shi ma? shishi shang shi bu shi zhen de? wo shishi shishi shishi la
While I suppose you COULD learn Chinese only with Pinyin, I can't imagine how painful that would be, and you'd never be able to read anything or be considered remotely literate. Probably why they never changed to pinyin.
Anyway, most of the comments here seem to be related learning to read, which in Chinese is a much easier task than writing. I can read newspapers just fine, but I gave up trying to memorize exactly how to write each character a long time ago, and just use pinyin input on my computer to write when I need to. I feel sorry for students who have to write with their hands, it really is quite difficult and slow for non-native learners. Even my Chinese friends can't remember how to write many of the characters they can easily read, and often if two or more them are in the same room when I ask them how to write a character, they will argue for a few minutes before consulting some reference to figure out exactly what the strokes are. They're also very used to computers doing that work for them.
Just because it's one of the few planets in the solar system whose gravity/temperature won't instantly kill you? Am I in the minority here by preferring to spend my entire life on earth than visit a desert with no breathable atmosphere? Why is it so important to send people to a barren rock before we have the technology to make it livable? Wouldn't the vast sum of money required be better spent preserving the rainforests here on earth? Who tagged this article 'getyourasstomars'? Why does going to mars in the near future matter even a tiny bit for our present situation?
The fact is that most people don't actually want to play a "massively" multiplayer online role-playing game. They (and I) want to play a multi-player online game. I loved playing Unreal and BF1942, but if they somehow made servers that could handle 100,000 people I wouldn't want to play on them. It's just too many people. Blizz and other companies try to find a balance between too many players in one place, and not enough. I think they have succeeded in that I can usually find a group to go wherever, and don't lag out when I zone into the capital cities.
As far as world PVP goes, please, they tried that. It always just devolves into zerging, whoever has the most people always wins. If your server is 75% alliance, world PVP is going to be pretty meaningless/frustrating if you're horde. The only way to make it fun is to try and make sure the same number of people fight each other at the same time, which is what battlegrounds and arenas are for.
Finally your assertion that WoW is a glorified dungeon crawling game strikes me as baseless, given that I spend ~20% of my time going to dungeons and 80% having fun killing people in battgrounds/arenas. WoW to me is like TFT2, but with swords and magic instead of guns.
While I agree with your sentiment, the problem is not exclusive to the USA. Every country seems to have a large number of people who are very impressionable and don't think critically enough. These people don't read enough books/articles to develop a well grounded worldview, and attempts to enlighten them are almost always futile. If half the country thinks it would be a good idea to elect Bush twice, what exactly am I supposed to do about it? If I was Venezuelan, what do you recommend I do to get rid of Chavez, or Castro, or the Chinese Communist Party? Even if most Iranians would rather not be ruled by the Ayatollah, it's not like they have much choice in the matter.
Assholes rule over idiots, it always has been that way and always will be. The only way to make a better society is to educate people to the point where they are capable of telling the difference between assholes, idiots, and smart well intentioned people.
I'm pretty much the same as far as telling direction. The only part of the summary I found amusing was the fact that the lady didn't already know which direction was north in her hometown. Lots of people I know are like that unfortunately. This is a pretty basic skill that I'm pretty sure everyone was adept at >50 years ago; look how far we've come.
It could just be poor coding. The server doesn't really need to know that your cursor is holding an item but the UI still wants to confirm that you can pick it up. Or maybe the mechanics of the game actually make it important for the server to know what you're picking up. I never played the game, so I don't know.
On the flip-side, it is possible to completely screw yourself over if you pick powers that don't synergize well. If, for example, you are a primarily ranged character (force bolts or something) but you take a melee energy builder attack (the basic attack that powers up your other attacks) you will probably not have much fun because you have to zoom in to build energy, then run away to fight at range. Or, you might make a "glass cannon" build - all offense with no defense. In the first 10 levels or so, you probably won't notice a lack of a passive defensive power, but very quickly after that you'll slam into a brick wall where you are repeatedly killed because mobs scale up under the impression that you will be a bit more well rounded.
I personally would have never played WoW if respecs cost me 1000 gold. You just gave me all the reason I need to never play this game. Most players aren't devs, didn't play in the beta, and really have no idea what skills are useful. How are people supposed to know which powers synergize never having played the game before?
Also, the utility of powers will change as you encounter different challenges or levels. The old version of Spirit Tap was great for my low level Priest, but once I hit the level cap (and even long before that) the skill was almost completely useless, and of course I wanted to respec to Blackout instead.
This system you keep apologizing for seems bent on punishing noobs for making mistakes that they had no way of knowing they were making. Most people don't do 80 hours of research and interviews with top players before attempting to play a video game. Another thing that makes no sense: respecs cost 280 days of play time or free at the next big patch? Yeah, it all makes perfect sense now.
You sound just like the Everquest devs shooting down all the petitions to make the game suck less to play because it didn't fit their pre-conceived notions of how long it was supposed to take to reach level 50.
I do realize it, but I reserve the right to mock them nevertheless. Oh and when I said arenas I meant battlegrounds. And when I say battlegrounds I mean not Alterac Valley. Warsong Gulch FTW!
I recommend "The Moral Animal" by Robert Wright. The book is mostly about modern evolutionary theory related through Darwin's works and life. I really liked that Galapagos documentary too, I felt like after watching it I never really need to go there myself, which is a good thing for the islands' wildlife.
I base my love for FPSs on the adrenaline rush aspects. AI can't provide that rush. Only when I know I'm playing against other people do I find it interesting.
I never understood people who play games for the plot. I play games for entertaining gameplay. To me the very definition of a game is something almost entirely lacking in plot. Chess, checkers, cards games, monopoly, etc all have no plot.
I played WoW for the arenas and always laughed to myself at the nerds who cared about the backstory of Archimonde and blah blah blah. The plot in these games is just a device to move the game forward. A boss that respawns every week and exists in infinitely many instances does not make for an interesting plot. When I want good stories, I read books.
Mommy why can't WE go the concert? I want to go to the concert! Pleeeeeease?
Seriously dude. You got a cruise. STFU. Many people would much rather take a nice boat ride than go to concert of 4 shitty bands they've never heard of. With your attitude it's no mystery as to why they don't want you back.
GP has a point. Most large organisms reproduce sexually for this very reason. The few that don't are relics living on isolated islands. Asexual reproduction makes organisms extremely vulnerable to pathogens, so most of them have already gone extinct. Many species can choose whether to reproduce sexually or asexually; they almost always choose sex when available because it gives so many advantages to their offspring.
How his post was flamebait I have yet to figure out.
/rant on
A lot of libertarian types' arguments aren't worth listening to. They are mostly half-educated hacks whose entire philosophy is based on one value, "freedom", don't realize that most people have many competing values, and can't appreciate nuance just like most extremists.
/rant off
Hubble's discoveries have had a major impact on the way I view the universe. Its old images are still my screen-saver, I can't wait to update them. If any NASA/astronomer types are reading this, I want to give you a huge heart-felt THANK YOU.
Yeah, and each time, it's obvious the evidence was planted.
I RTFA and tried to figure out how they are 100% certain the glycine is from space. Apparently it's because of the isotope ratios of C12 and C13, with more C13 being present in space. My question is, how much glycine did they collect? The link to the analytics on NASA's website keeps timing out.
Dude just take his advice and STFU. My mom was fat my whole life growing up, she tried a million diets through the years then five years ago she went on the south beach diet and has remained skinny since... Her greatest regret in life is not knowing about the diet earlier. Stop whining about long term statistics for weight loss and look instead at the long term effects of being fat.
Sorry about your wife's allergies, why don't you try eating spicy food on weekdays and making out on the weekends? If I had to choose between a woman and spice, well, there's just no contest. But again, look on the bright side, it's really easy to accidentally kill her off if you get sick of her.
Weight training isn't going to work now is it. That's great for bulking up.
So it's clear that you're not only fat but also retarded. Maybe you're just confused about a simple fact: muscle != fat.
Muscle burns energy while at rest and active, fat stores the energy. Weight training bulks up your muscle, not your fat, and the larger your muscle mass, the less you need to exercise to shed fat. Here's a tip: your largest muscles are in your legs and ass, so buy an exercise bike and work on making them bigger. Hope that clears things up for you.
Do you work for Twitter or something? Are they paying you to post this? Twitter hasn't killed anything except time wasted talking about it. Talking about twitter in a story about news strikes me as odd, given that all I can communicate via Twitter is a headline. I like reading stories, not tweets.
This is good old fashioned journalism at its best; a competent team of reporters going over a huge amount of data and expressing it clearly and succinctly in terms the public can understand.
But apparently they paid for the data. Some peddler was trying to sell it to major news organizations and they're the ones who decided to buy it after several refused. You skipped that part, otherwise nice post.
Slashdot Mirror
shi ma? shishi shang shi bu shi zhen de? wo shishi shishi shishi la
While I suppose you COULD learn Chinese only with Pinyin, I can't imagine how painful that would be, and you'd never be able to read anything or be considered remotely literate. Probably why they never changed to pinyin.
Anyway, most of the comments here seem to be related learning to read, which in Chinese is a much easier task than writing. I can read newspapers just fine, but I gave up trying to memorize exactly how to write each character a long time ago, and just use pinyin input on my computer to write when I need to. I feel sorry for students who have to write with their hands, it really is quite difficult and slow for non-native learners. Even my Chinese friends can't remember how to write many of the characters they can easily read, and often if two or more them are in the same room when I ask them how to write a character, they will argue for a few minutes before consulting some reference to figure out exactly what the strokes are. They're also very used to computers doing that work for them.
Just because it's one of the few planets in the solar system whose gravity/temperature won't instantly kill you? Am I in the minority here by preferring to spend my entire life on earth than visit a desert with no breathable atmosphere? Why is it so important to send people to a barren rock before we have the technology to make it livable? Wouldn't the vast sum of money required be better spent preserving the rainforests here on earth? Who tagged this article 'getyourasstomars'? Why does going to mars in the near future matter even a tiny bit for our present situation?
The fact is that most people don't actually want to play a "massively" multiplayer online role-playing game. They (and I) want to play a multi-player online game. I loved playing Unreal and BF1942, but if they somehow made servers that could handle 100,000 people I wouldn't want to play on them. It's just too many people. Blizz and other companies try to find a balance between too many players in one place, and not enough. I think they have succeeded in that I can usually find a group to go wherever, and don't lag out when I zone into the capital cities.
As far as world PVP goes, please, they tried that. It always just devolves into zerging, whoever has the most people always wins. If your server is 75% alliance, world PVP is going to be pretty meaningless/frustrating if you're horde. The only way to make it fun is to try and make sure the same number of people fight each other at the same time, which is what battlegrounds and arenas are for.
Finally your assertion that WoW is a glorified dungeon crawling game strikes me as baseless, given that I spend ~20% of my time going to dungeons and 80% having fun killing people in battgrounds/arenas. WoW to me is like TFT2, but with swords and magic instead of guns.
While I agree with your sentiment, the problem is not exclusive to the USA. Every country seems to have a large number of people who are very impressionable and don't think critically enough. These people don't read enough books/articles to develop a well grounded worldview, and attempts to enlighten them are almost always futile. If half the country thinks it would be a good idea to elect Bush twice, what exactly am I supposed to do about it? If I was Venezuelan, what do you recommend I do to get rid of Chavez, or Castro, or the Chinese Communist Party? Even if most Iranians would rather not be ruled by the Ayatollah, it's not like they have much choice in the matter.
Assholes rule over idiots, it always has been that way and always will be. The only way to make a better society is to educate people to the point where they are capable of telling the difference between assholes, idiots, and smart well intentioned people.
Good question.
I'm pretty much the same as far as telling direction. The only part of the summary I found amusing was the fact that the lady didn't already know which direction was north in her hometown. Lots of people I know are like that unfortunately. This is a pretty basic skill that I'm pretty sure everyone was adept at >50 years ago; look how far we've come.
It could just be poor coding. The server doesn't really need to know that your cursor is holding an item but the UI still wants to confirm that you can pick it up. Or maybe the mechanics of the game actually make it important for the server to know what you're picking up. I never played the game, so I don't know.
On the flip-side, it is possible to completely screw yourself over if you pick powers that don't synergize well. If, for example, you are a primarily ranged character (force bolts or something) but you take a melee energy builder attack (the basic attack that powers up your other attacks) you will probably not have much fun because you have to zoom in to build energy, then run away to fight at range. Or, you might make a "glass cannon" build - all offense with no defense. In the first 10 levels or so, you probably won't notice a lack of a passive defensive power, but very quickly after that you'll slam into a brick wall where you are repeatedly killed because mobs scale up under the impression that you will be a bit more well rounded.
I personally would have never played WoW if respecs cost me 1000 gold. You just gave me all the reason I need to never play this game. Most players aren't devs, didn't play in the beta, and really have no idea what skills are useful. How are people supposed to know which powers synergize never having played the game before?
Also, the utility of powers will change as you encounter different challenges or levels. The old version of Spirit Tap was great for my low level Priest, but once I hit the level cap (and even long before that) the skill was almost completely useless, and of course I wanted to respec to Blackout instead.
This system you keep apologizing for seems bent on punishing noobs for making mistakes that they had no way of knowing they were making. Most people don't do 80 hours of research and interviews with top players before attempting to play a video game. Another thing that makes no sense: respecs cost 280 days of play time or free at the next big patch? Yeah, it all makes perfect sense now.
You sound just like the Everquest devs shooting down all the petitions to make the game suck less to play because it didn't fit their pre-conceived notions of how long it was supposed to take to reach level 50.
I do realize it, but I reserve the right to mock them nevertheless. Oh and when I said arenas I meant battlegrounds. And when I say battlegrounds I mean not Alterac Valley. Warsong Gulch FTW!
I recommend "The Moral Animal" by Robert Wright. The book is mostly about modern evolutionary theory related through Darwin's works and life. I really liked that Galapagos documentary too, I felt like after watching it I never really need to go there myself, which is a good thing for the islands' wildlife.
I base my love for FPSs on the adrenaline rush aspects. AI can't provide that rush. Only when I know I'm playing against other people do I find it interesting.
I never understood people who play games for the plot. I play games for entertaining gameplay. To me the very definition of a game is something almost entirely lacking in plot. Chess, checkers, cards games, monopoly, etc all have no plot.
I played WoW for the arenas and always laughed to myself at the nerds who cared about the backstory of Archimonde and blah blah blah. The plot in these games is just a device to move the game forward. A boss that respawns every week and exists in infinitely many instances does not make for an interesting plot. When I want good stories, I read books.
That was sarcasm, right?
Mommy why can't WE go the concert? I want to go to the concert! Pleeeeeease?
Seriously dude. You got a cruise. STFU. Many people would much rather take a nice boat ride than go to concert of 4 shitty bands they've never heard of. With your attitude it's no mystery as to why they don't want you back.
GP has a point. Most large organisms reproduce sexually for this very reason. The few that don't are relics living on isolated islands. Asexual reproduction makes organisms extremely vulnerable to pathogens, so most of them have already gone extinct. Many species can choose whether to reproduce sexually or asexually; they almost always choose sex when available because it gives so many advantages to their offspring.
How his post was flamebait I have yet to figure out.
/rant on
/rant off
A lot of libertarian types' arguments aren't worth listening to. They are mostly half-educated hacks whose entire philosophy is based on one value, "freedom", don't realize that most people have many competing values, and can't appreciate nuance just like most extremists.
Hubble's discoveries have had a major impact on the way I view the universe. Its old images are still my screen-saver, I can't wait to update them. If any NASA/astronomer types are reading this, I want to give you a huge heart-felt THANK YOU.
Yeah, and each time, it's obvious the evidence was planted.
I RTFA and tried to figure out how they are 100% certain the glycine is from space. Apparently it's because of the isotope ratios of C12 and C13, with more C13 being present in space. My question is, how much glycine did they collect? The link to the analytics on NASA's website keeps timing out.
Dude just take his advice and STFU. My mom was fat my whole life growing up, she tried a million diets through the years then five years ago she went on the south beach diet and has remained skinny since... Her greatest regret in life is not knowing about the diet earlier. Stop whining about long term statistics for weight loss and look instead at the long term effects of being fat.
Sorry about your wife's allergies, why don't you try eating spicy food on weekdays and making out on the weekends? If I had to choose between a woman and spice, well, there's just no contest. But again, look on the bright side, it's really easy to accidentally kill her off if you get sick of her.
Weight training isn't going to work now is it. That's great for bulking up.
So it's clear that you're not only fat but also retarded. Maybe you're just confused about a simple fact:
muscle != fat.
Muscle burns energy while at rest and active, fat stores the energy. Weight training bulks up your muscle, not your fat, and the larger your muscle mass, the less you need to exercise to shed fat. Here's a tip: your largest muscles are in your legs and ass, so buy an exercise bike and work on making them bigger. Hope that clears things up for you.
How much wood would a wood-chuck chuck if a wood-chuck could chuck wood?
Most species on the planet would be better off if humans ruined their own civilizations; it's the asteroids and supernovas they're really afraid of.
Do you work for Twitter or something? Are they paying you to post this? Twitter hasn't killed anything except time wasted talking about it. Talking about twitter in a story about news strikes me as odd, given that all I can communicate via Twitter is a headline. I like reading stories, not tweets.
But there should be a "-1, Stupid" option.
The question you posed in the subject line was answered by the content of your post. Is there a way to mod 'null'?
This is good old fashioned journalism at its best; a competent team of reporters going over a huge amount of data and expressing it clearly and succinctly in terms the public can understand.
But apparently they paid for the data. Some peddler was trying to sell it to major news organizations and they're the ones who decided to buy it after several refused. You skipped that part, otherwise nice post.