Slashdot Mirror


Honda Develops Brain Interface For Robot Control

narramissic writes "Honda has released a video of experiments showing a person wearing a large hemispheric scanner on his head and controlling Honda's Asimo robot by visualizing movement. Back in 2006, Honda and ATR researchers managed to get a robotic hand to move by analyzing brain activity using a large MRI scanner. This latest work uses EEG to measure the electrical activity in a person's brain and blood flow within the brain using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to produce data that is then interpreted into control information. While both the EEG and NIRS techniques are established, the analyzing process for the data is new. Honda said the system uses statistical processing of the complex information to distinguish brain activities with high precision without any physical motion."

88 comments

  1. Hybrids by j-pimp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    End of line.

    --
    --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    1. Re:Hybrids by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Hybrid fuel technology meet hybrid car driver.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  2. Next Leap by I3ooI3oo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While controlling something (robot/UAV) will get easier and easier. The problem I see is getting the Input side working for total control. Combining the technology that is being developed to help the blind and deaf for something like this would be the next great leap.

    1. Re:Next Leap by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      House M.D. did this in the latest episode (yesterday's) to some extent.

      The patient was paralyzed ("locked in syndrome") and could only communicate by blinking, then lost that ability, so they used an EEG and trained ("think 'up'") the patient to move the cursor on the screen.

      Either way, I'm not really impressed as I'm sure this has been going on for about as long as the EEG has been around, which has been for over 100 years now, and NIRS for about 70.

    2. Re:Next Leap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wouldn't be impressed if I were you, either. Obviously you are one of the great minds in human-computer interface work and have a list of accomplishments that dwarfs this minor stepping stone of an achievement.

      I pshaw in the general direction of Japan along with you, brother.

    3. Re:Next Leap by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      I heard they did something like this in Star Wars too.

    4. Re:Next Leap by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Nov. 25th 2007
      http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=755

      Nov. 4th 1988
      http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel2/727/3075/00095357.pdf?arnumber=95357

      Monkey Feeding Itself

      Brain-Computer Interface

      It's not that I'm unimpressed, just not really impressed, especially since Asimo already has coordination and calculating abilities of it's own so it's not really "raw" input=result.

    5. Re:Next Leap by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it will be video games...

      Anyone who has seen Angelic Layer will know what I am talking about. Guy invents direct thought control system for medical applications, but in order to get it funded develops it into a game. Makes sense, go for a very large market to help reduce the cost of the technology and rapidly improve it and use that to push the more limited medical applications.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. one bad thing though... by interested+pyro · · Score: 1, Funny

    what happens when the guy thinks of women on the beach?

    1. Re:one bad thing though... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      It's Japan dude. Why would he have an inflatable doll in a country where you can hire schoolgirls?

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  4. I for one.... by furby076 · · Score: 4, Funny

    welcome our new bucket wearing overlords! All hail Lord Bucket!

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    1. Re:I for one.... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Funny

      NO! They be taken my bucket!

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:I for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your buckets are belong us.

    3. Re:I for one.... by Thelasko · · Score: 1
      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:I for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pronounced 'boo-kay'.

    5. Re:I for one.... by MaerD · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's "Boo-kay". It's french.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
  5. Army of the Future by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The book Starship Troopers by Henlein had people wearing huge armored suits equipped with nukes, lasers, etc. Perhaps we can just have robot armies controlled by humans mentally.

    Or maybe robot miners. And robot deep sea divers. And robot firemen. It doesn't all have to be destruction and chaos to be cool. :-)

    1. Re:Army of the Future by GMonkeyLouie · · Score: 1

      Heinlein's character Sergeant Zim (I think?) made the argument that men in the field were still the most superior weapon, and the only ones capable of stealing small objects out from under the enemy's noses, taking captives, and adapting to complex objectives.

      No robots for you.

    2. Re:Army of the Future by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Funny

      It doesn't all have to be destruction and chaos to be cool. :-)

      Yes, it does.

    3. Re:Army of the Future by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      scientist: "here we have the latest in robotic advances, we have..."
      audience member: (interrupting) "Can you *beep* it?"
      scientist: "Huh?"
      audience member: "Can you *beep* it?"
      scientist: "Uhh, no."
      whole audience: (all getting up and leaving) "grumbling"

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Army of the Future by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      No no. You still have men-sized (roughly) robots who are controlled mentally by men in La-Z-Boy armchairs. You don't need to put the person in the middle of the field, just the robot, since all its motions mimic the person's will.

    5. Re:Army of the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no. You still have men-sized (roughly) robots who are controlled mentally by men in La-Z-Boy armchairs. You don't need to put the person in the middle of the field, just the robot, since all its motions mimic the person's will.

      Only if these robots are communicating to the men in recliners (what women can't be lazy?) via a technology that can transmit large amounts of complex information very quickly, all while lacking physical wires/cables and nearly impossible to jam. Until we figure-out how build such communication technology, you'll still need units in the field capable of independent thought and action. So unless a robust and flexible AI system is availble, that means you'll still need some human soldiers on the front-lines.

    6. Re:Army of the Future by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Read "Waldo & Magic Incorporated", also by Heinlein. Teleoperation, robot mimics at a distance. Again, science follows science fiction, if at a safe and respectful distance.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    7. Re:Army of the Future by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 1

      ...via a technology that can transmit large amounts of complex information very quickly, all while lacking physical wires/cables and nearly impossible to jam.

      Entangled photons, imposible to jam or eavesdrop upon, and as nearly instantaneous as we can measure.

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
    8. Re:Army of the Future by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Waldos were first used to handle hot things inside nuclear power plants. Since then they've expanded their capabilities and uses. But until now they haven't been mentally controlled. (And I'm not certain that this counts...but it's sure getting a lot closer.)

      The generic term is telefactor. Waldo is the name given to tele-operated hands. (And as I recall that's how "Waldo" in the story "Waldo" used the items.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:Army of the Future by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Entangled photons, imposible to jam or eavesdrop upon, and as nearly instantaneous as we can measure.

      Oh, snap! Someone go told!

      Kidding, but it's a good idea. But we probably don't need anything more than what WiMax can deliver -- we're not transferring GB of information, just a continuous stream of data. Not too much different from an MMO, and the graphics need not be as good. You'll want technical feedback of your robot's status (health bar?) as well as eye-in-the-sky recon, but since you'll probably be VRing the thing...

      Come to think of it, VRing probably isn't the most efficient way -- you're limiting yourself to one point of view. You'll probably want multiple displays from different angles (including, of course, rear)...it would take a while to get used to of course.

  6. Video? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    "Honda has released a video of experiments."

    On a completely unrelated note, I've developed a series of exercises to read slashdot and reply, by pure will. I don't even require a computer.

    I present this text as sample of the experiment's result.

    1. Re:Video? by kheldan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please, don't show us a video of how this is done, nobody wants to see where you insert the CAT5 cable.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    2. Re:Video? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      nobody wants to see where you insert the CAT5 cable.

      And so the script for "Slashdotits" begins to take form.

    3. Re:Video? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is the internet..of Course someone want's to see that~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Video? by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1
      I read this as

      And so the script for "Slashdotits" begins to take form.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    5. Re:Video? by Mneten · · Score: 1

      I want to see where the CAT5 cable gets inserted! if its not too bad, I'd think about getting myself modded...

  7. No physical motion? by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Isn't blood flow physical motion?

  8. Sincerity is required by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what would happen if the subject felt the urge of punching someone, among other things.

    This could lead to very strange situations.

    --
    The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
  9. Makes a good movie... by nickt · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a spoiler for Sleep Dealer.

  10. Robot Control?! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why on earth would these gal-danged scientists create a brain interface for robot control?! The fools have already ensured that the robots will take over our society and force us into slavery. Do they have to make it so easy for them that the robots can just control us directly via our brains?! Are they trying to destroy mankind? These scientists have gone mad!

    What's that? Oh... never mind.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Robot Control?! by gambit3 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. We'll all have this inhibitor chip put at the top of our spine that will keep the super-smart robots from controlling our brain.

    2. Re:Robot Control?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if during a Nuclear Fusion test the chip is fried? WHAT THEN SIR!?!?!?

    3. Re:Robot Control?! by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      I shall rule Earth using robots and the flu! (Donning helmet) "Now, my mighty robots, kill Thor, while he's distracted by his explosive diarrhea!"

  11. Robot, Robot, In The Hall: +1, Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Who are the biggest WAR CRIMINALS of them all.

    Thank you for helping spread freedom and democracy around the world.

    Yours In Socialism,
    Kilgore Trout

  12. I fully expect... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    ...this to lead to humans battling it out in tournaments controlling huge, hundred ton robots.

    I better be able to play as a Nova.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:I fully expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, that brings me back... I spent so many hours in front of that game... Beating the two hidden bosses (Fire and Ice) and finishing on a difficulty level that took two secrets just to reach...

      Jaguar's overhead throw was just so overpowered and cheap.

  13. What could possibly go wrong... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    Maybe I watch way too much of Futurama/Simpsons/Family Guy/Sci-Fi channel...

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The result of the "wrong" is most certainly a greatly improved spam filter. Just imagine all the dirty and disgusting thoughts these robots have to ignore.

  14. So it begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this coming. You see these Acuras? See their mugs? God-damn transformers, I'm telling you.

    1. Re:So it begins... by socz · · Score: 1

      and everyone laughed when i said the veritech from macross/robotech would happen one day...

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  15. Brainsss!!!! by GMonkeyLouie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly, this is why the zombies want our brains. They must have already built the robots.

  16. Great!! by gijoel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I have to learn to think in Japanese as well as Russian.

    1. Re:Great!! by julesh · · Score: 1

      Now I have to learn to think in Japanese as well as Russian.

      Only +1 for that? Mods these days have no culture.

  17. Creepy, next thing you'll know they'll have by Logic+Worshipper · · Score: 2

    DRM in your brain. If you get a song stuck in your head you didn't pay royalties for... Not to mention the political implications of this, no more need for torture when you have a Romulan brain probe that can download the information you want out of the person's brain. Or how such technology could be used by a dictator to control the population by punishing unloyal thoughts.

    1. Re:Creepy, next thing you'll know they'll have by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      There is never a 'need' for torture. It is /impossible/ for torture to provide accurate information about anything. Torture never produces reliable information.

      The purpose of torture is to cause pain, not to extract information. Reality isn't a TV show.

    2. Re:Creepy, next thing you'll know they'll have by Logic+Worshipper · · Score: 1

      True, I should have written "excuse for torture".

      But would a brain probe be a form of torture? Should it be banned by the Geneva conventions?

  18. Mind Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that slashdot accepts this sort of this as real but laughs at people who are the victims of government psychotronic mind control? I've been plagued with this for years - making me hear voices, making my walls knock, causing my HVAC system to spread knock out gas throughout my apartment that leaves me out for days at a time.

    So why is this possible but mind control NOT? Why does no one recognize this?

    1. Re:Mind Control by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Because you're not wearing the funny buckethat. Get a funny hat and we'll totally believe you. Really.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    2. Re:Mind Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its mostly due to it not using made-up words like 'psychotronic'
      Seriously though, hearing voices, knocking noises, believing you've lost days of your life, etc - thats normal boring run-of-the-mill paranoid schitzophrenia. People get that outside the USA too, you know.

  19. forget the robots! by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    I'd want a mind control link for driving one of their cars! That way, we could keep our hands free for doing other tasks while driving, like talking on the cell phone, eating, or shaving!

    1. Re:forget the robots! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Except that you won't have your brain free for doing other tasks while driving. That's why hand-free devices don't actually make driving while cell-phoning significantly safer.

      Of course, maybe you drive in Boston or Chicago, where clearly brain-free driving isn't a problem.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:forget the robots! by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, a thought control cell phone! So instead of texting your friends while driving, you could just connect directly to their thoughts! Although that could get a little scary!

  20. obOverlord by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    I for one look forward to my new Honda built robotic overlord...

    I wonder if it's kick start...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  21. Soon... by Pad-Lok · · Score: 1

    We will be able to have real Battlemech combats at Solaris IV!

    Japanese mechas, pffffft, goddamn candyasses.

    --

    -- Sauer
    1. Re:Soon... by Icegryphon · · Score: 0

      Heck yeah Battletech FTW, How does it feel to be strapped to a walking nuclear reactor in the morning? neuro-helmets, Idea born long long before this article, damn clanners.

  22. Battletech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't stop thinking about the neural impulse helmet used pilot the mechs when I see this.

  23. lord bucket hails you by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    and reminds you that there is an ongoing chicken holocaust worldwide

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckethead

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:lord bucket hails you by bloodninja · · Score: 1

      and reminds you that there is an ongoing chicken holocaust worldwide

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckethead

      Why is this modded troll? This guy played in G'f'n'R for a while. Actually, it's the first thing that I though of too when I saw the word "bucket".

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
  24. Have I seen this before? by Babba+0'Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Isn't this a slightly fancier, much more well-funded version of what the "Prototype This" hackers did in a few days:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leVLTFy4vXo
    (around minute 1) and
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6aX2-o92ek

    ?

    1. Re:Have I seen this before? by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

      Everything in Asimo is a slightly fancier and much more well-funded and publicized version of everything that's already been done before. But most people see Asimo and they're amazed and they become instant fanboi's of it because this is the first time they see such-n-such technology.

  25. Rember the remote controlled rat? by belligerent0001 · · Score: 0

    Hey what would happen if they used this robotic interface to remotely control the 'remote controlled rat' of a couple of years ago? That might actually be kinda fun when you think about it...plus it might be helpful in fully understanding the complexities of the....rat....race...buhah..buuwhahahaha

    --
    "...a civilian some of the time, a soldier part of the time and a patriot all of the time." -Brig. Gen. James Drain
  26. C'mon Battlemechs! by CestusGW · · Score: 1

    Sweet! Ars was just covering a story about using carbon nanotubes for artificial muscles, and now we have the neural interface controls we need too. If only ITER would hurry up and get us to the point of developing compact fusion reactors, we'd be all set to go.

    --
    Too much repetition my too much repetition!
  27. Prior Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own one of these, it's in my desk right now:

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826100006

    Been out for a while. (Actually I found it via a /. article.)

    Seems like the same thing to me?
    http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews.php?/input_devices/ocz_neural_impulse_actuator_nia_-_the_log/1
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/ocz-nia--neural-impulse-actuator-review/

  28. Not very useful by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    The hitch is that most people still need a brain interface to a better brain.

  29. Wonder if by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    The guys working with the person wearing the input device, texted a hot babe to come by and just see if the robot spazzes out.

  30. Robots do not puch people by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    I can see the bumper sticker: Robots do not punch people, people punch people.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  31. Gregory House did it first. by nani+popoki · · Score: 1

    Last night's episode of "House" (FOX TV) had a gadget that used EEG to move a cursor so a paralyzed patient could answer yes/no questions. Talk about synchronicity!

  32. When can I start playing Angelic Layer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  33. Applications by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    An immediate application, of course, is prosthetics for lost or damaged limbs.

    But if it works out as described, where it's possible to direct additional stuff without interfering with your normal actions, by imagining what you want done and having the device do it, it could be used to control a robot helper or ADDITIONAL artificial limbs.

    How many times have people wanted extra hands while soldering, welding, assembling models or appliances, building houses, repairing cars, ...?

    Looks like Doctor Octopus may soon be technologically feasible.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  34. I saw that in a Client Eastwood movie... by flashfire · · Score: 0

    Firefox (1982) was about Soviet jet that could (at least in part) take command from the pilot's thought; they just had to think in Russian. Also, if memory servers me correct, there was research being done along this path at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the 90s. Nice to see a profit motivated company pursuing this technology.

  35. BM Interface? by BlogTheHaggis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds messy...

  36. Strange that it refers to a "Robot" by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    It is interesting to me that this is conveyed as a "robot" controlled by a human interface. It always seemed to me that the field of robotics generally tended to slide towards autonomy, not control by human interface. I would be more likely to dub this an achievement for a cybernetics or biomedical field than a robotics field. Of course, since few people seem to agree on what makes a robot a robot and whether autonomy is a requirement or not, I suppose I could just be picking at words...

    1. Re:Strange that it refers to a "Robot" by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I concur, and this is something that's been increasingly annoying me over the last few years (get off my lawn!). People seem to refer to anything with more than a couple of degrees of freedom as a "robot" even when it's blatantly remote controlled by a human operator. Robot Wars is a prime offender - they're not robots, they're glorified friggin' RC cars. I always thought the best entry would be one that jammed the others' radios while roaming around autonomously with an angle grinder.

      TFA is talking about a Waldo, not a robot.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  37. Grammar Error in Headline! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Rather, ambiguity:

    Has Honda developed an interface by which brains can control robots, or the other way around?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  38. Hmph... by the-advanced-lemon · · Score: 1

    I was gonna build something like this with some statistical stuff too... Only for computer games. But I worked out it was too expensive, and too dangerous. Looks like Honda beat me and my fantasy hobby project to it. Lol! ;P

  39. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens to you when you drive past a billboard for the latest Godzilla movie? Scary thought...

  40. Great help for quadripeligics. by Iowan41 · · Score: 1

    Control the house, the mobility device, you name it.

  41. Think of the children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next? Controlling robot cars with their brains?!?!

    They must be stopped.

  42. !Robot by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    If it is controlled by a human, via a joystick or psionic helmet/implant... it is NOT a robot. UAVs are not robots. The "bots" in Robot Wars were not robots, they were RC cars with weapons.

    Your car isn't a robot if you are controlling it, directly or remotely. If your car was sensing it's environment and navigating on it's own, then it would be a robot.

    Who'da thought Honda would be responsible for building the first Veritech fighters?

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  43. Part of it.. by zogger · · Score: 1

    ..is that this is Honda, a name brand major manufacturer who are in a position to mass produce things that actually work and are affordable. Sure, random joe nerd youtoober or pick a university project of choice might come up with something spiffy, but when Honda does it, there's at least some hope you might get one, one day.

  44. How best to train? by akakaak · · Score: 1

    The example video shows discrimination of 4 available discrete actions. The eventual goal would presumably be to discriminate tens, hundreds, or thousands of actions, if not smoothly varying parameters of action.

    There are two main ways to go about this:
    1. Train the algorithms processing the brain signals.
    2. Train the brain signals.

    The best approach is probably to do both in concert using real-time feedback to the user about how the algorithm is currently interpreting the signal. The user can then learn (explicitly or implicitly) what mental processes lead to what action outcomes. In this way the user will learn to control the system in much the same way we learn and constantly relearn how to control our own limbs.

    A significant issue will be how good the signal is that can be obtained with EEG and NIRS. Hopefully EEG alone is enough, because while NIRS takes some significant hardware, you could wear an EEG cap around all day pretty easily if you really had to.