Slashdot Mirror


Android Scans DVD Bar Codes, Downloads Movies

cars writes "Remember how you can scan any bar code with an android phone and it will tell you where to find that product for cheaper? A new Android application called BarTor (formerly ScanTorrent) can scan any DVD bar code and then signals either uTorrent or Vuze on your PC to download the movie from BitTorrent. How long do you think this will last?" Other features include purchase opportunities on barcode lookup, Google base product lookup, and site-level filtering.

39 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Charging 2.99 by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to people who don't want to pay for a movie? GLWT.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Charging 2.99 by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      I assume there will be a cracked version out shortly.

    2. Re:Charging 2.99 by castorvx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Try not to confuse people who don't want to spend a ridiculous sum of money for a 90 minute film that probably sucks with people who are simply thieves.

      I suspect a lot of people download movies rather than paying for them because $30 for a movie is just not viable.

      People may well buy that application for $2.99, because $2.99 is a reasonable price for a little phone application.

    3. Re:Charging 2.99 by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If $30 for a movie is unreasonable to you, there are plenty of other ways to see the movie without violating the law. You could go rent it at Blockbuster. Or you could get a Netflix account and get it there. There's no particular reason you need a permanent copy of the movie to call your own, especially if it "probably sucks".

      There are a lot of excuses as to why people download movies rather than renting them, but they're all pretty suspect.

    4. Re:Charging 2.99 by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry but if its about something for nothing. Its about PIRATES which is ANYONE who steals anothers work without paying for it and this is exactly what torrents are doing. Now im no fan of the MPAA/RIAA but if Andriod as a community continues to abuse things in this manner they WILL NEVER be taken seriously as a phone platform. Seriously, you want to be take seriously you have to learn you cant enable stealing from others. And that is what this app does...plain and simple. Further more if it is about convenience not price then Apple has already made this solution and Netflix and Voodoo or a host of others even Comcast. No this is pretty much about pirating movies so you dont have to pay for them. Laugh all you want iTunes store has done what no other online seller of music/movies has been able to do which is provide a simple / easy way to get the music/movies you want. It is not perfect but it is way better than pirating movies. Oh and if you think other phone makers will love Andriod for this...wait until the MPAA/RIAA sues the makers of the phones for their losses...unlike your grandmother...they are going to have some explaining to do.

      --
      . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    5. Re:Charging 2.99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > What's wrong with waiting a whole four days and then buying the book yourself?

      The buying.

      > Or, waiting a few days longer and borrowing a used copy from a friend?

      The waiting.

      > Or, waiting a few days longer and buying a used copy via eBay?

      The buying.

      > Or, borrowing a copy from your local library when they have it?

      The waiting.

    6. Re:Charging 2.99 by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People spend $30 at Starbucks in a week pretty easily, spend probably half an hour or so in line (presuming 10 visits to Starbucks at $3 each visit, 5 minutes in the store). Many still think that $30 (or even $15) for 1.5 to 3 hours of entertainment, no matter how bad it is, is too much.

      And Starbucks, IMO, isn't even all that great coffee.

      There are a lot of excuses as to why people download movies rather than renting them, but they're all pretty suspect.

      IMO, very true. Seems one of the more common ones is "Well if I like it, I'll buy it." Apparently, we only have to pay for what we use if we like it. Try doing that at a restaurant, hehe.

    7. Re:Charging 2.99 by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You offer many vaild points. The perception remains however that companies that charge 30 bucks for a shitty movie are practically thieves themselves. No one really feels guilty for stealing from thieves.

    8. Re:Charging 2.99 by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 3, Funny

      People spend $30 at Starbucks in a week pretty easily, spend probably half an hour or so in line (presuming 10 visits to Starbucks at $3 each visit, 5 minutes in the store). Many still think that $30 (or even $15) for 1.5 to 3 hours of entertainment, no matter how bad it is, is too much.

      Did I read this correctly? You are equating going to Starbucks as the same thing as watching a movie? Since we're on the subject of comparing totally different things, I fill up my car with gas about every two weeks for about $30 after about 5 hours worth of driving. At those rates, 2 hour movies ought to cost $12, and a 1.5 hour movie ought to cost $9. A flight from Seattle to New York (about 6 hours) ought to cost $35, but more if it's non-stop. Since all forms of entertainment are the same, a 3 minute song on iTunes should now cost $0.30. I like this new form of determining price; it makes everything so simple.

      Also, I'm sure the MPAA and RIAA will be glad to know that everyone in Starbucks also complains about the price of movies and so pirates them all. This certainly gives them an easy place to go round up all the copyright infringers.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    9. Re:Charging 2.99 by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try not to confuse people who don't want to spend a ridiculous sum of money for a 90 minute film that probably sucks with people who are simply thieves.

      If you don't want to pay what it costs, don't watch it. Wait for it to show up on TV for free. But it is not a valid justification for violating the copyright. The price point of when you start to violate copyright ($0.00 for some, more for others) does not make you any different or better.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    10. Re:Charging 2.99 by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is spending money on something not necessary (coffee, especially Starbucks branded, is not necessary), not money -> hours necessarily. Point with the Starbucks thing was actually that people are willing to pay more money than its worth (IMO, of course) AND wait in line for X amount of time.

      I was not attempting to say that everyone who pirates movies also drinks coffee. However, I'm pretty sure some of the poeple that drink Starbucks coffee, epsecially with all the techies that go there, also pirate movies. And students. And ... etc.

    11. Re:Charging 2.99 by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I kinda wish you had logged in. You gave the first respectable list of reasons to pirate this site has ever seen, without succumbing to the temptation to make it look noble. I commend your honesty, even in the face of your cowardice.

    12. Re:Charging 2.99 by mjeffers · · Score: 2, Informative

      "For electronic and audio-visual media, unauthorized reproduction and distribution is occasionally referred to as piracy (an early reference was made by Daniel Defoe in 1703 when he said of his novel True-born Englishman : "Its being Printed again and again, by Pyrates"[2]). The practice of labeling the act of infringement as "piracy" actually predates copyright itself. Even prior to the 1709 enactment of the Statute of Anne, generally recognized as the first copyright law, the Stationers' Company of London in 1557 received a Royal Charter giving the company a monopoly on publication and tasking it with enforcing the charter. Those who violated the charter were labeled pirates as early as 1603.[3]"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement

      So in other words, your original post and your followup are both pretty much completely wrong.

    13. Re:Charging 2.99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't believe in logging in.

    14. Re:Charging 2.99 by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually just make it myself. I've even gotten into a small amount of coffee roasting, it's pretty fun and tastes much different when you actually get fresh (i.e., roasted 5 minutes ago) coffee. And real cream.

      I go to Starbucks probably once every two months, and most coffee expenditures for me are for beans (either green or roasted, depending on the status of my roaster) and milk and/or cream...

    15. Re:Charging 2.99 by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you can't afford something, then you don't get it. If you don't think it's a good value, then don't buy it.

      You are not owed a movie.

      and what movie costs 30 bucks?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Charging 2.99 by Abreu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I go to starbucks for the "buy a small coffee, stay in a comfy chair with free electricity and wifi for hours" promotion

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    17. Re:Charging 2.99 by castorvx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Such high quality films as this.

    18. Re:Charging 2.99 by snowraver1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a home.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  3. Android... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 4, Funny

    For a moment, I thought that they were saying that Lt. Cmdr. Data was now using BitTorrent.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  4. This isn't an iPhone by GweeDo · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can install apps that aren't blessed by the Hand of Steve. This app might not stay on the store, but it sure won't go away...now where is my Windows Mobile version?

    1. Re:This isn't an iPhone by cortesoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm, you would rather enter the barcode manually to search for a movie torrent in an app than to enter the name of the movie in a search? May I ask why? Is there something I am missing?

  5. They charge you for it? by d474 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sounds like a nefarious MPAA plot. They've got your intent (barcode) and identity (paypal/credit card).

    If the MPAA didn't hatch this idea, I bet they wish they would have.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  6. Err...uh...2 days, 6 hours, 23 minutes 38 seconds? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Funny

    "How long do you think this will last?"

    If there is a market and people are willing (think iTunesVideo) then I'm sure it won't take long for the MPAA to start suing.

    You know, in the old days we had to go to the theater (oops, sorry, that's theatre for our friends across the pond) and sit with 200 of our closest friends to watch a movie. And we liked it that way.

    Damned kids and your fancy technogoogle phones.

    What's next? Video texting?

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  7. Quality? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will it find a version with quality appropriate to playback on the device? Ripping a DVD and transcoding it to play back on a mobile device is often more effort than I can be bothered with. Being able to just wave the device at one of my DVDs and have it automatically grab an appropriate copy would be great.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  8. Re:nice by think_nix · · Score: 2, Funny

    now all they need to do is port TPB vpn service to it and voila !

  9. Re:Err...uh...2 days, 6 hours, 23 minutes 38 secon by D+Ninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's next? Video texting?

    Been there. Done that, old man. We're now onto Googlefacevidtweettubing.

    Everybody's doing it.

  10. Re:nice by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The barcode recognition is the biggest feature IMHO. Imagine the apps you could build with a good barcode recognition.

    Scan a list of 'to buy'. Sort of a "Wedding registry" but how many times are you out and you see something that looks like a decent product but you want to check reviews? Scan a barcode, dump it into a Google docs document.

    The biggest IMHO is "crowd sourcing" grocery lists. So you go to the store and scan in what you're going to buy, punch in the price and it gets added to a database. Use the GPS to determine the store.

    Get a few hundred people checking prices and you'll have a fairly accurate database of prices. Then you go home, made a grocery list and have it calculate where the cheapest place to shop is.

  11. Re:nice by BlackCreek · · Score: 4, Informative

    The barcode recognition is the biggest feature IMHO. Imagine the apps you could build with a good barcode recognition.

    Scan a list of 'to buy'. Sort of a "Wedding registry" but how many times are you out and you see something that looks like a decent product but you want to check reviews? Scan a barcode, dump it into a Google docs document.

    The biggest IMHO is "crowd sourcing" grocery lists. So you go to the store and scan in what you're going to buy, punch in the price and it gets added to a database. Use the GPS to determine the store.

    What you describe already exists for Android since pretty much day one: http://www.biggu.com/

  12. Somewhere out there, by spacefiddle · · Score: 3, Funny

    the CueCat people are howling.

  13. "download the movie from BitTorrent" by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Informative

    BitTorrent is not a place. It's a protocol. Correct usage would be "download the movie via BitTorrent".

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  14. Re:nice by cdrguru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest IMHO is "crowd sourcing" grocery lists. So you go to the store and scan in what you're going to buy, punch in the price and it gets added to a database. Use the GPS to determine the store.

    Get a few hundred people checking prices and you'll have a fairly accurate database of prices. Then you go home, made a grocery list and have it calculate where the cheapest place to shop is.

    The problem with this is this pushes grocery stores to complete solely on price. Selection no longer matters, customer service doesn't matter, just price.

    Personally, I see enough of that already. The Internet certainly has the power to transform all purchases into a simple decision based on price while taking all other factors out of it. Then, we will all be shopping at WalMart. Forget about anybody else, they can't compete as effectively on price.

    Is that what you really want? Because that is exactly what we are in danger of getting.

  15. Re:Song of the South by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Short answer: Don't watch it

    It is the property of whoever owns the copy right. IF they choose not to share it, you don't get to. It is theirs, not yours. You do not have a right to something they created, and/or purchased the rights to.

    Bad analogy time:

    I do not have a "right" to watch your home movies. Just because you refuse to let me, does not give me the right to break into your house and watch them.

    --
    Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
  16. Re:nice by Rue+C+Koegel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the solution isn't to limit technology, but to encourage non-profit cooperative... at a non-profit grocer all prices can stay rock bottom for even the highest quality goods.

    plus, with the national co-op networks in place co-op grocers, and therefor the buyers themselves, can work together to encourage the manufacturers to make better products that cost less than, rather than more than, the crappier products.

    [i call this the wall-mart strategy, since they're notorious for successfully setting their own buying prices and demanding changes in manufacturing practices.]

    a good example of this could be: a sugarless wholegrain cereal at a co-op could cost less than a high sugar content bleached and then re-enriched cereal, or a sugarless organic peanut butter--which is naturally sweet--could be cheaper than sugared inorganic name brand crap.

    this would do away with the need to waste a customers time scanning the products at every grocery store to create a customer friendly database of product pricing schemes across a city/nation.

    please take note that such a system could be modified by retail agents.

    also note the fact that: in most areas the majority of the grocers are owned by the same organization. in seattle it's really just kroger vs wal-mart, and whole foods vs co-ops. all of kroger's stores are strategically designed to appear in business against each other in order to influence the sales of certain items. [i am the horses mouth]

    --
    DON'T CAPITALIZE! CO-OPERATE! AND FREE EVERYTHING!
  17. Re:nice by ronocdh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Selection no longer matters, customer service doesn't matter, just price.

    How can you say that? If I scan something and I find out no store in a 15-mile radius has that product, won't I buy it immediately?

    Seems to me this barcode scanning phenomenon would be better for consumers all around. Stores will have to compete not just on price, but on whatever consumers demand. If you want selection, then choose on selection.

  18. Re:nice by KermitJunior · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear they're naming the next model DATA and if it is a success, another one named B4.

    --
    There is a Universal Life Value Check it
  19. Re:nice by mustafap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Price is what the consumer demands. Only the stupid ones. The rest of us demand value for money, quality, reliability. Unfortunately 'the stupid ones' constitute a very large proportion of the general public, which is why we have to put up with so much shit coming out of Chinese factories. We ask for cheap shit, and they can make it. Rant over :o)

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  20. Re:nice by damburger · · Score: 2

    And because not everybody has the same values, the combined data isn't meaningful beyond a way to measure the lowest common denominator.

    The brutal oversimplification of 'econ 101' when applied to real world situations does not generally lead to good outcomes. People are just too complex.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?