Believing In Medical Treatments That Don't Work
Hugh Pickens writes "David H. Newman, M.D. has an interesting article in the NY Times where he discusses common medical treatments that aren't supported by the best available evidence. For example, doctors have administered 'beta-blockers' for decades to heart attack victims, although studies show that the early administration of beta-blockers does not save lives; patients with ear infections are more likely to be harmed by antibiotics than helped — the infections typically recede within days regardless of treatment and the same is true for bronchitis, sinusitis, and sore throats; no cough remedies have ever been proven better than a placebo. Back surgeries to relieve pain are, in the majority of cases, no better than nonsurgical treatment, and knee surgery is no better than sham knee surgery where surgeons 'pretend' to do surgery while the patient is under light anesthesia. Newman says that treatment based on ideology is alluring, 'but the uncomfortable truth is that many expensive, invasive interventions are of little or no benefit and cause potentially uncomfortable, costly, and dangerous side effects and complications.' The Obama administration's plan for reform includes identifying health care measures that work and those that don't, and there are signs of hope for evidence-based medicine: earlier this year hospital administrators were informed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that beta-blocker treatment will be retired as a government indicator of quality care, beginning April 1, 2009. 'After years of advocacy that cemented immediate beta-blockers in the treatment protocols of virtually every hospital in the country,' writes Newman, 'the agency has demonstrated that minds can be changed.'"
As the OP says, your body recovers from most infections by itself. Many antibiotics have unpleasant side effects - some can even cause permanent damage.
;). Or just gargle a warm water+salt+lime+honey solution (which might sting less ;) ).
So you should only take antibiotics if the disease is significantly worse than the antibiotics. Overuse of antibiotics has caused many of them to become less effective, and so doctors have to resort to the really nasty ones more and more often.
As an example, if you have a cold, skip the antibiotics even if you have a secondary infection (unless it is really bad - ask the doc - do I really need antibiotics? A good doc will tell you the truth).
Gargle whisky if you want to kill the bacteria in your throat
As for medical treatment for cancer, if the treatment is extremely expensive, makes you feel like shit for months, only gives you a small chance of a cure, you might prefer to not take treatment (especially if you are older - heck if you are older the treatment could kill you or weaken you so something else kills you).
Sometimes the best medical treatment is no treatment, or just palliative.