Slashdot Mirror


Archive Team Is Busy Saving Geocities

jamie found this note from Jason Scott, who organizes the Archive Team. They are busy downloading as much of Geocities as they can before it vanishes from the Net after Yahoo pulled the plug. (Note: that textfiles.com link is a good candidate for Readability.) "..after 48 hours of work, Archive Team has saved over 200,000 Geocities sites. We're now pulling in new sites at the rate of something like 5 a second. Is that fast enough? We'll see, won't we. ... A side-effect of the whole process is I now know way, way, way too much [sic] about Geocities than I ever expected to. We've had to dissect every aspect of how the site functions to understand how to mirror things, from its history through how it does crazy javascript ads. Some of it is stupid and some is hilarious... We think we have most every site from 1999 and before on Geocities that was left. ... It is more important to me to grab the data than to figure out how to serve it later. People who have been talking about copyright and stuff seem to think I'm going to sell it or take credit or some crap. I don't see how the final collection won't end up online, but how is elusive — maybe a torrent of a bunch of zip files, or as a curated collection, or as a bunch of hard drives. However it is, I'll make sure people can get it, somehow."

62 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Don't forget by ipb · · Score: 4, Funny

    to surround it all by a blink tag

    1. Re:Don't forget by Sfing_ter · · Score: 3, Informative

      firefox still supports the blink :D

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    2. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your ability to provide jobs is directly proportional to your ability to be on topic.

    3. Re:Don't forget by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Informative

      Until I found about:config, browser.blink_allowed.

    4. Re:Don't forget by dargaud · · Score: 2

      I've never understood why the same people who complain about the blink tag praise OSX 'design', including the dock's bouncing icons. Both irritate me to no end and the first thing I ever did with Mac OSX was spend 10 minutes on the web to figure how to turn that concentration killing monstrosity off.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  2. How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by Glass+Goldfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With Google losing half a billion a year, how long until they pull the plug on Youtube? I guess it could turn a profit, but when? My guess is the next downturn will cause shareholder pressure to force their hand.

    1. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by EonBlueTooL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last time someone brought this up moore's law was mentioned.

      As storage capacity and throughput expand and become cheaper, google can start to make a profit.

      I still however think that google is stupid for not doing what hulu does.

    2. Re:How long until someone's saving Youtube videos? by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're missing one important point:

      How much would Google be losing to competition if they didn't have Youtube?

      It's a war out there, and Youtube is an outpost - costly to keep, but if you don't keep it, the enemy will gain not only it but a lot of field.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  3. I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago... by bughunter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I lost the password to my Geocities page 10 years ago. Think you might be able to find it?

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  4. And nothing of value was archived by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, future generations must know about the horrors visited upon us by the millions of tubgirl and lolcats clones which populated Geocities. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

    1. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think some Yahoo suits thinking exactly as you joked but a message for them: It is history they will be rm -rf 'ing and you show like a company which can't even afford idle webpages hosting for historical purposes, in such a bad shape with no future.

      They will be deleting (or considering even) dead/passed away people's webpages while they don't have any chance to reply to their lame mails or "click here" things. They did the very same thing in Yahoo Briefcase, 10 MB of highly compressible data for God's sake. At most!

    2. Re:And nothing of value was archived by jlarocco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There was a time, I'd put it somewhere between 1996 and 1998, when Geocities wasn't half bad. Few people were really "up" on the technology, so they'd use Geocities to host real, actual pages that didn't suck. Granted it didn't last very long, and practically overnight everybody was using real hosting options for anything serious. But for a little while, seeing search engine return a link to Geocities wasn't automatically a bad thing.

      Then again, maybe there just wasn't much to compare to back then. Or maybe it just seemed neat because I was only 14.

    3. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Eudial · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh. We already have repeated it. Myspace is basically last couple of years' geocities.

      Now there's the web 2.0 boom which is the geocities of the future. Except, instead of small personals sites with blinking gif animations, you have big sites with horrible AJAX interfaces that completely breaks page navigation. Yes, this applies to big websites like slashdot and freshmeat as well.

      What the hell? What was wrong with the old slashcode? The difference for the end user is that now you have to click 10 times to do what you could do in one click in the web 1.0 version.

      The lesson to be learn is that you shouldn't fix what isn't broken.

      Now I'll get back to my rocking chair. I've got kids to keep off the lawn.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    4. Re:And nothing of value was archived by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or maybe it just seemed neat because I was only 14.

      Thanks for making me feel like an old man.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:And nothing of value was archived by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was 18 and it wasn't half bad as you say. There might be a lot of important information there to archive and we should help them if we can.

    6. Re:And nothing of value was archived by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There might be a lot of important information there to archive and we should help them if we can.

      Can you give us an example?

      I'm not doubting that there's something culturally crucial that's on a Geocities page somewhere that's never been moved elsewhere, but I'd like an example before I get too exercised.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:And nothing of value was archived by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      you shouldn't fix what isn't broken.

      That would eliminate a whole lot of what we call "progress" in technology and culture.

      Sometimes, you don't realize something is "broken" until somebody comes along and "fixes" it.

      Know what? I like people who fix what isn't broken.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:And nothing of value was archived by darkstar949 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed, in fact there is still some good content up on Geocites that I just recently discovered. Case and point would be a fairly inclusive reverence to the Cokin Filter System. I'm not sure if it is still being updated, but it would be a loss if it is the only site like it on the internet.

    9. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Eudial · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you shouldn't fix what isn't broken.

      That would eliminate a whole lot of what we call "progress" in technology and culture.

      Sometimes, you don't realize something is "broken" until somebody comes along and "fixes" it.

      Know what? I like people who fix what isn't broken.

      Though aimlessly adopting any new technology that comes along isn't progress.

      I'm appending a list of browser features mutilated by web 2.0:

      • The back, reload and forward buttons
      • Navigation with the cursor keys.
      • Bookmarking
      • Searching in pages

      When every webpage has it's own conventions for what happens when you press a key, you haven't moved forward, you've moved into chaos. Nowadays, what happens when you press a key or click on an element is an entirely arbitrary matter in the hands of the website designer, and completely different from site to site.

      Navigating webpages used to be difficult enough when all links were immediately available. Now, adding to the pain, you have to search page elements that are only loaded if you perform some arcane voodoo ritual that the designer figured decided was how the page elements should work.

      It's not that web 2.0 pages have a new interface that's different from the old, it's that every single web 2.0 page has it's own conventions.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    10. Re:And nothing of value was archived by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh. We already have repeated it. Myspace is basically last couple of years' geocities.

      Except for the fact that the girls are younger and sluttier, a definitive improvement.

    11. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Randle_Revar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The new Slashdot interface is better than the old, all in all. The preferences popup/overlay is stupid and the moderating interface needs to go back to having a confirm moderation button but the dynamic display of remaining mod points is nice and the inline, dynamic commenting is brilliant. The ajax-driven thread expand/collapse is also good.

    12. Re:And nothing of value was archived by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I found an excellent page describing dives from the top of the castle in Super Mario 64 on geocities once.

    13. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Mex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I humbly disagree that Myspace is anywhere near as useful as Geocities could be*. Or at least entertaining.

      You could spend hours on interesting geocities sites devoted to a very particular subject. Anyone remember the website "Spatula City"? I think it was hosted on geocities for a time.

      Then you had the websites that were kind of like mini-wikipedias for tv shows, Star Trek, the simpsons, and so on.

      There was the odd personal webpage that was actually interesting (I remember "Tales from a loser" or something like that, a blog before the word even existed), links, and who could forget, "those" sites that begged you "IF YOU DON'T OWN THIS SOFTWARE ERASE IT AFTER 24HRS OTHERWISE IT'S ILLEGAL! FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY!"

      90% of it was crap, but it was interesting crap. Myspace on the other hand, besides hosting the music for some bands, seems really useless to me as a host. And as a social network, Facebook is just better.

      * Operative word could

    14. Re:And nothing of value was archived by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Searching in pages: pleaaze... that has nothing to do with dhtml based pages!
      You can search within pages as long as you are document centric and dont have a rich client application running!

      I will give an example, most of the stuff mentioned can be done via applying a hash value which represents some kind of application state (hash because it is alterable from the script without causing page refreshes)

      I think you're both coming to the discussion with a different set of assumptions. You're absolutely right that for a web application, many of his gripes don't make sense. Realistically, though, many companies use DHTML for content which is static.

      http://digg.com/ is a perfect example. Disable Javascript and go to the comments on one of their stories. Now turn on Javascript. There's actual content which is inaccessible unless you have Javascript turned on. Slashdot has a similar system, except it gracefully falls back when Javascript isn't available. However it's still troublesome to bookmark certain things like a specific comment if you're using the Web 2.0 version.

      Think that's too close to an application? Try http://www.toyota.com./ The site ostensibly provides information on the company and their product--relatively static content compared to a lot of the Internet--but the site isn't navigable without Javascript. It's barely a Web 2.0 site, yet it's horribly difficult to navigate.

      I'm not just complaining about Javascript. Just about any time that Javascript is required for navigation, the site is not going to be screen-reader accessible.

      Anyway, the point is that lots of sites unnecessarily use DHTML and make interacting with the site in a conventional way difficult, even if they're serving static content and not providing a web application. I suspect that it's these sites that the grandparent is complaining about.

  5. At that rate... by symbolset · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'll be broke in only 40 years.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:At that rate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They'll be broke in only 40 years.

      I wonder if you were thinking the same thing I was when you said this.

      There is a part in Citizen Kane where his editor is telling Kane as a publisher 'your losing hundreds of thousands of dollars a month' or words to that effect and Kane says 'your right, at that rate I'll have to close the doors in 20 years' or there abouts.

      I am too lazy to login or google the exact quote.

    2. Re:At that rate... by dswensen · · Score: 4, Informative

      "You're right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars *next* year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I'll have to close this place in sixty years."

    3. Re:At that rate... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They'll be broke in only 40 years.

      Because of course, we know they'll never adapt, they'll never innovate, right?

      I mean, it's only Google. It's not like there's any smart people involved. What have they ever done?

      Sometimes, I tire of intellectual midgets.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:At that rate... by symbolset · · Score: 2, Informative

      The technology environment is not likely to change more in the next forty years than it has in the last forty.

      :-)

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:At that rate... by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, 40 years ago businesses with rare exception didn't have computers. There was no Internet. It took a professional typist about 10 minutes to bang out a professional letter. There were no cellular phones - hell, touch-tone wouldn't even be invented for fifteen years.

      I've got more transistors in my house than existed then in all the world. I've got more storage in my desktop computer (3TB) than existed in the world at that time. I can communicate in ways that at that time were absurd speculative fiction, and would have seemed absurdly undesirable. For example, an annoying computer sends an email reminder every night at midnight to my cellular phone and I can't convince its administrator to make it stop. I could turn my cell phone into a streaming web beacon that updates my position on a world-visible map in real time and I don't actually know if it's doing that without my permission. I can stream my live first person perspective to everyone in the world bored enough to watch it. And now it takes a team of 3 most of a day to craft and deliver a professional email.

      You're right. By then we may have lost the ability to communicate in the written form entirely, and lost the option to opt out. That would definitely be "more change".

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    6. Re:At that rate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but that's a bit disingenuous. It took a professional typist about 10 minutes to bang out a profressional letter -that was already written-. Now it takes a team of 3 most of a day to craft and deliver a professional email, -the exact same thing you glossed over before-.

      You can be harassed by an email reminder you don't want, or you could turn your damn phone off at night or set it up to be automatically deleted.

      How in the world you think we're losing the ability to communicate in written form I don't quite understand.

      Although, maybe you're right. No offense, but reading your poorly-reinforced argument (modded +5 insightful) is kind of an argument in itself.

    7. Re:At that rate... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It took a professional typist about 10 minutes to bang out a professional letter.

      Why is this an example of advancement? Technology hasn't changed that. What's changed is that the "typist" can now send it to a recipient halfway around the world instantly, or print 100 copies in minutes. The typist still has to bang out the letter on a keyboard, same as always.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  6. We should not let this happen. by brasselv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't anybody going to move a finger, while a significant part of our collective history disappears forever?

    I really don't think anyone should be allowed to simply pull the plug, no matter what TOS say.

    If I buy the Colosseum and then decide to blow it up "because it's mine", I bet I'd be stopped by someone, rightly so.

    As a historian of year 2075, I'd really want to have access to Geocities if I am researching the '90s.

    It happened at least once before. In the 50's and early 60's, video storage technology was expensive, and most video documentation was not not considered to be of any 'historical value'. As a result, most of it was just erased and we have lost forever an incredible source of information on that period.

    Is there a productive way to scream? A petition of some kind? An attorney to be addressed?

    --
    "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    1. Re:We should not let this happen. by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you buy a movie theater that shows dirty porn films and has jerk-off booths in the back, people will be demanding you blow it up for years, and when you do, they'll throw a party.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:We should not let this happen. by brasselv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... but you don't want to burn the only existing master of such porn films.

      (Seriously, believe it or not, early porn movies of the 20's are a prized source of historical documentation. And with good reason: they tell a lot about their time.)

      --
      "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
    3. Re:We should not let this happen. by floodo1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I wouldn't liken Geocities to the Colosseum, I too believe that these guys should be commended for keeping such an interesting archive. The beauty of the internet is that it's all digital so it's as if (to continue your Colosseum example) someone came in and copied the entire Colosseum before you blew it up.

      That said, everyone that originally had sites on Geocities should have already been responsible for the content they left there. If it was actually important then they should already have moved it someplace else.

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    4. Re:We should not let this happen. by djdavetrouble · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't anybody going to move a finger, while a significant part of our collective history disappears forever?

      Yes, the Archive guys are lifting their finger 5 times every second and archiving them.
      Don't make me say that RTF thing.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    5. Re:We should not let this happen. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      And archived porn from the 2000s will tell future generations that the sexual act in our time always ended with the man ejaculating up the woman's nose.

      They'll wonder how anybody ever got pregnant around the turn of the millennium.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:We should not let this happen. by merreborn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there a productive way to scream? A petition of some kind? An attorney to be addressed?

      Petitioning Yahoo to continue hosting an antiquated service that is likely bleeding money isn't likely to be productive, obviously.

      But it would be awfully nice of them to .tar everything up and .torrent it. There are thousands of us who'd be more than happy to do our part to keep those bits from disappearing into the ether.

    7. Re:We should not let this happen. by mike2R · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe not the Colosseum itself, but maybe the contemporary graffiti scrawled on it. See (although these are from Pompeii).

      It's actually quite an apt comparison, and shows how little we have changed as a species :) eg:

      I.4.5 (House of the Citharist; below a drawing of a man with a large nose); 2375: Amplicatus, I know that Icarus is buggering you. Salvius wrote this.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
  7. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did you try hunter2?

  8. Shame on Yahoo by Xero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just ridiculous the amount of work they have to go through to half ass archive geocities. Why can't yahoo just hand over a stack of hard drives to archive.org or someone?

  9. Who do I bribe? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to make sure that any geocities site I may have been affiliated with back in my formative years is not seen by anyone who might recognize me now.

    Who do I make the check out to, and how many significant places will be required?

    1. Re:Who do I bribe? by N3Roaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It might already be gone. I, too, once had a page on GeoCities, so I decided to look into it. Searching for it, Google couldn't find it (but it seems Google Books likes to interpret the old long s as an f). Fine tuning my search pulled up one hit: a Usenet post with a link to the page in the .sig. So, I take this, and I go to the wayback machine. Put in the URL, and I get two versions, both from the year 2000 (well after I had stopped updating the site). Clicking the links, both were unavailable. The content at the URL itself, of course, is long gone. I looked in a couple other places as well and as near as I can tell, that set of pages is fully and permanently gone from the Internet and this project can do nothing to change that.

      Okay, it turns out that I do have a full copy on an old computer. If I hooked a pair of modems up to it and a more modern machine, I could get it back and theoretically put it back on the Internet, but that won't be happening any time soon. So take a Google. You might not have to write that check out after all.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
  10. And how many of them will find other hosting? by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was an awesome amount of amateur research on Geocities. Some of my favorite reference sites are therefore just about toast (most of them containing first-hand military history).

    And just because someone asked, I saved all ~300 of my Youtube favorites to my HDD last weekend, when I realized how much I rely on them for my own hobby research projects, teaching classes, etc. Most of it was stuff that will never be on DVD. Some of it is stuff that the owners have *already* deleted in the last week, due to perfectionism or whatever.

    I was a Boy Scout, and relying on some free service without thinking of contingencies just doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:And how many of them will find other hosting? by AlHunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >I was a Boy Scout, and relying on some free service without thinking of contingencies just doesn't make sense.

      Sounds kind of like the argument against Web Apps ...

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
  11. Re:A lesson for future generations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Along with people who insist on using fixed width fonts in a forum where *everybody* else uses proportional width fonts.

  12. Did anyone else pronounce 'geocities'... by Jubilex · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to rhyme with 'atrocities' ?

  13. Thank god that somebody is archiving it by TinBromide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I posted earlier about how Geocities was the early web 2.0 in practice, where anybody could post anything and contribute to the community. I'm sure that there is a wealth of information on geocities about obscure topics that *Might* come in handy if you were to let your true inner geek reign supreme. I.E. I have bios roms of early mac's that I found on Geocities sites that couldn't be found anywhere else, and I'm sure that if they were posted nowadays, they would be subject to lawsuits or take-down notices by Apple.

    I think that our generation will leave less of a mark than that which came before it because nobody is writing on paper. Geocities is the closest thing that we have to shoe-boxes full of letters and diaries for the period spanning the late 90's (In the form of websites about star trek and software and pointless articles posted by ambitious young proto-webdesigners). In the future, there will be a similar scramble to preserve facebook and myspace to preserve correspondence for future generations.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
  14. angelfire's open directories by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Angelfire was fun to snoop around on, since the image subdirectories were open for the browsing. Sometimes you found images not meant for the public.

  15. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by MarkRose · · Score: 5, Funny

    What was that password? When you typed hunter2, all I saw was *******.

    --
    Be relentless!
  16. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by powerslave12r · · Score: 5, Funny

    "you can go hunter2 my hunter2-ing hunter2" http://www.bash.org/?244321

    --
    Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
  17. To those who say Geocities has nothing of value... by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is just one example of content on Geocities that has value.
    http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/8682/
    These old documents are still of value to people modding the old games.

  18. Re:Oh God by MadnessASAP · · Score: 3, Funny

    If anything s mentioned in the same sentence as goatse it's quite safe to assume that it probably doesn't involve puppy dogs and kittens, at least not in the traditional sense.

    --
    I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
  19. Re:I lost my geocities page password 10 years ago. by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny, but true. I did forget my login information (email/username and password) to this site, which is just the one image.

    For those who don't know, this is a parody of Chick religious tracts (God, what a waste of a domain name!) that has often been the target of the Chick lawyers.

    Note to the Chick legal team: I'll be glad to take it down if you give me my password! :)

  20. Garbage collection? by marqtholomew · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back in 1996-97 I made an extremely amateurish geocities site with some unfinished programming tutorials, the most popular of which was on qbasic. I sort of stopped working on it after a while, lost my password, and couldn't get yahoo to authenticate me years later when I wanted to remove my ridiculous site. The bio page is especially embarrassing, and the programming material that is there is of no use today. Honestly I'm too lazy to expend any more energy in my effort to shut down my site, so naturally I am relieved to see yahoo pulling the plug on geocities. The way I see it, the internet is cleaner without my site clogging the tubes. My site could live indefinitely in archiving systems, but hopefully someday it won't even show up on a search for "qbasic programming". Will the web naturally garbage collect my orphaned web page, without my intervention?

    1. Re:Garbage collection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on now, http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/Bay/5707/index.html is not all that bad. Sure, the blue background makes my eyes bleed in pain in an attempt to read the text, and the drivers license picture included is painful to look at, but overall it is not bad.

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. WOOOOOOOOSHHH!!!! by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny

    there is huge potential for growth in knowledge and inventions, compared to 40 years ago.

    n/t

  23. Re:Needed? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2, Informative

    >internet wayback machine

    who do you think archive.org is?

    And google cache is strictly short term.

  24. Re:The easy solution? by hezekiah957 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't you?

  25. Re:Good lord let it go by gadabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    with that site gone, how will people ever know that soy beverages, soy cheese, soy flour, soy meal, soy oil, soy sauce, soy protein, and soybeans ALL CONTAIN SOY PRODUCTS?

    i know it's not all of them, but seriously - damn near half of the products on that page have SOY in the name. i can only deduce that geocities hates natural selection.

    --
    the united states is a nation of laws; badly written and randomly enforced -- frank zappa