Slashdot Mirror


IE8 Update Forces IE As Default Browser

We discussed Microsoft making IE8 a critical update a while back; but then the indication was that the update gave users a chance to choose whether or not to install it. Now I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes in with word that the update not only does not ask, but it makes IE the default browser. "Microsoft has a new tactic in the browser wars. They're having the 'critical' IE8 update make IE the default browser without asking. Yes, you can change it back, but it doesn't ask you if you want IE8 or if you want it as the default browser, it makes the decisions for you. Opera might have a few more complaints to make to the EU antitrust board after this, but Microsoft will probably be able to drag out the proceedings for years, only to end up paying a small fine. If you have anyone you've set up with a more secure alternative browser, you might want to help check their settings after this."

68 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. Death to IE6! by mnslinky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's to the end of IE 6 and all the hacks needed for site to render correctly!

    1. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope... Many corporations built their intranet around IE6 and changing browser will break it. Rather than spend buckets of money revamping their intranet, they are just more likely to keep going with IE6...

    2. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It amazes me how when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade.

      Way to go Microsoft!!! If your users are uncomfortable with upgrading, force them anyway.

    3. Re:Death to IE6! by suso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that they don't care if you warned them. They just want to keep making money.

    4. Re:Death to IE6! by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I say go ahead and break the websites. They were all broken the minute they went browser specific.

      Granted, the fact that the HTML protocol could be interpreted two different ways indicates that it's not entirely Microsoft's fault... this time.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes you don't have a choice. Depends on the products you bought and when those vendors update their product and/or when you can afford to upgrade to the newer version. Money doesn't grow on trees, and you can't control other organizations schedules. I know of where I speak on this. Work in the health care industry some time.

    6. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      80%?
      What's your website, an IE6 fan club?

    7. Re:Death to IE6! by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are correct, however this is true only in the short term. The whole argument of "We're saving money by not switching." will only hold water for so long. Eventually there will come a point at which their enforcement of IE6 will prevent them from being competitive. While everyone else is moving forward with new technologies that allow them to do more (and more securely) they'll still be stuck with applications that depend on ActiveX and open them up to attack. Also, if enough people are using IE8/Firefox outside of work (or more importantly enough management-types) their frustration with the older browser will eventually leak into the workplace, and there will be a push to upgrade intranet apps to get with the times. Change does happen in the corporate world, it just happens slowly.

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    8. Re:Death to IE6! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's to making websites run on Lynx. They're invariably far faster, usually far more readable, far more usable for those with visual or manual problems, far lighter in bandwidth, and require far less testing for a variety of standards-violating clients.

    9. Re:Death to IE6! by quickcel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you kidding? Death to the best browser around? Help us save IE6 and sign the petition! http://saveie6.com/

    10. Re:Death to IE6! by mnslinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I help develop for a health care website, which is used internally by large clinics, etc, in Minnesota. With a strong, persistent insistence on clients switching from IE to Firefox, we've got from ~97% of users using IE to this month's stats showing 48.4% using IE, 50.8% using Firefox. We've also been pushing notices that IE6 has been EOL'd by Microsoft, and given links to upgrade to IE7. this has seen that 48.4% of IE users to be split with 20.3% of total users using IE7 and only 28.1% still using IE6.

      IMHO, it's been a quite successful campaign. I'm not a huge fan of IE, in general, but it's far easier to code for IE7 than IE6.

    11. Re:Death to IE6! by penguin_dance · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not just about having built their intranet around IE6. A lot of (really large) companies I have done contract work for are still using Windows 2000 as their OS and you can't run anything newer than IE6 with that. I think when XP came along, they decided not to upgrade, but just wait until the next version of the OS came out. Then Vista came along....

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    12. Re:Death to IE6! by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 2

      The humour in this has not gone unnoticed by me, but you're also right. A website that doesn't work is Lynx is not really a website at all.

    13. Re:Death to IE6! by gewalker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, he said 20K visitors. There is NO way that an IE6 fan club has that many visitors.

    14. Re:Death to IE6! by Wintermute__ · · Score: 2

      Sometimes you don't have a choice. Depends on the products you bought and when those vendors update their product and/or when you can afford to upgrade to the newer version. Money doesn't grow on trees, and you can't control other organizations schedules. I know of where I speak on this. Work in the health care industry some time.

      Been there, done that. Hopefully won't have to again any time soon. Industries I prefer to avoid as an IT worker: Healthcare, Education, Government. Also, watch out for Law offices and Accounting firms. Strange politics at those places.

      But, back on-topic: many industries have these broken (or at least fragile) apps, from 3rd party vendors or otherwise.

      IT shops with apps like that should be managing patches for their users, whether with something like SUS or whatever manual process suits their environment. Allowing automatic updates is just asking for it.

    15. Re:Death to IE6! by ivucica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Real problem is they're forcing their browser to be default system browser, in place of Opera, Firefox, Chrome - whichever is your default. Y'know how aforementioned browsers (and older IE) ask you if you want them to be the default? The /. summary makes point of forcing IE8 as the default.

    16. Re:Death to IE6! by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They also won't remember that you warned them. They'll remember that somewhere along the line, IT oversaw this intranet for them. It worked for a while, then something broke. Even if they're aware that this is related to IE6 (probably not), nobody will remember who made that call, especially not the idiot who said "let's just go with that blue E internet thingie."

      They'll just know that IT made it, and it broke after a few years.

    17. Re:Death to IE6! by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if this is quite what you mean, but in IE7, if you put an XHTML DOCTYPE tag at the top of a page, IE7 will render the page closer to correctly than it does without a DOCTYPE (I assume it renders it in the completely-broken IE6 mode).

    18. Re:Death to IE6! by TheCycoONE · · Score: 2, Informative

      IE7 and 8 do not natively support xhtml, they treat the document as SGML and apply SGML rules to it. This means that namespaces, MathML, etc. cannot be supported by that browser, and that it will not fail on invalid content as an xml parser should.

    19. Re:Death to IE6! by JoelisHere · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, he said 20K visitors. There is NO way that an IE6 fan club has that many visitors.

      or do they... http://www.saveie6.com/

    20. Re:Death to IE6! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It amazes me how when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade.

      People who use Firefox generally understand the concept of updating software. Folks who use IE, en masse, don't even know that there's a difference between "Internet Explorer" and "web browser"; in fact, they might not even realise that IE is an application as such - how many times in your life did you hear, "and then I clicked on the blue Internet icon"? Making the former group update is easy - roll out a bunch of new features, including stuff only a geek would truly understand the meaning of and care about (such as 100% ACID3...). It's much harder for the latter group.

    21. Re:Death to IE6! by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The summary calls this a "new" trick, IT IS NOT! They pulled the exact same shit when IE7 came out, trust me. I do tech-support for friends (who know nothing about computers). During one month (when they pushed the update), 90% of the people I helped (I always install firefox for them) phoned and said "What the hell happened to my bookmarks?!?". The first time it happened, it took me a while to figure out that they were not using FireFox, but that their keyboard-shortcut was now bound to IE7!

      Microsoft thinks their browser is the best, or at lest good enough for everyone, but when you upgrade an unused program and end up wrecking another one, YOU FUCKED UP!

      This is definitely the kind of thing that Opera needs to bring to the EU's attention.

    22. Re:Death to IE6! by jonadab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > IE7 and 8 do not natively support xhtml, they treat the
      > document as SGML and apply SGML rules to it. This means
      > that namespaces, MathML, etc. cannot be supported by
      > that browser,

      Actually, it's theoretically possible to still support those things without fully embracing all the other XML rules. It won't make the purists happy, but it can be done.

      > and that it will not fail on invalid content as an xml parser should.

      I consider completely failing on all invalid content to be an undesirable characteristic in a web browser and contrary to the basic principle of graceful degradation that the web is built on. If a browser sees an element it does not recognize, it should just treat it as a generic element (comparable to span) and go on. This allows webmasters to go ahead and use new features before every web browser that's still in use supports them (which can take a decade or more).

      A web browser is not a validator. That isn't its purpose. Web developers need to know how to use a validator, yes, but the web browser shouldn't be it.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    23. Re:Death to IE6! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does any browser on the market today fail on invalid XHTML? (by "fail" I mean refusing to parse the page and render it)

      Yes. But it actually has to be served as XHTML, and the vast majority is not.

      There is a popular misconception that an XHTML DOCTYPE means the page is interpreted as XHTML, this is incorrect. All the DOCTYPE really does is turn off quirks mode in IE, the actual content-type of the page (which is sent in the HTTP response header from the server) is virtually always served as text/html.

      In order to have a page truly interpreted as XHTML, it needs a content-type header of application/xhtml+xml, and this will indeed break rendering and display an XML parsing error for the most trivial of errors. And of course IE6 doesn't support application/xhtml+xml, so this is not a viable option unless you want to start serving different versions of your page based on the browser.

      Thus the situation we have today, is that everyone writes "XHTML style" HTML (ie, self-closing tags, everything lowercase, quoted attributes, etc), but it's actually interpreted as poorly formed HTML by the browser. (ie, <br /> is technically not valid HTML) Luckily browsers are extremely forgiving of poorly formed HTML.

      A couple links on the subject:

      http://www.autisticcuckoo.net/archive.php?id=2005/04/08/doctype-declaration-and-content-type-headers

      http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    24. Re:Death to IE6! by Firehed · · Score: 4, Informative

      Validate! If you write valid (X)HTML and CSS, IE7 gets pretty close to the mark and IE8 seems to get it spot-on outside of some newer, often browser-specific CSS properties (text-shadow, -X-border-radius, etc). Hell, even IE6 seems to render more accurately if you have a doctype tag and code that validates against said doctype. Your code won't pass validation without a doctype tag.

      Re: XHTML flash - if you MUST use it, http://validifier.com/.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  2. Nothing changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IE remains the biggest security problem in Windows (besides user stupidity).

    If webpages can override the render engine in IE8 then IE8 is only as secure as the worst render engine.

  3. this wasn't my experience by lambent · · Score: 5, Informative

    i updated IE8 manually on like 20 machines yesterday. it asked every time. it didn't kill my default browser selection.

    it there something i'm overlooking, like does automatic updates apply it and not ask you? am i missing something from TFA?

    1. Re:this wasn't my experience by Briareos · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, there is one question during IE8 setup whether to use some (listed) default settings or the change those settings - maybe setting it as the default browser is one of those defaults?

      It didn't override Firefox being the default browser in my XP installation, at any rate...

      np: Can - Mother Upduff (Anthology (Disc 2))

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    2. Re:this wasn't my experience by LurkingOnSlashdot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wasn't my experience either. I upgraded my home machines and my office computer to IE8 and do not recall that it became my default browser.

  4. Re:Whooooooooosh! by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's nothing wrong with this tactic. Firefox does the same thing to me in Linux.

    Firefox makes IE 8 your default browser in Linux? That's kinda odd.

  5. More secure alternative browser? by CubicleView · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have anyone you've set up with a more secure alternative browser

    Is it not a bit early to be deciding which browsers are more secure than IE8?

    1. Re:More secure alternative browser? by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it not a bit early to be deciding which browsers are more secure than IE8?

      No it isn't, unless you believe in miracles. This isn't really Microsoft's fault but for every hacker who says "lets target Firefox and try to capture bank details" there are 100 trying to do it for IE.

    2. Re:More secure alternative browser? by derGoldstein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How was this modded troll? It's a fact of life, and he even added "This isn't really Microsoft's fault" which most slashdotters wouldn't have bothered with.

      IE is the primary target for browser hacking, and will remain so as long as its market share is anywhere in the vicinity that it is now.

      The best thing you can do at the moment is install Firefox *and* Chrome *and* Opera and try to dedicate types of sites to each browser.
      I usually assign Google properties to Chrome, highly compliant sites to Opera, and everything else to Firefox.
      (This may sound paranoid, or just overkill, but I have to develop/test on multiple browsers anyway so for me it's also a way to get to know them better.)

      I'm not suggesting that everyone should install every browser, but at the very least install Firefox and make it the default, because they patch it early and often, and it's very good at maintaining itself (updating when you restart, checking for plugin updates, etc.)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
  6. Does anyone fact check here? by Avagadro's+Number · · Score: 5, Informative

    I installed IE8 through windows update in Vista and it asked me if I wanted to set it as the default browser. I clicked no and Firefox is still my default. If you use the full auto install it will make it the default browser. Of course, if you do the full auto install with any Microsoft product you deserve any pain that results.

  7. If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by jarodss · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you let the IE install do it's thing automatically then it sets itself as default.

    Anyone not choosing to customize IE's install deserves to have it supplant their settings.

    1. Re:If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But that's the point. Those people (grandma/grandpa) are already helped by others and set to work with an alternate browser. Now if this is true (that MS automatic update set to "install updates automatically" and it makes IE8 default), then all that hard work is lost.

      I don't know about you, but I can count at least 10 computers (other than mine) I have set FF to be default browser. I don't think its fair to undo that work (if this article is true, which I doubt).

  8. IE8 on Vista, not the default by PunditGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just checked to make sure -- Firefox is still my default. No surreptitious shenanigans.

    Is this an XP thing? TFA didn't say which OS he was running.

  9. FUD by Z_A_Commando · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have several machines, all running several versions of Windows (XP & Vista in both 32- and 64-bit varieties) and I have not seen IE8 automagically installed through Windows Update on them. I have Windows Update set to automatically install updates without asking and the result is exactly what happens with IE7 when you get it off of Windows Update: An installer screen pops up asking if you'd like to install IE8 now, would like to wait, or don't want to install it at all, ever. All have updated to Office 2007 SP2, which was released to Windows Update the same day.

    However, I can't speak to what happens when you have IE6 installed on your XP machine and this update comes across the wire. I dropped IE6 over a year ago. Still, I doubt such an upgrade would be forced like this. Also, when I did choose to install IE8 on a machine that has Firefox as the default browser, after the restart, Firefox was still the default. This article is simply FUD. Furthermore, what's wrong with replacing a less standards compliant browser with a more standards compliant browser? Provided you don't change the default browser of course.

  10. SOP for all Microsoft products by GaryOlson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Service packs for Visual Studio are no longer available on our WSUS server for this reason [after some hard political battles and beating Security over the head with a clue bat]. Visual Studio service packs change all your file associations from non-VS applications to Visual Studio. The Computer Science 101 students' heads all exploded when foo.java opened in Visual Studio 2005 instead of Notepad++.

    Microsoft has a long history of forcibly breaking your operating environment.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    1. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What do you mean "your" operating environment? Windows is theirs!

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by owlstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a reason why I hate Microsoft at times, and Visual Studio installs are definitely one of them. First it goes and update your entire system, restarts a couple of hundred times and then it messes up your file associations. And of course you can be assured additional fun if you work at a company that does not have internet connections on their development PC's.

      Compare that with an Eclipse inst^H^H^Hunzip.

      Anyway, the whole idea that a single source file should open in an IDE is flawed. Let IDE's open workspaces and projects, but single files (many of them just containing fragments of code) that I want to view (promptly if possible) should *NOT* open in an IDE, and especially not in VS.

      That said, VS itself is getting better. But it starts off by annoying the hell out of possible switchers.

    3. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have installed Visual Studio 2008 twice in the past week - zero reboots needed each time, and the only file associations it monkeyed with was .cs. No network connection in either case here either.

  11. Some info about this by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was actually "released" from the IE8 team for precisely my opposition to this action.

    The day I found out I no longer had to show up to Redmond, the sun was low in the sky and the light mist that always seems to hover over the Puget Sound area was turning into a cold drizzle. The drizzle would eventually become snow and we'd have two days straight of spring snow.

    I pulled my Fiat into the parking lot and was met by two of my teammates. They were waiting to warn me of the incoming news of which they had only heard the very basics. I was to be fired and marched out. It was to make an example of me and to impress on the remaining team members not to rock the boat. IE8 would take over as default browser, no matter what any ruggedly handsome senior developer thought.

    My manager met me in my office and handed me 6 cardboard boxes. He thanked me for the years of work I had put in, and was sorry that things had reached this point. The my sentence was handed down from above, and he had done his best to lobby on my behalf. But he didn't share my feelings about the default browser action.

    I took down my patent cubes and unopened boxes of shipped products. My books were packed up into the cardboard boxes and I took a few paper clips and pens as mementos. My final official act was to grab two bottles of Talking Rain. Raspberry and Lemon Lime. And with these, I walked with my manager and security guard to my tiny, snow-covered car.

    The decision to do this with IE8 came as a product of much deliberation. It is no accident. They took action against me personally because I had the audacity to speak out. I always heard about their anti-competitiveness, but didn't really understand its reality until that snowy day.

  12. Making it a critical update was a favor by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IE6 is a plague on the internet development world. If it gets rid of that, wonderful. Making it the default browser, that's classic Microsoft. Actually, that's the new, desperate to hang on to market share in the face of shrinking revenue Microsoft.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  13. works on my computer by RingDev · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not that I saw. I remember seeing an explicit "Make IE8 your default browser?" dialogue show up. I'm not sure about XP, but on Vista 64, it behaived exactly as I expected it to and did not change any settings that I didn't tell it explicitly to do.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  14. Re:Nothing new here by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure it was accidental. Nobody at Microsoft would notice this because they all use IE (by law).

    --
    No sig today...
  15. You fucking suck... Slashdot by GF678 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm yet another person who installed IE 8 via Windows Update and it did NOT forcibly set itself as the default browser.

    Seriously Slashdot, do you even bother to vet your troll articles anymore? Do you realize how embarrassingly pathetic this one significant site in the tech world has become?

  16. Vista/IE8 bug by clickclickdrone · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm holding back installing it as there's still a bug (apparantly) that stops media sharing working with WMP11 when you install IE8 on Vista.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  17. FUD by sherriw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I agree that making it default _without asking_ is a shady move on Microsoft's part, I'm sure what the payoff is for them versus the negative response many people will have. Those users who have a non-IE browser as default will notice the switch and will switch it back, these are the users who are actively choosing which browser to use anyway. The people who don't care what browser they are using, are probably already using IE. So what do they accomplish, other than reaffirming to the non-IE people the rightness of their choice?

  18. As Machiavellian as this seems... by Assmasher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...we know that most people (sadly) are using some version of IE currently; ergo, if they install IE8 and it makes itself the default, this is good for a variety of reasons entirely related to security (and good for the rest of us as the last thing I need is more zombies out there spamming me night and day.)

    Now, most people who have an alternative browser installed do so because they are 'aware' of the realities of modern web surfing and make an intelligent choice accordingly. These people are being inconvenienced by this because they've got to set their browser back to being the default (often this is simply a case, using Mozilla as an example, of starting up their favorite browser and it saying "Hey, don't you want to use me all the time" and they choose "yes, make yourself my default browser." Inconvenient, annoying, suspicious, yes - a real problem for these people? No...

    The last group are the (imho) very small minority of web users who've been lucky enough to have an informed web user install an IE alternative for them, but they themselves do not know what the fuss is about. These are the people actually getting screwed by this. They may end up with IE8 until their good Samaritan revisits them to right this terrible wrong.

    Ignoring whatever the actual motives for this decision at Micro$oft was, I personally think the good outweighs the bad. It would still be nice to smack the guy who green lighted this in the face though, wouldn't it? :)

    --
    Loading...
  19. Didn't override FF3.5 being the default. by wiredog · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a WinXP SP3 box here at work.

  20. Bollocks by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes in with word that the update not only does not ask, but it makes IE the default browser.

    When I looked at my XP box the other day, there was a bubble notifying me of available updates. I checked to see what it was and all there was was IE8. So I unchecked the box, told it never to ask again, and that was the end of that. So why the FUD ? Can't you even configure windows properly ? Please stay away from Linux.

  21. Not a problem here by glennpratt · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just allowed a handful of computer at work to install the update. All of them asked before installing and none of them changed the default away from Firefox.

    Somebody needs to explain this.

  22. Bullshit by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, you can change it back, but it doesn't ask you if you want IE8 or if you want it as the default browser, it makes the decisions for you.

    This is not entirely true. When you install IE8, it asks you whether you'd like to do an Easy install or if you'd rather do a custom install. The Easy install does indeed set IE8 as the system's default browser, without asking. However, if you do the custom install, it does ask, and it honors what you tell the installer to do.

    Even if your default browser setting does get hijacked, the very next time you launch Firefox, it'll let you know it's not set as your default browser, and it's one click to change it back. Not a big deal at all, other than if you're running unattended installs on critical systems which require Firefox to be the default browser for some reason.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  23. FUD by wcb4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I allowed the install of IE8 on 2 of my personal machines yesterday. Both of the still have Firefox as the default browser. Vista and XP. Who is complaining that its switching their default browser? What's the setup?

    --
    I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
  24. How much difference would it actually make? by williamhb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much browsing is done through the "default browser" setting anyway? Maybe the occasional click of an email link. Surely most of the time, however, browsers are invoked directly by double-clicking the icon of your usual browser, rather than through invoking the Windows default browser setting. And most browsers have an automatic pop-up asking you if you want to set them as your default browser, with "yes" pre-checked (as well as "run this check every time"), so most non-techy users would very quickly end right up back with their old browser setting again, just through their habit of saying OK without thinking very much.

    1. Re:How much difference would it actually make? by Rinnon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are SIGNIFICANTLY overestimating the general public, leading me to believe you have never worked in a technical support call center. Remember how when you install Windows, it gives you an Icon at the top of the start menu that says "Internet" and then if your default changes, that icon changes? Surely, those of us in know laugh at this as a potential problem, but I can't count the number of people who claim they have "lost" their browser or (more commonly) they can't open Outlook, and instead Outlook Express is opening, and they don't know why. And do you think the average user is going to click on the "custom" button when installing IE8? Are you kidding? That "custom" button to them, means "crazy details I'm not supposed to touch"; but just because they don't know this and that about computers, doesn't make them any less deserving to not have their settings pulled out from underneath them. They're the ones who really suffer from things like this. Not us on Slashdot, who spend 20 times more time typing up the complaint than actually fixing the issue. ~2 Cents

  25. Not an uncommon practice by CodingHero · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems that Microsoft takes the heat for forcing its products to be the default browser/media player/whatever, but whenever I get an iTunes/QuickTime update, QuickTime doesn't give me the option of choosing whether or not it is the default media player and proceeds to take over my machine. Furthermore I, like many posters before me, was given the option during IE8's install process of whether or not I wanted it to be the default browser. Of course I do custom/manual Windows updates. Perhaps those who use Express update are met with a different result?

  26. possibly this was by-design by derGoldstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's conceivable that it only makes itself the default under certain circumstances. Maybe if you have auto-updates "fully" turned on (where it doesn't even ask, it just installs), it'll make it the default.
    I don't want to sound troll-ish but it's likely that people who have auto-update set to "download-and-install-automatically" aren't the more savvy set, and therefor MS thought they could get away with it (I almost added "and I don't want to sound like a conspiracy-theorist", but this is MS, it's *expected*).

    I can even see MS apologists taking their side here, something like: "look, you probably installed Firefox on your parent's computer to protect them from IE hacks, not because of usability, but IE8 makes very significant improvements and you know that it will be kept patched on a system that automatically installs updates from MS"

    To me this seems to be a designed tactic.

    --
    Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    1. Re:possibly this was by-design by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You tried, but no cigar. My anecdote: XP Pro SP3, all auto-updates, upgraded to IE8 and left Firefox 3 as my default browser. I call troll on the article itself, from my anecdotal.

  27. IE 8 didn't force itself on me but... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Funny

    It did throw a chair at me when I said to leave me default as Firefox.

  28. Same here by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Installed on Vista 64.

    I think what TFA actually means to say is:

    "I got really click happy and just blindly clicked my way through the IE8 install without looking and it made itself my default browser, how dare it!"

  29. Microsoft Choice Guard by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't experience any issues updating to IE8 but I did experience MS hijacking my firefox search and homepage when I installed their Live stuff.

    I restarted my computer after installing the latest updates including the Live stuff and when I restarted Firefox, the addons window popped up with something called "Microsoft Choice Guard." With a name like "choice guard" it sounded like spyware to me and I was basically right.

    It turns out that if you aren't paying attention MS will install this http://help.live.com/help.aspx?market=en-us&project=wlinstallerv3&querytype=keyword&query=draug_eciohc

    This isn't going to win MS any friends...

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  30. By The Numbers by westlake · · Score: 4, Informative
    when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade

    Browser Version Market Share

    IE 7 44.5%
    IE 6 17.5%
    IE 8 4.3%
    IE 5 0.04%
    IE 5.5 0.03%

    Firefox 3.0 20%
    Firefox 2.0 1.8%
    Firefox 3.1 0.18%
    Firefox 1.5 0.15%
    Firefox 1.0 0.06%
    Firefox 3.5 0.01%

    So call it 50% of the web for IE 7 and IE 8.

    Net Applications tracks hits to e-commerce and other mass market websites.

    It's not looking at techies. It's looking at guy who watches Fox News and does his shopping at K-Mart.

    The geek lives in a bubble.

    He believes what he wants to believe.

  31. Re:Whooooooooosh! by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I let Vista install all 300MB of collective updates last night, including IE8, and it did not change my default from Chrome.

    --
    My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
  32. You just proved his point! by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By those numbers, only 6.5% of IE users are running the latest version. Even if you include IE7 you get that only 73.5% of IE users have upgraded to a browser released in the last three years.

    On the otherhand, 91.4% of Firefox users are running the latest stable version or a beta version. And if you include FF2 (released the same month as IE7) 99.5% of firefox users have upgraded to a browser released in the last three years.

    Firefox users are far more likely to upgrade to the newest version than Internet Explorer users are, which is what he was claiming.

    1. Re:You just proved his point! by dintlu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's been my experience that Firefox automatically downloads updates and installs them when I restart my browser. Firefox users are up to date because *they don't have a choice.*

      Now, who was complaining about MS forcing an update?

    2. Re:You just proved his point! by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you want that bug/security fix, regardless of browser? I thought so. How about that major update? Gonna hold off on that one till it's a little bit more stable/faster/whatever? Hey, I guess you had the choice with FF. IE8 doesn't give you a chance. There's the difference.