Slashdot Mirror


Design Software Giants Target the Unemployed

avishere writes "People are losing their jobs, but for some execs the economic meltdown seems like the perfect time to get their software into the hands of those who can't afford their multi-thousand-dollar price tags. Software giants Autodesk and SolidWorks have each latched onto the worst-economic-disaster-since-the-Great-Depression meme and released free versions of their flagship computer-aided-design brands before their potential users are forced to sell their laptops on Craigslist. 'In these uncertain economic times,' Autodesk coos sympathetically, it will give away temporary licenses of AutoCAD and other software to those unemployed in the fields of architecture, engineering, and design. (They are also developing a Mac version, two decades after abandoning the platform.) SolidWorks was quick to respond with its subtly titled Engineering Stimulus Package. So if anyone out there has their weekdays free, jumpstart your hardware and design projects for cheap. Legally, too."

204 comments

  1. how about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's actually cost effective to freely distribute your software to people who want to learn it.

    It's like someone figured out that someone will eventually pay for a license for software you are good at using.

    1. Re:how about that by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what Adobe does with Photoshop? I'm sure there is someone out there who has actually paid for it, but I've never met them... Oh come on! Just kidding.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:how about that by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      SolidWorks was already available for cheap since Dassault Systems released the student development kit. Sure, the licenses only last for for about 6 months, but they're also like $80. That's a far cry from the typical licensing fees.

      Now if only there was a student version of CAMWorks...

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    3. Re:how about that by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still disagree with the time limits on the licenses. It's okay to watermark the creative output if someone hasn't purchased the product, but what in the hell is the point of stopping someone from using a "learning edition" product just because 90 days have passed?

    4. Re:how about that by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      I have a legal copy of 3.0..... Not sure if it even did layers then.

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    5. Re:how about that by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Autodesk have been thought to do this for years already on the warez scene.

      Autodesk are thought to have released their own cracks for the dongle that they supply with the software. Unlike their main competitor with regard to architecture (ArchiCAD), AutoCAD was on warez sites within days of release, crack and all. ArchiCAD has always taken longer to get out there, more than likely because they won't crack their own dongles.

    6. Re:how about that by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I've paid for it - $100 for the cheapie version that does what I need for retouching.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:how about that by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's actually cost effective to freely distribute your software to people who want to learn it.

      It's like someone figured out that someone will eventually pay for a license for software you are good at using.

      That may well be, but here I am with an Ubuntu machine and I'm willing to pay for another full Solidworks license if they will release for this platform. They _could_ be making money off me, but they'd rather give the software away for free then let me pay them for a Linux port. Luckily, SW 2006 runs fine in Virtual Box, and I can open it's window alone, without having the whole XP desktop visible.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    8. Re:how about that by fuziwuzi · · Score: 1

      imo they are using the psychological law of reciprocity, basically people are more willing to help you or give you money, if you give them something in advance. i assume autdesk are having issues with finances, and are just going to weather the recession, but this tactic means that more people will be likely to by their products after teh recession as a result of reciprocity and being helped in tough times. the krishna used this tactic to make money in the US airports in the 60s and 70s.

    9. Re:how about that by th1nk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Autodesk have been thought to do this for years already on the warez scene.

      Autodesk are thought to have released their own cracks...

      I don't know the validity of your statement, but I do know that they are quick to send their lawyers out if they think you are profiting with a pirated copy of their software.

      I set up a website about 7 years ago when I was working for myself as a mechanical design engineer. The website showed some examples of my work created in AutoCAD, among other software packages. A few months after it went live I received a very threatening certified letter from a group of lawyers representing AutoCAD saying that they had no record of my company purchasing a license for AutoCAD. At that time I did not own a legitimate copy of AutoCAD. I wrote a letter back stating that the examples were created using a legitimate copy, that I was not currently using AutoCAD and that I would remove any references to it on my website if they wished. They then said that was cool and never pursued it again.

    10. Re:how about that by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Does it work in Wine? Then you wouldn't need to boot another OS.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    11. Re:how about that by Jurily · · Score: 1

      It's like someone figured out that someone will eventually pay for a license for software you are good at using.

      Blizzard and WoW. The client itself has no copy protection whatsoever.

      The catch: all the free servers out there suck. Horribly.

    12. Re:how about that by digitalunity · · Score: 0

      That's why you run your own server and reroll paladin. You can 1 man all the content, except for scripted events that require more than one player(Lady Vashj comes to mind first).

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    13. Re:how about that by spazdor · · Score: 1

      I don't know the validity of your statement, but I do know that they are quick to send their lawyers out if they think you are profiting with a pirated copy of their software.

      Then their business model seems to have been working perfectly. They had the apparent moral high ground to send you letters and try and scare you out of working using pirated software, but thanks to the dongle crack you managed to go and build yourself up an AutoCAD skillset anyway.

      Did you end up purchasing (or get purchased for you) a legitimate copy for any later projects?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    14. Re:how about that by sponga · · Score: 1

      Yes, some of us younger Civil Engineers were looking forward to some of the new features making things much more seamless and the layout of the Ribbon bar makes things nice also while the vets will grunt at you and use the command line.

      The 90 days kind of ruins it though; I mean some of my individual projects from survey, layout to estimate take far more than 90 days just to get the wet stamp of approval.

      Working only for commission right now is tough in between permanent jobs; would be nice if they Autodesk gave me a longer liscense like a year as more of incentive to use their newer version.
      They already sell the LT version which is cheaper and without the 3d basically; be nice if they lowered the price even more which is about $150-$200.

    15. Re:how about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beware of the AutoCAD student version watermarks.

    16. Re:how about that by shawb · · Score: 1

      To further this, I don't even think the person who receives the software under a temporary license will be directly doing the reciprocation... supply and demand of labor will do the job for you. If there is an excess of potentially employable people who are familiar with your software, companies will not have to pay as high wages for new hires. Therefore purchasing your software will yield companies a net gain. So they buy your software rather than a competitor's, even if the feature set is comparable.

      It may seem like taking the free license will be hurting you more than helping, as your wages go down because of the process. However, not taking the free license results in you not being employable at all... enough people would think a job with less money is better than no job with no money.

      This does, of course, assume that the two pieces of software are different enough that learning one will not make you significantly better at the other. This assumption is realistically not very strong in practice, but the image of the assumption's strength could very well be enough to convince HR to put "3 years of experience with Autocad" rather than "3 years of experience with CAD software."

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    17. Re:how about that by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "what in the hell is the point of stopping someone from using a "learning edition" product just because 90 days have passed?"

      "Have some crack, kid!"

      Nothing a BIOS clock adjustment can't work around...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    18. Re:how about that by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Actually they are temporary licenses. This is really no different from the free software for students that Microsoft gives out or the Express version of Visual BASIC 2008, Visual C# 2008, etc.

      It is software for the unemployed to learn to use, and when they get a job with it, their employer will have to pay the tens of thousands of dollars to have the former unemployed person become their employee and buy a retail version of the software.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    19. Re:how about that by thebug40 · · Score: 1

      This is a great idea! I'm in this industry and feel like i should contribute. The manufacturing industry is going through a huge technological upheaval, if you are unemployed please take these oppotunties to get additional training. There are 3 major players in the small (think machine shop) to medium (John Deere) computer aided design market, SolidWorks, Autodesk Inventor, and Pro Engineer. For what it's worth, there seems to be the most job postings for SolidWorks, then Autocad, then Inventor, then Pro Engineer. SolidWorks Corporation also has a free license program for unemployed workers. Their program is at www.solidworks.com/esp its a 90 day free trial with free tutorials and if you live in the midwest our company offers free SolidWorks fundamentals training and help with finding a job. (PM if you are interested as i do not want to threadjack) if you are unemployed i am so sorry, its a very tough market out there; but there are jobs to be found. Check your smaller cnc, plastics, and farm equipment companies as they seem to be doing ok. If you have any questions on breaking into this industry or questions on the software please dont hesitate to contact me. good luck!

    20. Re:how about that by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Anyone know how the set (change) the time of a virtual machine?

      I run linux so it would be in a virtual machine (VirtualBox) anyways. If I can change the clock of just the virtual machine, I don't have to mess up the rest of my system.

    21. Re:how about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been doing that for years with my electrical add-on for Autocad - free for home use, engineering companies pay - but even giving stuff away can be slow and difficult. Still, if anyone is interested, drop me a line at tyrannosaur@gmail.com and I'll give you the link to the online version.

      Augustus

    22. Re:how about that by Zhila+the+Great+Z · · Score: 1

      Unless I misread you, or you made a mistake in your post... In what way are the free student and VS Express software temporary? Other than the eligibility of obtaining student software being temporary (you can't be a student for life), once you obtain the software, you are licenced for life. And, the VS Express products have been free from the first beta of 2005 until this very day.

    23. Re:how about that by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Try reformatting your system and reinstalling the VS Express software back onto the new reformatted hard drive using the same user key. I did and I had to apply for a new key, it wouldn't take my old key.

      In contrast to this the real Visual Studio takes the CD key after every reformat of the OS and reinstall of Visual Studio.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    24. Re:how about that by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "If I can change the clock of just the virtual machine, I don't have to mess up the rest of my system."

      No, but the fact that you are asking how to do it on Slashdot rather than just fscking googling it, suggests that you will find a way to do so just the same ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    25. Re:how about that by wired_parrot · · Score: 1

      This works because we're talking about dedicated engineering software which is sold almost exclusively to businesses at enormously inflated prices. We pay more than US$100,000 per year for a single license of some of our design software. Getting unemployed engineers, who would never be able to legally afford those licenses in any cases, into using their products is a win-win situation. When the market picks up and they're rehired, they may well find themselves in a purchasing decision for the very same software for their firm. Plus, given the steep learning curve for many engineering software, people are less likely to easily switch over to competing software.

      It's a brilliant strategy, and companies already do this all the time with trial versions of their products. But for most consumer software, it would be undercuting their own market.

    26. Re:how about that by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Time warpin’ with Sun xVM VirtualBox
      Set the 'bios' time of the virtual box.

      VBoxManage modifyvm <name> -biossystemtimeoffset <ms>

      Actually, thanks for having me look that up, because I was wondering myself.

      --
      No existe.
    27. Re:how about that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to mention this (y'know, here, but Microsoft has already been doing this for ?? don't know.

    28. Re:how about that by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      AutoCAD is widely used in pretty much all fields where some sort of CAD might be useful. ArchiCAD isn't. I think that more than explains why AutoCAD gets cracked so much faster.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    29. Re:how about that by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      That may well be, but here I am with an Ubuntu machine and I'm willing to pay for another full Solidworks license if they will release for this platform.

      Agreed, Solidworks is really a joy to work with. Sadly, it's so tightly coupled with Excel (or it was last time I used it, anyway) that I think you'll have to wait for MS to port Office first.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    30. Re:how about that by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I'd run a dd if=/dev/zero from a liveCD, then format and reinstall, just to see what happens.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    31. Re:how about that by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason I posted my original comment was to suggest to other people that they could probably use a VM to spare their main OS's time scheduling.

      I'm sorry if you unintentionally wasted your time answering a question I only posted to inspire others...

    32. Re:how about that by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      No, Solidworks does not work in Wine. An older version does run in Crossover, however.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    33. Re:how about that by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Coupled with Excel? What do you mean?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    34. Re:how about that by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Maybe they've changed it, but last time I used it you couldn't even install it unless you had Excel installed already. That's what it used for all the parts lists and such.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    35. Re:how about that by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I did not realize that. It might still be true, MS Office is one of the first things that I install on a Windows machine (well, was, it's been years!) and certainly before Solidworks.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  2. May I just say... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    They are also developing a Mac version, two decades after abandoning the platform.

    ...it's about FRICKIN' TIME! What were they waiting for? Windows XP to become a legacy system?

    1. Re:May I just say... by zuzulo · · Score: 1

      This is really awesome. I love solidworks and autocad inventor, great apps. But of course, they waited to give out free windows licences till just about a month *after* i got rid of my only remaining microsoft machines which were used exclusively to run these two applications. bah humbug, after finally getting out from under the microsoft heel now i have to go back again. At least i still have xp pro licences lying around. ;-)

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    2. Re:May I just say... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      They were waiting for Apple to get more than 0.0005% market share. (Yes, I'm exaggerating.)

      The funny thing is, now that they've finally done it, it's not necessary. If someone wants to buy a Mac for the "cool" factor of the design or having 8 xeonriffic cores, they can load windows on it and run all the windows software they want. :)

    3. Re:May I just say... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, AutoCAD was the classic example of companies that "just don't get it" when it comes to the Mac.

      AutoCAD for the Mac was released back in 1988, I believe. But what they did was port their DOS-based product to the Mac. It didn't work or look like a Mac product (no menubar, windows, or anything like that), it worked and looked just like the DOS product. The company said that they planned to release this version first and then make a "more Mac-like" one later on based upon how well this one sold.

      Of course, nobody bought it. If you were already doing CAD work on the Mac using one of AutoCAD's competitors, you certainly weren't going to give it up. If you didn't have any Macs, why would you buy the Mac version when it didn't give you anything you couldn't do with the DOS version? Even better, AutoCAD announced their plan to create a "more Mac-like" version. So most Mac users said, "Cool. We'll wait for that one, thank you."

      A few years later, AutoCAD for Mac was dropped because there "just wasn't a big enough market for CAD on the Mac." The reality, though, was that there wasn't a big enough market for DOS ports to the Mac. Mac users expected a Mac interface.

    4. Re:May I just say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were they waiting for?

      What I hear is that their VP who ran the Autocad group had some kind of personal issue with Apple, and he just sat on it instead of getting it done, despite the fact that Carol Bartz had stood on a stage with Steve Jobs and promised it.

      Maybe the incompetent prick finally retired or got canned.

    5. Re:May I just say... by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reality, though, was that there wasn't a big enough market for DOS ports to the Mac.

      That's for sure.

      Mac users expected a Mac interface.

      That's mostly true, but the key is that Mac users demand a good UI. If you look at something like Maya, that breaks a lot of Mac UI principles but it's not a complete train wreck like Autocad always was.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:May I just say... by JakartaDean · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, AutoCAD was the classic example of companies that "just don't get it" when it comes to the Mac.

      AutoCAD for the Mac was released back in 1988, I believe. But what they did was port their DOS-based product to the Mac. It didn't work or look like a Mac product (no menubar, windows, or anything like that), it worked and looked just like the DOS product. The company said that they planned to release this version first and then make a "more Mac-like" one later on based upon how well this one sold.

      Of course, nobody bought it. If you were already doing CAD work on the Mac using one of AutoCAD's competitors, you certainly weren't going to give it up. If you didn't have any Macs, why would you buy the Mac version when it didn't give you anything you couldn't do with the DOS version? Even better, AutoCAD announced their plan to create a "more Mac-like" version. So most Mac users said, "Cool. We'll wait for that one, thank you."

      A few years later, AutoCAD for Mac was dropped because there "just wasn't a big enough market for CAD on the Mac." The reality, though, was that there wasn't a big enough market for DOS ports to the Mac. Mac users expected a Mac interface.

      I was working in sales and technical support for a CAD/CAM vendor in when Autodesk released Autocad for the Mac, and we took it for a test drive, even signed up to be a Mac dealer.

      While you're right that Autocad on the Mac wasn't "Mac enough," that wasn't the main problem -- speed was. Autocad on DOS came with a bunch of "close to the metal" drivers for graphics cards and other resources, and these were, by 1988, written mostly by the hardware manufacturers to a well-defined API. They couldn't do this on the Mac, and as a result the software took 2-4 times as long to do anything on the Mac. CAD systems, at least in those days, weren't used part-time, they were expensive tools for full-time designers (more likely draftspeople). So, the market for Autocad on the Mac ended up being people who would put up with terrible performance for interface compatibility with other applications they were seldom likely to use. Not a huge market.

      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
  3. Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequence by Tetsujin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "These uncertain economic times"

    I'm tired of hearing it. It's like the PR tool's qualifier for everything.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  4. Adobe has a similar program for developers by md17 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Adobe recently announced a similar program but for software developers:
    http://www.jamesward.com/blog/2009/04/03/free-flex-builder-for-unemployed-developers/

    -James (Adobe)

    1. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by dblackshell · · Score: 1

      yep, you can get the free Flex from https://freeriatools.adobe.com/flex/

      --
      $god = null;
      if($god) echo 'I believe!';
    2. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

      YA, we offer FREE FLEX for all the WUSSY LITTLE GIRLY MEN!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    3. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      There are two big problems with Adobe software: full licences are very expensive (particularly the upgrades) compared to good-enough competition, and a lot of the big name products now come with DRM that causes serious practical difficulties even without the ethical considerations that would offend a lot of people reading this.

      Until you fix those things, your software is not a viable choice for many of us, so please keep your unsubtle advertising to yourself.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by BillAtHRST · · Score: 1
      That may be the case with other Adobe products, but not Flex:
      • Flex (incl. ActionScript) is free and open-source;
      • so is BlazeDS, the server-side component;
      • FlexBuilder (the IDE) is $250.
    5. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by PPNSteve · · Score: 0

      Adobe recently announced a similar program but for software developers: http://www.jamesward.com/blog/2009/04/03/free-flex-builder-for-unemployed-developers/

      -James (Adobe)

      3) My license to use Flex Builder 3 under this program will not be used for production or commercial purposes, nor will it be transferred to any other person or entity, including to my employer should I become employed. Yeah right.

      --
      PPN
    6. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by Malkin · · Score: 1

      Which differs from Autodesk... how, exactly?

      I'll be honest with you: The DRM in Photoshop causes a very real and direct problem for me, as a single user who previously used her Photoshop license on three machines, all of which are not used by anyone else. I am a legitimate user, not attempting to defraud the company in any way, and Adobe's DRM is nonetheless extremely inconvenient for me. However, I have the same exact problem with the DRM in Autodesk Maya, which also limits me to two machines. So I don't understand why you're picking on Adobe, here. The Flex notification was every bit as useful and/or relevant as the Autodesk one. In fact, I would have posted about it myself, if someone else hadn't.

      Moreover, I don't think that most of your complaints about Adobe's products really apply to Flex, as a product, per se. Flex is, in my opinion, more reasonably priced than Adobe's other software, and it doesn't seem to use the same noxious DRM system that's used in the Creative Suite products. (If someone has better information, feel free to correct me on that.)

    7. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Adobe is going to PUMP *clap* YOU UP!

    8. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Eclipse Ganymede the other IDE is free as well,
      I've got it installed and working on Ubuntu I've not had time to do much with it yet but i've tried a few simple projects.
      don't think there are too many restrictions its an alpha though and time limited to about 8 months I think.
      looks like fun anyway.

    9. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you can't really build a decent Flex app with just Eclipse, it would be just marginally better than building in Notepad. It can be done (since the compiler is free) but pretty painful.

    10. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      First, what Adobe products use is not DRM. We devalue the word if we tag every software restriction as "DRM".

      What Photoshop and other CS products have is license management (think WGA if you will). It will let you activate the products two computers, which I actually find decent. On the other hand, transferring a license from a dead computer can be a hassle (almost happened to me once, the drive was failing but I managed to boot and deactivate the license on it). I wish they had an online tool for managing licenses.

    11. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and here is a link to where you can actually get it, rather than a self-promoting link to one's blog.

      https://freeriatools.adobe.com/learnflex/?PID=1225267

      (and I'll even post as AC in case someone mods this insightful, since it should be obvious)

    12. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      At first I thought that link was freeriaatools.adobe.com ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      actually have you tried it? (It's not just Eclipse) It's a fully integrated IDE you can build test get code hints the usual . listofoptions sort of thing debug run in your browser or standalone flash player (debug standalone flash player if you want to debug). If thats marginally netter than notepad you must be using a different notepad.

      If you have tried Eclipse before and found it missing a thick manual I can relate to that, I had that experience before trying to code java with it. Being dumped in an IDE with no idea of the workflow is frustrating however the flex plugin environment along with a few tutorials from adobe and elsewhere soon get you in the swing of things.
      (parden the pun). It's a capable IDE that enables you to get stuck in.

      Honestly try it, you may even find a few posts on an ubuntu forum which details how to get it installed, the flex plugin defaults are no good for ubuntu at least. partially since ubuntu ships an older incompatible version of eclipse.

    14. Re:Adobe has a similar program for developers by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Rather OT, but this has been bugging me:
      Why doesn't somebody make a ActionScript + whatever else goes into a SWF to JS+SVG+W3C recommended replacements, instead of trying to copy their VM implementation? That should be easier than trying to clone a shifty ABI, with the added benefit of maintaining something that from functional perspective is more or less completely embedded in any modern browser.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  5. I looked... by Chabo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was hoping that they were just giving away short-term licenses to anyone, but apparently if you sign up for the program, you have to be verifiably unemployed. I wonder what method they use to check...

    (hmm... Firefox says that "verifiably" isn't a word, but I looked it up, turns out it's a valid adverb form of "verifiable")

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    1. Re:I looked... by Chabo · · Score: 1

      To answer my own question:

      Autodesk reserves the right to contact the former employer HR contact to confirm program
      eligibility and applicants will be asked to consent to such enquiries.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:I looked... by avishere · · Score: 1

      Added this to the linked article. Thanks for the heads up.

    3. Re:I looked... by physicsphairy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I put down CowboyNeal. I hope if he gets a call he'll confirm that I don't work for him.

    4. Re:I looked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a sequence of letters has an obvious pronunciation and an unambiguous meaning to the general English-speaking population, then it automatically a valid English word, even if you made it up 5 minutes ago.

      That's the beauty of the English language.

    5. Re:I looked... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      They could easily verify if you are jobless. E.g. referrer=slashdot.org at work hour.

      Oh wait...

    6. Re:I looked... by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      (hmm... Firefox says that "verifiably" isn't a word, but I looked it up, turns out it's a valid adverb form of "verifiable")

      firefox's dictionary is horrible. i've lost track of the number of technical terms and simple grammatical derivations it's missing. the os x dictionary is far better, but i'm stuck on windows here at work....

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    7. Re:I looked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course, US & Canada only.

      - Ramanujam

    8. Re:I looked... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Bang. THERE's the secret!

      What kind of phenomenal privacy grab is that?! "For the price of a license we can not only know who you worked for, but why you're no longer there, and "aggregate that information (in reversible ways) to better provide you with the Autocad customer experience".

      Preying on the desperate.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    9. Re:I looked... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "(hmm... Firefox says that "verifiably" isn't a word, but I looked it up, turns out it's a valid adverb form of "verifiable")"

      Can anyone verify this?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re:I looked... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure they are checking, so much as going by the "honor system". I signed up and was verified within a couple hours... like around 2am CST. If they are actually verifying this stuff, it's probably not being handled by a human.

      That said, I'm glad these guys are doing this. The software is interesting and makes for a unique learning experience. Just don't get any funny ideas and try using it for profit though...

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    11. Re:I looked... by LittleNegative · · Score: 1

      "(hmm... Firefox says that "verifiably" isn't a word, but I looked it up, turns out it's a valid adverb form of "verifiable")"

      Can anyone verify this?

      It's not in Merriam-Webster, so I would say Firefox is correct in this particular instance.

    12. Re:I looked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see what the big deal is. It's a perfectly cromulent word.

    13. Re:I looked... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      No way in hell any employer would mention the why.

      Some may not even comment at all considering Autodesk isn't making the call as a matter of the hiring process.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    14. Re:I looked... by tepples · · Score: 1

      They could easily verify if you are jobless. E.g. referrer=slashdot.org at work hour.

      There's a PC in the break room.

    15. Re:I looked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SolidWorks is going on the honor system.

  6. Smart Move by Pearson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This actually makes sense. The most important thing for a software company to be successful is to have people who know how to use their software. Which is why student prices and Learning Editions exist. And there have been reports that some laid off workers are starting their own companies, so getting your software into the hands of those people would be a smart move, too.

    --
    I...I'm attacking the darkness!
    1. Re:Smart Move by geobeck · · Score: 1

      A number of years ago, an Autodesk sales rep told me that the company consciously turned a blind eye to 'unofficial' copying of their software by students. Their increasing use of DRM has probably made it more challenging to copy AutoCAD since then, but it seems as if this announcement is merely making an unofficial policy official as a PR move.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    2. Re:Smart Move by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This actually makes sense. The most important thing for a software company to be successful is to have people who know how to use their software. Which is why student prices and Learning Editions exist. And there have been reports that some laid off workers are starting their own companies, so getting your software into the hands of those people would be a smart move, too.

      My local Solidworks distributor is a moron in this regard. He insists that students pay $400 for a license. And the company won't sell to me directly. I don't think that SW even has our local language support, so I will probably buy the $99 student version from a foreign vendor.

      I should also mention that when I went to my faculty's computer help desk to ask about a student version, they gave me two options:
      1) Pool with 9 other students who would be willing to share a license (I have no idea how this would work).
      2) Pirate it. The student assistant was even willing to give me the disk.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Smart Move by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      http://www.bricsys.com/en_INTL/bricscad/features.jsp

      http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/

      http://www.touchcad.com/tc3features.html

      http://www.touchcad.com/tc3news351.html

      See 3/4 of the way down on this for OpenGL rendering
      http://www.touchcad.com/tc3news35.html

      Possibly dated review:

      http://software.techrepublic.com.com/abstract.aspx?docid=599221

      This one:

      ProgeCAD, is kinda interesting. It has a layer management system that is different from but kinda similar to ACAD. I tried it last year, but then it timed out on me. It's free for academic use, otherwise, starts about $250 depending on the version, IIRC. It's one of those that seems to be an ACAD knock-off, but kinda updated or less crufted than ACAD 2007/2008 maybe due to a cleaner, newer codebase (as opposed to, say, accumulating decades of in-fighting over code functions, (my ACAD course instructor in 07 said ACAD))

      http://www.progecad.co.uk/Downloads/

      Also, consider ViaCAD

      http://www.punchcad.com/products/viacad2d3d.htm

      Their prices are pretty good, and if you're not needing the overkill of ACAD and not working with clients who DEMAND ACAD, and who live with DXF/ACIS formats that contain the info, then why get addicted to a product that costs a fortune to use legitimately. You have rake in some serious dough to justify paying $4k+ on software which can take years to get proficient with. ViaCAD is GREAT for me for lofting/surfacing & solids-making.

      Right now, the ship design industry (maybe, based on the economy now, compared to last year) is short on designers/drafters who are GOOD at CAD. If you're designing real or model boats for sale as kits (or ships & boats to be built) check out the combination of delftship and Punch ViaCAD...

      Also, see boatdesign.net

      http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/design-software/

      and...

      http://www.polycad.co.uk/links.htm

      GOOD LUCK!

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    4. Re:Smart Move by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but none of those are Solidworks. I need to be interoperable with other engineers.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  7. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Chabo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No kidding.

    Maybe if people stopped calling these "economic times" "uncertain", then they'd stabilize!

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  8. Bravo! by N!NJA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    nothing like an economic meltdown to make Co's recognize the value of their most important asset: their current and potential customers.

    1. Re:Bravo! by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      Too bad many don't seem to recognize the importance of their current employees.

    2. Re:Bravo! by Deagol · · Score: 1

      That, or they're acknowledging the true value of bits on a disk: zero.

    3. Re:Bravo! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "That, or they're acknowledging the true value of bits on a disk: zero."

      You can make ridiculous claims all you want, but you can have the particular stream of "zero value" bits to which I lovingly refer to as my pr0n, when you pry the storage medium out of my cold dead hands (well the right one might still be a bit warm) ...

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  9. Seems to be a trend in sales... by slummy · · Score: 1

    Buy a new Saturn today!*

    If you lose your job, don't worry.. we will postpone the repossession for up to 9 months!

  10. SolidWorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    SolidWorks is a package; IIRC, it is the cousin product to Dassault Systemes' (under license by IBM) CATIA. It is not a "company" as far as I know. Much like 3DSMAX is owned by Discreet. Also, SolidWorks is not the "Flagship" product. ;) That would be CATIA. :D

    I'd MUCH rather see free licenses for Catia V5, than Solidworks any day. SolidWorks is OK, but you can do WAAAY more with a "Full" seat of Catia. (Everything from avionics, to radar waveguides; there's a workbench for it in Catia.)

    1. Re:SolidWorks by CompMD · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what one complete floating license of CATIA costs. The price tag is best expressed in scientific notation. I used to do a lot of work in Unigraphics/NX and CATIA, including beta testing. For a very limited license with only solid and surface modelers, assemblies, and translations, you could blow $20,000 for one seat.

  11. US and Canada only by hkz · · Score: 1

    Oh, US and Canada only. Never mind then.

  12. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by JanneM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe if people stopped calling these "economic times" "uncertain", then they'd stabilize!

    And maybe if they stopped calling these times "economic" all money would disappear!

    Sorry.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  13. They killed the UNIX port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and now we get a mac port? We used to get a version that would run on all kinds of UNIX platforms. Now they have to use OSX? Bullshit. Civil3d is hitting the trash can; I'm switching to Inroads.

  14. And for software engineers? by rocket22 · · Score: 1

    Any company doing the same for developers? Something like IDEs, build tools, profilers, version controls?

    1. Re:And for software engineers? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Visual Studio Express is free (as in beer) by design. Of course, it is a Microsoft product, so you have to be willing to contaminate your workstation with binaries from the Evul Kingdom.

      And a 240 day license of the various MS server products is free as well.

    2. Re:And for software engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a similar program for software.

    3. Re:And for software engineers? by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft also has free (again, as in beer) versions of much of their software available to students.

      https://www.dreamspark.com/

      This includes Visual Studio 2005/2008 Professional Edition, and Server 2003/2008.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    4. Re:And for software engineers? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      And if you found a startup company, Microsoft will happily give you a free MSDN Premium subscription, with production licenses of the server products, provided you meet a few criteria (i.e. if you're an outsourcing firm, piss off. If you earn more than $1M per year, piss off. If you have a large corporate owner, piss off) and agree to pay an exit fee at the end of the program.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    5. Re:And for software engineers? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Eclipse, XCode, GCC, GDB, SVN, ...

      There is enough software for anyone to go around. For any closed source package, there is at least 1 open source alternative. Anything from Office utilities to realistic Flight and Space sims, it's there.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    6. Re:And for software engineers? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      ...agree to pay an exit fee at the end of the program.

      Isn't that how deals with the devil always work?

    7. Re:And for software engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSDN? Is that the version of the help file that lives on your hard drive yet takes longer to come up when you press F1 than actually installing firefox on your machine and searching the internet using google? And always gives you the results for C bloody sharp or Windows CE instead of the Win32 interface?

  15. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    True, in reality it's pretty certain what's going to happen from here on out.

    Higher unemployment, a bit of something that looks like recovery, a sudden bout of inflation, high interest rates, more unemployment, inflation gets under control, unemployed bankers find something better to do with their lives than make bets about something they don't understand, then recovery. Might be some other fun stuff in there along the way, but that's the main thrust of it.

    --
    Qxe4
  16. Avoid! Just getting you hooked on the stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is too much nasty software out there. Forced upgrades, incomprehensible licenses, AdobeDesk monopoly, since they bought all competition in their respective markets I moved to linux and illegal Autocad 2000.

  17. Next step: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    HR realises that they can save licencing $$$$$ by firing the entire engineering team and farming out CAD jobs on Mechanical Turk, for the newly unemployed to do with their free software.

    Ponies for everyone!

    1. Re:Next step: by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      works great until some other company grabs the devs for their own project and builds some competing stuff.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  18. Can't stand 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never used SolidWorks, but I've used AutoCAD extensively. Autodesk knows how to force upgrades by capriciously changing their file formats better than anyone. As soon as one company in the network of companies that use AutoCAD upgrades, their peers are also forced to upgrade in order to remain compatible, and their peers, and so on. It's a cash cow not based on design excellence or innovation, but scurrilous abuse of their customers.

    Which leads to the question: why are there no good free-as-in-freedom CAD programs? Because I haven't written one yet, I know. But surely I'm not the only one who's aggravated by this. I would be more than happy to assist anyone making a serious effort.

    1. Re:Can't stand 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want Rhino3D. It's file format is open sourced. Its user interface is what AutoCAD should be.

    2. Re:Can't stand 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish there was better free-as-in-freedom CAD too, and I've thought about writing some, and plan to when I can.

      In the meanwhile there's lots of stuff that is either free-as-in-beer or at least various low level free-as-in-freedom stuff which can be used as a tool to help write a higher level package.

      In no particular order / classification (beer vs freedom):
      qcad's freebie version
      kicad

      lignumcad (I'm not sure if it is progressing or what, I remember it from about 2 years back on sourceforge)

      OpenCascade which is both a commercial / expensive full suite and also has some open-ish source library stuff that is part of their commercial product line minus some shiny expensive modules. There are various freeware / open source products built with OC libraries / codes. Not as much as I'd hope in quality / capability / completeness, but some things seemed to be progressing...slowly.

      there's a bunch of free FEM analysis stuff, grid / mesh library and utility stuff, etc.

      wings -- freeware 3d "cad" system for creating ....video games/ movies / animations.
      blender -- freeware 3d "cad" system for creating ...video games / movies / animations. ..interestingly both of those latter two are actually quite 'good' (though high learning curve) and widely used 3d modelling systems. I just couldn't frakking believe there seemed to be no obvious / simple way to just turn on a set of METRIC COORDINATE AXES / SCALES / GRIDS and so on and let you actually, you know, design REAL stuff with them instead of just random shapes in some arbitrarily scaled 3D universe. Seems like 5 people who know the code bases / UI given about 3 months could turn these into a USABLE freeware 2D / 3D CAD system with real blueprint / cad system format mesh capability. Shouldn't take MUCH effort. Maybe it is already possible and I'm just too clueless to have seen that bit of the UI / manual. It has been a few years since I gave up in disgust trying to do something horribly simple in 3d cad with them and failing miserably after an few hours.

      BRL-CAD is actually free-as-in-freedom serious CAD ware paid for by US taxpayer dollars as ex-government software, and it is a real honest to goodness mechanical CAD system designed for certain "mock up" visualization / modelling purposes. I have no idea how useful it is at doing things like generating data inputs that can be used directly for CNC / CAM / blueprint / manufacturing purposes, but at least you can design "real" stuff and do good visualizations with it. I may give it a serious try to try to mock up some cable reeling design ideas I want to play with soon (I've never really used it before, but the feature list sounds intriguing...).

      K3D is a freeware 3d modelling system for KDE (probably best under LINUX).. I've no idea how well you might be able to use it to design 'real' stuff.

      et. al. Lots of source codes out there, mostly either junk or stuff that's so hard to learn / limited / "some assembly required" that it'd be "cheaper" to buy a real copy of Qcad / Alibre / Autocad / .... Or projects that are really promising to turn into a fully capable free cad system ... one day, not this
      week / month / year / ....

      If you get seriously interested in developing something with some of this open source stuff post back another reply soon and maybe I'll see if I can help if we can agree on the right codebase / goal / whatever. Or just pick a project and pitch in. There's a lot of low hanging fruit, hell, just COMPILE some of the stuff and maintain RECENT VERSION packages of it for, say, Ubuntu, Fedora, Vista, whatever and that would be a huge help. Some of this stuff takes like a man-week just to install 16 dependency packages, read the docs, compile the codes, manually patch things so you don't get build errors, and then you can actually use the freeware. Of course by that time you're probably ready to upgrade to the new tool or OS vers

  19. One word i'm sick of: by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Stimulus.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:One word i'm sick of: by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Right then, who wants to get some stimulus for their Semprini in these uncertain times?

  20. What this really means by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Read this sort of thing along the lines of: "Since you're now low on dough and high on time, we're giving you our stuff for free so you dare not move to open source in general and Blender in specific to refocus your skills there, because that little Project is closing in on us in leaps and bounds and frankly is scaring the living piss out of us."

    I sold my Lightwave 8.5 Licence (+ books 'n stuff) and forfeighted the right for cheap upgrades of this very neat Hollywood Grade 3D Kit because Blender has gotten so good, there are only very few features missing that LW has, and quite a few that LW (or any other closed source kit) doesn't have. Oh, and btw., Blender 2.5 is coming closer with a complete architectural redo that will boost its developement even further. The 3D market is tough as it is and Blender is a scaring thing to watch for SideFX, AutoDesk, NewTek and the likes, you can believe that. The 3D tool market allways was tough, but these days its even more so - wouldn't wanna swap with any of those companies still asking upwards of 3000 Euros for their software.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:What this really means by igloonaut · · Score: 5, Funny

      [My english is better than most other people's german, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]

      Good afternoon! I believe German should be capitalized if you please.

      --
      Kirkland Signature
    2. Re:What this really means by mephistophyles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That may be true for the architectural design side of things, but isn't really true for floorplans and is certainly far from true for the SolidWorks part of the story. SolidWorks is still the platform of choice in almost every Mechanical Engineering project I've gotten a glimpse of.

      The thing however, and this applies to AutoCAD too in this case, these products are 3D CAD, not graphics software. The mindset to work in one is different to working in the other

    3. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Afternoon! I believe German should be capitalized if You please.

      Fixed.

    4. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You" should not be capitalized except at the normal places for any word.

    5. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there an open source app that competes with 3d cad apps from Solid Works?

      Having worked in the industry (support for a particular 3D cad toolkit) I'd honestly say that the vast majority of all manufacturing shops use Solid Works for everything (certain verticals like Aviation use Catia and other apps, but still use Solid Works for other projects).

    6. Re:What this really means by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You" should not be capitalized except at the normal places for any word.

      Apparently the AC is a capitalist.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    7. Re:What this really means by ivoras · · Score: 1

      Since it's such a successful project, it looks like somebody must pay for the developers... 3D graphics is a fairly specific area that requires not only generic programming knowledge but a fair amount of math. I looked around a little at http://www.blender.org/blenderorg/blender-foundation/ but there is no list of donators or sponsors. So, who's paying? If it's about services - what services? Developers are usually not very good at teaching art and writing books.

      --
      -- Sig down
    8. Re:What this really means by clong83 · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, Blender is not a suitable alternative to SolidWorks for 3-D mechanical design. If there was an even halfway decent open-source project that had 3-D modeling capabilities that was halfway compatible with SolidWorks (industry standard), I'd switch in a heartbeat. This seems like a logical and good move on their part. They understand that if people get used to using their software, they might just buy a license down the road...

      Also, if you know of an open-source alternative, please don't hold out. Let me know about it.

    9. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was talking to god.

    10. Re:What this really means by adamchou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this is incorrectly interpreting the motive of these companies. Its not because of fear of blender. If it was, they would give it away regardless of the economic situation. This is much more about marketing their product to people that are in a dire economic situation. Once they attain these loyal customers now, they'll continue to be loyal when the economy returns. Besides, there is some evidence that during the great depression, it was the companies that continued to aggressively promote their brand and advertise that ultimately succeeded.

    11. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blender has some nice algorithms under the hood (which are likely patented and unlicensed by the blender team, LOL!), but its user interface sucks ass. If you dare research into ways of reorganizing the user interface so as to make it more intuitive and post your suggestions to the forums, its developers will quite readily tell you to go f^ck off.

      No thanks.

    12. Re:What this really means by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

      ...English should be, as well.

      --
      - Dan
    13. Re:What this really means by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      To be blunt, his English is better than most people's English.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    14. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your link:

      The Blender Foundation has offices in the Amsterdam Blender Institute. Revenues from e-shop and publishing enable Ton Roosendaal and a small staff to work full-time on Blender, organize activities like for Siggraph or the Blender Conference, support development/documention projects, and pay for bookkeeping and administration expenses.

    15. Re:What this really means by asadodetira · · Score: 1

      At the mechanical engineering level a good example would be Alibre, which is a parametric design software (like Solid Works or Autodesk Inventor).

    16. Re:What this really means by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Blender 2.5 is coming closer with a complete architectural redo that will boost its developement even further.

      Wow, looks like they forgot about the hookers and blackjack and got down to business.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    17. Re:What this really means by Sardak · · Score: 1

      It's been a month or two since I've done anything significant with Blender, so it's possible that it has changed significantly since then, but at the time it was atrocious and unintuitive at best, and down right unusable at times, compared to the likes of Maya. Granted, it's not nearly as bad as Milkshape, but it still got in the way and just plain didn't provide some of the functionality that is commonly needed in the workflow I've become accustomed to as well as that which is used by my artists.

      The only useful aspect in which I would consider it to be superior to other 3D packages is in its plugin/scripting system. I was able to toss together a quick Python importer/exporter in a night's worth of coding, whereas the API for most other packages is much less friendly.

    18. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not pleased.

      -GOD

    19. Re:What this really means by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      Only if they won

    20. Re:What this really means by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      shush, you--he has enough Trouble learning not to capitalize every Noun as it is

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    21. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As should 'English'.

      Also, in English, 'capitalized' would have an 's' instead of a 'z'.

    22. Re:What this really means by fyoder · · Score: 1
      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    23. Re:What this really means by sowth · · Score: 1

      I Found A Mistake In His Post: No Links to Hot German Chicks!

    24. Re:What this really means by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, Blender is not a suitable alternative to SolidWorks for 3-D mechanical design. If there was an even halfway decent open-source project that had 3-D modeling capabilities that was halfway compatible with SolidWorks (industry standard), I'd switch in a heartbeat. This seems like a logical and good move on their part. They understand that if people get used to using their software, they might just buy a license down the road...

      Since when is SolidWorks the industry standard, as opposed to (say) ProE?

      And just so you know, you can use blender for CAD like 3D modelling to make useful STL files for conumption by a rapid prototyper of some sort. It works OK, if not amazingly well. What you can't do is all that spiffy stuff involving simulation of moving mechanisms. However, not everyone designs mechanisms. Some of us just need the odd custom case, gear or whatever. And some people round my way use blender for that.

      Also, if you know of an open-source alternative, please don't hold out. Let me know about it.

      The US Army seem quite fond of BRL CAD. Never used it myself, but they developed it in house when that was the only choice.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    25. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blender is not ready for AAA game production.

      In any case, this article is about CAD programs. Blender is cool, but it's not a CAD program.

    26. Re:What this really means by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Then you must not have been part of many mechanical engineering projects. Solidworks is used by little guys who don't have the cash to pony up for the real deal. The big engineering firms in the aerospace and automotive sectors (along with pretty much any Fortune 500 engineering firm) use complete engineering packages provided by CATIA, UGS/IDEAS or Pro-E.

    27. Re:What this really means by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Without being too picky (just helpful, hopefully):

      my Lightwave 8.5 Licence (+ books 'n stuff)

      That should be "books 'n' stuff" (see here for explanation). Also, license not licence.

      that little Project is closing in on us

      The word project is not a proper noun as used, it should be "project".

      Blender is a scaring thing

      Should be "scary".

      My english is better than most other people's german,...

      English and German should both be capitalized. Your English is also better than many other people's English.

    28. Re:What this really means by clong83 · · Score: 1

      Since when is SolidWorks the industry standard, as opposed to (say) ProE?

      Well, Solidworks may not be the only option out there, but most people I know use it. ProE seems to have fallen out of fashion lately. I'm certainly not defending or advertising for SolidWorks, I'm just reporting my experience. I am one person, so my experiences may not be a representative sample. Take it for what you will.

      As for BRL-CAD, I will check it out, thanks for the tip. 3-D CAD modeling is the only application left keeping me with one toe in the windows world...

    29. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes after doing 3dsmax and SoftImage for years I took the plunge to learn the UI and I have to say once you understand Blender it is comparable to the rest. The problem is that it does not work like any other Desktop application as far as expected behavior so the initial curve is extremely steep and it usually drives people away after a few hours. If you really spend a week doing tutorial you find that it is (a)easy and (b) quite a productive work flow. There are some things that I like about the other products better, but there is a lot in Blender that I think is superior to the other offerings.

    30. Re:What this really means by orzetto · · Score: 1

      Das gilt für "English" auch.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    31. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do discussions like this always get confused between CAD software and programs like blender. By no stretch of the imagination does AutoCAD or SolidWorks perform the same function as Blender. QCAD is the closest thing to a gpl replacement for AutoCAD and there isn't anything at all that could replace a 3d CAD system.

    32. Re:What this really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not developers, they are artists. Blender started as an in-house tool used by a Dutch animation studio (NaN). They still make (and sell) animations in between each software release.

  21. It must suck to be beholdern to these corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm only a lowly programmer, not a CAD designer or anything fancy like that, but this kind of thing is exactly why I stopped using commercial programming tools and went with open source tools for my consulting business.

  22. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    And maybe if they stopped calling these times "economic" all money would disappear!

    And maybe if they'd stop calling it "time" our universe would disappear!

    Or at least be static, in which case we'd have no chance to formulate thoughts on the universe, in which case the universe would, in essence, cease to exist due to lack of observation. Or maybe instead we'd all instantaneously be travelling at the speed of light, since the universe would be static (i.e., "time" would have stopped). Or something.

    Now, where did I put that cruller?

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  23. Everybody is a marketer these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every administration has it's catchphrase. The last one was "because of 9/11...". This one is "in these uncertain economic times".

  24. Glad to hear it by Maalstrom+Aran · · Score: 1

    I'm impressed. Sounds like an easy hand out to potential customers. Smart, and effective I bet.

    --
    Truth is a matter of perspective. Wear the other guy's shoes before you dismiss him.
    1. Re:Glad to hear it by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm impressed. Sounds like an easy hand out to potential customers. Smart, and effective I bet.

      Not all Solidworks' customers want a hand out. I actually want to pay them for a full license for an Ubuntu port. But they'd rather hand them out to Windows users for free than take my money.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:Glad to hear it by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      All you need to do is prove to them that you aren't the only one that wants to pay them for a Linux port. Whining that they don't want your money is counterproductive. Find more people who also want to give them money, and prove to them that it's in their best interests.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    3. Re:Glad to hear it by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

      OK, here's another person who would fork over the dough for a Linux port, although I'd prefer a version that ran on my Gentoo system.

      Currently, I'm using a paid-for, licensed copy of VariCAD. Not in the class of SW, but adequate for my needs at the moment. There are only a few viable solutions for 3D mechanical design on Linux that I'm aware of: VariCAD on the low end, and NX on the very $$$$$ high end. What I'd really like to see is someone like Alibre CAD offer a Linux version for the same price as the Windows version. That would be sweet. If it had an open, readable native file format for archival purposes, that would be incredible. And if by some miracle either intel, nvidea or ati actually manage to develop a decent 3D graphics card with decent 3D open-source drivers, that would be heaven.

      Of course, none of this is in their 'best interests'. Hell, what would be in their best interests would be to sell you a locked-down PC with only their software on it. Guaranteed lock-in. However, as the entire CAD space becomes more crowded and more mainstream, you'll see folks like Google introducing a cross-platform sketch-up, or some open-source project gaining momentum like gimp, blender, firefox and Ooo did, and then you'll start to see the prices come down and the porting start as the established players attempt to maintain their market share.

    4. Re:Glad to hear it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second that. Solidworks is the only thing keeping me on Windows - as soon as I find a better option, I'm switching,

    5. Re:Glad to hear it by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Did you write to them and tell them that? Here is the address:
      http://www.solidworks.com/pages/company/SolidWorksOfficeWorldwide.html

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  25. Adobe by future+assassin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thats why Adobe is so popular. Piracy does build huge user bases and when the younger user base grows up they are already hooked on your brand and will buy a license eventually. Now I'm not saying that everyone will buy a license by quite a few will.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Adobe by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

      You can even take that a step further and say that those users that pirated the software when younger will ask to legally use the software while at work. That's why Adobe's getting paid for my copy of Fireworks, which I prefer over Photoshop at my workplace.

      --
      "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
    2. Re:Adobe by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well... Those "pirates" (ARRR) chose to download and use specifically Adobe product for a reason. When everything is free, you take everything, and keep only what you like.

      If only others would realize the marketing potential of file-sharing networks.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Adobe by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course marketing through pirate software only helps if you can get the people to pay eventually.

      Thats why theese companies tolerate piracy by individuals who aren't yet making any money out of them but form organisations like the BSA to scare companies out of running pirate software.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Adobe by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Thats why Adobe is so popular. Piracy does build huge user bases and when the younger user base grows up they are already hooked on your brand and will buy a license eventually. Now I'm not saying that everyone will buy a license by quite a few will.

      I didn't buy a license. I got legitimate! I moved to GIMP!

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    5. Re:Adobe by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Most Pirates just want to try an expensive piece of software before they buy it. Most of them are students or unemployed people who cannot afford the software so they pirate it. Once they get a good paying job they will naturally buy a legit version of each software title they pirated and liked. But not the ones they didn't like.

      I recall Windows 3.1 became popular on the BBSes when they were downloading the install disk images and passing them from BBS to BBS. That is one way that Windows 3.1 beat OS/2 2.0 as the OS/2 users didn't want to pirate their software. But once Windows 95 became popular every BBS was downloading that as well. After that the Internet file sharing took over because it was the late 1990's when faster modems and DSL and cable modems started being used for higher bandwidth.

      I wonder what would have happened had the BBS pirates decided not to share Windows 3.1 and later Windows 95? Would we be using OS/2, SCO Unixware, Linux, BSD Unix, or DR-DOS with GEM?

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    6. Re:Adobe by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy a license. I got legitimate! I moved to GIMP!

      I tried GIMP. Even the new 2.6 doesn't work with 16 never mind 24 bit colour depths. However CinePaint can work with 32 bits per colour channel. GIMP doesn't work with CYMK either. Ah apparently there are plugins for CYMK. My problem is that CinePaint requires X11 to run on Macs but I wasn't able to get it to work. So what I want to do is install Ubuntu on my Mac to try CinePaint. I'd like to get a book on it but though there are books for GIMP, one was reviewed on /. a few weeks ago, I haven't found one for CinePaint.

      If CinePaint won't do what I want I may end up getting Photoshop CS.

      Falcon

    7. Re:Adobe by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I've found the 2.6 builds of GIMP work quite well with Mac (and yes, 24-bit colour has been supported for a long time). There are testing versions available for native "aqua" interface, but there are still a few issues with it, so I prefer the X11 version. However, the older 2.4 versions were a lot more snappy than 2.6, and just as functional. To be honest, Gimp seems to have less speed-bumps on my Linux machines, though I can't think of any good reason why.

      As a matter of interest, what's your problem with X11? It should "just work" once you have installed it off your OS X DVD.

    8. Re:Adobe by Hebbinator · · Score: 1

      "Most Pirates just want to try an expensive piece of software before they buy it"

      [citation needed]

      I would assume that most pirates are taking something they want without paying, period. Pirates in your age group or work group may have other motives, but as a general rule, I assume people are stealing the program to steal it.

      Photoshop has a "tryout version," Microsoft has trial versions for all of its office suite and a couple other things as well. Why not do it the legal way?

    9. Re:Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what is it that you're trying to do which you can't with gimp, krita, cinepaint, etc? is there something in particular or are you just upset that your gd-penis isn't going to be nearly as long as those of graphic designers using photoshop?

      I'm not trying to make excuses for the lack of high bit depth support, or cmyk(though the importance of this is more questionable) in gimp, just want to gauge how much you're suffering because of it.

    10. Re:Adobe by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      STOP using that P-word! It only makes you look like an idiot! (Click my link in GP post for an explanation why.)

      Now on to your comment:
      Well, the biggest problem is, to see Software as a Product. It is not, it never was, and it never will be.
      It is a service.

      As soon as you realize that, you can come up with many realistic, working, business models. Some also having no problem at all with file sharing.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    11. Re:Adobe by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      I pay for all my stuff legitimately (or use FOSS), but I'd venture to say that the answer to your last question is that most tryout versions suck pretty bad. If I were to have to judge a product on a typical demo, I'd never buy anything.

      Not a justification, just a bit of (hopefully) insight.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  26. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by plopez · · Score: 1

    unemployed bankers find something better to do with their lives than make bets about something they don't understand

    They knew what they were doing. See:

    http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/transcript1.html

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  27. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You may have been marked as funny, but you do deserve a bit of insightful for that.

    Perhaps not all of it, but a portion of the 'uncertainty' is due to the fact that everyone is certain that we are in 'uncertain' times. If we stopped pushing that down folks throats, then there might be less panic to keep things stired up.

  28. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by DavidJSimpson · · Score: 1

    That's to distinguish it from all those certain economic times, where everyone knows the next day's stock market results, lottery numbers, winning horses, etc.

  29. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Chabo · · Score: 1

    You're right; I wasn't actually going for Funny with that one.

    People are scared of spending money right now because they hear "OMG CRISIS" every day, but the best way to make sure that we don't end up in another Depression is for people to spend money. Otherwise, more businesses (small businesses, mind you, I'm not talking about those "too big to fail") will go out of sale, putting more people out of work, putting the economy in an even worse state.

    Fortunately for me, I just got a new job and moved across the country when all this started to happen, so I was able to buy all the things I would've needed to get anyway for much cheaper than I otherwise would've spent.

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  30. AutoDesk can eat shit and die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about as close to an extortion racket as you can find. You can opt for $1000/seat "maintenance" where they send you the next years version with only half of last years bugs fixed and a full crop of new ones, plus the need to double your workstation horsepower. Or you can hang onto your license for four years - about a year beyond when they update their file format (which is not backward compatible) and you get tired of most of your clients not being able to send you drawings without a hassle - and pay the price of a new seat (magically, just about 4 years x annual maintenance).

    Oh, and of course if you ever decide to get off the train, you can't sell your licenses without selling them as part of the assets of your entire company.

    Autodesk can kiss my hairy white ass.

  31. Re: Semprini by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

    Right! There will be none of that here!

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  32. solidworks response is to google sketchup by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    we (well not me, but the engineers i work with )are pretty serious solidworks users.
    and at the last project mtg, the boss says, i gotta show everyone this, i did a model of our project over the weekend with google sketchup which is free, and he says, of course it isn't solidworks, but the 3d rotation is better...
    Those of you with memories of more then a few minutes will remember that there use to be this great software called proE, and it was incredibly exspensive, and along came this "low cost" upstart, solidworks...... the innovators dilemman, in software

  33. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Fuck them all.

    I've been wondering for a while now why they didn't just get down to the business of finding the exact value of the mortgage backed securities. If they did, it would end the whole problem almost immediately: investors would be willing to buy them again because they would know their true value.

    Now I know. It's corrupt bankers, trying to hide their corruption, and cowardly politicians, trying to 'protect' the general public. We could be all done with this by now and on the road to recovery.

    --
    Qxe4
  34. Kudos to both. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too bad employers aren't more willing to take "risks" on people who can prove that they've been able to learn on the job before.

    I mean, I'd never get hired to use AutoCAD, but I learned to use at least the basic functions on the job here. Heck, from looking at some crazy AutoLisp program we bought, combined with a bit of Googling and minimal knowledge of functional programming, I modified and expanded the code to cover nearly everything we do regularly.

    That said, I think these guys are doing the right thing by releasing versions like these. I only wish that more software companies would consider things like this when they have meetings about how best to "fight piracy," because this is a far more sensible way to deal with their problems.

  35. Re:Smart Move... Employment Status... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, if they say you must be verifiably unemployed, they have to check with the (or each) state's unemployment benefits division. It could take weeks for people to get counted, and in that time, people might game the system with fake information.

    For those who are honest, though, they might be starting up their own company, but then the software companies giving away software to the "unemployed" will have to "look the other way", since in some states the mere ACT of operating as a business means you're in business. That is, incorporating, signing documents, opening business bank accounts, advertising on web sites and issuing business cards, and the like. So, if the STATE says the person is in business (income absence need not verify that you are not employed, it just means you don't have cash flow...), then the can of worms opened up is caused by companies turning a blind eye.

    If they are GOING to turn a blind eye, why not just offer the software for all, but then continue to key-code it and grant continued functionality/accessibility only to those who prove they are meeting the spirit of the contract.

    WARNING: these companies *might* compel the student/unemployed to furnish their SSN. THAT would be a bad move. Thus, these start-up types might need to get an EIN (Employer Identification Number), which further murks their employment status, depending on the state. IIRC, Calif will let you draw unemployment if you are not actually earning income/cashflow while in start-up phase, but, don't try to game the system. If you are a student, make sure your school uses student ID numbers not made up of parts of your SSN. If you are a non-student, you may want to initially contact your EDD/UI division and pre-arrange some proxy/substitute ID that binds the state protect your SSN, even though this is a 3rd party event tangential to obtaining for free some product/service not offered by the state.

    It might be interesting if one or more enterprising unemployed or part-timing students band together and create competing training centers. If they already KNOW the material/product, they could create their own course that only lacks creds/authorization/blessing of the software company. Then, OTOH, i suppose they'll have already writtn (or will soon) a clause barring such competitive-purposes acquisition of their products.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  36. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by maxume · · Score: 1

    They don't have exact values; as the default rates of the underlying mortgages change, the value of the security changes. Selling foreclosed homes into a depressed market exacerbates this (because you have to throw out your old estimate of what you were going to recover).

    If you don't know where the economy and the housing markets are going (and no one knows), you can't put an exact value on the securities.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  37. SolidWorks Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SolidWorks/Dassault Systems has already made some software for Mac's
    http://www.edrawingsviewer.com/pages/news/eDrawings_Mac_OSX_version.html

    http://www.cosmicblobs.com/software/deluxe.html

    and they gave away 4000+ iPods at SolidWorks World 2008 with Microsoft being a big sponsor

  38. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We know how often people typically default. We know how often they typically default during recessions. The only real unknown here is how many of those loans were given to people without documentation. How many of those loans were rated AAA when in reality there was no chance they would be repaid. If those questions are answered, we can return stability to the financial sector. Although it will probably be a stability at a point much lower than some people would like.

    --
    Qxe4
  39. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We know how often people typically default. We know how often they typically default during recessions. The only real unknown here is how many of those loans were given to people without verification of what they could pay. How many of those loans were rated AAA when in reality there was no chance of being repaid. If those questions are answered, we can return stability to the financial sector. Although it will probably be a stability at a point much lower than some people would like.

    --
    Qxe4
  40. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by jcr · · Score: 1

    the best way to make sure that we don't end up in another Depression is for people to spend money.

    Broken Window Fallacy. Google it.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  41. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by maxume · · Score: 1

    In a sense, I am just quibbling over what 'exact' means (which isn't very interesting, but your first comment is a lot more open to it than this one, as it (the first comment) talks about the securities in a very general fashion).

    I'm not entirely convinced that recent recessions will be a great guide for foreclosure rates, home values were way out of whack, and this recession looks to be pretty severe, so the models are getting pushed on from both sides.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  42. Re:Smart Move... Employment Status... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    if they say you must be verifiably unemployed, they have to check with the (or each) state's unemployment benefits division.

    A prior poster said you have to include your previous employer/supervisor and the company will check with them.

    Falcon

  43. agree to pay an exit fee at the end of the program by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Isn't that how deals with the devil always work?

    With the devil, if you're lucky you get to be a Ghost Rider.

    Falcon

  44. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Chabo · · Score: 1

    The Broken Window Fallacy just means that we shouldn't break windows for the express purpose of creating more business for the glacier.

    However, if people stop replacing windows that get broken naturally, the glacier will go out of business.

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  45. Free LabVIEW Training by Plocmstart · · Score: 1

    National Instruments is providing information on how to get Government-paid NI training and certification. You have to complete a couple steps (depending on your state) to get assistance, but there is a good amount of information and assistance available here.

  46. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 1

    Maybe if people stopped trying so hard to measure these "economic times" they wouldn't be so "uncertain"

    --
    The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
  47. Tip for Unemployed by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    Learn how to MANIPULATE and USE people, processes and technologies.

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  48. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    In a sense, I am just quibbling over what 'exact' means

    Yes you are! Stop it!

    I'm not entirely convinced that recent recessions will be a great guide for foreclosure rates, home values were way out of whack, and this recession looks to be pretty severe, so the models are getting pushed on from both sides.

    Indeed, valuing anything is not precise, but it needs to be precise enough for people to dare to take risks.

    In any case the point of my original post was that I hate everyone involved in this thing. Read the link that someone above me posted and you will see why.

    --
    Qxe4
  49. No Tea and Buscuits fund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had almost lost all hope in Autodesk after hearing they had cut the Tea and Biscuits fund.

    For shame, Autodesk.

  50. Newsflash - Typo puts Antarctica into business! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    The Broken Window Fallacy just means that we shouldn't break windows for the express purpose of creating more business for the glacier.

    I didn't know ice rivers did anything business related. Gee, the things you learn on /. these days! :D

    Silliness aside, I think the word you wanted was "glazier", as in, "someone who glazes windows". For that matter, I wonder if "someone who glazes doughnuts" is also a glazier? Mmm, doughnuts...

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Newsflash - Typo puts Antarctica into business! by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you. I did mean "glazier".

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  51. So true... by Michael_gr · · Score: 1

    If you work with 3DS max, they "update" their file format so it's not backward compatible *every frickin' version*! and they release a version every year! Tey do it for no reason at all other than to force you to keep up with others - the actual difference between versions is usually minor. Their business practices make Microsoft look like the Mother Teresa of software development.

    1. Re:So true... by BobZee1 · · Score: 1

      It is the same for Solidworks, also. Us users have been begging for a "save as earlier version" for years.

      --
      dumber people are doing harder things everyday
  52. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by sowth · · Score: 1

    But then the big companies won't be able to get free "bailouts" from the governments, and they'll have to do desperate things to make money. ...like selling goods and providing services for reasonable prices. Oh no!

  53. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Oh, no. The "economic times" are uncertain because people are trying hard to measure the "economic energies". If they were trying to measure the "times" directly, they'd be way more certain (but of course, would have no idea of the "energies").

  54. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    You're assuming people have money. The problem is that there was a slight dip in the economy and a few too many people lost their jobs. Those people have no money. Unfortunately those people had mortgages that had been sold as part of complex financial instruments and as soon as investors realised that they were riskier than they were led to believe they all wanted to sell them and buy no more. This led to the collapse of the credit system.

    In turn, this caused businesses that were depending on credit for their short term cash flow to go under as their banks called in their loans. This lead to more job cuts, more people with no money and more defaults on loans.

    People can't spend what they don't have; expecting people who've just lost their job and don't see a new one coming any time soon to spend their savings for the greater good is madness. The idea that the economy is dependant on confidence is just a form of magical thinking.

    --
    Nick
  55. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Raenex · · Score: 1

    People can't spend what they don't have; expecting people who've just lost their job and don't see a new one coming any time soon to spend their savings for the greater good is madness. The idea that the economy is dependant on confidence is just a form of magical thinking.

    But there are people who have jobs and extra income that aren't spending as freely because of all the bad economic news. Self-fulfilling prophecy, vicious circle, etc. There's no magic in that.

  56. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Confidence won't make all those shitty loans that banks were handing out to anyone with a pulse turn into anything but the worthless garbage that they always were. Were that we could just pretend our way out of the ass-raping we just got at the hands of defrauding bankers, deregulation-happy politicians, greedy investors, and irresponsible fools who thought the definition of "American Dream" was "the right to perpetually live beyond your means."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  57. Re:Smart Move... Employment Status... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    How are they going to prove the "unemployed" didn't falsify information? Unless these software offerors check with DUNS/Dun & Bradstreet or some other source, they have to spend a lot of effort making sure the "company" is not the friend of a scammer.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  58. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by ultranova · · Score: 1

    But there are people who have jobs and extra income that aren't spending as freely because of all the bad economic news.

    And they shouldn't spend their income, but rather save it so they can afford housing, medicine, etc if and when it's their time to face unemployment. That's the problem with treating people as "human resources", as capitalism does: they have no security of income, so they have to react with panic to every economic hiccup.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  59. Just a note on the watermarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi guys, these are student/educational editions and aren't allowed to be used for commercial purposes (only upskilling and personal use) so the article comment about 'starting your own projects on the cheap' is kind of true but if you ever got to the point where you were making money from what you created with the edu version, you would be violating the agreement.

    Just worth people knowing.

    And for those who think 'how can you watermark 3d?'. They don't, they watermark any 2D drawings and prevent saving in any format other than the proprietry educational format.

    Still a great idea though, for its PR value more than anything else!

  60. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Pollardito · · Score: 1

    ...or maybe if they'd just acknowledge that all economic times are "uncertain". The people that are certain about the economy are the ones that think that everything will always go up

  61. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by juancnuno · · Score: 1

    And maybe if they stopped calling these times "economic" all money would disappear!

    And maybe if they stopped calling these times "times," everything would happen all at once!

    I'm not sorry.

  62. Re:Smart Move... Employment Status... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    How are they going to prove the "unemployed" didn't falsify information?

    By calling the previous employer. Sure it could be someone the applier knows but if the person calls and gives bad info they would be risking their own reputation.

    they have to spend a lot of effort making sure the "company" is not the friend of a scammer.

    reverse phone lookup. It won't prevent a scam but it can help.

    BTW, I don't think these companies should be doing this. Instead if they're going to do anything let everyone download and use a special edition if nothing else.

    Falcon

  63. Re:Four words I am damn sick of hearing in sequenc by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Banks stopped trusting each other after they started buying and selling a whole crapload of shitty debt.

    Now it's hard to borrow money, which is funny because usually when the economy goes to shit money gets cheap (See 20s and the railroad,oil, and automotive barons).

    It's a whole new kind of economic fuckup... it helps only one group. Communist states like Venezuela and China.

  64. photo editing by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I've found the 2.6 builds of GIMP work quite well with Mac (and yes, 24-bit colour has been supported for a long time).

    I heard GIMP finally got native Mac support, I wish CinePaint came out with it too. However while GINP does work with 24 bit colour depths it does not edit photos in 16 never mind 24 bits. Currently it shouldn't make much of a difference if the software doesn't work with 16 bits unless a high end digital back is used because most digital cameras only use 12 bits per channel, and a few that use 14 bits. But that's still more than GIMP can reliably work with. For professional print work GIMP doesn't work.

    As a matter of interest, what's your problem with X11? It should "just work" once you have installed it off your OS X DVD.

    Perhaps I wasn't clear. It's not X I have trouble with, it's CinePaint. When I click on the icon or try to open a photo with CinePaint, by right clicking er ctrl clicking the photo and choosing "open with" it does not display. I get the CinePaint menu on top but that's it. I googled for a tutorial for CinePaint but didn't find one. Heck, CinePaint's online tutorial doesn't go over how to use it.

    Falcon