Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Promises 4G Wireless For Rural America

Hugh Pickens writes "A Pew study last year found that only 38 percent of rural American homes have access to broadband Internet, compared to 57 percent in cities and 60 percent in the suburbs. All that could be about to change with the announcement that Verizon plans to start introducing a new wireless network in the 700 MHz spectrum in 2010. 'The licenses we bought in the 700MHz auction cover the whole US,' says Tony Melone, a Verizon Wireless VP. 'And we plan to roll out LTE [high-speed mobile service] throughout the entire country, including places where we don't offer our [current] cell phone service today.' Because the [700 MHz] spectrum is in a lower frequency, it can transmit signals over longer distances and penetrate through obstacles, and because the signals travel longer distances, Verizon can deploy fewer cell towers than if it used spectrum from a higher frequency band, which means it can provide coverage at a lower cost. President Obama's administration is well aware of the high-speed Internet divide that exists today, and as part of the overall economic stimulus package passed by Congress, the government is allocating $7.2 billion for projects that bring broadband Internet access to rural towns and communities."

11 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Welcome by Mishotaki · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let us welcome our future monopolistic overlords! so... they're gonna cap them at 5 gigs of data transfer a month for 200$ ? gotta pay for the bills of the bran new network!

    1. Re:Welcome by Aranykai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I for one would welcome a monopoly over a lack of any service.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
  2. But will it be capped? by kdekorte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just hope it is a service with a reasonable cap or without a cap. The current 5GB limit to the wireless internet is way to small. If it has a 100GB or over cap I'd sign up today. Currently, I run about 25GB over Sprint Broadband and would expect more with a faster service. And yes it is all legal stuff...

    1. Re:But will it be capped? by maxume · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe they will do something completely ridiculous and charge reasonable prices for metered bandwidth.

      Everyone one wins, light users pay less, heavy users get the bits they want for a reasonable amount, the company has the resources necessary to expand the network.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:But will it be capped? by Daimanta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Everyone one wins, light users pay less, heavy users get the bits they want for a reasonable amount, the company has the resources necessary to expand the network."

      That's what happens if companies play nice.

      What really happens: Light users pay exactly the same, "heavy users" will pay a lot more.

      My proposition: do NOT oversell your capacity. You cannot sell what you do not have and if the network grinds to a halt, it's not the rightful users who are to blame.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  3. Prediction: by lessthanpi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Farm related porn will flood the interweb

    --
    One man with a gun can control 100 without one
  4. Re:Because it worked so well last time by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is giving subsidies to private companies without anything that tracks where that money goes. Building Internet infrastructure is a worthwhile investment. Giving Verizon billions of dollars and saying, "I hope you build something good with this," is not such a great idea.

  5. High Speed Internet Availability by snowraver1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    compared to 57 percent in cities and 60 percent in the suburbs[...]

    That's pretty terrible...

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  6. Why is everyone ignoring the latency issues? by NevDull · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems as though everyone's excited about "wireless broadband", but the speedtest app on my iPhone says 416ms ping while I'm on 3G.

    Latency that's even half that is useless for many applications, and just frustratingly slow for just about all the rest.

    Are we just heading for a new definition of the digital divide whereby some people don't have access to *useful* broadband?

    -Nev

    1. Re:Why is everyone ignoring the latency issues? by kindbud · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems as though everyone's excited about "wireless broadband", but the speedtest app on my iPhone says 416ms ping while I'm on 3G.

      Speedtest.net from my PC when it is connected to my Cradlepoint WAP, which in turn is connected to Verizon's 3G EVDO network, shows me 150 ms latency all the time. Xbox360 games, EVE Online, other PC games, they all work great over my 3G service.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Why is everyone ignoring the latency issues? by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 3, Informative

      From http://mobiledevdesign.com/tutorials/lte_next_step_cellular_3g-1027/

      "Network latency will also improve, from as much as 200 ms today to 5 to 10 ms with LTE."