Slashdot Mirror


Obama Administration Defends Warrantless Wiretapping

a whoabot writes "The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the Obama administration has stepped in to defend AT&T in the case over their participation in the warrantless wiretapping program started by Bush. The Obama administration argues that that continuation of the case will lead to the disclosure of important 'state secrets.' The Electronic Frontier Foundation has described the action as an 'embrace' of the Bush policy." Update: 04/07 15:18 GMT by T : Glenn Greenwald of Salon has up an analysis of this move, including excerpts from the actual brief filed. Excerpt: "This brief and this case are exclusively the Obama DOJ's, and the ample time that elapsed — almost three full months — makes clear that it was fully considered by Obama officials."

9 of 788 comments (clear)

  1. No shit.... by PontifexMaximus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well OF COURSE he is. Obama is a lying weasel who said what the stupid American people wanted to hear to get elected. Oh, I know they all do that, but he's the worst of the lying filthy scum bags. He's an idiot, he's incompetent, he's corrupt. The trifecta of a perfect politician. Having him as president in my country makes me want to weep, then die.

    --
    Pax Vobiscum
  2. Re:Does this by Idiomatick · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well for the companies; they did something illegal. buuuut the government told them to do it. So, they can't exactly sue them after. I think that qualifies as entrapment of some sort. Also I think Bush should be jailed over it. Obama may be being stupid about it but he wasn't the president when the crime was committed....

  3. Re:Change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He may be yet another sleazy politician, but at least as of today, he hasn't invaded another country based on lies, and gotten over 4200 American soldiers killed.

  4. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    no it's not. Not completely...

    The man at least is not the raging asshat we had for the last 8 years pissing off the entire world. He's actually making some inroads abroad to lessen the "We're america and FUCK YOU!" mantra we used so long...

    Honestly the points where he is flip-flopping most enlightened people expected. Plus people got way overboard on worshiping the man. when you have nutjobs screaming that Obama is gonna pay her mortgage.. you know you went over the top, jumped the shark and may have just caused yourself some problems...

    Honestly the warrentless wiretaps.. if they are used on bankers, CEO's, CFO's and all financial sectors I'm OK with that. Maybe add in all congress members as well.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  5. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by Lumpy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    In that same thought pattern we should execute everyone that looks like a terrorist. Kill 1000 people and you kill that 1 that was going to Kill 5000-more people... That's a good thing right?

    There is no such thing as more or less wrong. It's WRONG and there is nothing that can change it.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But we like Micheal Moore. He leads with a heart, not the hate and spite of Rush Limbaugh.

  7. Re:Change? by conspirator57 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Damn, the saying used to be, "If you're not a liberal before you're 30 you have no heart. If you're not a conservative after you're 30 you have no brain." You, sir have no heart, and thus give the lie to the old canard.

    "blah blah push your predefined agenda blah blah."

    You know, not every forum post is astroturfing. In fact, I'd hazard to guess that fewer than half of /. posts are by bots.

    Some of us happen to have drawn different conclusions about the world than you have. It's okay. It's still protected speech. So jog on, fascist.

    --
    "If still these truths be held to be
    Self evident."
    -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  8. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Bullshit.

    They claim to hate him NOW because they don't want to appear utterly partisan, even though they are. Even the Republican candidate for president ran on a platform that would continue the Bush policies which led to the deficit. How is that HATING the deficit?

    I can only think of ONE republican who has consistently attacked deficit spending. Guess what? Republicans hate him.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  9. Re:Does this by earlymon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Either way, he shouldn't be running your country.

    I'm sorry, but I was doing fine until you made that statement.

    At the risk of being modded troll or flamebait - which this definitely is not - you have no right to express to Americans who SHOULD NOT be running our country - plain and simple, as you say, this isn't your country.

    I have liked and disliked foreign politicians in my time, but have never had the audacity or arrogance to suggest that someone should or should not be running some other country - I simply am one of those Americans that does not believe that I'm in the right telling other people in other countries what they should or shouldn't do.

    And that, by the way, is the reason that Obama had a lot of support in this country - despite his glaring shortcomings and potential for failure, I voted for him because I no longer wanted a president that projected to the world that America, read: Americans, are all about telling others what to do. America has been guilty of that for some time, but Americans stood up and have attempted to correct that problem with a chosen change of leadership.

    This isn't flaming either, but I know I'm taking my chances: I find no irony whatsoever that you think Obama should not be running our country and at the same time, you are telling us how America should be.

    Color me sad - very, very sad.

    Evidently, war is indeed an inevitable part of the human condition.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.