Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Isolate and Treat Parasite Causing Decline in Honey Bee Population

In a recent report, a team of scientists from Spain claims to have isolated and treated the parasite causing honey bee depopulation syndrome. Their hope is to prevent the continued decline of honey bee populations in Europe and the US. "The loss of honey bees could have an enormous horticultural and economic impact worldwide. Honeybees are important pollinators of crops, fruit and wild flowers and are indispensable for a sustainable and profitable agriculture as well as for the maintenance of the non-agricultural ecosystem. Honeybees are attacked by numerous pathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites."

26 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hope by tarpitcod · · Score: 5, Informative

    You know bees are useful for fertilizing plants and not just the sticky yellow stuff right?

  2. Re:Hope by puppetman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pollinating, not fertilizing.

    Unless you kill them, crush and compost their bodies, and add the compost to the plants, that is.

  3. Re:Hope by tarpitcod · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dammit I knew posting on Slashdot on a Friday was a bad idea....

    Thanks for the bugfix!

  4. Sweeeet! by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This should bee a positive step for farmers everywhere who depend on these critters for pollination of their crops. I'm buzzing with joy!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  5. Nosema is a fungus... by denzacar · · Score: 5, Informative

    A parasite. Not virus or bacteria.
    Breeding resistant bees is kinda like breeding humans that are resistant to tapeworm.

    You kill or surgically remove parasites - you don't develop antibodies to fight them.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Nosema is a fungus... by _KiTA_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You kill or surgically remove parasites - you don't develop antibodies to fight them.

      So what? Are we looking at another grape blight? Are we going to have to kill off 99% of the commercial bee population and start over?

      We're probably in some deep trouble if so. But maybe we should infect killer bees before we wipe this parasite out?

    2. Re:Nosema is a fungus... by frieko · · Score: 4, Informative

      [citation needed]. My dad breeds sheep, and yes, you can select for parasite resistance. You'd be surprised at the things your body can fight off.

    3. Re:Nosema is a fungus... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is believed that larger bees are more susceptible to mites, because the bees are easier for the mites to get into. Giving the bees an artificial wax starter foundation with larger cells than they normally make increases the ratio of honey to wax, but also means that the bees will produce larger brood to fill the cells, which results in larger adult bees...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Nosema is a fungus... by turbidostato · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Why not just have sustainable environmental practices"

      So in order to avoid production being reduced tenfold we will use practices that will reduce production tenfold.

  6. Opposing study by DinDaddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    This story is in direct disagreement with a recent article in SciAm, where they find colony collapse is MORE like caused by IAPV, and NOT the nosema parasite.

    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=saving-the-honeybee

    And since the scientists in the SciAm article looked at a lot more than two apiaries, I am gonna have to give them a lot more credence.

    1. Re:Opposing study by alanrw · · Score: 5, Informative

      For anyone interested in CCD, I strongly recommend the book "Fruitless Fall" by Rowan Jacobsen. In it, he suggests, just like the SciAm article does, that CCD is likely a combination of multiple factors, including IAPV, nosema, pesticides, industrial farming, and other contributors. While this study is a good start, I won't hold my breath that CCD is over until we have much more evidence.

  7. Quite so... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nosema seems to be just a part of the equation - not the solution to it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey_bee_depopulation_syndrome#Nosema

    A study reported in September 2007 found that 100% of afflicted and 80% of non-afflicted colonies contained Nosema ceranae.

    Link to the September 2007 SciAm article about the study:
    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=bees-ccd-virus&page=1

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  8. Read further down the story by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Interestingly, the story itself contains a quotation not so favorable to the story's summary, and even its own text is less optimistic:

    There have been other hypothesis for colony collapse in Europe and the USA, but never has this bug been identified as the primary cause in professional apiaries.

    "Now that we know one strain of parasite that could be responsible, we can look for signs of infection and treat any infected colonies before the infection spreads" said Dr Higes, principle researcher.

    A critical read of these statements (remember to parse it as English) and the rest of the article as well tells us that this particular parasite was identified as the sole cause in two professional apiaries. The principal researcher (they say "principle" in the article... reading "news" causes me physical pain these days) is saying one strain of parasite could be responsible. But what has actually happened is that they have identified a single parasite that was active in two apiaries with hives suffering from underpopulation. That does not mean a single parasite caused the dieoff (the bees suffering from some other parasite, infection, or other distress might be the ones that departed) and it does not mean that the "cure" for colony collapse disorder has been identified.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. No, don't treat the parasites by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't treat the parasites, kill them. The parasites are the problem, and the last thing we need is to treat them. Treat the bees, kill the parasites.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  10. Re:Humanity interfering... by RsG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't be an idiot.

    Honeybees are a domesticated species. Like crops, cows and cats. There is no more "natural progression of life" to interfere with here, because the life in question is that of living things we've bred, sheltered and tamed (as much as we can say an insect is "tame").

    Plus, if it weren't for "filling wallets", the dying colonies wouldn't exist in the first place. Do you honestly think we go out and take honey from wild beehives? Are you that ignorant?

    The colonies that are dying mostly weren't those wax and paper numbers you see hanging from tree branches, they're wood and wire mesh numbers built for the express purpose of farming the bees for honey. Wild bees were also dying, but it's the domesticated ones we noticed first.

    Hell, the disease itself might not have anything to do with this moronic concept of "natural progression" you ignorantly put forth, and everything to do with us creating a situation in which the fungus can more easily infect domesticated bees than wild ones.

    Your argument might make some sense if we were referring to a wild species that was dying off from a cause unrelated to human activity. As it stands, what you're saying makes about as much sense as saying we shouldn't treat bird flu in the chicken population.

    Plus the concept of "natural progression" is a fools notion, put forward by idiots who'd have flunked out of bio 101 if they'd ever tried taking it. Evolution isn't about progress, nature isn't some sacred ineffable god, and mankind is only morally obligated to minimize the environmental impact of our own actions. We are not bound to do what is evolutionarily best, because the concept of one outcome being "best" for evolution is meaningless, and in any event we should not be using the principles of biology as moral grounds.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  11. Re:Scientists *From* Spain? by clem · · Score: 3, Funny

    With the Girl from Ipanema?

    --
    Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  12. Honeybees displace more efficient pollinators by Ichijo · · Score: 3, Informative

    You know bees are useful for fertilizing plants and not just the sticky yellow stuff right?

    But not as useful as more efficient, native pollinators, which in North America honeybees displace.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Honeybees displace more efficient pollinators by Opyros · · Score: 4, Interesting
  13. Re:HoneyWell by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seriously, people.

    It's a 1d20, and they can add half their hit dice plus CON bonus, if any.

  14. Best news I've heard all day by mc1138 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading the other comments here, it's clear this isn't a case closed situation, but, this has been one of the single most frightening changes in nature in recent years and its reassuring to know that there at least seems to be progress.

  15. Re:Bees by amilo100 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Falcon's don't pollinate anything.

  16. Re:Bees by mattack2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apostrophes can be overused, too.

  17. Thank the Gods by Coraon · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was worried there would be a mead shortage...and a decline in pagan moon shine is a bad thing...

    --
    -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
  18. Re:Science solves science's problems? by duffel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sort of thing infuriates me. Flamebait be damned, this needs saying.

    Science is not a cause, nor a goal, or agent. Science is a framework for gaining knowledge while discarding falsehood. That is all. Saying science is the cause of some evil is saying that learning is the cause of some evil.

    There are consequences to the knowledge that science unlocks, it is true. Some of these consequences are detrimental, it is true. However, to condemn the best process of learning because some of the things we have learnt have been used in a less than ideal fashion is to condemn all the good things we have learnt through it as well, and on balance, I'd say we're ahead.

    And finally, to bitch about science, from the shelter of your science-made walls that house your your electricity-powered home, via quantum mechanical communication equipment, and with you alive in no small part due to a plethora of antibiotics and immunisations - is the worst disrespectful hypocrisy. Next time a doctor saves your life think hard on that.

  19. Re:Bees by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Funny

    No' t'he'y' c'ant'

  20. You insensitive clod... by denzacar · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the people who don't like or can't eat Chinese?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens