Slashdot Mirror


India Launches Its First All-Weather Spy Satellite

murthydn writes "According to a Times of India article, 'India on Monday successfully launched its first all-weather spy satellite that will help security agencies keep a watch on the movements on the borders. The satellite has all-weather capability to take images of the Earth and would also be beneficial in mapping and managing natural disasters, such as floods and landslides, besides amplifying defence surveillance capabilities of the nation. It would also help keep track of ships at sea that could pose a threat.'"

67 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. All-Weather? so it can work with out rain fade? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    All-Weather? so it can work with out rain fade?

    1. Re:All-Weather? so it can work with out rain fade? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      It's all-weather, it has wipers for the rain.

  2. But the headline says... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Informative

    "RISAT-2 not a spy satellite: ISRO chief". Methinks the story changed during the 'slashdot delay' window.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:But the headline says... by ap7 · · Score: 1

      Well, the Indian media has also been calling it a spy satellite for weeks now.

    2. Re:But the headline says... by theCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From TFA:

      "Though the satellite has a global coverage we will use it only for our use," ISRO chief G Madhavan Nair told reporters at a post-launch press conference.

      Yeah... just like RICO was only used against gangsters, the PATRIOT act only against terrorists, and asset forfeiture only against drug lords. And red light cameras and automatic speed traps are for safety, not revenue generation. Sure.

      Not that there's any reason that they couldn't or shouldn't use their new satellite to look at other nations, it's just annoying when officials say something like that that they know (or should know) will be false.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    3. Re:But the headline says... by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Point of order: this isn't the USA.

  3. Snigger... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see further down:
    "He said the launch of Anusat has prompted six other educational institutions"
    With a name like that it *has* to be for looking at Uranus.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Snigger... by ap7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps you were trying to be funny, but in case you were not, 'Anu' in Hindi means atom. So the name Anusat was probably for a very small satellite.

    2. Re:Snigger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps you were trying to be funny, but in case you were not, 'Anus' in English means butt. So the name Anusat was probably for a very small satellite that will explore your butt.

    3. Re:Snigger... by ap7 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now you are just being anal.

    4. Re:Snigger... by Werrismys · · Score: 2, Funny

      PROFESSOR FARNSWORTH: I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all. FRY: Oh. What's it called now? PROFESSOR FARNSWORTH: Urectum.

      --
      'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  4. So... by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It can withstand the weather in space?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:So... by KublaKhan1797 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it can withstand even the nastiest space typhoon...

      --
      No keyboard detected. Press F1 to continue...
    2. Re:So... by rumith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, shielding spacecrafts from the effects of space weather is a real problem! Aah, nothing like the sound of onboard electronics getting fried with a ton of high-speed protons from a coronal mass ejection :-)

    3. Re:So... by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      In space, nobody can hear your computer fry.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    4. Re:So... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      With the implication being that the operations of certain other spy satellites are subject to present weather conditions in space. And I supposed since this is an all-weather spy satellite, they've solved the problem of getting hit by space rocks.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  5. Overload! by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

    managing natural disasters, such as floods and landslides

    We're talking about India here. That specific part of the satellite's remit will occupy all of it's attention, I'm afraid. They don't seem to get much luck in that area...

    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:Overload! by EvilToiletPaper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apart from that it's sandwiched by Pakistan and Afghanistan on the left and China and Burma on the right.

      They don't seem to have much luck in that area either..

  6. I get the feeling... by lobiusmoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It might be keeping an close eye on Pakistan's nuclear weapons facilities too, given the way that country is heading. Can't be much fun having a collapsing nuclear power next door.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:I get the feeling... by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can't be much fun having a collapsing nuclear power next door.

      I don't know. Would any Canadians like to comment?

    2. Re:I get the feeling... by greentshirt · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not that bad, I mean we get American TV channels.

    3. Re:I get the feeling... by geobeck · · Score: 1

      Would any Canadians like to comment?

      I don't know what you're talking aboot.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    4. Re:I get the feeling... by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 1

      Nicely put, you beat me to it! Wish I had some mod points for you...

    5. Re:I get the feeling... by stoicfaux · · Score: 1

      Can't be much fun having a collapsing nuclear power next door.

      I don't know. Would any Canadians like to comment?

      Iceland has nukes?!?

      http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/oct2008/gb2008109_947306.htm?chan=globalbiz_europe+index+page_top+stories

    6. Re:I get the feeling... by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      They have a vast supply of geothermal facilities. Obviously it is just a short step to weaponization. We must invade before we see a steam cloud over Washington.

      --
      -
    7. Re:I get the feeling... by techamed · · Score: 1

      Can't be much fun having a collapsing nuclear power next door.

      I don't know. Would any Canadians like to comment?

      Sure... I didn't know that our southern neighbours were having that much trouble. :)

  7. SAR by phyr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All-weather in this case means Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) and I don't believe this is anymore a spy satellite than Radarsat2.

  8. In other words by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    "It would also help keep track of ships at sea that could pose a threat." In other words any unexpected ships heading to major ports from Pakistan.

  9. First? by Thelasko · · Score: 1, Redundant

    India Launches Its First All-Weather Spy Satellite

    How are they so sure? They're probably just the first country to admit having one.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:First? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      India Launches Its First All-Weather Spy Satellite

      How are they so sure? They're probably just the first country to admit having one.

      You mean "probably the first of such satellites they admit having launched", right?

    2. Re:First? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      probably the first of such satellites they admit having launched

      That would imply the first satellite India admits launching. I'm talking about any country.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:First? by didroe84 · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about any country.

      The quote you started with wasn't though:

      India Launches Its First All-Weather Spy Satellite

    4. Re:First? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Once again, a misuse of the "Redundant" mod. Although there may be posts that say the same thing above this one, it was only the 5th post on the story.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  10. But it's our WEATHER! by dmomo · · Score: 2, Funny

    How dare they spy on all our Weather. It now belongs to THEM! For great justice.

  11. Pakistan replies .... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In response to India launching yet another satellite into orbit, Pakistan vowed it will redouble its madrassas and launch more planes into buildings.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Pakistan replies .... by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hope that this gets modded funny. However sadly I think it is informative. After all they responded to India saying it would increase border defences after the Mumbai attack by saying it would reduce efforts in the War against terror.

    2. Re:Pakistan replies .... by hansraj · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is quite some way of putting things! In all fairness you have to realize that India and Pakistan have a serious trust problem with each other. Even though India would claim that the increased border defense (read more military near India-Pakistan border) is only for defense, in case of a future tense situation it would put Pakistan under immense pressure to mobilize its forces quite suddenly. The only rational move for them, therefore, is to move forces to the border already. And that implies weakening the force available at the Pakistan-Afganistan border and thus "reducing their efforts" in the war against terror.

      Now you can all wish that we lived in a perfect world where such a reasoning in not needed, but unfortunately the reality of India-Pakistan relations is ugly and one of deep mistrust for each other. And in such a situation what you wrote in your post is a natural way to react for the parties.

      PS: I am Indian and believe that Pakistan has a fucked up priorities with regards to India and its vision for its own future, but there is no need to put a shade of propaganda to everything.

    3. Re:Pakistan replies .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hansraj,

      Your analysis and comments are accurate and sensible IMHO.

      I am Pakistani, and I agree that we have major problems and our priorities are quite messed up.

      Unfortunately, along with all these problems, there is a lot of propaganda going on domestically and internationally. This masks the real problems to the extent, that most people spend hours debating upon inconsequential issues.

      Either its propaganda or people are so deluded about the rest of the world, that they can't tell black from white.

    4. Re:Pakistan replies .... by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      It is just this sort of sloppy thinking that got us into Iraq.

      Insightful? Funny? This barely rises to the level of flamebait. I guess we really do need a (+1 Inciteful) moderation option.

      --
      -
    5. Re:Pakistan replies .... by dhavleak · · Score: 1

      Well put.

      It's very tricky for the international community to even know how to help Pakistan right now. They don't have control of the North/Northwestern part of their country. They don't have leaders with any sort of vision (or even just wisdom/sense). And they are (quite justifiably) suspicious of the West and unlikely to accept help/suggestions.

      I really hope they find some way to pull out of their current situation. And if/when they do, I hope they are able to establish a good civilian government able to keep its own military in check. This whole crisis was slowly created by an overambitious military with a long track record of craving (and obtaining) political power, and waging a proxy war through Afghan militia. That's the root cause right there - an ambitious military and a weak civilian government/weak leadership. That's not something the rest of the world can help them fix. If Iraq taught us nothing else, let it at least remind us that you can't fix the government in a foreign country -- that change has to come from within.

  12. Re:Yeah - beging the space wars!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Extremely doubtful that the pakis could kill a sat at this point. Not impossible, but it's a non-trivial task. Also, the rest of the developed world would take a gigantic shit on them, because it would clutter up orbit even worse.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Spying on all weather? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    For when you need an accurate short-range forecast for the hail of nuclear-tipped missiles heading your way.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  14. Remind me again will you by Peter_J_G · · Score: 1

    Why are we (UK) still sending million of pounds of aid to a country that is launching it's own satellites?

    1. Re:Remind me again will you by freakxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sorry but can u be more descriptive in the kind of aid the UK is providing to India? In which field? And are you sure that it is "aid"?

    2. Re:Remind me again will you by zoneerror · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably it's a way of returning the wealth stolen from India! Cheers!

    3. Re:Remind me again will you by Peter_J_G · · Score: 1

      If that was the case we'd be giving aid to 3 quarters of the world, which we don't.

    4. Re:Remind me again will you by priyank_bolia · · Score: 1

      ha ha ha... UK sending aid to India. I am not sure when and for what. India don't need any country help. Also what's wrong with launching a satellite. Do we need to pay tax to UK for that.

    5. Re:Remind me again will you by Peter_J_G · · Score: 1

      I was just say that a country with enough wealth to launch it's own satellite doesn't need aid.

    6. Re:Remind me again will you by priyank_bolia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yes, you are right, I totally agree with you. In fact, the world's largest democratic country don't need any aid from any country. We will be more happy if UK and it allies stop aiding countries supporting terrorism: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7486948.stm

    7. Re:Remind me again will you by Peter_J_G · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So would the British public :)

    8. Re:Remind me again will you by suman28 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that even though India is launching satellites, it does not mean that the country is somehow rich. It just means that the government is controlled by hungry/greedy companies that want profits and are able to buy the politicians into spending money on such things, while largely ignoring even the most basics of the people. Many people are dirt poor, live in horrible conditions, and malnutrition is everywhere. But, as long as the ultra rich get richer, and the politicians run the India, it will never prosper.

    9. Re:Remind me again will you by Peter_J_G · · Score: 1

      okay

    10. Re:Remind me again will you by Peter_J_G · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think you should.

  15. Re:Yeah - beging the space wars!!!! by ap7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Judging from the complete lack of hysteria in the US about Pakistan's nukes, I'd say that the nukes are already under the US's control or they have veto power over deployment. Besides, Pakistan would risk being wiped out by any retaliatory attack should they attack anyone first. And they would likely lose any remaining sympathy the international community for their problems. That would be bad news for Pakistan, Taliban and their cronies.

  16. Attention: Newbie Indian Space Program by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    When you launch an "all-weather spy satellite," remember to leave out the words "all" and "spy."

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  17. So many 'good' uses! by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

    The satellite has all-weather capability to take images of the Earth and would also be beneficial in mapping and managing natural disasters, such as floods and landslides, besides amplifying defence surveillance capabilities of the nation. It would also help keep track of ships at sea that could pose a threat.

    Can't read TFA, since our work has it blocked for some bizarre reason (some seemingly arbitrary things are blocked), but the summary was a little amusing to me. They list off all these various ways that the satellite can be used for good things, that will benifit mankind!

    WILL it be used for those good uses? I think we all know the answer to that one. I suppose I could attempt to be optimistic, but society as a whole has taught me that to do so is pointless and irrelevant.

    --
    Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  18. so we're allowed to use racist language on /. ? by fantomas · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not sure how the term is received in the USA but over here in the UK calling somebody from Pakistan a "paki" is like calling somebody with African-American heritage a "nigger". Most people consider it outdated and downright offensive, most folk with Pakistani origins who live in the UK associate it with small minded neo-nazis shouting at them, parading through the streets and telling them to "go home" and worse.

    For your information... Not sure how the the term is received in the USA. But if you ever came on holiday to the UK you'd be better not to use the term unless you wanted to get into fights quite regularly.

    regards.

    1. Re:so we're allowed to use racist language on /. ? by LittleNegative · · Score: 1

      After I found out about this (through watching clips from Big Brother) I started watching my mouth, even though none of my Pakistani friends here in the US find the term offensive at all.

    2. Re:so we're allowed to use racist language on /. ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      After finding out how most of the world talks about Americans, I stopped giving one tenth of one shit about how I referred to anyone else. If they're offended they should refer to Mencken; I'm not prejudiced, I dislike everyone equally. I think the difference between the USA and any other nation is largely one of starting position on the board of Civilization.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. Need for a satellite by parallel_prankster · · Score: 1

    Being an Indian, I can tell you that there is no need for an all weather satellite. Terrorists enter in broad daylight and in really good weather conditions sunglight and all and attack Indian cities. Spending this money on Border Security Force is a much better alternative.

    1. Re:Need for a satellite by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

      With a strength of about 57 battalions, or 78,000 men, it is one of the world's largest border patrol forces.

      BSF India already has very good border security force with lots of resources. However, India still needs to invest in these satellite projects for scientific purposes which don't get pushed in country like India, unless "War on terrorism" clauses are used. Yes. I am an Indian too.

      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    2. Re:Need for a satellite by parallel_prankster · · Score: 1

      India also has the worst terms with all of its neighbors :- China, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. With all the force you have mentioned, the problem of illegal immigration, supplying ammo and drugs across borders is huge in India. My point is that maybe we could supply money to these forces to modernize the BSF than use satellites to track terrorist activity, because it is not unknown to us as to when and where the terrorists come from. Its just lack of resources and corruption that is creating the problem of infiltration.

  20. Re:Yeah - beging the space wars!!!! by cusco · · Score: 1
    Actually, unlike every other nuclear power Pakistan's nukes are under the control of the general who runs the area that they're located in. I guess the original justification was that if the government were beheaded by a surprise attack the military could still retaliate, but it makes for an exceedingly scary environment.

    A couple of years ago a meteor blew up over the eastern Mediterrainean Sea, with a Hiroshima-size blast. Had it arrived a couple of hour later Earth would have rotated that much further and the explosion would almost certainly have been mistaken for a nuclear attack.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  21. Which way does the earth rotate? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you meant a couple of hours earlier, as Pakistan is east of the Mediterranean Sea.

  22. Begging India by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    So can someone explain to me why it is that India can afford nuclear weapons and spy satellites but I regularly see begging tv adverts telling me I need to give generously because Indians can't afford proper eye care or to provide themselves with clean water?

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  23. nice abuse of moderation by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You may not agree with what I say, but that doesn't make it a troll. I know the moderator guidelines are complicated; perhaps an IQ test for moderators is in order?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"