Slashdot Mirror


Obama Administration Defends Warrantless Wiretapping

a whoabot writes "The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the Obama administration has stepped in to defend AT&T in the case over their participation in the warrantless wiretapping program started by Bush. The Obama administration argues that that continuation of the case will lead to the disclosure of important 'state secrets.' The Electronic Frontier Foundation has described the action as an 'embrace' of the Bush policy." Update: 04/07 15:18 GMT by T : Glenn Greenwald of Salon has up an analysis of this move, including excerpts from the actual brief filed. Excerpt: "This brief and this case are exclusively the Obama DOJ's, and the ample time that elapsed — almost three full months — makes clear that it was fully considered by Obama officials."

14 of 788 comments (clear)

  1. More than an embrace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a full blown leg humping.

    1. Re:More than an embrace by conspirator57 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if only the next two steps would come from the microsoft playbook...

      extend, extinguish.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
  2. Re:Change we can believe in? No we can't! by Thanshin · · Score: 3, Funny

    And people wonder why we have the Republicrat meme.

    Because "Democan" sounds like a suitable name for a superhero's pet?

  3. Re:don't act so surprised by Scragglykat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yet he forcibly reversed Bush's policy on dealing with known terrorists in Guantonimo Bay and there is fear that that might have consequence as well. I guess if the US citizens are to be stripped of rights, we have to give rights to someone... might as well be terrorists. :)

  4. Re:Change? by Moryath · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Change"... is all you'll have left in your pocket or bank account once Obama is done.

  5. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good job, you voted for someone who wasn't running for president.

  6. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 5, Funny

    But with option 2 you spent 50 years with the lesser evil the whole time.

    Why vote for a lesser evil?

    Cthulu 2012

  7. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

    I get warm fuzzies by picking the loser and complaining.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  8. Re:Change? by steelfood · · Score: 2, Funny

    Change is what that cup in your hand is for.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  9. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Considering the opposition, Cthulu might be the lesser evil!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  10. Everyone, hmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In that case, I'm going to write-in "Anonymous Coward" in '12.

  11. Re:The Only Change You Can Believe In by feepness · · Score: 3, Funny

    Awesome, it's like a dictatorship with an extra choice!

    I feel bad for you.

  12. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...the case will lead to the disclosure of important 'state secrets.'

    This really means: the case will lead to the disclosure of embarrassing stuff we'd really like to keep secret.

  13. Re:Change? by garett_spencley · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, look on the bright side. At least convincing people to play with "real" money at Sunday-night-card-night won't be so challenging :)