Slashdot Mirror
What Do You Call People Who "Do HTML"?
gilgongo writes "It's more than 10 years since people started making a living writing web page markup, yet the job title (and role) has yet to settle down. Not only that, but there are different types of people who write markup: those that approach the craft as essentially an integration task, and those that see it as part of UI design overall. The situation is further complicated by the existence of other roles in the workplace such as graphic designer and information architect. This is making recruitment for this role a real headache. So, how do you describe people who 'do HTML' (and CSS and maybe a bit of JavaScript and graphics manipulation)? Some job titles I've seen include: Design Technologist, Web Developer, Front-end Developer, HTML/CSS Developer, Client-side Developer and UI Engineer. Do you have any favourite job titles for this role?"
The time where 'doing HTML' (and CSS) was enough to give you a decent career is over imo.
What's this, a set up for a joke about unemployment?
In my more recent experience, html people are liberal arty types who pick up some web design to complement their other skills. Photographers, animators, graphical artists. Webapp designers usually have some html, but often you have a coder and a design person and they have different responsibilities.
HTML by itself just isn't a marketable skillset anymore. Hell, it's hard enough being a graphic artist, or a flash designer, or something like that, who also does html.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
You're a markup writer. Even if you're the best, most semantic, standard following markup writer in the world, you're not a web developer. If you only know the basics of CSS and Javascript, you can hardly call yourself anything but a markup writer.
Design technologist? You're not designing anything.
UI Engineer? Sorry, you're not really engineering anything if you're only using HTML. Either that or you're writing bloated, non-semantic markup.
Front-end / Client Side Developer? If the front end is ONLY HTML (what a boring site)
Sigs are for Terrorists.
But why should an employer pay for PHP when all he needs is the basic skills? The point of the question is that they need to hire some people with basic skills, but they don't know what to call the skillset.
BTW, I vote for "web layout artist".
"Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
Web Designer. At least that title was used a lot in off-shores/out-sourcing companies I had to deal with.
Web Developer was also used, but to lesser extent and only to distinguish those who can also do JavaScript, PHP, Perl, etc.
Easiest way to find the word du jour is to check job listings.
All hope abandon ye who enter here.
I mean, it's great to have someone available to handle that sort of thing, but can you really sustain a job with this as your only skill?
Those would be my definitions as they relate to the production of HTML. Betty, the lady who types things up, puts them into some simple HTML, and makes a few things italic or bold or adds images is a coder. Bob, who uses PHP to make dynamic pages, is a programmer. Jerry, who uses Dreamweaver to do both, is a designer.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
Errata:
"or they might enter data into an HTML."
Should be:
"or they might enter data into a CMS."
Don't let them fool you into thinking they're programmers ;)
Seriously though, HTML is usually a starting point and they usually go on to design or web programming. You have to start somewhere.
AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
How about child care? No money to be made there either?
Give me someone who can do proper HTML anytime over some jack of all trades who can do everything a little bit but is master of none.
Sure, if you think slashdot layout is good, then perhaps you don't need a html/css wizard but some of us have higher standards.
If you are serious about web apps you need just a good a HTML "coder" as a database expert and sysadmin as a coder and project manager.
But what to call it? No idea, the job is pretty rare on its own but as long as HTML is constantly evolving standard raped by every browser, only a handfull will be really good in it.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
Designers = artists. They plan layouts (often just static images and slide shows).
Developers = coders who realize a designer's plan.
Two different jobs, two different skill sets. Some (FEW!) people bridge the gap.
I know quite a few people that do, such as myself, simply because I find it faster to work. I can also make it easier to read in source code than the spaghetti code most of the GUI apps make, which means easier to track down issues, and there always are issues.
Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
Oh god, not the "if you don't pass the PE test you can't call yourself an engineer" nonsense again.
Really? So there's a drag-and-drop program with nice visual effects that creates a standards-compliant page that works in all browsers, is accessible and resizable, and degrades gracefully when JS/CSS aren't available? Because last time I checked that was kinda hard.
Or were you thinking of crappy pages made in Microsoft FrontPage?
(Note: I sass you hesitantly because I recognize your username and remember you are a smart guy. :) )
Depending on how you're developing your site and/or Web application, having a guy or gal that can take the designer's design mockup (usually still in .PSD format) and properly interpret it into clean HTML and CSS wireframes is a godsend for the Web Developers.
There's a lot of finesse involved in doing this right: you need to make sure it works in all browsers, that the page size isn't too large, and that it stretches and scrolls and wraps in all the right places. And no, Dreamweaver still doesn't cut it, so it takes quite a bit of skill and experience to do it right.
With experience, most of the good ones move either up or down the stack, depending on their interest/strengths, but we wouldn't have been able to complete several large client projects without our "HTML/CSS/JS/UI/stuck-between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place guy".
body massage!
In many places, It's a protected word. Like Doctor. You don't want people who aren't doctors around calling themselves a doctor, prescribing drugs and doing surgery, and you don't want people who aren't civil engineers designing bridges. I think the same should be true for the software field.
Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
It's not nonsense it's true (everywhere but the U.S.). Engineering is a profession. If you can't bother meeting that profession's standards then don't identify yourself with it.
"Six munce ago I cudn't evin spel Injuneer - and now I are one."
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
..on what the website that needs design and maintenance does in the first place? There's no such thing as a generic website, some are just for fun, and may be quite involved and complex, but aren't really designed to rake in cash, so no, it couldn't be self supporting for the web-person most likely, whereas others are designed from the start to be profitable, an e-commerce site for instance.
Just as a casual web surfer, I can see the difference between a well designed and easy to use site or not, and that has to come from someone or a team that has superior skills, and a lot of those folks DO make a living at it, so it is like any other job.
"Wow, all you can do really well is run this CNC machine, is that really enough to make a living? I mean, you can't build a house or run a vineyard, your skills are lacking from my own leetness, so you must be inferior to me"
"Can someone who only understands transmissions really expect to make a living at that, just that one
skill, when cars are so much more than just the transmission"?
What's your skill, and how do you justify your check? Really, what are you saying?
The only reasonable answer is, if you somehow get a check from that skill, and the check cashes. That's the only justification or criteria needed to determine if your skill set is adequate or not.
Often times don't matter. Most of the Web Developers or Web Designers have many overlapping duties.
o_O
No, just like it's fine to be a nurse and work in the medical field, or a construction worker to build bridges. Just don't inflate what your actual credentials are. There's certain things that can be done by just regular programmers or developers that makes them very valuable for many companies. I'm a developer also. I took software engineering in university. However, I would never say that what I do at work is engineering, or call myself an engineer.
Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
Doctors of Philosophy and Doctors of Divinity probably outweigh Medical Doctors (you know, M.D.), even if you throw in Doctors of Dental Surgery (D.D.S.), or D.V.M.s (Doctors of Veterinary Medicine).
The question though is one of Credentials. You obviously wouldn't (and shouldn't) trust a Doctor of Philosophy to handle your medical needs, any more than you'd trust a Civic Engineer to design a circuit in place of an Electrical Engineer (though an E.E. usually can't wire their house since they'd need to be a Licensed Electrical Contractor).
So, the REAL question is "What are (or should be) the different type of "engineers" in the field of Computers, and what are (or should be) the qualifications/responsibilities for those titles?"
The main problem with Computer titles is one of standardization (especially odd considering how much computers rely on standardized protocols for communication :) ).
This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
Yes, but those "simple" pages WILL probably be functional, and beautiful (eye of the beholder), and render properly across all the major browsers.
The places you usually start hitting browser issues is when you start getting "fancy" (again, eye of the beholder :) ).
Some of the simplest web designs I've seen are incredibly useable, and close to 10 years old (with no updates).
Is the technology "old" that they are using? Yes.
Does it make the site less intuitive/useful/pretty/functional? Not as much as you'd imagine.
This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
The people I've known that do html, css, and graphics were called a Web Designer.
Developer implies your putting functionality in place.
Designer implies making is pretty, and at least some basic UI design.
A lot of web developers do both but most are only good at one or the other.
What do you call someone who does [b]UBB[/b]?
HTML and CSS are no more difficult nor deliberately accessible than what used to be called "word processing", but is now called "writing a letter".
Back in my day, typing and/or word processing were manditory high school courses. Do they even teach them anymore?
War as we knew it was obsolete
Nothing could beat complete denial
- Emily Haines
Depending on the context, you might call that person an electrician, or an auto mechanic, or a plumber, or a computer technician, or a housewife trying to change a battery.
HTML is a tool. A job title/description tends to be more about what you are expected to accomplish.
This can be confusing, because there is such a thing as a "C++ developer." Well, yeah, but what you really are is an application developer who uses C++. Your job is to develop applications. It just so happens that C++ is the primary (maybe even only) tool you need to accomplish that job, so that's what you get called.
I think the reason this particular skill has not acquired a standard job title is that HTML, by itself, is not really a tool you can use to accomplish a whole lot. To accomplish a complete task, you will need to use it in conjunction with graphic design tools, if you're designing an interface, or with database tools if you are designing an app, or something else.
So I'd say it depends on what you are expecting them to use HTML to accomplish, and what other skills they will need in order to accomplish that task.
As for whether HTML is a complete skill set -- well, imagine applying for a job as a plumber and saying, "well, I can't use a wrench, but I can use a screwdriver..."
My site: Free Nature Pictures