allocate.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    13. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol... linux sure sounds like fun.

    14. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to try that until I noticed special instructions for compiling on 64-bit machines...because it only supports 32-bit. I'm not going back to using a 32-bit browser, let alone figure out how to compile one on a 64-bit machine.

    15. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is not available for Linux. It is only available for Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE. You can not compile the code for other distributions. Even that these three distrubutions are using Linux operating system, the Chromium isn't possible to get installed on them from source.

      I am not going to switch distribution to try a browser. Same reason was on me to not switch operating system to try it in the first place.

      If Google want to be a good for all of us (that does not men it would be evil either), then it should design their software to follow the LSB (Linux Standard Base) what is a standard for the Linux OS what rules what basic libraries and applications the software system should include.

    16. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      WHy not run the Firefow 3.1 beta with the JIT enabled, maybe not as fast as Chrome, but still damn faster than current firefox release. Don't forget to enable the JIT for the Firefox UI as well

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    17. Re:Is it going to come to Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how this post got modded down even though the guy is absolutely correct. You fucking Linux tools are always going on about how you are "free" to change your software and how if someone doesn't like something, then they should change it themselves.

      It was all bullshit. You dumb fucks don't know the first thing about writing code or designing software, which is why you don't practice what you preach and why Linux STILL sucks ass after all these years.

  3. Already by dixiecko · · Score: -1, Troll

    Year of Google Chrome!

  4. No Linux Release != Evil by andrewd18 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because a company's informal motto is "Don't be evil." doesn't mean they have to release their products for Linux.

    Now I think it'd be unwise if they didn't release it for Linux, but it definitely doesn't make them evil.

    1. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by SultanCemil · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm just saying, on a scale of 0 to 100 (0 being kittens rolling around, 100 being Vader running hell), not releasing Chrome for Linux is somewhere around 70. That's all. Fell free to disagree. Discuss amongst yourselves.

      --
      Cemil.
    2. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except they are releasing it. It's just gonna be a while (current build is "experimental"). There will be a linux release eventually. It's not particularly evil when it's difficult to create cross-plaform software with the goals google has in mind for the browser (It will probably require various hooks into the specific operating system). It's to be expected that they focus on windows first.

    3. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C-

      Your scale looks padded to me. Should have been a 7 out of 10, not a 70 out of 100.

    4. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      A

      c
      a
      t

      i
      s

      f
      i
      n
      e

      t
      o
      o

    5. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by anexkahn · · Score: 1

      I prefer 7 Billion out of 10 Billion

      --
      Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
    6. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by xant · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kittens are a zero? Man, kittens can *kill* you. I almost choked on one once.

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    7. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying, on a scale of 0 to 100 (0 being kittens rolling around, 100 being Vader running hell)

      Carter: Security Systems has its tendrils into every element of our society - the government, our homes, the police, the courts - I'm not gonna spike this story just because it deals with dollar amounts beyond your comprehension! It's too important!
      Murray: ...cerebral...
      Theora: Murray, we're trying to play this takeover as a threat to our average viewer. Nobody knows who's doing it. I mean, we all deal with SS every day - what if some really dangerous people got control of it?
      Murray: Who do you think controls it now?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm thinking a 14. Seeing as how a browser with what, 4% market is being asked to make a version for a loosely confederated set of GNU/Linux based OS'es with a less than 5% market share?

      So they would run on, let's see, 3,752 machines?

    9. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 3, Funny

      4% market share, but 99% awesome.

    10. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      you gagged eating pussy? Better stick to a big fat cock, turd burglar.

    11. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by cafard · · Score: 1

      Always bless the tin...

      --
      This post is awesome.
    12. Re:No Linux Release != Evil by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 3, Funny

      GP meant it as in various shades of evil. That "kitties rolling around" is actually "rolling around in a frying pan".

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  5. Who asked for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who wanted really fast JavaScript?

    1. Re:Who asked for this? by camcorder · · Score: 1

      Users of Google services, which abuse JavaScript usage beyond initial intention of this scripting language design.

    2. Re:Who asked for this? by Rayban · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah... I hate seeing anyone use a language with closures and prototype-based-objects for more than form validation and yellow backgrounds for results.

      We should go back to static HTML pages and get it right this time!

      --
      æeee!
    3. Re:Who asked for this? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      That's a good question. Maybe for having a haskell-interpreter written in javascript.
      Imaging how you would address the dom-tree though ...

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    4. Re:Who asked for this? by rockNme2349 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google's applications all run based on javascript. The current browsers didn't run javascript very fast, so performance lagged. Google released a browser and spat really fast javascript in the face of mozilla and microsoft. Next thing you know firefox and ie have new releases with faster javascript to compete with chrome. People switching to chrome is just a side affect for google. They're goal of making other browsers faster is completed. I have to say, evil or not, they're really smart guys, and know how to get what they want.

      --
      Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
    5. Re:Who asked for this? by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the Mozilla javascript engine projects (Tamarin turned Tracemonkey) were well on the way before Google "spat" out Chrome. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    6. Re:Who asked for this? by rockNme2349 · · Score: 0

      I choose to believe what I was programmed to believe!

      --
      Sewage Treatment Facilities - "Our duty is clear."
  6. Linux version by WillKemp · · Score: 1

    When can i get a Linux version???

    All i've got at the moment is CrossOver Chromium v.0.9.0 - which isn't much use really.

    1. Re:Linux version by dkegel · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are daily builds you could try. They're pre-alpha, though, so don't expect too much yet. Or you could build it from source, it's not too hard. See http://chromium.org/

    2. Re:Linux version by nschubach · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/linux.html

      Put your name on the list. Well, um... your email that is.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  7. worst summary ever by jgarra23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Chrome is not in beta, there has ALWAYS been beta builds around for Chromium & they are advertising those builds more since the new features are pretty solid (and the speed too) but Chrome is NOT in beta.

    1. Re:worst summary ever by caffeinejolt · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:worst summary ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link, but I'll bet once they make it easy to install on Linux that those charts start going way up. Also, they have such an aggressive campaign through their ability to promote through AdSense that those charts will look much different in a few months.

    3. Re:worst summary ever by sysstemlord · · Score: 1

      It's true that the summary is wrong. What does it mean Chrome returns to beta? There is a current stable version which is 1.0, and there is a beta version 2.0, and that's the case in almost all products.

    4. Re:worst summary ever by caffeinejolt · · Score: 1

      I doubt a Linux release will have substantial impact on their market share given current Linux client usage. But I do think it is important for Google to offer support for Windows/Mac/Linux if they want an edge on IE.

    5. Re:worst summary ever by whoop · · Score: 1

      I suppose the submitter thought Google would just stop developing it after moving the old beta to the stable branch. So it was news to him. But this is just a dupe of the of the story yesterday.

    6. Re:worst summary ever by msgtomatt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like gMail. It has been in beta forEVER! Maybe they are to stupid to make an actual release.

    7. Re:worst summary ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever?

      You must be new here.

  8. the chrome is rusty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Ahhh google. The do no evil company.... until they get big enough.

  9. Cool Experiments by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the cooler ones I saw for Firefox 3.1b3 was real-time chroma-key replacement* in video. (i.e. The blue screen technique) Does anyone know if this new version of Chrome supports the video tag yet? I've been doing experiments with real-time video effects in Firefox, but I'd like to start ensuring that they're cross browser.

    * I did my own version of the Chroma-Key replacement that ran a Javascript function for each pixel. It managed real-time playback even on slower PCs!

    1. Re:Cool Experiments by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I looked up the Firefox 3.1b3 experiments in case anyone is interested. Here's the experiment itself:

      https://developer.mozilla.org/samples/video/chroma-key/index.xhtml

      Here's the page explaining the experiment:

      https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Manipulating_video_using_canvas

      Don't let the small video size fool you. I've managed much larger videos thanks to TraceMonkey's high performance. In doing my own experiments, I realized that they shrunk the final product so that areas where the color wasn't being properly replaced (or worse yet, reflections from poor camera technique) wouldn't be as visible.

    2. Re:Cool Experiments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      liar.

    3. Re:Cool Experiments by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      How can I be lying when there's evidence in the post immediately above you?

    4. Re:Cool Experiments by theolein · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking that the current round of very fast Javascript machines might have one side effect that will have far reaching consequences: Effects like you posted might make Flash (since a good deal of Flash on the web is used for video) and Sliverlight irrelevant ina couple of years, and when that happens, Microsoft and Adobe are going to have to find other things to do.

    5. Re:Cool Experiments by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Flash yes--Silverlight, not so much. Silverlight's ability to integrate horizontally and vertically with other .NET stuff is going to be a lot more useful than a video codec in the future.

      (Side note - I just installed the new Chromium on Windows, and this thing flies. Chrome 1 was too slow for my tastes, but this is awesome. I absolutely love this.)

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    6. Re:Cool Experiments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the cooler ones I saw for Firefox 3.1b3 was real-time chroma-key replacement* in video. (i.e. The blue screen technique)

      Unfortunately it seems that "the blue screen technique" is available only in the Windows builds.

    7. Re:Cool Experiments by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Works fine on the Mac. And since it uses OGG, it should work fine on Linux, too.

  10. Perfect for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It makes perfect sense for Google to release a fast Javascript browser. Many of their apps require active javascript and the performance of these apps, or at least the perceived performance, is directly related to the javascript speed.

    On Linux it's an interesting story. Firefox is slow. I use it on a daily basis, and unfortunately, it's annoyingly slow. Bugs that should have been fixed months ago are still evident. Granted, some of these problems are related to Flash, but not all.

    (I'd go as far as to say that Adobe Flash is deliberately being crippled because it works so poorly on Linux.)

  11. informative 5pongEsponge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
  12. This is so misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The article summary refutes itself.

    There are multiple Chrome release channels.

    There is a stable, non-beta channel (1.0.x).

    There is a beta channel (2.0.x stable-ish).

    And there is a dev channel (2.0.x, bleeding edge, weekly builds)

    They are not "returning" Chrome to beta. They are working on the next version of Chrome.

    The version numbers are kind of a big tipoff. FYI.

  13. Raping Little Suzy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    "Daddy," said my daughter Karen, trying to get my attention. I was sucking on the little girl's swollen titties, while my little sister kept my cock hard by giving it an occasional lick, so it'd be ready when our daughter was. "Yes, Honey?" I turned my attention to the 12 year old girl's other nipple. In spite of her distraction, I could tell that the child was getting aroused.

    "Isn't it about time, you raped Suzy?" The little girl's voice was getting ragged, as I started licking my way down her smooth little tummy.

    This attracted my attention. I stopped licking the little girl's navel, and used my hands to stimulate her, while I answered.

    "Gee, Honey," I said, "our daughter's only 4 years old! Give the little girl a chance. I didn't rape you, until you were over 6 years old, you know. Even then, I was a little bit early. You didn't get pregnant, until you were 7, and didn't keep one, until you were 8. Even your sister. . ." I was interrupted by Diane, as she told her own story.

    "Daddy raped me for the first time, when I was 5," she said proudly. At my stern glance, she continued, "Well, OK. 5 and a half. But I got pregnant with Jason, when I was only 6." She looked over at me, and amended, "OK, almost 7. And Daddy raped Ginny, for the first time, just last year. I think our daughter's already pregnant. Anyway, she's already starting to like it. Even she's only 6." Diane shifted her swollen belly, to a more comfortable position, as she continued, "So what makes you think Suzy needs it?"

    "She's been playing around with Jason," said Karen, as I got ready to mount the little girl.

    "So?" I asked. "Jason doesn't cum yet, and even if he did, do you care if your nephew gets Suzy pregnant? What's so different if I did?"

    "The trouble is," said Karen, arching her back, to take my engorged penis up inside her, "what if he doesn't? When Jason was finished, he had red on his cock, and it wasn't her virginity. She lost that 2 years ago, when Jason did his first rape-training session. You remember? Suzy was the only one small enough, and who still had her virginity then. Of course, there's Keri, and Tracy now."

    "Oh Shit!" said my little sister, at our daughter's words.

    "You think she's already having periods?"

    Karen was getting carried away; as the stimulation of my cock inside her made her forget the conversation for a moment. "Unh! unnngh! Augghh. Oh Daddy! Daddy. Fuck me! Get me pregnant, Daddy. I want another baby. Please Daddy! Knock me up?"

    The whole family was getting exited, watching me get ready to impregnate my second-oldest daughter. "Do it Daddy," they all chorused, almost in unison, "make a baby in Karen."

    I couldn't help it. In spite of wanting it to last, so my daughter could feel me inside her for a nice long time, the stimulation of my daughter's 12 year old cunny squeezing on my penis was too much. I gave my little girl what she wanted. A belly full of baby-juice. Squirt after squirt of my sperm went into my daughter's fertile young womb. We had planned this carefully, and if we were careful, the little girl would be pregnant again by tomorrow, leaving me free to take care of my other duties.

    Damn! I'd have to take care of Suzy too. If the little girl was having periods already, I'd have to be sure she got fucked properly, at least once a month, until she got pregnant. Oh well, along with the pleasures of the job, come a few harsh duties.

    I extracted my shining penis from Karen's belly. My sister came over, and handed our daughter a round rubber disk to use to hold my sperm inside her. Carefully, not wasting a drop, they made sure that every bit of the sperm I had expended in her, stayed inside. When they were finished, Karen looked over at me.

    "Thanks Daddy," she said, "I hope I'm pregnant now."

    I agreed. It was so much trouble, when you were working to make sure. Rarely these days, did either of us have the time or energy to just fuck for the fun of it any more. I gave my daughter a kiss, as I left. A

  14. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking through a few of these (especially one called "balldropping") I can't help but think "this is one of the coolest things I've seen in awhile".

    I'm more entertained trying to make music out of balls and lines than anything else right now.

  15. Noo . This is the 2.0 Beta by AlienRancher · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google has not reversed their position. This is the beta for what will be 2.0 eventually. The 1.0 branch is and will be release. See: http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/17/2345216

  16. The Story of ANAL VAPORS, by Drunken Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Anal Vapors Part 1

    by Drunken Bastard

    Dr. Jurkov, the world renowned gynecologist sat in his office examining the patient file he agreed to examine because he owed a nonsexual favor (for once) to his brother. This case interested him as they sat discussing it one day, and he decided to take the case just because he thought his brother was full of shit and misinterpreted the results of the tests. That was 6 weeks ago. Today, he believed the outrageous test results which were in front of him as he waited for the patient to show up for her appointment.

    A few moments later, he was interrupted from his daydreams of young boy scouts by a knock on the door. His receptionist poked her head in.

    " Doctor, your next appointment is in the waiting room."

    "Yeah, the nasty bitch with the constipation problem. She's here for her test results. Send her in." As the receptionist went to get the patient, he reached into his pants and pulled a worm out of a festering sore on his penis. "Here comes your mother, you little bastard," he said and ate it with a flourish. He turned around as the nasty woman was shown in. "Good afternoon," he said and held out his hand to shake hers, but thought better of it when he saw her slick pus coated fingers. "Have you been scratching your herpes sores again? I thought we discussed that earlier."

    "I'm sorry, doctor, but it felt so good. Uh, do you have my test results?" she asked as she started to lick her fingers. The doctor fought back the urge to help lick her fingers and her crotch, remembering that he actually gave her the disease during a previous appointment.

    "Yes... And they are very interesting. Tell me, do you engage in anal intercourse?"

    "Yes, especially with this itch."

    "Hmmm. I see. Are you, by any chance, bisexual?"

    "Yes I like to carpet munch."

    "Were you engaging in cunnilingus and ingested menses?"

    "Cunni.....what?"

    "Carpet munching."

    "Yes, and I pulled out a couple of bloody tampons before I started, but I ended up getting a mouthful of tomato paste."

    "And you swallowed it?"

    "Yes."

    "And you took it in the rear and ate bloody fish within 48 hours of each other?"

    "Yes. Does this have anything to do with this killer constipation?"

    "Oh I think it explains your condition quite nicely. You see, you are pregnant. More precisely, you have a rectal pregnancy. You were impregnated up the anus. I've seen this in porno movies and medical journals before. That is why I had to ask you those questions. This will be the first bowel movement birth I have ever seen. You are going to have a bunghole baby."

    "When?"

    "Well, you're about 2 months along now. At 8 months, we can give you a laxative to induce labor. The constipation will get worse, but it will feel good to take a birth shit."

    "Alright, doctor, I guess I'll see you in 2 weeks."

    Six months passed. During this time, the woman came in regularly for examinations. The doctor stopped using his penis and started fisting her on his desk. When he examined her anus, he would trim back her hemorrhoidal tissue and take it home to cook and serve as ravioli. Gradually, his penile worm problem cleared up, but the festering sore remained, so he found a woman who would give him head and suck out all the rancid pus.

    When the time to give birth approached, he met the woman as she was wheeled into the hospital. "Ah. So good to see you. How are you feeling?" he asked as he looked over her shit-bloated body.

    "It hurts!!! Oh God, IT HUUURRRRTTSSSS!!!!!"

    "There. There....There. There.... Nurse! Wheel her into the delivery room."

    She was taken to a room, stripped, and bent over a table and strapped into that position. A nurse came and began feeding her bars of Ex Lax and started a Milk of Magnesia I.V. A bit later, the doctor came in to examine her. "Well, let's have a look and see wha....." He was horrified by what he saw. In front of him were two of the foulest bodily openings he had ever seen. One had a crackle

  17. Join the GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA Today.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    GNAA - GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA

    About GNAA:
    GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the first organization which gathers GAY NIGGERS from all over America and abroad for one common goal - being GAY NIGGERS.

    Are you GAY ?
    Are you a NIGGER ?
    Are you a GAY NIGGER ?

    If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGERASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!
    Join GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) today, and enjoy all the benefits of being a full-time GNAA member.
    GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) is the fastest-growing GAY NIGGER community with THOUSANDS of members all over United States of America and the World! You, too, can be a part of GNAA if you join today!

    Why not? It's quick and easy - only 3 simple steps!

    Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today! Upon submitting your application, you will be required to submit links to your successful First Post, and you will be tested on your knowledge of GAYNIGGERS FROM OUTER SPACE.

    If you are having trouble locating #GNAA, the official GAY NIGGERASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is NiggerNET, and you can connect toirc.gnaa.us as our official server. Follow this link if you are using an irc client such as mIRC.

    If you have mod points and would like to support GNAA, please moderate this post up.

    .________________________________________________.
    | ______________________________________._a,____ | Press contact:
    | _______a_._______a_______aj#0s_____aWY!400.___ | Gary Niger
    | __ad#7!!*P____a.d#0a____#!-_#0i___.#!__W#0#___ | gary_niger@gnaa.us
    | _j#'_.00#,___4#dP_"#,__j#,__0#Wi___*00P!_"#L,_ | GNAA Corporate Headquarters
    | _"#ga#9!01___"#01__40,_"4Lj#!_4#g_________"01_ | 143 Rolloffle Avenue
    | ________"#,___*@`__-N#____`___-!^_____________ | Tarzana, California 91356
    | _________#1__________?________________________ |
    | _________j1___________________________________ | All other inquiries:
    | ____a,___jk_GAY_NIGGER_ASSOCIATION_OF_AMERICA_ | Enid Al-Punjabi
    | ____!4yaa#l___________________________________ | enid_indian@gnaa.us
    | ______-"!^____________________________________ | GNAA World Headquarters
    ` _______________________________________________' 160-0023 Japan Tokyo-to Shinjuku-ku Nishi-Shinjuku 3-20-2

    Copyright (c) 2003-2009 Gay Nigger Association of America

  18. SIR HAXALOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Sir Haxalot was tired after another long day of karmawhoring at slashdot. "Hacky," his mother called, "time for dinner!" Sir Haxalot came upstairs from the basement where the bright lights of the kitchen temporarily blinded him. "Mommy, it's too bright in here!" he complained. His mother smiled "Come here, Hacky. Let mommy make you feel better."

    He followed her voice but kept his eyes tightly shut. He felt a hand massage his crotch.. "MMmm... mommy, you know I like that..." "Yes dear, mommy knows.." The hand undid his zipper and pulled his turgid member forthwith.

    A warm mouth gently licked the head of his penis. It didn't take long. Only moments later a jet of hot wad shot into the mouth.. "Did you like that?" his mother asked from behind him.. "Wha..?!" he asked, suprised. Opening his eyes he saw his daddy eagerly swallowing every drop of his cum.

    "DADDY!! You came back!" cried Sir Haxalot. "Hello son," his father replied, "I had a lot of thinking to do and this was the best way I could think of to apologize for leaving you after that intense round of sodomy 3 years ago."

    "That's OK, daddy. I know you had problems keeping your job as the school janitor. I don't believe anything the other kids said about you touching their pee-pees and putting your pee-pee in their bums."

    His father lost his smile "Son.. that's what we have to talk about.. it's true. For 17 years as a school janitor I was a filthy sodomite. I'd take little 12 year old 'pee-pees' in my mouth and get them hard. Once the lad was past the point of caring, I'd get him to stick it in my bum. Then I'd have my way with them. It was a good 17 year stretch but now, with these new damn laws, I'll have to keep my penchant for anal excusions strictly here at home. 'Home is where the Hard is' you know."

  19. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they really think wannabe testers are too dumb to download a Chromium nightly? It's not that those nightlies crash all the time. I'm using them and I can't complain.

    I kinda liked the model of "force updates on computer illiterates" to get rid of updating compliance issues and version confusion. But that relies on those forced updates being really stable, not beta in any sense. Are they reversing that now and going back to the oldfashioned release model?

  20. KILL ALL JEWS, Jews are destroying all of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    KILL ALL THE KYKES!

    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijtiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijDMMQtiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicXMMMMMMQjiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicSMMMMMMMMHJiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiSWMMMMMMMHJiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiii6WMMMMMMMNYiiiiiiiiJciiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiii5WMMMMMMMN5iiiiiiiiJHMMSciiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiii5NMMMMMMMW5iiiiiiiiJHMMMMMWSiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiicXMMMMMMMMNYiiiiiitKMMMMMMMMMW6iiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiijDMMMMMMMMHJiitQMMMMMMMMMMMMMW5iiiiiii
    iiiiitciiiiiiijQMMMMMMMMKDMMMMMMMMQWMMMMMMMN5iiiii
    iiitKMWSiiiiiiiijQMMMMMMMMMMMMMMQtiiSWMMMMMMMNYiii
    itQMMMMMW6iiiiiiiitKMMMMMMMMMMKtiiiiicSMMMMMMMMHJi
    iJHMMMMMMMW6iiiiiicSMMMMMMMMMMDjiiiiiiicXMMMMMMN5i
    iiiYNMMMMMMMN5iiiSWMMMMMMMMMMMMMDciiiiiiicDMMW6iii
    iiiii5NMMMMMMMNSWMMMMMMMHNMMMMMMMMXciiiiiiij5iiiii
    iiiiiii5WMMMMMMMMMMMMMN5ii5NMMMMMMMMSciiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiii6WMMMMMMMMMW5iiiiii6WMMMMMMMWSiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiSWMMMMMW6iiiiiiiitKMMMMMMMMXciiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiicSMMWSiiiiiiiitQMMMMMMMMDjiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiic6ciiiiiiijQMMMMMMMMQjiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijDMMMMMMMMQtiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicXMMMMMMMMKtiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijQMMMMMMHJiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitKMMHJiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
    iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitYiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

  21. Firefox bashing incoming by BenoitRen · · Score: 0

    Firefox bashing will commence in 3... 2... 1...

    1. Re:Firefox bashing incoming by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

      nah they too busy restarting their browser

    2. Re:Firefox bashing incoming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      I think you meant Opera users spamming will commence in 3... 2... 1...

    3. Re:Firefox bashing incoming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Firefox sucks - slow, clunky, ponderous.

      In addition Safari 4 sucks, it crashes browsing The Inquirer. I didn't ask for a browser with taste, goddammit.

      Chrome sucks too, clicking back from a form submission results in 1997-era form handling / loss / etc - just show me the previous page as it was before I clicked on the submit button!

      Lynx sucks too.

      IE3, that was okay.

    4. Re:Firefox bashing incoming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition Safari 4 sucks, it crashes browsing The Inquirer. I didn't ask for a browser with taste, goddammit.

      I'm sure I should make a joke about Apple users here, but I'm actually typing this on Safari (the stable 3.x branch).

    5. Re:Firefox bashing incoming by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      I'm typing this on Safari 4. After one day I got sick of the title bar tabs and disabled them. After two days, I was sick of the awesome bar-style results and disabled them. Now it's like Safari 3, but without the reload/stop load button. Putting it right next to the rss feed button, far away from the forward/back buttons seems like a bad decision to me.

      The web inspector is much better, though.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  22. Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by presidenteloco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it vastly amusing the amount of press that browser "speed" gets (compared to trivialities, like, say, "usability in peoples' computer-based work patterns").

    Ok sure, javascript engine speed might be important, but javascript clearly is inadequate as a rich-client development platform anyway.

    I for one do not sit here on my macbook or my dual-core 2.6GHz 2G RAM pc and think to my self "damn these 70 browser windows and tabs are rendering slow - damn damn damn". No, I pretty much never have to think about that, thanks to good work done by hardware and software engineers over the last 15 years or so.

    Speed is SO NOT the key issue anymore. Netbooks prove this. Usability in the context of always-on info and my persistent context and where the hell is the stuff I was working on etc. is way way more important as a surfing quality of life issue.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by castorvx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing you don't use some pretty heavy duty JavaScript sites? There is a substantial difference in performance between browsers on some sites, and I say this with a very high powered system.

      There are a lot of performance issues that could still be resolved. While your other points are relevant, I would say that the issue of performance is a long way from being resolved, and not just with JavaScript.

    2. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And 64k is enough for everybody.

      It's true that websites run perfectly well in modern browsers -- otherwise you would be annoyed at how slow the site is and browse to someone else's faster website.

      But if the browser becomes more capable, and executes javascript code with greater speed, then what those web developers can actually include in their website for you expands, and the things you can work on with a website expands, and we continue to advance forward.

    3. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by WoLpH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a very simple reason for it, speed is one of the few things that can be measured objectively. All forms of usability tests tend to vary per person.

      That makes it really easy to post some benchmarks while any article about usability will be bashed to no end.

    4. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by Braino420 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm guessing you don't use some pretty heavy duty JavaScript sites?

      *shudder*

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    5. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by prockcore · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speed is SO NOT the key issue anymore. Netbooks prove this

      Netbooks prove the opposite. Throwing hardware at the problem isn't a solution anymore. No one in their right mind is going to run an office suite on a netbook. The browser is the one place where speed and lightweight memory usage *has* been important. That's why netbooks pretty much run browsers and that's it.

    6. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      My god man, how heavy can these sites get on Javascript? The most demanding sites I've been to, in terms of tax on the system (flash not included) are Slashdot and Digg. How much worse than the "4+ seconds to render the comments page" I experience on my system could it be?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    7. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I agree with you completely. It isn't speed that's the issue, so much as usability.

      I put up with the bloat of Firefox on my 512Mb laptop on the sole basis that it's functional. It has the extensions I need, and I can work it in around how I do my other work. Opera crashes incessantly, though it's probably second best in terms of 'usable'. And IE doesn't even approach either. Chrome, the little I've used it, is closer to IE than the other two (and not that much different than Firefox in terms of memory use).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I find it vastly amusing the amount of press that browser "speed" gets (compared to trivialities, like, say, "usability in peoples' computer-based work patterns").

      To an extent they're related...

      Speed doesn't just mean rendering speed (where they're all good enough) - it also includes JavaScript speed where you can never be fast enough (websites/applications - such as slashdot - will continue to push the limits of what's possible with current speed), and overall responsiveness.

      One huge advantage of Chrome over Firefox is that Chrome (I believe IE8 has this too) has a process per tab so your whole browser doesn't lock up when you have something slow to load in one tab. This was a huge usability issue for me - one of my major browser usage patterns is opening up eBay search results one per tab, and it sucks when you've got 20-30 tabs open then the browser locks up because someone has a slow loading/hanging graphic linked to in their eBay listing.

    9. Re:Hilarious that speed is key evaluation by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No one in their right mind is going to run an office suite on a netbook.

      Eh? Every single x86 netbook on the market can run an Office suite just fine, and a lot of people use them for that, students especially.

  23. Frost 4ist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    THAN THIS BSD BOX, has ground to a volume of NetBSD to l0ok in7o lost its earlier impaired its under the GPL. is ingesting startling turn

  24. Important question by maxume · · Score: 1

    Is this a master beta?

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  25. If it doesn't run on Linux it is trash. by bradbury · · Score: -1, Troll

    Software which does not run first and foremost on an open source system, e.g. Linux is of little interest, e.g. "trash". As I have yet to see a Chrome release which will run under Linux I place all news regarding such releases in said category, i.e. *Until* chrome runs on Linux it is *trash*. Google marketers are going down a road (close to those which mozilla marketers are going down) of pursuing the dominant (and wrongheaded) position in the marketplace rather than the *right* role in the marketplace (i.e. you, if you are a Google Chrome developer / marketeer, are clearly prostituting yourselves.) I personally, would rather be labeled as someone who was right from a technical standpoint, rather than someone who was right (or temporarily right) from a marketing standpoint. Where are your "moral" and/or "technical" standards?

    Yea, yea, yea, I know the counter-arguements "Windows is the dominant force in the marketplace." And the counter-argument is "one should not support that". Where is the marketing strategy that Chrome only runs on Linux? I currently and in the future will tend to discount Chrome because in fact it was not written to run on Linux simultaneously with its operation under Windows (which is to my mind a semi-worthless OS).

    1. Re:If it doesn't run on Linux it is trash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, since no one cares about your opinion, e.g. "trash", just stuff it. Fact is, running on Linux will have little impact on the usage of Chrome.

    2. Re:If it doesn't run on Linux it is trash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true.

      Google took other people's work, the KHTML engine, added spyware and then broke it so it doesn't work right on the OS it was developed on.

      This is exactly like Microsoft stealing the BSD TCP/IP stack, breaking it, selling it and then demanding the police arrest kids that copy 'their' OS. The courts found that Microsoft willfully copied the BSD code and didn't credit it.

    3. Re:If it doesn't run on Linux it is trash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A marketing strategy that Chrome only runs on Linux? You don't work in marketing, do you?

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. faster? so what? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe I'm in the minority here, but what's all the fuss with a "faster" browser, at this point? They're pretty damn fast as they are (pick one). The big problem, in my mind, is their memory use. That goes for both "normal running" memory use, and "my god it's leaky" memory use.

    Currently, Firefox is running with 360M virtual and 131M resident memory utilized. The browser window has been open for 85 minutes with exactly 20 tabs - no flash, and 1 slashdot page. I've got to shut down firefox due to excessive swapping/poor system performance more often than I used to have to reboot Windows 9x due to stability issues!

    Firefox, IE, and Opera have all shot up in their memory use extremely quickly - to the point where Firefox has become almost unusable on my laptop with 512M, while having Tbird and OO.org open at the same time. And that's only with about 20 tabs open, noscript, flashblock, and a bunch of other things to reduce the memory overhead.

    Just because RAM is cheap doesn't mean you should leave people out in the cold who have older stuff. Likewise, if you bloat your products, porting them to portable devices (cell phones, etc.) is going to be a bit troublesome: RAM doesn't seem to be having the same speed or capacity leaps that CPUs are - and in a portable, sticking more RAM in is only going to decrease battery life.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Do not use this version! by crivens · · Score: 1

    Do not use this version! I'm constantly suffering non-responsive tabs that do nothing for ages and cannot be closed or reloaded without killing the process. Stay away!

  30. Re:Those talking about Chrome on Linux miss the po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >For us web developers, we should be screaming in joy.

    Chrome-specific bugs suggest otherwise.

  31. Took the words right out of my mouth... by Benfea · · Score: 1

    ...although a browser that's faster than other browsers on a modern dual-core desktop is not necessarily going to be faster than other browsers on a netbook. If people are going to benchmark browsers, there probably should be at least two separate sets of benchmarks.

  32. I agree... sort of. by Benfea · · Score: 1

    I agree that competition is forcing Microsoft to change, but I don't think it is at all fair to say they're "losing badly to competing browsers". They still have a sizable majority of the browser market right now.

    They're not making significant changes to IE because they're losing, but because they want to keep winning.

    1. Re:I agree... sort of. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Microsofts market share is shrinking, and that alone is worrying for them. It is shrinking fast even, and is reaching the point where they can not be called the de-facto standard anymore. That, and that alone, is what worries them.

  33. High memory by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    I'm confused when this is said I have 4 tabs open in FF including this one. For addons I have NoScript, Adblock+, Filterset.G updater, bugmenot, Firemacs, Flashgot, McAfee SiteAdvisor, and User Agent Switcher.

    According to Process Explorer the working set is 64mb and the peak is 67.

    1. Re:High memory by Christian+Henry · · Score: 1

      Me, personally: Firefox, 49 tabs, VM size (Windows XP) is over 450 MB. To be fair, however, Outlook currently is taking over 300 MB VM too (!). I realise that this is a large number of tabs, but still...

    2. Re:High memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Firefox with Adblock+, NoScript and download statusbar. 10 currently open tabs and the browser has been running a little over 2 days. Memory usage is 1.4GB and I get nice intermittent CPU spikes that push one of my cores up to 100% utilization.

      Fuck Firefox. I'm switching to Chrome, Opera or ANYTHING that doesn't leak memory like this. As far as I'm concerned, IE is even a better browser at this stage.

    3. Re:High memory by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Oh that maybe it, I usually close it when I'm done/walk away.

  34. Chromium is not yet ready by teko_teko · · Score: 1

    As stated on the warning page.

  35. Re:Join the GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA Toda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Artist: Johnny Rebel Song: who likes a nigger

    L.B.J. was a-flyin' one morn', Over south Louisiana...feeling for alarm, When he looks down below, and what does he see?, Two cajuns pullin' a nigger on ski's!, So he lands, and says, "Thanks for helping your black brother!", And them two cajuns just looked at each other, And said, "He might be smart, but I'll tell you something...", "He don't know a thing about alligator huntin'!", O-wop-bop-bam-bam, Who likes a nigger?, o-wop-bop-bam-bam
    (CHORUS), Who likes a nigger?, o-wop-bop-bam-bam, Who likes a nigger?, And the hatin', everybody, is a-gettin' much bigger, Rich man travelin' down thru the South, Stopped in Mississippi to get a tooth pulled out, When he paid the doctor the charges due, He said "My nigger chauffer's got a bad tooth, too", "Well, I'll pull it...", said the doc, "but you'd better not holler!, Cause I'll have to charge you $200.00, Cause here in Mississippi he can't open his mouth, We'll have to go thru his bottom, to get the thing out!"
    Chorus
    There ain't much difference 'tween a nigger and a donkey, 'Bout as much between an ape and a monkey, Ones a little bigger, but you gotta agree, There's not very much more that you can see., But a mule earns his livin' by the sweat of his neck, While a nigger sits down and draws a gov't check, The nigger should be smarter, as a general rule, But in a spelling contest, I'd pick the mule!

    Artist: Johnny Rebel Song: nigger hating me

    I like sugar, and I like tea, But I don't like niggers...no siree!, There's two known things that'll make me puke, And that's a hog eatin' slop, and a big, black spook!, You know it...cause I show it, Like a barn-yard rooster I crow it!, And the NAACP, Would sure like to get a-hold of nigger-hatin' me!, Roses are red, and violet's are blue, And nigger's are black, you know that's true, But they don't mind, cause what the heck!, You gotta be black to get a welfare check!, And I'm broke...no joke, I ain't got a nickel for a coke!, And I ain't black, you see, So Uncle Sam won't help poor nigger-hatin' me., Jig-A-Boo, jig-a-boo...where are you?, I's here in the woodpile...watchin' you, Jig-A-Boo, jig-a-boo...come out!, No! Cause I'm scared of the white man's a-way down South, You know it!...cause I show it., Stick your black head out and I'll blow it!, And the NAACP, Can't keep you away from little old nigger-hatin' me!, Mirror, mirror...on the wall, Who is the blackest of them all?, A man named King, and there ain't no doubt, That he's causin' lots of trouble with his baboon mouth., Brewin'...he's a doin', It's caused by the trouble he's a-brewin', And the NAACP, Can't win if the white men stick with nigger-hatin' me!, Hey! Mr. President! What do you say?, When are we whites gonna have our day?, The nigger's had there's such a long, long time, I'm white, and it's time that I had mine!, You know it...cause I show it!, Stick your black head out and I'll blow it!, And the NAACP, Can't win if the white man sticks with nigger-hatin' me

    Artist: Johnny Rebel Song: Affirmative Action

    Affirmative action, what's this country coming to?, Affirmative action, what's the white man gonna do?, It's another government handout and simply said, "You've got to hire a nigger instead", I was down at the office, cleaning up the joint, Just doing a little extra, making brownie points, Cause I'd heard somebody say, a promotion's on the line, So I was working hard, I wa.nted that promotion to be mine, So I asked the CEO if I could have a try, He said "you work hard, son and I know you qualify., You're the best man for the job but it's out of my hands, I've got to give it to a nigger, courtesy of Uncle Sam", Oh affirmative action, what's this country coming to?, Affirmative action, what's the white man gonna do?, It's another government handout and simply said, "You've got to hire a nigger instead.", Now I went looking for a new job the very next day., I got an interview and things were surely going my way.., I was asked a lot of questions, I was giving it