Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Discover Exoplanet Less Than Twice the Mass of Earth

Snowblindeye writes with this excerpt from the European Southern Observatory: "Well-known exoplanet researcher Michel Mayor today announced the discovery of the lightest exoplanet found so far. The planet, 'e,' in the famous system Gliese 581, is only about twice the mass of Earth. The team also refined the orbit of the planet Gliese 581 d, first discovered in 2007, placing it well within the habitable zone, where liquid water oceans could exist. Planet Gliese 581 e orbits its host star — located only 20.5 light-years away in the constellation Libra ('the Scales') — in just 3.15 days. 'With only 1.9 Earth-masses, it is the least massive exoplanet ever detected and is, very likely, a rocky planet,' says co-author Xavier Bonfils from Grenoble Observatory. Being so close to its host star, the planet is not in the habitable zone. But another planet in this system appears to be. ... The planet furthest out, Gliese 581 d, orbits its host star in 66.8 days. 'Gliese 581 d is probably too massive to be made only of rocky material, but we can speculate that it is an icy planet that has migrated closer to the star,' says team member Stephane Udry. The new observations have revealed that this planet is in the habitable zone, where liquid water could exist. '"d" could even be covered by a large and deep ocean — it is the first serious "water world" candidate,' continued Udry."

8 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Astronomy by Reorix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I always hear about these sorts of discoveries, of new planets more and more similar to earth, but having almost no astronomy background, I have no idea how significant they are.

    How much do we really know about these planets, and how much is guessing? How close are these planets, really, to earth?

    1. Re:Astronomy by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's 20 (or so) light years from Earth. According to this article, we've probably already pissed off any inhabitants...

  2. Good news by KingPin27 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "could even be covered by a large and deep ocean â" it is the first serious "water world" candidate" .. Good.. I wonder if we can export Kevin Costner.

    --
    "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
  3. Call me when we find an auric world. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Water worlds always have the crappiest minerals. Oh look more alkalines. Yay. It won't be worth spending the fuel to land on Gliese 581 d, much less the cargo hold space. Gliese 581 e might have iron and other metals, but being so close to the star it probably has major hot spots. So that's probably not worth landing on either until we meet the Melnorme and buy some tech off them.

    Oh well. Eliminating planets to explore is good too. There's a lot of stars in the sky, you know, and only so much time to explore them before the UrQuan return.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  4. Wanna see more: Celestia by SalaSSin · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you would like to know more, download Celestia, an open source project to cruise around the universe in 3D.
    Just select "go to object" and type in "gliese 581", you'll get the orbits of the different planets already found too.

    The neat thing is, you can just "cruise" around, speed up time to see how stellar objects move, and so on... Quite cool :-)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
  5. Re:but what about Earth 2... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is very interesting but no where near as exciting as finding another Earth like planet. I suppose we will have to wait for the next generation of telescopes before we find it though.

    Well the 'e' planet is somewhat earth-like in mass and possibly earth-like in composition. It's not in the habitable zone for the star, but the closer a planet is to the star the easier it is to detect, and this exoplanet is at the very edge of our ability to detect (thus why this is news -- smallest exoplanet ever found). So you're right, we'll have to wait for technology to advance to find earth-sized rocky planets in the habitable zone (especially of non-dwarf stars).

    What is a little surprising though is how many planetary systems we have found that are very different to our own. I can't believe ours is unique but perhaps it's quite rare.

    I'm not sure anything we've found suggests that our type of solar system is rare. The limitations of our detection method by and large assures we'd find systems different from our own first. Astrophysicists might not have expected to find gas giants very close in to stars, but if they exist, we were going to find those first. The two main things that seem to have changed to me are that 1) we've gone from having nothing but our own solar system as an example and thus assuming ours was the model for all of them, to have many more examples showing different types and 2) we've learned that solar systems seem to be pretty common.

    If we get to the point where detecting a solar system like ours would be simple, and despite finding thousands of others we don't find any like ours, then maybe that points to rarity. Right now though I doubt we're anywhere near being able to say that.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  6. Re:Planets and moons by American+Terrorist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only if you eradicate the ewoks first. God those things are annoying. But hopefully tasty.

  7. Re:Extraterrestial life by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think it would be a good idea to send a rocket with a screen and dvd player or something, with a big red button on it that plays it.

    Yeah, because if a big thing from another planet lands and I look inside and see a big red button attached to some unknown device, I'm gonna just press that puppy right away :-)