Slashdot Mirror


Archive Team Is Busy Saving Geocities

jamie found this note from Jason Scott, who organizes the Archive Team. They are busy downloading as much of Geocities as they can before it vanishes from the Net after Yahoo pulled the plug. (Note: that textfiles.com link is a good candidate for Readability.) "..after 48 hours of work, Archive Team has saved over 200,000 Geocities sites. We're now pulling in new sites at the rate of something like 5 a second. Is that fast enough? We'll see, won't we. ... A side-effect of the whole process is I now know way, way, way too much [sic] about Geocities than I ever expected to. We've had to dissect every aspect of how the site functions to understand how to mirror things, from its history through how it does crazy javascript ads. Some of it is stupid and some is hilarious... We think we have most every site from 1999 and before on Geocities that was left. ... It is more important to me to grab the data than to figure out how to serve it later. People who have been talking about copyright and stuff seem to think I'm going to sell it or take credit or some crap. I don't see how the final collection won't end up online, but how is elusive — maybe a torrent of a bunch of zip files, or as a curated collection, or as a bunch of hard drives. However it is, I'll make sure people can get it, somehow."

267 comments

  1. Don't forget by ipb · · Score: 4, Funny

    to surround it all by a blink tag

    1. Re:Don't forget by Sfing_ter · · Score: 3, Informative

      firefox still supports the blink :D

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    2. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      sadly if the guy is not reproducing the bitch is more productive....

    3. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your ability to provide jobs is directly proportional to your ability to be on topic.

    4. Re:Don't forget by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that if you've created Slashdot trolling jobs for 14 people, you may not be stimulating the economy as much as you hope.

      (To the mods: the parent post has appeared in several other slashdot discussions and is a spam/troll.)

    5. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we assume that possibly 14 people work for slashdot and that 200,000 people per year is a gross understatement of slashdot readership, then trolling does indeed stimulate the economy.

      Thanks, Mr Troll!

    6. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are literally a child

    7. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All browsers that support CSS1 should display blinking text when the following property is used.

      "text-decoration: blink;"

      <blink>Shockingly</blink>, or should that be surprisingly? IE6 doesn't support this.

    8. Re:Don't forget by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Eye candy, or eye cancer? You be the judge.

      I remember reading a sentence of a paragraph once that was trapped in the blink vortex and said fuck this. *copy* *paste into notepad*

      --
      The game.
    9. Re:Don't forget by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Informative

      Until I found about:config, browser.blink_allowed.

    10. Re:Don't forget by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      The comment was for my own personal amusement. If the troll enjoyed it, good for him.

    11. Re:Don't forget by dyefade · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter if he "enjoyed" it - ANY attention is bad. Please don't feed the trolls.

    12. Re:Don't forget by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      but to my credit, I can claim I brought it to military spec
      (duty cycle of 3/4th time on, 1/4th off.)

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    13. Re:Don't forget by dargaud · · Score: 2

      I've never understood why the same people who complain about the blink tag praise OSX 'design', including the dock's bouncing icons. Both irritate me to no end and the first thing I ever did with Mac OSX was spend 10 minutes on the web to figure how to turn that concentration killing monstrosity off.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    14. Re:Don't forget by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Yeah but when will it support the interval attribute??!?

      <blink interval="100ms">that's what she said</blink>

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    15. Re:Don't forget by z80kid · · Score: 1

      In related news, incidences of epileptic seizures drop sharply following death of Geocities.

    16. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are all forgetting that this is peoples content, and you have no legal rights to do anything with it. Maybe I have a site there, and do not want you to archive it. What gives you the right to do so?

    17. Re:Don't forget by hitmark · · Score: 1
      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    18. Re:Don't forget by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Bankrupt!!!

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  2. A lesson for future generations by Merc248 · · Score: 1

    Always avoid

    --
    "Hegelians, who love a synthesis, will probably conclude that he wears a wig." - Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:A lesson for future generations by Merc248 · · Score: 1

      ... I think there's hope for us after all, I just hope the Archive Team archives slashdot so that <blink> is eliminated forever

      --
      "Hegelians, who love a synthesis, will probably conclude that he wears a wig." - Bertrand Russell
    2. Re:A lesson for future generations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Along with people who insist on using fixed width fonts in a forum where *everybody* else uses proportional width fonts.

    3. Re:A lesson for future generations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along with people who insist on using fixed width fonts in a forum where *everybody* else uses proportional width fonts.

      People!? You know that fixed-width fonts are a by-product from the chatbot AI, right? You're actually replying to an alien robot trying to infiltrate our population! I didn't realize most people do not possess this knowledge. Quick spread the w.. Hang on a sec, someone at the door.

      I am sorry about the downtime. Please ignore everything I just said. I am sure it's just my imagination.

    4. Re:A lesson for future generations by maxume · · Score: 1

      He needed to make a <blink> and used something that ignored < but turned on fixed width.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:A lesson for future generations by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      Cool! We all know how much more readable fixed-width is, and how much more pleasing it is on the eye, too.

    6. Re:A lesson for future generations by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      You're not a very smart bot; why'd you hit "Submit"?

    7. Re:A lesson for future generations by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Meh. Proportional fonts are great for word processing and desktop publishing, but on the internet? That'll never catch on. How would you do ASCII art signatures? Besides, most internet software doesn't even support them. Gnus does, but that's the exception (Gnus supports *everything*, including TeX formatting if you have AucTeX installed, but who would want to use formatting in messages on the internet when we already have perfectly good all-ASCII conventions for *bold* and _underline_?). Mutt and Pine and Lynx and so on and so forth are all fixed-width for a reason.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  3. How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by Glass+Goldfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With Google losing half a billion a year, how long until they pull the plug on Youtube? I guess it could turn a profit, but when? My guess is the next downturn will cause shareholder pressure to force their hand.

    1. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Those numbers were on crack just so you know. (The cost to run youtube #s)

    2. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you get that number from? Google is quite profitable. Do you mean YouTube is costing them half a billion a year?

      Good luck trying to pull all that data. Geocities is a 90's era remnant and as such just doesn't have that much data on it (probably less than a terabyte if I had to guess). YouTube on the other hand is a modern era high-bandwidth site where pretty much every user has broadband, it's orders of magnitude more data.

    3. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by EonBlueTooL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last time someone brought this up moore's law was mentioned.

      As storage capacity and throughput expand and become cheaper, google can start to make a profit.

      I still however think that google is stupid for not doing what hulu does.

    4. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      This is why I use the various tools available out there to locally save ANY YouTube video I particularly like.

      It's a very important rule to follow when you're on the net: If you like it, save it. It won't be there forever.

    5. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by fraktus · · Score: 1

      Whoaaa, that's a cool idea! Of course at some point it will just disappear, anybody believe that youtube will still be there in 10 years ?

      --
      In cyberspace nobody knows you're a cat!
    6. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      This is especially true with Youtube. Content is removed by the minute for various, sometimes superfluous reasons.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    7. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      They're losing half a billion a year, but how much does the service actually cost to run? 2 billion? Three? If they're making 1.5 or 2.5 billion dollars in revenue then it's not terribly difficult to tighten the screws and make it profitable over the long term. Most businesses lose money the first two years. I think Geocities lived as long as it did because of the name recognition, and Yahoo attempted to (but failed) to convert that community into a loyal group of users who used Yahoo services and ads. I see the connection you're trying to make here but it's a pretty weak link.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're missing one important point:

      How much would Google be losing to competition if they didn't have Youtube?

      It's a war out there, and Youtube is an outpost - costly to keep, but if you don't keep it, the enemy will gain not only it but a lot of field.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by Gunstick · · Score: 1

      With a firefox proxy addon I run all flv through a proxy (wwwoffle) which simply saves every youtube video.
      Unfortunately the newer raw flv are no more playable (some DRM stuff?) so an additional script regularly retrieves the mp4 version.

      --
      Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
    10. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by lefiz · · Score: 1

      Google is in a tough spot. Youtube has incredible market share in the video space, which gives Google the best chance to make money in that space if/when someone figures out a proper business model. As a GOOG shareholder, I would be pissed if they just gave up and surrendered this space (and its something like 90% market share) to competitors. If nothing else, YT can serve as a "loss leader" brand to keep folks in the fold. A proper business model should work too. How about $2 for a full length new release film? Won't work you say? People can get those films for free? Tell that to the iTunes store. Or check out Hulu. Higher quality video, targeted single commercials.

    11. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by operagost · · Score: 1

      That sounds too similar to the current administration's policy of printing more money and hoping the economy recovers so that something can back it up.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what that word means?

  4. I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago... by bughunter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I lost the password to my Geocities page 10 years ago. Think you might be able to find it?

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  5. And nothing of value was archived by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, future generations must know about the horrors visited upon us by the millions of tubgirl and lolcats clones which populated Geocities. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

    1. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think some Yahoo suits thinking exactly as you joked but a message for them: It is history they will be rm -rf 'ing and you show like a company which can't even afford idle webpages hosting for historical purposes, in such a bad shape with no future.

      They will be deleting (or considering even) dead/passed away people's webpages while they don't have any chance to reply to their lame mails or "click here" things. They did the very same thing in Yahoo Briefcase, 10 MB of highly compressible data for God's sake. At most!

    2. Re:And nothing of value was archived by jlarocco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was a time, I'd put it somewhere between 1996 and 1998, when Geocities wasn't half bad. Few people were really "up" on the technology, so they'd use Geocities to host real, actual pages that didn't suck. Granted it didn't last very long, and practically overnight everybody was using real hosting options for anything serious. But for a little while, seeing search engine return a link to Geocities wasn't automatically a bad thing.

      Then again, maybe there just wasn't much to compare to back then. Or maybe it just seemed neat because I was only 14.

    3. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Eudial · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh. We already have repeated it. Myspace is basically last couple of years' geocities.

      Now there's the web 2.0 boom which is the geocities of the future. Except, instead of small personals sites with blinking gif animations, you have big sites with horrible AJAX interfaces that completely breaks page navigation. Yes, this applies to big websites like slashdot and freshmeat as well.

      What the hell? What was wrong with the old slashcode? The difference for the end user is that now you have to click 10 times to do what you could do in one click in the web 1.0 version.

      The lesson to be learn is that you shouldn't fix what isn't broken.

      Now I'll get back to my rocking chair. I've got kids to keep off the lawn.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    4. Re:And nothing of value was archived by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or maybe it just seemed neat because I was only 14.

      Thanks for making me feel like an old man.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:And nothing of value was archived by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was 18 and it wasn't half bad as you say. There might be a lot of important information there to archive and we should help them if we can.

    6. Re:And nothing of value was archived by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There might be a lot of important information there to archive and we should help them if we can.

      Can you give us an example?

      I'm not doubting that there's something culturally crucial that's on a Geocities page somewhere that's never been moved elsewhere, but I'd like an example before I get too exercised.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:And nothing of value was archived by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      you shouldn't fix what isn't broken.

      That would eliminate a whole lot of what we call "progress" in technology and culture.

      Sometimes, you don't realize something is "broken" until somebody comes along and "fixes" it.

      Know what? I like people who fix what isn't broken.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:And nothing of value was archived by darkstar949 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed, in fact there is still some good content up on Geocites that I just recently discovered. Case and point would be a fairly inclusive reverence to the Cokin Filter System. I'm not sure if it is still being updated, but it would be a loss if it is the only site like it on the internet.

    9. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Eudial · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you shouldn't fix what isn't broken.

      That would eliminate a whole lot of what we call "progress" in technology and culture.

      Sometimes, you don't realize something is "broken" until somebody comes along and "fixes" it.

      Know what? I like people who fix what isn't broken.

      Though aimlessly adopting any new technology that comes along isn't progress.

      I'm appending a list of browser features mutilated by web 2.0:

      • The back, reload and forward buttons
      • Navigation with the cursor keys.
      • Bookmarking
      • Searching in pages

      When every webpage has it's own conventions for what happens when you press a key, you haven't moved forward, you've moved into chaos. Nowadays, what happens when you press a key or click on an element is an entirely arbitrary matter in the hands of the website designer, and completely different from site to site.

      Navigating webpages used to be difficult enough when all links were immediately available. Now, adding to the pain, you have to search page elements that are only loaded if you perform some arcane voodoo ritual that the designer figured decided was how the page elements should work.

      It's not that web 2.0 pages have a new interface that's different from the old, it's that every single web 2.0 page has it's own conventions.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    10. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time, I'd put it somewhere between 1996 and 1998, when Geocities wasn't half bad.

      Yeah I remember that...OK, not really. Even in the days of yellow background and purple text, Geocities pages always kind of sucked. I remember when a fellow writer friend of mine wanted to start publishing his stuff to the web. We knew jack-crap about HTML then, but he kept telling me how "easy" and "cool" this Geocities thing was. I took one look and told him no thanks, I'll be buying the first book on HTML I can find.

    11. Re:And nothing of value was archived by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh. We already have repeated it. Myspace is basically last couple of years' geocities.

      Except for the fact that the girls are younger and sluttier, a definitive improvement.

    12. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      your five digit uid doesn't?

    13. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Nested display was totally broken for long topics (if the thread tree got too big, each additional page would just be a repeat of the previous page). At least now it's just really slow on big topics. And you have to keep hitting more till you actually load the whole discussion.

    14. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Randle_Revar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The new Slashdot interface is better than the old, all in all. The preferences popup/overlay is stupid and the moderating interface needs to go back to having a confirm moderation button but the dynamic display of remaining mod points is nice and the inline, dynamic commenting is brilliant. The ajax-driven thread expand/collapse is also good.

    15. Re:And nothing of value was archived by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      Uh. We already have repeated it. Myspace is basically last couple of years' geocities.

      I have a theory that all new internet formats (blogs, social networking pages, etc.) ultimately evolve into attempts to recreate Geocities. Geocities is the archetypal version of what happens when everyone has a web presence.

      --
      Visit the
    16. Re:And nothing of value was archived by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I found an excellent page describing dives from the top of the castle in Super Mario 64 on geocities once.

    17. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Except?? That is the best thing of all! :P

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    18. Re:And nothing of value was archived by ghmh · · Score: 1

      I'm appending a list of browser features mutilated by web 2.0:

      • The back, reload and forward buttons
      • Navigation with the cursor keys.
      • Bookmarking
      • Searching in pages

      Flash mutilated those long before this so called '2.0'

    19. Re:And nothing of value was archived by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I'm appending a list of browser features mutilated by web 2.0:

              * The back, reload and forward buttons
              * Navigation with the cursor keys.
              * Bookmarking
              * Searching in pages

      The back, reload and forward buttons are doable even in web 2.0 by applying hash codes and history stacks to the navigation. It is not easy but doable!

      Navigation with the cursor keys, same here doable!

      Bookmarking, as well doable by adding deep linking via hash codes!

      Searching in pages: pleaaze... that has nothing to do with dhtml based pages!
      You can search within pages as long as you are document centric and dont have a rich client application running!

      The problems I see currently is that all of this stuff is doable but the browsers have deficiencies and some web application types are from the type where bookmarking for instance does not make sense!

      I will give an example, most of the stuff mentioned can be done via applying a hash value which represents some kind of application state (hash because it is alterable from the script without causing page refreshes)
      Problem is you cannot rely on a onHashChange event except in IE8, there are hacks to bypass this limit, but they are really ugly, like polling the hash!

      Bookmarking only really makes sense in a page context, what are you going to bookmark if you have a full blown rich client application like a mind mapping tool on your hand, you only can make the entry point of the submodule bookmarkable. Same goes for back which then probably will be relegated to undo or redo in this case....

    20. Re:And nothing of value was archived by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      The new Slashdot interface is better than the old, all in all.

      You used to be able to view which of your posts were replied to with 1 click. Now, it's 1 plus 1 click per post. With 5 posts, that's 6 clicks to do what you could do before with 1 click.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    21. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Mex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I humbly disagree that Myspace is anywhere near as useful as Geocities could be*. Or at least entertaining.

      You could spend hours on interesting geocities sites devoted to a very particular subject. Anyone remember the website "Spatula City"? I think it was hosted on geocities for a time.

      Then you had the websites that were kind of like mini-wikipedias for tv shows, Star Trek, the simpsons, and so on.

      There was the odd personal webpage that was actually interesting (I remember "Tales from a loser" or something like that, a blog before the word even existed), links, and who could forget, "those" sites that begged you "IF YOU DON'T OWN THIS SOFTWARE ERASE IT AFTER 24HRS OTHERWISE IT'S ILLEGAL! FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY!"

      90% of it was crap, but it was interesting crap. Myspace on the other hand, besides hosting the music for some bands, seems really useless to me as a host. And as a social network, Facebook is just better.

      * Operative word could

    22. Re:And nothing of value was archived by kop · · Score: 1

      Just don't try to read it on an iphone

    23. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and thats why noscript bans all javascript on slashdot. It's ridiculous.

    24. Re:And nothing of value was archived by that_itch_kid · · Score: 1

      the moderating interface needs to go back to having a confirm moderation button

      Please god, yes. Bring it back.

    25. Re:And nothing of value was archived by MadKeithV · · Score: 1
      Quote I've heard (paraphrased, can't find the original):

      The wise man adapts to his surroundings. The fool adapts his surroundings to him. All progress is made by fools.

    26. Re:And nothing of value was archived by u38cg · · Score: 1

      This is a good example. Extremely specialised interest, not available anywhere else (unless it's been mirrored in the last couple of years), and covers its subject in better detail than I've encountered in any of the standard histories. Certainly much more detail than the Wikipedia article.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    27. Re:And nothing of value was archived by laejoh · · Score: 1

      That's why I raise my kids with conditioning!

    28. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I think the kimichi diode page was hosted on geocities. Theres only one page about this phenomenon left on the internet left, sadly.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    29. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to connect an Atari 2600 Paddle to the PC, by means of the use of a standard PC mouse board as the interface

      Maybe not important, maybe not knowledge that will be irretrievably lost, but interesting nonetheless. I also seriously digg the homemade tiling background ;-)

    30. Re:And nothing of value was archived by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      The only thing I like of the new interface is the ability to click a comment link and have it appear inline. However, this behaviour isn't predictable. When I'm logged in, it's the old behaviour again, and recently I don't have to be logged in anymore for it not to work. I can't seem to control this behaviour through the confusing preferences either.

      The same behaviour applies to replying. I never know what I'm going to get. I prefer the old reply code, as with that I can easily log in on the same page.

    31. Re:And nothing of value was archived by pbhj · · Score: 1

      [*** HELP *** anyone know of a way for non-premium members to download a geocities site quickly? I can get most of it with wget but have some older pages that aren't linked in. Cheers!]

      My page was in Research Triangle, IIRC, I stopped using it in about '99 (again IIRC) though I backported some info to it and used it for testing and ultimately updated it to do a redirect to my privately hosted pages on http://alicious.com/ which is now my blog.

      Amazingly nedstatbasic isn't that anymore it's some other company but still has stats and reports 6000 page views since 2003 (which must be when motigo took over?).

      6 visitors in 2009,
      98 visitors in 2008,

      On motigo.com they have lots of geocities pages in their stats listing, this is a pretty good example of the type of thing:
      * http://www.geocities.com/yosemite/trails/3543/ a horse page
      * http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Facility/9209/ electronics page

      This second one has a frame-breaker, webring adverts but is missing the "under construction" gif that would of completed the set ... C..C..C..Combo-BREAKER!

    32. Re:And nothing of value was archived by makomk · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, all the actual content there appears to have 404ed.

    33. Re:And nothing of value was archived by characterZer0 · · Score: 1

      Project managers realized that they could drop support for all of this stuff ("We'll add it later!") and produce applications cheaper and quicker.

      However, the platform has gotten so bad and other technologies have gotten so good that it is quicker and cheaper to write desktop applications and deploy them via the web. But "Web 2.0" is still the buzzword, so nobody will fund a project using Java Web Start.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    34. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And history repeats itself. Most of these were broken by frames 10 years ago.

    35. Re:And nothing of value was archived by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Wierd. It was there this morning. Archive.org has it, though.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    36. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Too funny, that was my exact thought just before I read your comment. I started in this industry before the internet, when remote support was done over 1200 baud, and the thought of a multi windowed screen was unthinkable. My first experience with a "windows" system was "No way will I ever have more then one or two windows open, its too confusing".

      Today it averages 10 or more, I remote support from my home, across the country, with negligible lag time on a desktop connection, and can be contacted when I am out on my boat sailing. I have maybe 15 more years to go in this industry and frankly I cannot even imagine what systems will be like then.

      God, 14 years old remembering Geocities...I feel a lawn comment coming on.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    37. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      future generations must know about the horrors visited upon us by the millions of tubgirl and lolcats clones which populated Geocities. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

      Perhaps the Library of Congress could be persuated to create a national archive for these websites and the culture contained within. Anthropologists alone could churn out numerous PhDs of this material. This material should be considered as important as the wall scriptures of Pompeii.

    38. Re:And nothing of value was archived by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      If anything was important, somebody would have copied it already.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    39. Re:And nothing of value was archived by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > There was a time, I'd put it somewhere between 1996 and 1998, when Geocities wasn't half bad. Few people
      > were really "up" on the technology, so they'd use Geocities to host real, actual pages that didn't suck.

      I don't remember it that way. I remember Geocities being a large collection of pages that basically said "Wow, look at my page, I know how to specify a black background and frames! And I really like fractals!" clear back when I was in college. I graduated in May of 1997.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    40. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Though there's a boundary, a low UID does not necessarily indicate age. I would have been about 17 when BHI changed their name to Geocities.

    41. Re:And nothing of value was archived by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Well it makes me think that Geocities could be a relatively strong brand nowadays. a so 90's brand, it could work with those born in the 90's, who could have a "vintage" address :-) or older guys like us who had their first web site hosted on geocities. Ah those good pionneer years :-). Mmmmh...If only I had the money :-)

    42. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Searching in pages: pleaaze... that has nothing to do with dhtml based pages!
      You can search within pages as long as you are document centric and dont have a rich client application running!

      I will give an example, most of the stuff mentioned can be done via applying a hash value which represents some kind of application state (hash because it is alterable from the script without causing page refreshes)

      I think you're both coming to the discussion with a different set of assumptions. You're absolutely right that for a web application, many of his gripes don't make sense. Realistically, though, many companies use DHTML for content which is static.

      http://digg.com/ is a perfect example. Disable Javascript and go to the comments on one of their stories. Now turn on Javascript. There's actual content which is inaccessible unless you have Javascript turned on. Slashdot has a similar system, except it gracefully falls back when Javascript isn't available. However it's still troublesome to bookmark certain things like a specific comment if you're using the Web 2.0 version.

      Think that's too close to an application? Try http://www.toyota.com./ The site ostensibly provides information on the company and their product--relatively static content compared to a lot of the Internet--but the site isn't navigable without Javascript. It's barely a Web 2.0 site, yet it's horribly difficult to navigate.

      I'm not just complaining about Javascript. Just about any time that Javascript is required for navigation, the site is not going to be screen-reader accessible.

      Anyway, the point is that lots of sites unnecessarily use DHTML and make interacting with the site in a conventional way difficult, even if they're serving static content and not providing a web application. I suspect that it's these sites that the grandparent is complaining about.

    43. Re:And nothing of value was archived by JorgeFierro · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making me feel like a young man.

    44. Re:And nothing of value was archived by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Yeah, I hope archive.org gets the job done I have lost 3 entire web sites and only one is archived.

    45. Re:And nothing of value was archived by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have been constantly running into pages which have all content located at its own URL but on which ALL navigation links are href="#" and use onclick javascript to navigate to another page. When I see something like this I go look for another site. Sometimes that means I have to go look for another vendor to buy a competing product, and spend more money. I will do this every time I have the option. I won't shop newegg because you have to enable some spammers' javascripts and/or cookies to use the site — I'm not sure which - I never did get it to work since installing noscript.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Sancho · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that I'm a bad activist. Newegg is so damned convenient and usually one of the cheaper merchants, that I put up with their javascript.

      You have to enable newegg.com and the inaptly named neweggimages.com in order to navigate/purchase.

    47. Re:And nothing of value was archived by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That may be enough now, but it wasn't last time I tried. Maybe I'll try again sometime. Ebay requires ebay and ebaystatic but it's clear those are both ebay. They have other scripts too, but I don't have to enable them to make the site work. Last time I tried newegg, it wasn't so reasonable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    48. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I don't order from them that often, but once you said that, I do remember having a harder time getting their site to play nicely with NoScript a while back.

    49. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Eudial · · Score: 1

      My problem with web 2.0 is that while many of the web 1.0 features we used to have may be doable, precious few sites actually take the time to do it. The primary issue with web 2.0 is the lack of consistency. It feels like playing the lottery when using standard browser features, like maybe this time you've entered a page that actually supports them.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    50. Re:And nothing of value was archived by mrrudge · · Score: 1

      A reasonable man adapts himself to his environment. An unreasonable man persists in attempting to adapt his environment to suit himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

      -- George Bernard Shaw

    51. Re:And nothing of value was archived by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The period you're talking about was just before Geocities was absorbed by Yahoo. In those days it was less about free hosting and more about social networking. Kind of ahead of their time in that way, though the social networking features they had didn't really compare to current sites.

      Also, 1997 was when they introduced advertising. If they'd managed to make the advertising less obtrusive, they might have been OK. But as it was, they quickly drove the more clueful users away. The people who stuck around were the clueless types who think that flashing banners are cool. The rest is history.

    52. Re:And nothing of value was archived by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``you have big sites with horrible AJAX interfaces that completely breaks page navigation. Yes, this applies to big websites like slashdot''

      Oh, don't get me started. For a long time, Slashdot was a haven of sanity in the onslaught of broken Web 2.0 abominations. Now it's one of them. I pretty much can't use anything beyond the homepage without logging in (which enables somewhat simpler and saner code), and my own page is pretty much useless - I can't read my own comments and I can't see if someone else has replied to them.

      With the new kids on sites like Digg and /b/ and what have you, and the old school being turned off by Slashdot's breakage, I wonder what is going to happen to the news site I used to love...

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    53. Re:And nothing of value was archived by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``> you shouldn't fix what isn't broken.

      That would eliminate a whole lot of what we call "progress" in technology and culture.''

      It all depends on the details.

      All too often, people take something that works and replace it by something that only does some of the things the old thing did, and most of them worse than the original. Think about forgetting to design some important piece of functionality into the new system, replacing a stable product that has received years of bug fixes with something decidedly more buggy, etc. This is why "if it isn't broken, don't fix it" is good advice.

      Of course, that doesn't mean "if it isn't broken, don't ever touch it". If touching it at all causes Bad Things to happen, it is broken and it should be fixed. And even if it isn't broken, it makes sense sometimes to start over. You just have to be careful not to throw out the baby with the bath water.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    54. Re:And nothing of value was archived by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's from way back, when they were using the named category directories and an account number to identify pages....I used to have one like that, but I lost it due to neglect when they switched to the new name system.....errr, new as of 8 or 9 years ago or something, anyhow...

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    55. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      you cannot rely on a onHashChange event except in IE8, there are hacks to bypass this limit, but they are really ugly, like polling the hash!

      This is true - I had to implement a hash frag / backbutton thingy recently, and all the solutions I found to detect a change of state ultimately involved polling, though most dressed it up in event syntax. Then again, in any event-driven code, something somewhere is being polled...

    56. Re:And nothing of value was archived by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      When browsers first came out, I was thrilled. You could give it a bunch of data, and it would reasonably format it for you. Things were simple & consistent. Once "designers" got into it and got tools to get around html, the simplicity & consistency was gone. Now web pages are like every other custom app I've used.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    57. Re:And nothing of value was archived by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Sigh. I never bothered to click on the Comments header. It doesn't look like a link.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    58. Re:And nothing of value was archived by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that! Sounds a lot better that way too.

    59. Re:And nothing of value was archived by jpkunst · · Score: 1

      I remember "Tales from a loser" or something like that, a blog before the word even existed

      Actually, that one is still active after 14 years: Keeper of Lost Lives.

    60. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it consistently seizes up my 1.8 GHz Athlon where I do a lot of my browsing. A computer, which used to be perfectly adequate for reading the same information. Bloat.

    61. Re:And nothing of value was archived by cwtrex · · Score: 1

      Too bad I didn't respond to you when this article was being read and modded as this isn't just a response to you but others that have said something similar. University of Central Florida's motto in a few of their classes state that UCF's motto is, if it isn't broken, fix it. Sounds silly to some, but it stands for exactly what you post states.

  6. At that rate... by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll be broke in only 40 years.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:At that rate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They'll be broke in only 40 years.

      I wonder if you were thinking the same thing I was when you said this.

      There is a part in Citizen Kane where his editor is telling Kane as a publisher 'your losing hundreds of thousands of dollars a month' or words to that effect and Kane says 'your right, at that rate I'll have to close the doors in 20 years' or there abouts.

      I am too lazy to login or google the exact quote.

    2. Re:At that rate... by dswensen · · Score: 4, Informative

      "You're right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars *next* year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I'll have to close this place in sixty years."

    3. Re:At that rate... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They'll be broke in only 40 years.

      Because of course, we know they'll never adapt, they'll never innovate, right?

      I mean, it's only Google. It's not like there's any smart people involved. What have they ever done?

      Sometimes, I tire of intellectual midgets.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:At that rate... by symbolset · · Score: 2, Informative

      The technology environment is not likely to change more in the next forty years than it has in the last forty.

      :-)

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:At that rate... by beav007 · · Score: 1

      I think you're wrong. With the ease of information transfer and academic research that the internet allows now, but didn't for large portions of the previous 40 years, there is huge potential for growth in knowledge and inventions, compared to 40 years ago.

    6. Re:At that rate... by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      Technology growth is exponential, it certainly will change more in the next 40 years.

      Google technological singularity.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    7. Re:At that rate... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      40 years ago there was no Internet.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:At that rate... by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, 40 years ago businesses with rare exception didn't have computers. There was no Internet. It took a professional typist about 10 minutes to bang out a professional letter. There were no cellular phones - hell, touch-tone wouldn't even be invented for fifteen years.

      I've got more transistors in my house than existed then in all the world. I've got more storage in my desktop computer (3TB) than existed in the world at that time. I can communicate in ways that at that time were absurd speculative fiction, and would have seemed absurdly undesirable. For example, an annoying computer sends an email reminder every night at midnight to my cellular phone and I can't convince its administrator to make it stop. I could turn my cell phone into a streaming web beacon that updates my position on a world-visible map in real time and I don't actually know if it's doing that without my permission. I can stream my live first person perspective to everyone in the world bored enough to watch it. And now it takes a team of 3 most of a day to craft and deliver a professional email.

      You're right. By then we may have lost the ability to communicate in the written form entirely, and lost the option to opt out. That would definitely be "more change".

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:At that rate... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Sure they can adapt. But what is to stop them from following the same path that they have a proven track record of following, and keep themselves perpetually behind the eight ball? Just like the tech weenies who just have to buy the latest gadget. So far they seem to be good at overextending themselves. Not all companies have leaders who can reign themselves in. I seem to recall some server company being bought by Oracle recently.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    10. Re:At that rate... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      please mod this guy up

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    11. Re:At that rate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I hear a big whooossshhh going by.

    12. Re:At that rate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but that's a bit disingenuous. It took a professional typist about 10 minutes to bang out a profressional letter -that was already written-. Now it takes a team of 3 most of a day to craft and deliver a professional email, -the exact same thing you glossed over before-.

      You can be harassed by an email reminder you don't want, or you could turn your damn phone off at night or set it up to be automatically deleted.

      How in the world you think we're losing the ability to communicate in written form I don't quite understand.

      Although, maybe you're right. No offense, but reading your poorly-reinforced argument (modded +5 insightful) is kind of an argument in itself.

    13. Re:At that rate... by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      How in the world you think we're losing the ability to communicate in written form I don't quite understand.

      I think (s)he was referring those stick thingies people used to use to make words appear on... what's it called... that flat white stuff made out of trees..?

    14. Re:At that rate... by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      H.L. Hunt, oil tycoon made a similar quote in the 1960s about his son, Lamar, co-founder of the AFL which later merged with the NFL, to form the AFC half of the current NFL.

      From my first link:
      It was suggested to billionaire H. L. Hunt that he must be worried about son Lamar's pro football losses, which surely amounted to $1 million a year.

      "Oh, I am, I am," the elder Hunt exclaimed. "At that rate he will be broke in 200 years."

    15. Re:At that rate... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It took a professional typist about 10 minutes to bang out a professional letter.

      Why is this an example of advancement? Technology hasn't changed that. What's changed is that the "typist" can now send it to a recipient halfway around the world instantly, or print 100 copies in minutes. The typist still has to bang out the letter on a keyboard, same as always.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    16. Re:At that rate... by jdevore · · Score: 1

      Great movie. The question is how many people will get the reference.

    17. Re:At that rate... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Considering he was replying to a post which referenced it? I'd guess a lot.

      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1213783&cid=27739377

    18. Re:At that rate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot that 40 years ago businesses...... Hey, you kids! Get off my lawn.

    19. Re:At that rate... by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      This actually refers to William Hearst's purchasing of the New York Journal. In reality it wasn't William Hearst who said it, but rather his mother. He relied on his mother's wealth to pay for the paper and her accountant was becoming concerned with the rate at which he was spending her money (he spent well over $8 million before the paper ever turned a profit). Citizen Kane is based loosely off Hearst and Pulitzer.

      --
      Get a web developer
    20. Re:At that rate... by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, I tire of intellectual midgets.

      You know, people similarly disparaged doubters of the "new economy" during the dotcom bubble, too.

    21. Re:At that rate... by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      The typist still has to bang out the letter on a keyboard, same as always.

      Except the WhiteOut(tm) fumes are gone.

  7. Darn it! by Surrounded · · Score: 1

    Right when you think it's dead, they find a way to keep it alive!

    1. Re:Darn it! by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Geocities is dead! Netcraft confirms it!

      Sure the archive keeps it on life support, but do you really call that alive?

      --
      The game.
  8. Kick Ass by LWolenczak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I could find my site from ages ago... and find all the fun crap people have posted to geocities.

  9. We should not let this happen. by brasselv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't anybody going to move a finger, while a significant part of our collective history disappears forever?

    I really don't think anyone should be allowed to simply pull the plug, no matter what TOS say.

    If I buy the Colosseum and then decide to blow it up "because it's mine", I bet I'd be stopped by someone, rightly so.

    As a historian of year 2075, I'd really want to have access to Geocities if I am researching the '90s.

    It happened at least once before. In the 50's and early 60's, video storage technology was expensive, and most video documentation was not not considered to be of any 'historical value'. As a result, most of it was just erased and we have lost forever an incredible source of information on that period.

    Is there a productive way to scream? A petition of some kind? An attorney to be addressed?

    --
    "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    1. Re:We should not let this happen. by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you buy a movie theater that shows dirty porn films and has jerk-off booths in the back, people will be demanding you blow it up for years, and when you do, they'll throw a party.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:We should not let this happen. by brasselv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... but you don't want to burn the only existing master of such porn films.

      (Seriously, believe it or not, early porn movies of the 20's are a prized source of historical documentation. And with good reason: they tell a lot about their time.)

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    3. Re:We should not let this happen. by floodo1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I wouldn't liken Geocities to the Colosseum, I too believe that these guys should be commended for keeping such an interesting archive. The beauty of the internet is that it's all digital so it's as if (to continue your Colosseum example) someone came in and copied the entire Colosseum before you blew it up.

      That said, everyone that originally had sites on Geocities should have already been responsible for the content they left there. If it was actually important then they should already have moved it someplace else.

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    4. Re:We should not let this happen. by British · · Score: 1

      By that same logic, any archived porn from the 80s will tell historians nobody ever shaved their pubic hair.

    5. Re:We should not let this happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History, shmistory.

      The Colosseum is cool, but tourism is really the only industry it would effect if I blew it up. History is interesting, but don't act like it's important.

    6. Re:We should not let this happen. by thefringthing · · Score: 1

      Someone didn't read the article.

    7. Re:We should not let this happen. by djdavetrouble · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't anybody going to move a finger, while a significant part of our collective history disappears forever?

      Yes, the Archive guys are lifting their finger 5 times every second and archiving them.
      Don't make me say that RTF thing.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    8. Re:We should not let this happen. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      And archived porn from the 2000s will tell future generations that the sexual act in our time always ended with the man ejaculating up the woman's nose.

      They'll wonder how anybody ever got pregnant around the turn of the millennium.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:We should not let this happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's a strawman argument, and you know it.

    10. Re:We should not let this happen. by merreborn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there a productive way to scream? A petition of some kind? An attorney to be addressed?

      Petitioning Yahoo to continue hosting an antiquated service that is likely bleeding money isn't likely to be productive, obviously.

      But it would be awfully nice of them to .tar everything up and .torrent it. There are thousands of us who'd be more than happy to do our part to keep those bits from disappearing into the ether.

    11. Re:We should not let this happen. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      As a historian of year 2075, I'd really want to have access to Geocities if I am researching the '90s.

      I'm unclear; are you a historian for the future, or one from the future? Either way, care to share with us whether Myspace finally gets shut down like this too?

    12. Re:We should not let this happen. by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      > They'll wonder how anybody ever got pregnant around the turn of the millennium.

      Easy. Historians will find that They need to do way instain mother> who kill thier babbys. becuse these babby cant frigth back.

      On a serious note, how would we archive enough social context for this comment to make sense in even 10 years?

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    13. Re:We should not let this happen. by Toonol · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hmm. Can I control all your property, like you would like to control Yahoo's?

    14. Re:We should not let this happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems a bit strange that Yahoo would not simply hand over a copy to the Internet Archive.

    15. Re:We should not let this happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of all the things to ask a historian from the future, you ask if Myspace will get shut down?

      I'd ask when. Then I'll know when I can take this fork out of my eye. It hurts, but not as much as the alternative...

    16. Re:We should not let this happen. by Haoie · · Score: 1

      On the upside, at least Yahoo gave warning.

      Although there's no exact date for closure, is there yet?

      --
      If each mistake being made is a new one, then progress is being made.
    17. Re:We should not let this happen. by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you give something to someone, you should have to keep giving it to them forever. How else will we all feel entitled.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    18. Re:We should not let this happen. by Wuhao · · Score: 1

      If the service does indeed belong to history, then let's see history pay its bills.

    19. Re:We should not let this happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed. why doon't you donate a few mil to yahoo and I'm sure they'll keep it up for a while more.

    20. Re:We should not let this happen. by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      That said, everyone that originally had sites on Geocities should have already been responsible for the content they left there.

      How about the people that have composed historically significant geocities content but the people themselves are dead? That's the deal with history. The important content can't be maintained by its creators for the long term.

      Seth

    21. Re:We should not let this happen. by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      If I buy the Colosseum and then decide to blow it up "because it's mine",

      Funny that you mentioned it, exactly what you described happened with the greek Acropolis in Athens a few hundred years ago. The turkish used it as a weapons storage and it blew up!
      Not that the greek back then even bothered, athens by that time was nothing more than a village with a handful of people!

    22. Re:We should not let this happen. by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

      well, that's one explanation for the negative population growth in the western world (ignoring immigration)

    23. Re:We should not let this happen. by syousef · · Score: 1

      1. You're comparing Geocities to the Colosseum. Sanity check required.

      2. I bet if someone bought and wanted to pull down the Colosseum right after it lost popularity there would have been no uproar. It's only because something has survived for so long in the first place that it becomes so important, because it's rare.

      3. If most of it is archived, that's not such a bad solution. People/historians want to preserve it so they can. Now if Yahoo or the owners got in the way of that by claiming copyright etc. or if the archivers wanted to charge for access I'd see a potential problem.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    24. Re:We should not let this happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, pregnancy will be forgotten...the next sexual revolution will have taken hold by then.

      Involves two girls and one cup.

    25. Re:We should not let this happen. by mike2R · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe not the Colosseum itself, but maybe the contemporary graffiti scrawled on it. See (although these are from Pompeii).

      It's actually quite an apt comparison, and shows how little we have changed as a species :) eg:

      I.4.5 (House of the Citharist; below a drawing of a man with a large nose); 2375: Amplicatus, I know that Icarus is buggering you. Salvius wrote this.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    26. Re:We should not let this happen. by Threni · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > Isn't anybody going to move a finger, while a significant part of our collective history disappears forever?

      Lol! You can't be serious.

      It's not my history. A collection of some of the worst sites around, full of photos of fat Americans and their dumpy, buck toothed partners and their kids and cats. Oh, and a cheesy little 'under construction' gif. Yeah, where do I send the cash - this stuff has to be archived for the future....in case their comedy sucks and they want a quick laugh at this generation's expense.

    27. Re:We should not let this happen. by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Isn't anybody going to move a finger, while a significant part of our collective history disappears forever?''

      Somebody is: the people who are archiving this stuff!

      Besides this effort that seems focused on Geocities, there is also The Internet Archive's Wayback Machine.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    28. Re:We should not let this happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh...because women ovulate nasally now. Don't you know anything?

  10. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did you try hunter2?

  11. Shame on Yahoo by Xero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just ridiculous the amount of work they have to go through to half ass archive geocities. Why can't yahoo just hand over a stack of hard drives to archive.org or someone?

    1. Re:Shame on Yahoo by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      It seems the new management has no clue how Internet works. It sounds funny while I write but it seems like the truth. The large storage companies doesn't have a clue about sponsoring things. E.g. instead of putting a gigantic SAN ad to a "Windows 7 rocks" story at CNET, hand them some quality storage right IBM?

      I better start archiving my Yahoo mail which is up since 1998.

    2. Re:Shame on Yahoo by mgblst · · Score: 1

      You can be certain they won't be reusing them. I guess it would involve too many privacy concerns, and too much effort your yahoo. They are probably a little bitter, since they spent so much money on geocities only a few years ago. Of course, they are also the reason that it lost popularity.

    3. Re:Shame on Yahoo by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when you put a woman in charge. Look at what happened to HP after Carly Fiona. +10 flamebait, but you know it's true.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  12. I just shit out a giant turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Perhaps the archive.org folks would like to preserve this too.

    1. Re:I just shit out a giant turd by CZakalwe · · Score: 1

      Quick! Start polishing...

  13. Who do I bribe? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to make sure that any geocities site I may have been affiliated with back in my formative years is not seen by anyone who might recognize me now.

    Who do I make the check out to, and how many significant places will be required?

    1. Re:Who do I bribe? by N3Roaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It might already be gone. I, too, once had a page on GeoCities, so I decided to look into it. Searching for it, Google couldn't find it (but it seems Google Books likes to interpret the old long s as an f). Fine tuning my search pulled up one hit: a Usenet post with a link to the page in the .sig. So, I take this, and I go to the wayback machine. Put in the URL, and I get two versions, both from the year 2000 (well after I had stopped updating the site). Clicking the links, both were unavailable. The content at the URL itself, of course, is long gone. I looked in a couple other places as well and as near as I can tell, that set of pages is fully and permanently gone from the Internet and this project can do nothing to change that.

      Okay, it turns out that I do have a full copy on an old computer. If I hooked a pair of modems up to it and a more modern machine, I could get it back and theoretically put it back on the Internet, but that won't be happening any time soon. So take a Google. You might not have to write that check out after all.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    2. Re:Who do I bribe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ... and how many significant places will be required?

      A googol will probably be sufficient.

    3. Re:Who do I bribe? by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

      You make the check out to me. Because I am such a nice guy, you only need to make it out to about 6 digits.

    4. Re:Who do I bribe? by drizek · · Score: 1

      I'll give you $1.00001. Shelster Dude it is then...

    5. Re:Who do I bribe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1 is way too much for this. I can take care of your little indiscretion for 50 cents, max!

      To facilitate payment, please post a reply below with your bank's routing and account numbers and my crack team of Nigeria-based technologists will take it from there...

  14. Oh God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You could have explained that (tubgirl==shockSite).

    1. Re:Oh God by MadnessASAP · · Score: 3, Funny

      If anything s mentioned in the same sentence as goatse it's quite safe to assume that it probably doesn't involve puppy dogs and kittens, at least not in the traditional sense.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    2. Re:Oh God by emurphy42 · · Score: 1

      Now if only Jabbrwokk's comment had mentioned tubgirl in the same sentence as goatse...

    3. Re:Oh God by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      We'll I'll be damned it doesnt. Freinds shouldn't let friends post drunk and all that. On the other hand though I'm pretty sure tubgirl is well beyond that staute of limitations.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    4. Re:Oh God by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      Some things are just too evil to put in the same sentence. We're talking resonance cascade here.

  15. Why not ask yahoo for a mirror? by mrphoton · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why not just ask yahoo for an image of the site. They are going to shut it down anyway. So what value is a load of crappy web pages to them. They may be glad to send it rather than have a load of random web trawlers going over there entire web site.

  16. And how many of them will find other hosting? by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was an awesome amount of amateur research on Geocities. Some of my favorite reference sites are therefore just about toast (most of them containing first-hand military history).

    And just because someone asked, I saved all ~300 of my Youtube favorites to my HDD last weekend, when I realized how much I rely on them for my own hobby research projects, teaching classes, etc. Most of it was stuff that will never be on DVD. Some of it is stuff that the owners have *already* deleted in the last week, due to perfectionism or whatever.

    I was a Boy Scout, and relying on some free service without thinking of contingencies just doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:And how many of them will find other hosting? by AlHunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >I was a Boy Scout, and relying on some free service without thinking of contingencies just doesn't make sense.

      Sounds kind of like the argument against Web Apps ...

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    2. Re:And how many of them will find other hosting? by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      Sounds kind of like the argument against Web Apps ...

      I guess that's why he was using it to make an argument against a web app. :)

    3. Re:And how many of them will find other hosting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You research military toast? Is there a Gatling gun of toast? If so, I would like to buy one.

      You can pry my toast from my cold dead hands.

    4. Re:And how many of them will find other hosting? by againjj · · Score: 1

      Echoes of RMS and SaaS reverberate....

    5. Re:And how many of them will find other hosting? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much it would cost to just save everything I download. I mean not just the occassional song or movie, but also web pages I look at, emails I get. Everything that enters my computer that is destined for me. I honestly think it is no more than a few hundred megabytes a month. That wouldn't be too expensive.

      The problem would be how to make it accessible. Hmm, this is interesting. :-)

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  17. I hope that they don't copy all of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made a 4 or more GeoCities sites. 3 of them are useless, because I never got very far with them.

    Is there a way to let them know which sites are not meaningful? In time, I could back up my other site, and then it would be useless.

  18. Needed? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Isn't this already taken care of by things like google cache or the internet wayback machine?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Needed? by rincebrain · · Score: 1

      Google Cache only covers some content, and only until it expires from Google's search results.

      archive.org would probably be up for mirroring it, but it's unclear that they have all of it.

      --
      It's only an insult if it's not true.
    2. Re:Needed? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2, Informative

      >internet wayback machine

      who do you think archive.org is?

      And google cache is strictly short term.

    3. Re:Needed? by leenks · · Score: 1

      1) Google's cache is temporary - it's just what they crawled to produce their index
      2) Wayback machine *IS* archive.org

    4. Re:Needed? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Google Cache used to go back to 2000, but I've noticed in the last six months or so their cache typically only goes back a week, and in some cases as far back as six months. A lot of the older, more obscure stuff, google might have a link to, but the link is dead and the cached version may be incomplete.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    5. Re:Needed? by ymgve · · Score: 1

      archive.org is not Archive Team.

    6. Re:Needed? by maxume · · Score: 1

      The effort described here is quite separate from archive.org and the Wayback machine. See:

      http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Who_We_Are

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Needed? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Huh. How about that.

    8. Re:Needed? by maxume · · Score: 1

      My favorite part is that the blog post (linked in the summary) contains the expected "Go archive team Go".

      Something this nerdy practically demands it, and there it is. I do think it's great that Jason Scott actually follows through and takes action about something he is passionate about, but that doesn't even begin to make it less nerdy.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  19. legal reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because someone is sure to sue them for copyright infringement.

  20. my 1st website was there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and made in 1999
    in college

    sad to see it go

  21. slashdotted! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Ironically enough, I had moved past the article in question to read the article about Jason's bandwidth being overwhelmed by myspace layout providers referencing an image on textfiles.com; I clicked on the next article and... down to to either "maintenance or capacity problems". 8^/

  22. archive.org has failed us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have not seen archiving geocities.com since 2002. Before then they have less than 25,000 pages saved:

    http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://geocities.com

    1. Re:archive.org has failed us by sabernet · · Score: 1

      Because there's just so little for them to do.

  23. A little sad... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    The first web page I ever created (never finished though) was on Geocities, what's left is here http://www.geocities.com/brad1138/ but it is disappearing fast. Had pictures of kids and family etc.... I always wondered how long it would last, over 10 years isn't bad I guess.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:A little sad... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Makes me think of The Langoliers. The data of yesterday getting sucked up one byte at a time, obliterated. Meanwhile, Our Heroes try to rescue all the content they can find... before the Langoliers get to it.

    2. Re:A little sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr Toomey! *pops in the dvd*

  24. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll probably be followed by Blogspot and the likes, in a not too distant future.

  25. Did anyone else pronounce 'geocities'... by Jubilex · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to rhyme with 'atrocities' ?

    1. Re:Did anyone else pronounce 'geocities'... by theazreal · · Score: 1

      Yes. And I still did, right up until you posted that.

      Ye gads. Geo-cities. Now those bizarre scaling methods actually make sense!

      (I kid, I kid.)

    2. Re:Did anyone else pronounce 'geocities'... by BathTub · · Score: 1

      I remember Soledad Obrien did, and got teased by that animated co-host on msnbc.

  26. All that work by voodoobettie · · Score: 1

    I hope they save my site about the Cramps that I made back in '98, it took me hours.

    --
    Nobody can guarantee what's going to happen tomorrow, not even an admiral from the future.
  27. The easy solution? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Why not just ask the sysadmin guys at Geocities to 'surplus' you a full copy of backup tapes (or disks, or whatever it is they use for backups).

    It may still take you years to understand the backups, but at least you'll have the full data for posterity.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:The easy solution? by jzuccaro · · Score: 1

      Would you really like 40TB of animated gifs? :)

    2. Re:The easy solution? by hezekiah957 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't you?

  28. I'm Suing!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Suing the archival guys for copy right infringement!!! How dare they copy my abandoned hello kitty tribute site with out my permission!!!

  29. Thank god that somebody is archiving it by TinBromide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I posted earlier about how Geocities was the early web 2.0 in practice, where anybody could post anything and contribute to the community. I'm sure that there is a wealth of information on geocities about obscure topics that *Might* come in handy if you were to let your true inner geek reign supreme. I.E. I have bios roms of early mac's that I found on Geocities sites that couldn't be found anywhere else, and I'm sure that if they were posted nowadays, they would be subject to lawsuits or take-down notices by Apple.

    I think that our generation will leave less of a mark than that which came before it because nobody is writing on paper. Geocities is the closest thing that we have to shoe-boxes full of letters and diaries for the period spanning the late 90's (In the form of websites about star trek and software and pointless articles posted by ambitious young proto-webdesigners). In the future, there will be a similar scramble to preserve facebook and myspace to preserve correspondence for future generations.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:Thank god that somebody is archiving it by dargaud · · Score: 1
      I heard this morning that 700 letters sent by Jean Cocteau (famous french director) to Jean Marais (famous french actor) were sold for 2 millions euros !

      I can't imagine my emails being sold, much less for this value !

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  30. angelfire's open directories by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Angelfire was fun to snoop around on, since the image subdirectories were open for the browsing. Sometimes you found images not meant for the public.

  31. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by MarkRose · · Score: 5, Funny

    What was that password? When you typed hunter2, all I saw was *******.

    --
    Be relentless!
  32. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by powerslave12r · · Score: 5, Funny

    "you can go hunter2 my hunter2-ing hunter2" http://www.bash.org/?244321

    --
    Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
  33. To those who say Geocities has nothing of value... by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is just one example of content on Geocities that has value.
    http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/8682/
    These old documents are still of value to people modding the old games.

  34. My first webpage was on GeoCites by darpo · · Score: 1

    Back in 1997 or so, my very first site was hosted on GeoCites, uploaded via 14.4 modem. I wish I had kept it up, for nostalgic reference. The URL alone was hilarious, you know, that /OuterSpace/Asteroids/7382/ kind of thing, before subdomains became popular.

  35. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny, but true. I did forget my login information (email/username and password) to this site, which is just the one image.

    For those who don't know, this is a parody of Chick religious tracts (God, what a waste of a domain name!) that has often been the target of the Chick lawyers.

    Note to the Chick legal team: I'll be glad to take it down if you give me my password! :)

  36. Garbage collection? by marqtholomew · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back in 1996-97 I made an extremely amateurish geocities site with some unfinished programming tutorials, the most popular of which was on qbasic. I sort of stopped working on it after a while, lost my password, and couldn't get yahoo to authenticate me years later when I wanted to remove my ridiculous site. The bio page is especially embarrassing, and the programming material that is there is of no use today. Honestly I'm too lazy to expend any more energy in my effort to shut down my site, so naturally I am relieved to see yahoo pulling the plug on geocities. The way I see it, the internet is cleaner without my site clogging the tubes. My site could live indefinitely in archiving systems, but hopefully someday it won't even show up on a search for "qbasic programming". Will the web naturally garbage collect my orphaned web page, without my intervention?

    1. Re:Garbage collection? by Cathbard · · Score: 1
      But an important representative collection of unimportant pages.

      (You may have to be a Yes, Minister fan to get that one)

      --
      "A cynic is what an idealist calls a realist" - Sir Humphrey Appleby
    2. Re:Garbage collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on now, http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/Bay/5707/index.html is not all that bad. Sure, the blue background makes my eyes bleed in pain in an attempt to read the text, and the drivers license picture included is painful to look at, but overall it is not bad.

    3. Re:Garbage collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha you bastard

    4. Re:Garbage collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yer welcome.

  37. Geocities? Anyone remember Homestead? by drfool · · Score: 1
  38. Wish they would have done that for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wbs.net
    best chat site evar.

    abc/disney/go network can burn. burn and diaf.

    i especially missed the 'girl chat' room. so many dudes pretending to be chicks and sharing the pixellated pr0n.

    oh well, at least we still have IRC and 4chan. (congrats m00t!)

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. WOOOOOOOOSHHH!!!! by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny

    there is huge potential for growth in knowledge and inventions, compared to 40 years ago.

    n/t

  41. Re:Good lord let it go by kimvette · · Score: 1

    This site has been of enormous value to me and friends who are also soy intolerant and/or allergic to soy:

    http://www.geocities.com/hotsprings/4620/decoder.htm

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  42. Re:Good lord let it go by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    Value to whom and for what? This stuff is of historical importance just as much as the diaries of people in the previous decades is to historians. Why not preserve it?

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  43. "I don't see how the final collection won't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... end up online, but how is elusive."

    Maybe you can call it, I dunno, something like ... "Groups."

  44. Re:Good lord let it go by gadabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    with that site gone, how will people ever know that soy beverages, soy cheese, soy flour, soy meal, soy oil, soy sauce, soy protein, and soybeans ALL CONTAIN SOY PRODUCTS?

    i know it's not all of them, but seriously - damn near half of the products on that page have SOY in the name. i can only deduce that geocities hates natural selection.

    --
    the united states is a nation of laws; badly written and randomly enforced -- frank zappa
  45. first figure out how to digitize your turd ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... It's a smelly business being programmer these days ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  46. Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    There are some important documents about Mr. T, Chewbacca and testicle consumption that would be a shame to lose.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. AC for off-topic rambling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still use the old comment system. By default I browse Threaded, Highest Scores First, +2 or above, karma and subscriber bonus off. If I want more to read, I'll knock it to +1. If I want to read replies to one particular comment, I open it in a new tab and they're all laid out below it.

    With the new system, it doesn't rank highest first, there's no one-click way to show more... just a vague dragbox.

  49. Please Archive My Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12/index.htm

    I spent years building that little site full of goodies for scientific document preparation. I kept it on geocities so it would have a permanent home. It is the number one site for several google searches. No @#$%in blink tags. HTML 4.01 strict compliant. Haven't updated it for a few years but still get over a thousand views a month.

    It angers me when smarmy elitists dismiss Geocities out of hand. I for one am glad someone wants to archive my page. I needed a free, stable web hosting site. Geocities did that. Now there is no other option.

    1. Re:Please Archive My Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, you are correct. There is no other free stable web hosting site. At least none that I could find on hotbot.

      The sad thing is, I checked hotbot.com after making a joke that only counts if you were on the web in 1996. It's still there. Man, I'd give my left nut to have a job working for hotbot as chief of the lynx division.

  50. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My geocities site was my first Hand coded web page )
    lucky i already had it backed up.
    Course now i have to find another place to host my Drumming class handouts.
    of course the Bad thing about Yahoo buying geocities was the spam i recived when up 1000% over night since they would mail to the geocities adress and it was Automaticly forwared to my yahoo.
    I had to end up stoping useing the email adress i had since yahoo first started offering acounts
    I still get 200+ spam message a day there threw there loasy spam filter

    Emyrs

  51. Cult of Save Everything by squoozer · · Score: 1

    Yet again we see the Cult of Save Everything trumpeted in the media as if they are the ultimate force for good in the world. Get a grip, the plug was pulled because it wasn't popular enough to warrant keeping. Now that it's stuck on some hard drive somewhere who do you think is going to go and dig it out and look at any of it. At best it will last one generation and then get thrown away by his grandchildren.

    I completely agree with the idea that we should preserve quality works of our and previous generations so that generations to come can enjoy them but we just seem to be trying to archive everything. How will future generations know what drove and inspired us?

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Cult of Save Everything by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Get a grip, the plug was pulled because it wasn't popular enough to warrant keeping.

      If popularity were the only metric w.r.t. archiving, a LOT of our human cultural heritage would have disappeared by now, or never have been preserved at all. Having said that, not everything is worth preserving...

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:Cult of Save Everything by dargaud · · Score: 1

      If popularity were the only metric w.r.t. archiving, a LOT of our human cultural heritage would have disappeared by now

      IIRC, the gist of the sumerian tablets contain lists of bought/sold items (actually traded items since money didn't exist at the time). In other words, shopping lists. Something totally uninteresting ? Nope, it gives us all the information we need to know about how people used to live.

      Having said that, not everything is worth preserving...

      Indeed, a backup of all Visa card transactions would be probably more enlightening to future generations than a geocities backup.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    3. Re:Cult of Save Everything by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Now that it's stuck on some hard drive somewhere who do you think is going to go and dig it out and look at any of it. At best it will last one generation and then get thrown away by his grandchildren."

      He doesn't care. And since it's not costing you anything in storage or transmission costs, why do you?

    4. Re:Cult of Save Everything by squoozer · · Score: 1

      I care because today he's doing it using his money, tomorrow he (or someone else) will be asking for government money to help preserve this or something else - then it costs me money.

      There is a growing habit of navel gazing which, I feel, we need to combat. I'm not advocating deliberately destroying history or forgetting the lessons of the past but we should be focusing our attention on what we can achieve in the future.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  52. Re:Good lord let it go by squoozer · · Score: 1

    By that argument we should try to preserve every piece of media we ever produce in any format no matter what quality it is. Can you imagine the situation if that were the case? What if every civilization for 6000 years before us had preserved everything they had written? Sure we would know a lot more about them but we would have so much material we would never be able to sift through it and preserving it all would probably consume damn near all our resources. Further more we would probably struggle to determine what the people of the time found important and what drove them.

    It is better, I feel, to let history filter the material. If it really is worth keeping someone will keep it and it will stand the test of time. If it doesn't get preserved then obviously it wasn't important enough to anyone to preserve.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  53. Re:To those who say Geocities has nothing of value by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

    Awesome, thanks for that link! I had no idea that a new version of Mix Manager was out. According to the page, it no longer crashes "on fast computers (Pentium II or faster)". Sweet!

  54. Moderation system is completely borked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new moderation system is broken. I've twice had 15 mod points in the last couple of weeks but the "Moderate" button just won't show. I even tried temporarily allowing all the javascript on the page to run (yes I run NoScript) but I refresh the page and still no "moderate" button appears.

    So I loaded the page in IE and there was the button. Whatever's going on it simply doesn't work for me in Firefox.

    But if you think I'm running IE or removing NoScript just so I can moderate on Slashdot think again !

    1. Re:Moderation system is completely borked. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      you mean the old one? because the new one applies the moderation as soon as you select it with the dropdown. I thought the new one was broken because it wouldn't apply, but it was just that for some reason they moved the JS to fsdn.com, and noscript was blocking it.

  55. Re:Good lord let it go by ymgve · · Score: 1

    Sure we would know a lot more about them but we would have so much material we would never be able to sift through it and preserving it all would probably consume damn near all our resources. Further more we would probably struggle to determine what the people of the time found important and what drove them.

    If there only was some kind of program that could sift through billions of documents and automatically index them and rank them according to relative importance. Some kind of searcher. Too bad nothing like that exist.

  56. Way back machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you guys know about way back machine, right? It's at http://www.archive.org/index.php . Do yourself a favor, delete all that crap from geocities. Sort of like trying to save all of my (or someone elses) 4th grade school papers. Who cares?

  57. "Readability" irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, this used to pass as a non-destructive non-dumb idea?

    I run my browser on a personal computer, which displays web pages in a resizable windows. If text is too narrow, I can widen it. If it's too wide, I can shrink it. It even lets me change font sizes, so if text is too big or too small, I can effortless fix that too.

    Use that 'readability' thing, and stuff instantly becomes less readable. Now you get to pick from 1 of 4 widths instead of one of the hundreds (over a thousand, actually) widths that I can size a window to. If I pick the best fit and then size my window, oh look: a horizontal scroll bar! The only way you could make it harder to use, would be to make it blink too.

    And back in the mid 1990s they called this "readability?!" I assume they did it as a joke on all the poor shmucks who were stuck with Mosaic for MS Windows.

  58. sam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't bother, Goecities is a collection of a bunch of garbage that it useless. Let it go away please!

  59. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

    My old Tripod password was hkyxxt, but they deleted my account about 10 years ago :-(

    --
    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  60. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by operagost · · Score: 1

    Right after I tried 12345!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  61. Downloadable? Maybe these guys will volunteer by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ``I don't see how the final collection won't end up online, but how is elusive -- maybe a torrent of a bunch of zip files, or as a curated collection, or as a bunch of hard drives. However it is, I'll make sure people can get it, somehow.''

    Based on my memories of visiting various Geocities web sites, perhaps the "Web Pages That Suck" site could offer them as downloadable examples of how not to design web pages.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  62. Re:Good lord let it go by Nightbrood · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I have to strongly disagree with you. The future importance of Geo Cities cannot be discounted. One of the most prized finds in archaeology is the ancient human garbage dump... Geo Cities is the largest garbage dump of our generation!! The reason for this is because the knowledge behind many historical items of significance DOESN'T EXIST ANYMORE!!!

    Researching even the detritus of Geo Cities would provide a great deal of insight into our culture to those researching it hundreds of years from now. Given the difficulties our civilization has had in researching the construction of the pyramids, Stone Henge, and the Mayan calendar, no reasonable person should be okay with destroying our history... even if it is "garbage." These instances, and many others, demonstrate the vast quantities of knowledge that have been lost throughout the ages. The sad part is that it probably derived from the people of that time having an attitude similar to yours.

    As a result, we have people producing documentaries on the History Channel proclaiming ALIENS had to help build the Pyramids and create the Mayan calendar.. because, you know, humans back then had to be too stupid and simple to do it themselves. Heck, we cannot even recover some knowledge from the 1960's and 70's because of our blatant disregard of the potential need for the information in the future!!! Perhaps you may not care, but I would prefer people knowing how we built the Hoover Damn or developed atomic energy. It would be highly insulting for future generations to have create a hypothesis about alien life allowing us to build our great achievements because your attitude resulted in the information being destroyed.

    In short, I'd rather future civilizations know too much about us rather than too little.

  63. Re:Good lord let it go by againjj · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know what you mean. Their historical worth probably is no better than the worth of a public announcement about a tax reduction written in three languages.

    *cough*Rosetta stone*cough*

    It is generally quite difficult to know the historical value of something in advance. And just because something is not well known does not mean it does not have historical value, either.

  64. More storage? I disagree. by LandruBek · · Score: 1

    I've got more storage in my desktop computer (3TB) than existed in the world at that time.

    I'll grant you have more hard drive space, but "storage" itself of digital information has been around for a long, long time --- for one, in the "aperiodic crystals" that store the blueprints for our own bodies: DNA. For example, the DNA in a human cell contains about one CD ROM worth of quaternary digital storage. Your body contains somewhere from 10-100 trillion cells, so assuming you are human, you yourself embody at least a zettabyte of digital, chemical information storage.

    --
    $META_SIG_JOKE
  65. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

    That's the stupidest password I've ever heard of in my life! That's the kinda thing an idiot would have on his luggage!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  66. heh by crutex · · Score: 1

    Geocities is near and dear to me. It's how I made millions of neopoints by phishing neopets kids.

  67. Re:Good lord let it go by kimvette · · Score: 1

    yeah the ones with "soy" in the name are obvious. It's the other half that is so insidious.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  68. Re:Good lord let it go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what, is Geocities Sodom now?

  69. AJAX-ified Slashdot is an improvement by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

    Although I knew about Slashdot years ago, I always just used to click straight through to the article. I only started reading the comments when the AJAX interface appeared; before that I just couldn't hack the number of clicks, especially of the back button, required to navigate them.

  70. Ask Yahoo hand over the disk! by phonx · · Score: 1

    Why not just ask yahoo to hand over the disk to way back machine organisation????? Much much faster than miroring.

    --
    Let there be light, three cheers to the Internet