Spotify Releases a Linux-Only Client Library

f0rk writes "Spotify, a popular music streaming service, has just recently released libspotify. An official, binary-only, only for subscribers, library to 'enable and inspire you to build some really cool stuff.' The first release only has support for x86-32 Linux, the only major platform Spotify does not run on. It looks like the Spotify team is trying to be nice to the Linux community and hope someone will use their restricted binary-only library to write a Linux client."

Comments

linux slashvertisement

[Anonymous Coward]

fuck open source. fuck it up it's faggot ass.

most open source articles that appear on slashdot are either blatant ads, squabbles over minor revisions of the three open source projects that have more than 12 people who care about it or aren't open source at all but rather a way for open source bitches to try to clasp their favorite religious mantra on to anything that even remotely looks like open source (free as in [beer/speech/a five minute jimi hendrix guitar solo])

the fact is that there really isn't much left to open source at this point. it's dead and needs a fork stuck in it but there are loons out there who haven't found a new cause to tattoo on their foreheads so we're stuck with their endless ravings about how there is a brave new world of technology at all of our finger tips but musicians should have to go around playing on the street corners like some old time bards to earn their daily bread.

jesus christ, it's a fucked up movement.

Why linux will never be mainstream.

[aristotle-dude]

You guys are all way too busy arguing about how the library is not GPL. Guess what? It's still a free world and the copyright holder can still choose whatever license or distribution method he/she wants because it is their "right" to do so. None of you have the right to dictate which license software you had no part in writing should be distributed. Linux will never become mainstream as long as fanatics sit around talking about the GPL rather than actually writing good software. The average end user does not give a crap about open source other than seeing it as a way to get "free" as in beer software.

I would bet that the vast majority of you advocating or discussing the GPL have probably never written code that is in use by someone other than yourself if any code at all. Stop being such posers. You are great "fans" of linux and open source but would probably never lift a finger to help develop software.

If you expect people to take open source software seriously then you have to take copyright holder rights seriously and get over the illusion that the GPL somehow removes rights from the original author which it does not. No license can do that other than selling of the actual copyright to another party.

BTW. I just love how so many of you automatically assume that they must have stolen GPL code in there. Bloody hypocrites.