Slashdot Mirror


Fastbooting Linux For Dummies?

Linux First timer writes "I wonder whether the Linux Gurus of Slashdot could help me with some advice on setting up a Linux system for my wife. She is not at all computer literate, but likes to get on the net for a few minutes every morning to read news etc. She is always bitching that our XP desktop takes way too long to boot 'just to get on the net for a few minutes.' I was thinking that I could take an old laptop we have, do a little first time test drive installing and using Linux, and possibly solve her problem in one go. The requirements for the system are simple: fast as possible boot/load Firefox, easy for a computer dummy to get onto the net, hard to break through random incompetence, and comes with Open Office.org or similar for occasional use. Wouldn't be used for much else. Any useful advice for us two poor Linux newbies? For example, is Ubuntu the best choice for this, or is there a better Linux flavour for the purpose? Any useful tweaks a novice can handle to make it work better for these simple tasks only?"

41 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. hibernate instead of shutting down... by fasuin · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you put your system in hibernation mode, the wake up process is much faster then a cold boot... My windows desktop wakes up in less than 5 secs. It boots in more the 3 min...

    1. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by Nimey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Assuming hibernation works for you. It doesn't for me.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by psnyder · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree on the hibernation.

      But from the perspective of a cold boot:
      I have WinXP and Ubuntu dual-boot on my 5 year old system. I timed their bootup the other day. WinXP took approx 3 and a half minutes, Ubuntu took approx 1 and a half minutes.

    3. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Informative

      For me, waking from hibernation is no faster than a cold boot.

    4. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by FirstTimerWhoAsked · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason she boots every morning is because she thinks she will "break" the computer by leaving it on. Not sure if she is afraid of malware or thinks the computer is suffering 'wear and tear' in hibernation mode, but she just thinks its safer to turn it off. And before you say "educate her" - she doesn't listen to me when her 'intuition' tells her something.

    5. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by nmb3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you put your system in hibernation mode, the wake up process is much faster then a cold boot

      I concur with this. I have an older Dell laptop with XP and Ubuntu on it. I always hibernate Windows, and it takes (once past Grub) about 8 seconds to be ready to log in. I've never had any trouble keeping Windows hibernated for weeks at a time.

      On the flip side, I don't know what the problem is, but Ubuntu takes longer to boot up after being hibernated (assuming it comes up at all -- now and then it just stops resuming). I keep hearing about low power modes being better supported in Linux distributions, but I've yet to come across something that will work reliably in standby or hibernation on any of the laptops I've used.

      It's unfortunate because it means if I need to do something quick, I always go for Windows. On the same machine I can be up and running Windows in literally 15 seconds, while Ubuntu takes over 4 minutes to be ready (or even longer when there's no network connected) with or without a previous hibernation.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    6. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason she boots every morning is because she thinks she will "break" the computer by leaving it on. Not sure if she is afraid of malware or thinks the computer is suffering 'wear and tear' in hibernation mode, but she just thinks its safer to turn it off. And before you say "educate her" - she doesn't listen to me when her 'intuition' tells her something.

      Then it is her ignorance that's standing in the way of a fast-access system, not software.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    7. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Informative

      IME xubuntu is great for booting quickly and working well with older hardware. And if you feel up to tackling a kernel recompile, you can make it boot even faster.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    8. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the reasons why Linux always seems so "slow" booting is because by the time X is loaded, everything is ready to go. By the time explorer.exe loads on Windows, the system is still in fact, booting up (which is why you have to wait a minute before you really do anything). Secondly, on the hardware you have achieved the "overkill" for both systems. For daily, non CPU intensive applications, a decent CPU and 2 gigs of RAM is going to make XP and Ubuntu seem fast. The reason why it doesn't seem faster is because there really isn't that much more "fast" then it can go for daily tasks. On the other hand, if you try gaming or other demanding tasks, you may see a difference.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by rootofevil · · Score: 4, Funny

      typically i dont refer to it as 'educate' when i 'totally make shit up'.

      the wear and tear issue has been debunked by several prominent tech websites.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    10. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by Shikaku · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shhh...

    11. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by Toonol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Point her to a random comment on Slashdot. Typically, women will believe the expertise of a random stranger far more than their husband.

      Why, I don't know... but it's the truth, and nearly globally applicable.

    12. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      He just needs to look at her sternly and say 'I find your lack of faith ... disturbing.'

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    13. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by ciderVisor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hopefully intuition doesn't tell her to bone the mailman

      Hey, I'm their mailman, you insensitive clod !

      --
      Squirrel!
    14. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Informative

      Download Puppy and run the live CD for a day sometime. You'll think KDE 4 is a half-dead slug. KDE 3 is a spritely, healthy slug compared to JWM, but still a slug.

    15. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Random comment selected: please read comment 27323679

      Wait...

    16. Re:hibernate instead of shutting down... by jacksinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suggest installing Ubuntu (or some derivation) and go to System-->Preferences-->Session and add a new startup item like, say, Firefox. Have Firefox defaulted to opening the sites she likes to go to. Also, auto-login her user. I basically have this setup at work where I turn on my Ubuntu machine, go pour a cup of coffee, and when I get back Firefox is open and my mail client is open.

      --
      Life==Jeopardy. All the answers are right in front us - the hard part is coming up with the correct question.
  2. Why do you boot XP every morning? by godless+dave · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just leave it up all night. I boot our XP system once a week if that.

    --
    "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
    1. Re:Why do you boot XP every morning? by Nimey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Suspend-to-RAM. Comes up faster than hibernate, and sucks minimal power as long as you remember to shut the monitor off. On mine the only thing getting power is the RAM; the fans and drives are all turned off.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Why do you boot XP every morning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just leave it up all night. I boot our XP system once a week if that.

      Did you note, you'll be wasting equal amount of electricity as a printer printing 10000 pages if you leave your computer on all night long?

      Guys, help conserve energy.

    3. Re:Why do you boot XP every morning? by Afforess · · Score: 2

      Trees are sustainable though.

      --
      If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
    4. Re:Why do you boot XP every morning? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did you note, you'll be wasting equal amount of electricity as a printer printing 10000 pages if you leave your computer on all night long?

      [Citation needed]

      Dot-matrix? Ink-jet? Colour laser? Laptop? Desktop? Server? Display on or off? CRT? TFT? Storage? Power saving mode?

      Notwithstanding that I challenge your statement to be anywhere within an order of magnitude or two off target as a generalised rule, the usage can be radically different depending on the combination. CRT's are different from TFT displays in energy use for example, rather dramatically in fact.

      And my work laptop - a Dell Latitude D620 / XP Pro gets unplugged and locked into a desk drawer each night. I close down Outlook and shut the lid. Resumes in about 6 seconds the next morning. Whatever power usage it's consuming in that state, it's not enough to warm the desk drawer it resides in appreciably, and I don't see it spending much time recharging.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  3. How old of a laptop? by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Informative

    The decision of a Linux distro for old hardware is somewhat dependent on the age of the old hardware. I've been pretty successful at using PuppyLinux (and MacPup isn't too bad) on a very old Toshiba laptop with 192mb RAM. However, I have found that the "random incompetence" factor is an issue with it, as well as some laptop quirks (X refuses to come back if you close the laptop lid, and you then have to power it off, X doesn't start up on boot, and you have to type "startx" at the command line and chose xmesa or xorg...).

    Xubuntu is actually not too bad from the resources side... I tried it on an old 256mb ram/celeron computer. It was pretty slow, though.

    gOS also isn't too bad. It's geared towards getting online and using Google stuff... gmail, google docs, etc. It booted faster and the liveCD was faster than Xubuntu, for me.

    Another one that I haven't used a whole lot but looked pretty good was TinyME (based on PCLinuxOS I think).

  4. Have you thought about a USB bootloader? by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't messed around with this much myself... but instead of making her morning routine specific to an older, outdated laptop you have lying around, what about installing Linux on a USB drive for boot. Usually you can set Bios to detect USB first and installing something small and lightweight would be preferable. If you set up a Bash script to start Firefox I'd recommend Puppy Linux because it's quick and small, but if you want her to be able to mess around with the OS GUI and not "break" anything I think a better idea would be xubuntu instead. Still smaller and rather lightweight, but much more user friendly. The beauty of the USB drive boot though is you can use that old laptop as well as your main home computer without uprooting an existing OS and you'll still have access to all of those files if she wants to do work in OpenOffice or something similar.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:Have you thought about a USB bootloader? by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Informative

      usb will be slow to boot

      Actually it depends. USB 2.0 itself has a maximum throughput of 420Mbit/sec. To put that in perspective, it's nearly identical to most 7200 RPM hard drives on the market right now and about half as fast as a Western Digital Velociraptor VR150 which is one of the fastest consumer hard drives on the market.

      (60MB/s == 480Mb/s) I do admit this solution breaks down in two situations:
      1) you cheap out on the flash drive - in order to do this with reasonable speed you'll need to get a high-speed USB stick, but honestly a 2GB or 4GB high-speed stick is not that expensive
      2) The computer is not USB 2.0 compliant. - This is only a problem for older hardware, but if their normal home computer was made in the last 8 years, they should be safe.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    2. Re:Have you thought about a USB bootloader? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The theoretical throughput might be 480 Mb/s, but I have yet to see any real-world benchmarks above about 300 Mb/s (37.5 MB/s), and if my own experience is any indication you'd be lucky to get even 20 MB/s on bulk transfers without high-end (read: expensive) hardware.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  5. What's the hardware? by guruevi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Go check here for a list of minimalistic Linux distro's:

    http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Minimal_Linux_distros

    Slackware with a XFCE and Firefox/OpenOffice is very, very fast on even older hardware.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:What's the hardware? by gbarules2999 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Slackware with a XFCE and Firefox/OpenOffice" = Zenwalk. Easier than Slackware itself; comes with a few extra tools. http://www.zenwalk.org/

  6. tinycore linux by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...boots very fast from a CDROM. It would be much faster from a hard disk or SSD.

    link

    1. Re:tinycore linux by gbarules2999 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suppost this comment. Tiny Core, plus Opera, is as fast as it gets. Also: Puppy Linux, or anything based on Slackware (Slackware itself, not quite for newbies).

  7. Re:If your laptop can take it by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the website, around 3 seconds. Now, some embedded systems have Flash cards large enough to take a mini distro. The Arcom card I used a while back could do this. This is unlikely to be the case for the laptop as-is, but I can't see why you couldn't ultimately have a memory image placed into Flash which is booted into via coreboot.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  8. Re:how foolproof to install? by FirstTimerWhoAsked · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't mind tinkering with it for a few hours, don't want to be pulling my hair out for a few days. Never installed Linux before and I'm not stupid, but not a computer super-geek either. Hardware is a couple years old (a tablet, probably)

  9. Xandros Presto! by NynexNinja · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.prestomypc.com/ says it boots in eight seconds.

  10. Wii takes a while to render anything by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Wii. I try loading Slashdot in Internet Channel, and it freezes for 30 seconds while something runs. I suspect it's JavaScript or reflow related to Slashdot's tag system, the same thing that freezes Firefox on my desktop for a couple seconds. Besides, Internet Channel has no tabs, no Java (if the wife visits sites that use it), and no Flash Player 8 or 9 (if the wife visits sites that use it).

  11. Auto Power On by sleekware · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have noticed in the BIOS before, that there is an option to have the computer turn on at a specific time. This would be handy if you set it for a time that would be a few minutes before you ordinarily need to use it.

  12. Damn small linux by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    DSL linux boots insanely fast. On my pentium 2, 300Mhz machine it takes 28 seconds to cold boot off of a CD. And part of that is the delay at the grub prompt! Plus it fires up the applications like a mail client nearly instantly.

    main difference is the graphics and dialog boxes are not as sexy as ubuntu

    I note that one possible reason linux or windows boots slowly or wakes from hinernation slowly on an older machine can be it's memory starved. For example ubuntu boots on that machine in about ten minutes(!). the machine only has 396MB of memory so it's a miracle ubuntu even boots at all.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Damn small linux by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Use Linux, recompile the kernel with the necessary drivers only and use fvwm or another light-weight window manager to speed things up even more.

      Also optimize the startup scripts to skip any service not needed.

      And finally - recompile the kernel specifically for your processor.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  13. Linux Newbie by troll8901 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the standard of a Linux Newbie (from TFS)?? Recompiling the kernel, modifying startup scripts and understanding SSEx instruction sets?

    It's too much. I'm quitting the Linux stuff and going back to Windows. I'm going to download Test King papers, memorize the answers, and get my MSCE certification. Experience and knowledge be damned!

  14. Slashdot suggestions quality by troll8901 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On behalf of Slashdot, I apologize for the quality of some of the suggestions given. (Basically the readers here write what they want, instead of what you want.)

    As you have discovered, the best suggestions tend to gather near the bottom of the HTML page (as they have fewer replies), while the trolling suggestions tend to gather near the top.

    You write well. Hope you can be a regular contributor with us.

  15. Awake from Sleep in 3 seconds by mspohr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My older Dell laptop with Ubuntu 8.10 wakes up from sleep in just a few seconds. When I leave Firefox open, it opens also with all of the tabs. I didn't have to fiddle with anything to get this working. I just set the power button to enter 'sleep' mode to make it easy to start and stop.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  16. Why reboot? by RandySC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is everyone rebooting? Just leave it on and reboot once a week if it is XP and about 45-60 days if it is Linux. Always on rules!

    --
    Organization: alphabetical, sometimes numerical or messy