Slashdot Mirror
Scientists Isolate and Treat Parasite Causing Decline in Honey Bee Population
In a recent report, a team of scientists from Spain claims to have isolated and treated the parasite causing honey bee depopulation syndrome. Their hope is to prevent the continued decline of honey bee populations in Europe and the US. "The loss of honey bees could have an enormous horticultural and economic impact worldwide. Honeybees are important pollinators of crops, fruit and wild flowers and are indispensable for a sustainable and profitable agriculture as well as for the maintenance of the non-agricultural ecosystem. Honeybees are attacked by numerous pathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites."
You know bees are useful for fertilizing plants and not just the sticky yellow stuff right?
Pollinating, not fertilizing.
Unless you kill them, crush and compost their bodies, and add the compost to the plants, that is.
Dammit I knew posting on Slashdot on a Friday was a bad idea....
Thanks for the bugfix!
So where are they now?
Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
This should bee a positive step for farmers everywhere who depend on these critters for pollination of their crops. I'm buzzing with joy!
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
A parasite. Not virus or bacteria.
Breeding resistant bees is kinda like breeding humans that are resistant to tapeworm.
You kill or surgically remove parasites - you don't develop antibodies to fight them.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
This story is in direct disagreement with a recent article in SciAm, where they find colony collapse is MORE like caused by IAPV, and NOT the nosema parasite.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=saving-the-honeybee
And since the scientists in the SciAm article looked at a lot more than two apiaries, I am gonna have to give them a lot more credence.
"Honeybees are attacked by numerous pathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites."
The Honeybees role 15d6 to defend -
Death to the Fungi!
"i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
In other words, they didn't think Nosema ceranae was the cause at first. After they ran out of "top ten" suspects, they started going after the more "ordinary" organisms inside the bees one by one.
The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
Nosema seems to be just a part of the equation - not the solution to it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey_bee_depopulation_syndrome#Nosema
A study reported in September 2007 found that 100% of afflicted and 80% of non-afflicted colonies contained Nosema ceranae.
Link to the September 2007 SciAm article about the study:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=bees-ccd-virus&page=1
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
Interestingly, the story itself contains a quotation not so favorable to the story's summary, and even its own text is less optimistic:
A critical read of these statements (remember to parse it as English) and the rest of the article as well tells us that this particular parasite was identified as the sole cause in two professional apiaries. The principal researcher (they say "principle" in the article... reading "news" causes me physical pain these days) is saying one strain of parasite could be responsible. But what has actually happened is that they have identified a single parasite that was active in two apiaries with hives suffering from underpopulation. That does not mean a single parasite caused the dieoff (the bees suffering from some other parasite, infection, or other distress might be the ones that departed) and it does not mean that the "cure" for colony collapse disorder has been identified.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Don't treat the parasites, kill them. The parasites are the problem, and the last thing we need is to treat them. Treat the bees, kill the parasites.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
Don't be an idiot.
Honeybees are a domesticated species. Like crops, cows and cats. There is no more "natural progression of life" to interfere with here, because the life in question is that of living things we've bred, sheltered and tamed (as much as we can say an insect is "tame").
Plus, if it weren't for "filling wallets", the dying colonies wouldn't exist in the first place. Do you honestly think we go out and take honey from wild beehives? Are you that ignorant?
The colonies that are dying mostly weren't those wax and paper numbers you see hanging from tree branches, they're wood and wire mesh numbers built for the express purpose of farming the bees for honey. Wild bees were also dying, but it's the domesticated ones we noticed first.
Hell, the disease itself might not have anything to do with this moronic concept of "natural progression" you ignorantly put forth, and everything to do with us creating a situation in which the fungus can more easily infect domesticated bees than wild ones.
Your argument might make some sense if we were referring to a wild species that was dying off from a cause unrelated to human activity. As it stands, what you're saying makes about as much sense as saying we shouldn't treat bird flu in the chicken population.
Plus the concept of "natural progression" is a fools notion, put forward by idiots who'd have flunked out of bio 101 if they'd ever tried taking it. Evolution isn't about progress, nature isn't some sacred ineffable god, and mankind is only morally obligated to minimize the environmental impact of our own actions. We are not bound to do what is evolutionarily best, because the concept of one outcome being "best" for evolution is meaningless, and in any event we should not be using the principles of biology as moral grounds.
Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
No, he posts on slashdot. He's clearly smarter than the average bear.
But not as useful as more efficient, native pollinators, which in North America honeybees displace.
Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
Reading the other comments here, it's clear this isn't a case closed situation, but, this has been one of the single most frightening changes in nature in recent years and its reassuring to know that there at least seems to be progress.
The musings of just another geek and his junk.
Falcon's don't pollinate anything.
Apostrophes can be overused, too.
I was worried there would be a mead shortage...and a decline in pagan moon shine is a bad thing...
-Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
While bees have been around for a very long time, I'm not so sure it's been the same type of bees for millions of years. Commercial beekeepers are using only a very few varieties of bees.
In those millions of years it could well be that there have been many instances where a single variety of bee has been wiped out.
Or nearly wiped out. A 10 year recovery period may not show up in fossil records. But 10 years for recovery is a big deal for the fruit industry and other industries that depend on bees.
Also "past performance is not an indicator of future success". The fossil record has plenty of species that have been around for millions of years and then got wiped out. Some could have just been very unfortunate. Modern human society is actually very fragile and highly dependent on many things going right. We could go from billions of humans to millions in a very short time.
This sort of thing infuriates me. Flamebait be damned, this needs saying.
Science is not a cause, nor a goal, or agent. Science is a framework for gaining knowledge while discarding falsehood. That is all. Saying science is the cause of some evil is saying that learning is the cause of some evil.
There are consequences to the knowledge that science unlocks, it is true. Some of these consequences are detrimental, it is true. However, to condemn the best process of learning because some of the things we have learnt have been used in a less than ideal fashion is to condemn all the good things we have learnt through it as well, and on balance, I'd say we're ahead.
And finally, to bitch about science, from the shelter of your science-made walls that house your your electricity-powered home, via quantum mechanical communication equipment, and with you alive in no small part due to a plethora of antibiotics and immunisations - is the worst disrespectful hypocrisy. Next time a doctor saves your life think hard on that.
Err, no. What you refered to as "a crude sort of science" was really a crude sort of technology. The bees were not bought to North America as part of a scientific experiment from which they escaped. They were brought for specific commercial purpose, and that purpose wasn't to expand our knowledge of how the world works (in other words, not for science). So, no, science did not create the problem you cite, either. People did, but they were not scientists nor were they in any way doing science, nor was science in any way involved.
"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
No' t'he'y' c'ant'
Saying the reason the bees were dying was because of human pollution.
Another media lie.
What about the people who don't like or can't eat Chinese?
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
If you have a resource which can be exploited at a certain rate sustainably, then find by for example pouring nitrates and phosphates on to it you can triple production for a few years, then it fails. Is it really sane to exploit it unsustainably?
Our economic system forces perverse results. Sustainable equates with failure. In the above example those who operate sustainably will be forced out of business because they have to compete with others who can simply borrow some money, increase production for a short time flooding the market and crashing the prices, then buy up their competitors at a steep discount before raising prices again.
Actually this is a national security issue, particularly for farming and food production.
Deleted