Slashdot Mirror


NASA To Announce Module Name On Colbert Show

olddotter noted that NASA's Facebook page says "NASA's newest module for the International Space Station will get a new name on April 14. The agency plans to make the announcement with the help of Expedition 14 and 15 astronaut Sunita 'Suni' Williams on Comedy Central's 'The Colbert Report.' The program will air at 11:30 p.m. EDT."

48 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. I know the name by reidiq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, everybody. There was a lot of talk about the name of this module. We are on the Colbert Report tonight to talk about what name we picked after all the submissions. Tonight, we are glad to announce that the name will be, Jonathan Stewart!

    --
    Sig? No thanks. I don't smoke.
    1. Re:I know the name by stereoroid · · Score: 5, Funny

      The module won't be named after Colbert, because NASA has already found a place for his name: a new commode. As in "back in a few minutes, I need to go and use the Colbert".

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    2. Re:I know the name by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      This reminds me of the Howard Stern Rest Stop controversy in the middle 1990s. When Christine Todd Whitman was elected governor of NJ, one of her campaign promises was to name a highway rest stop after Howard Stern. The designated rest stop ended up being one that is notorious for anonymous gay sex.

  2. Too "Colbert".. by bradgoodman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It would be too "Colbert"...for NASA to come on his show and announce that they decided to name it "Tranquility", or whatever else they were planning on actually naming it anyways.

    You'd assume this means they decided to name it after him...wanna bet?

    1. Re:Too "Colbert".. by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      NASA has done segments with Colbert before, such as when the astronaut aboard the ISS was interviewed on his show. I would imagine Colbert's core audience of young college students appeals to NASA quite a bit. The trick, as for anyone that shows up on his program, is to go with a good non-ridiculous name and present it in a funny way on his show.

      I think their best bet would be to name the node itself Serenity and name the actual urine recycling unit inside "Colbert". That should appease his audience and make for good TV as well.

    2. Re:Too "Colbert".. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But, since it is essentially a toilet, I think Colbert should get the honors; Serenity should be the name of a spacegoing vessel.

      Amen to that. Let me try this comment again, I think it got modded down by the dumber side of the Firefly fanbase (you know, the side I'm not on) last time: Serenity is a spaceship. This thing is not only not a spaceship, but its ass does not glow. It does not make any sense whatsoever, whatsofuckingever to name it Serenity. I know a lot of you loved the show, so did I; I know a lot of you voted for that name, but it was silly. Don't get your back up because you're wrong :D

      I do have to admit to liking the idea of naming just the toilet after Colbert. He likes to twist people's dicks after all (metaphorically speaking, so far as I know) and it would only be justice. But then we'd probably end up with a toilet module named Serenity which is just not much of a tribute. Sorry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Too "Colbert".. by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think their best bet would be to name the node itself Serenity and name the actual urine recycling unit inside "Colbert".

      I think the node should be called Colbert and the commode/urine_recycling_unit be named Serenity. Don't you want to experience Serenity on the Colbert as well?

    4. Re:Too "Colbert".. by clintp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm reminded of the dumbasses that lobbied to get the shuttle prototype named "Enterprise". Due to design changes, it never went into space. Nice tribute.

      On the plus side, it didn't blow up either.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    5. Re:Too "Colbert".. by digitalhermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Serenity is as meaningful as "Enterprise". Hell, the name "Enterprise" is pretty damn boring without the back-history. It conjures visions of boardrooms and suits, "enterprise-wide mandate", "enterprise agreement", "enterprise regulations".

    6. Re:Too "Colbert".. by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

        The word "serenity" predates a certain wonderful science show by quite a few centuries.

        It fits in very well with the nomenclature used for the other modules.

        It also describes the feeling of seeing the earth from orbit.

        I've seen entirely too much of this "OMG it's from a teenager science fiction drama" on this site to think that there are many adults (!=age) on this site anymore.

        Even if it was named after the valley where a certain SF character lost a war and/or a SF spacecraft, what the hell is wrong with that? The story gestalt in Firefly was about freedom to go and explore and survive.

        You have no fucking imagination and as far as I'm concerned no damned right to comment on spacecraft names at all. You just plain don't get it.

        Go live in your little world.

        Shadowbearer (who is old enough to remember why the prototype space shuttle was named Enterprise)

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  3. Nice Summary by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    The program will air at 11:30 p.m. EDT. The name, which will not be publicly released until the program airs."

    The paragraph, which will not make sense until this sentence is substantially revised.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Nice Summary by olddotter · · Score: 3, Informative

      For the record, that is a cut and paste from the NASA announcement.

      I love your comment, ROFL.

    2. Re:Nice Summary by Refrag · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sentence is straight from NASA. LOL! Come on, y'all, this isn't rocket-science!

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    3. Re:Nice Summary by RasputinAXP · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shaka, when the walls fell!

    4. Re:Nice Summary by Hottie+Parms · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow. I got this joke immediately. I feel uber-geeky.

    5. Re:Nice Summary by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, that's the problem. NASA does rocket science, not grammar!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    6. Re:Nice Summary by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what they call toilets in that language.

    7. Re:Nice Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Colbert, his pants down his jaws clenched

  4. The name by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The summary, which the editors did not read.

    Is this some sort of crazy neo-yoda-speak? Am I missing out on a new meme? :(

    --
    Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    1. Re:The name by Binestar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah. Neo-Yoda speak would be something like "Kung-fu, know I."

      Whoa.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
  5. Glad they are playing along... by iamhigh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is probably the first time in 10 years news about NASA has stuck in my mind. Sure some scientific stuff is interesting to read... sure I hear press releases and news tidbits, but those go in one ear out the other. This is the best "stick to your ribs" news (aka marketing) NASA has made with the post baby boomers.

    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
  6. Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Land toilet -> crapper, ship's toilet -> head, space toilet -> colbert

    Let's start a campaign. From now on a space toilet shall be a "colbert".

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by Talderas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry chap, I'm going to have to take a short break from this experiment. I feel a most dire need to drop a deuce in the Colbert, lest I drop a deuce in my suit, and we know what happened the last time that happened.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    2. Re:Ship's toilet - head: Space toilet - colbert by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Land toilet -> crapper, ship's toilet -> head, space toilet -> colbert

      Let's start a campaign. From now on a space toilet shall be a "colbert".

      That really does fit. Space toilets are odd machines to begin with. They actually use an impeller to move the waste into the collection unit since there's no gravity to rely on. So in other words, the shit hits the fan by design! If that doesn't sound like a Colbert device, I don't know what does.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  7. Re:The new name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, that'd be funny. Can't have comedy on a comedy show.

    That's what Fox news is for.

  8. The medium is the message by rlseaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real news was that this was announced on the NASA Facebook page. The medium is always the message - as Colbert's success demonstrates.

    1. Re:The medium is the message by lbk70 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This information is on the NASA home page, right at the top.

  9. Re:A Strategem by ericrost · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, you obviously didn't get much out of that tax funded public education, so I can see where your "ideals" come from. /burn karma burn/

  10. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by black_lbi · · Score: 2, Funny

    So you can accidentally the whole sentence? You'd wish!

  11. Pro-Science Colbert by Mordac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know its been covered a lot elsewhere (scienceblogs.com) but I don't think it can be understated. Colbert Report is a great venue for science, a wonderful public face. He's had on lots of scientists, more than any show I can recall in a couple decades.

    I don't recall the last fun show that had the host actually talking to an Astronaut in orbit.

    So even if NASA goes with Serenity for the name, I'm glad they went onto Colbert to announce it.

    1. Re:Pro-Science Colbert by spydabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's exactly what NASA wanted with this contest. Publicity. They couldn't have done better...

  12. Re:common sense people! by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thomas Crapper helped popularize the toilet, as well as come up with a few innovations. I am not sure what Stephen Colbert has done in the same respect to warrant comparison.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  13. Re:common sense people! by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact that someone named Thomas Crapper came up with an invention called the ballcock has to be the greatest semi-useless factoid ever.

  14. Re:Editors are supposed to edit... by alta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wrong wrong, I'm using the 'Pro' version of slashdot.
    In the Pro version, all grammar is corrected. There's also the political distortion field. There's a slider at the top of the page that lets me choose ConservativeLiberal.
    By moving the slider everyone's comments are automatically refactored to reflect my beliefs. Go ahead, say something positive about B.O. I'll never see it!
    It also merges duplicate stories, merging their comments.
    And best yet, I NEVER have any missing poll options. It gives me a text field where I right in the correct answer, and then it's always the most popular.

    This is great, you should get the pro version.
     

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  15. Re:A Strategem by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I said it before, and I'll say it again:

    The public's lack of interest in NASA has nothing to do with pop culture, it's that NASA isn't doing anything interesting anymore.

    In the days of the space race, it was very exciting. The "us vs them" competition with the USSR, people doing things never done before, going to places nobody ever went before. And all that done by launching people with experimental hardware done on monumental scales.

    Where is all that now? NASA keeps shuttling people between ground and space station, where they do amazing experiments, such as how spiders react to a lack of gravity. The hardware is still big and dangerous, but now if something goes wrong it's not because it's new unproven tech, but because the management at NASA is stupid. The Mars robots are about the most interesting thing being done these days, and even that isn't all that exiciting.

    What's needed is not nonsense like Britney getting involved in the space program, but a space program that does something the public would be interested in. A colony on the moon, and astronauts on Mars would be a start. Sure it's dangerous and expensive, but it's also very much exciting, and the danger didn't stop anybody in the race of getting to the moon.

  16. Fairly obvious name... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think, judging by their chosen venue, the name they release will be obvious. To do otherwise would just be tacky.

    "Yes, we'll get all the recognition we can from your show, but not scratch your back in kind."

    Glad they went with it, as it was the winner. Aside from that, the name marks much more than anything like Serenity would.

    Serenity shows the world what? There are a few scifi geeks in NASA? At most, maybe that they find inspiration in grand goals. Naming it Colbert, on the other hand, signifies a return to pop-culture significance. That the people are excited about space again. Or at the very least, naming it after Colbert will ensure that the module stays in the public eye as he continues his "status updates" (like he did for his baby eagle and a few other stunts). It would be a huge missed marketing opportunity NOT to name it after a television host who has supported science more than any other in recent history.

    Of course, they already know this. That's why it's being revealed on his show.

    1. Re:Fairly obvious name... by mea37 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not sure I'd declare victory until the facts are in. I don't know which way they'll go, but if I were to bet, I would bet against the name being Colbert.

      Saying it would be "tacky" to announce a name other than Colbert on Colbert's show misses the entire context in which this is happening. Colbert doesn't take these stunts seriuosly. If anything, the Colbert character needs things to be outraged about.

    2. Re:Fairly obvious name... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is true. But it's also done as satire. The dog and pony show, which is in some respects pure genius, is all in an effort to shine a light on the ridiculousness of the media and the institutions that it reports on.

      Sir Dr. Stephen T. Colbert D.F.A. attacks most "harshly" the things that common sense says there's no point in attacking. Controversial subjects are glazed over while minutia are battled. It's a show that goes much farther than the reach of the TCR stage. In a recent interview on the Today show (or was it GMA?) when asked if he would turn down the naming of the module after him, his response was laughter, followed by something along the lines of "Are you serious? Why would I do that?"

      But that's not to say the guests who come on his show behave in the same way. Yes, they know what the show is. They know what it represents. They know that the host is a fun-house version of FOX News. But that doesn't prevent them from going on for their own purposes (usually to promote a book, or in the case of NASA- to gain popular support).

      I think they'll be naming it after him just based on the question: if they don't plan to announce the name is Colbert, why would they go on his show to announce it?

      Either way, I'm sure it'll be great for ratings. I know I'll be tuning in (I catch maybe 50% of the episodes). He knows how to build drama where there is none (always has), and how to get his audience to care about relatively trivial things. That's 90% of the reason we're talking about this on /.

  17. Watching it online? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to watch this show, but I don't have cable. It's very nice that they have full episodes available on Colbert Nation. However, is there any way to watch the show online Tuesday night? Does anyone know how long they wait before putting that night's show onto the web?

  18. I can vouche for this by coryking · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a slider at the top of the page that lets me choose "American Fat-Cat" / Communist. By moving the slider, everyone's comments are automatically refactored to reflect my beliefs. Go ahead, say something negative about Fidel Castro. I will never see it!

    Good to see you agree! Fidel isn't some capitalist pig-dog like Obama. Amazing that this site is so full of people who agree!

    Did you mention the cameo appearances by Sean Hannity and the Back Street Boys?

  19. Re:The new name? by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should send USS Goatse to check out some black holes.

    --
    Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
  20. Re:A Strategem by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, you didn't get much of a sense of humor in your intellectual wanderings, did you?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  21. I'd give them extra brownie points if.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA guy introduces Patrick Stewart who walks out in robes and a crown and says, "From this day forth, all the toilets in space shall be known as... Colberts!" Then he beams off the stage. They don't even have to name the module just all the toilets. I'd be happy even though I voted Colbert.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  22. Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    that will be named Bush or cheney. Always full of crap and fails a lot.

    1. Re:Nah by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Funny

      And all this time, I thought W.C. stood for Water Closet. Instead, it was W and Cheney.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  23. Re:A Strategem by jae471 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know about the ants, but the worms survived

  24. Transcript from the segment by Ifni · · Score: 4, Funny
    "NASA's newest module for the International Space Station will get a new name on April 14. The agency plans to make the announcement with the help of Expedition 14 and 15 astronaut Sunita 'Suni' Williams on Comedy Central's 'The Colbert Report.' The program will air at 11:30 p.m. EDT."

    Transcript of NASA segment from the April 14th, 2009 Colbert show.

    Colbert: As many of our watchers will recall, NASA recently had a contest allowing the public to vote for the new name for "Node 3", the newest module of the International Space Station. Thanks to you, my fans, the highest voted name was "Colbert". However, NASA reserves the right to select any name they choose, regardless of the results of the contest, leaving many wondering if my prestigious and time honored name will indeed grace the new module.

    (laughter from audience)

    Colbert: Tonight, we have a very special guest from NASA - a two time visitor to the International Space Station - here to officially announce the selected name. Please offer a warm welcome for Astronaut Sunita Williams!

    (audience cheers) Sunita walks on stage, shakes hands with Colbert.

    Colbert: Thank you for coming.

    Sunita: It's a pleasure to be here.

    Colbert: I know we are all waiting to hear what NASA has decided, but first tell the audience a little about yourself.

    (Snipped for brevity - read about her here. She was one of the astronauts to use the ametuer radio stations on the station to talk with school children - very cool stuff.)

    Colbert: Thank you "Suni". You've done some amazing things, and we look forward to the contributions yet to come. (applause from audience) Ok, it looks like we might have a revolt on our hands if we don't cut to the chase. NASA has chosen you to officially announce - here, tonight - the name of the newest module for the International Space Station.

    Sunita: Yes.

    Colbert: Then, without further delay, Sunita Williams, ladies and gentlemen.

    Suinita: Thank you. "Node 3", as it has been known, is the newest addition to the ISS, due to be sent up February 2010. It will provide life support systems, including water recycling and oxygen generation, for the ISS. Tonight, it is my great honor to announce on behalf of NASA that it has now, officially, been renamed "Xenu". (laughter from audience) No, seriously.

    (Sunita can't keep her face straight, causing Colbert to break from script with a smile. Sunita breaks into laughter)

    Colbert: We are going to get sued for this.

    End Transcript - sorry, you're going to have to wait for tomorrow's airing for the revelation of the true name.

    --

    Oh, was that my outside voice?

  25. Re:The new name? by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

    It makes vast amounts of sense, especially if you're miffed at Colbert using his popularity leverage to push his own name through the vote. Go on his show, name it something else, just to mess with him. :P