Slashdot Mirror


First Look At Fedora 11 Beta Release

Ars Technica has a first look at the latest beta release from the Fedora universe and it has several new shiny-bits including kernel modesetting, ext4, and faster boot times. "Fedora 11, which is codenamed Leonidas, is scheduled for final release at the end of May. It will include several new features and noteworthy improvements, such as RPM 4.7, which will reduce the memory consumption of complex package activity, tighter integration of PackageKit, faster boot time with a target goal of 20 seconds, and reduced power consumption thanks to a major tuning effort. This version of Fedora will ship with the latest version of many popular open source software programs, including GNOME 2.26, KDE 4.2, and Xfce 4.6. This will also be the first Fedora release — and possibly the first mainstream distro release — to use the new Ext4 filesystem by default.

14 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Leonidas? Cue the "300" jokes in 3... 2... by tjonnyc999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    1... and GO!

    1. Re:Leonidas? Cue the "300" jokes in 3... 2... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Funny

      THIS. IS. LINUX.

    2. Re:Leonidas? Cue the "300" jokes in 3... 2... by jamesmcm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tonight we design in Hell!

  2. ext4? This is madness! by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 3, Funny

    THIS IS FEDORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    Oh yeah, well tonight, I in fact plan on dining in Hell.

  3. Ext4? by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 3, Funny

    Doesn't Ext4 have occasional issues with data integr)_SF*@)_M#$ I'm surprised to see it used by defau#%FVN641

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Ext4? by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Spartans! Prepare for data loss!

    2. Re:Ext4? by Jurily · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tonight we dine in /dev/null

    3. Re:Ext4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But why are they dining in purgatory that makes no sense.

    4. Re:Ext4? by nystire · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gnome has config files? I thought that the devs just hardcoded everything to have the "best" defaults available. (Please note that I am a Gnome user, etc..)

  4. Re:Bad summary. by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Brace yourself techno-vampire...

  5. Re:Finally Fedora? by H0p313ss · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm a long, long time RedHat user. (Since Red Hat Linux 5.1, if you're curious)

    I suddenly feel very, very old.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  6. Re:One question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    PulseAudio isn't even "bleeding edge" software, it's more "oh god that edge just went clean through my torso and cut me in half oh god there's blood everywhere I'm going to die".

  7. Re:ext4? This is madness! by Inner_Child · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mother-in-law doing the cooking?

    --
    Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  8. Re:One question: by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Funny

    It really sucked when most of the users could never have more than one application using audio simultaneously. Also controlling the devices could not be offered via unified user interface.

    I solved that problem by installing a PCI sound card I found in the trash. It can cope with me forkbombing sox processes at it and it has a unified user interface - the three sound buttons on my keyboard that run aumix.

    Compare this to Pulseaudio, which manages to combine the obtrusiveness of aRts, the unusability of a Gnome GUI, and the uselessness of a network server that sounds like trying to stream a wav file over 56k - on the rare occasions that it produces any result at all.