Slashdot Mirror


White House Joins Facebook, MySpace, Twitter

theodp writes "The official White House Blog called the move WhiteHouse 2.0 as the Obama administration unveiled its membership in a trio of the social-networking leaders: Facebook (157,606 fans and counting), MySpace (174,817 friends and counting) and Twitter (34,612 followers and counting)."

28 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Facebook by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    My wife and her High School friends use Facebook to stay in touch. Which seems to primarily revolve around sending drinks to each other. Transparency and reachability are certainly good, but, it does make you wonder how many people are going to send "buttery nipples" to the White House, and if that is actually a good thing or not.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Facebook by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

      He is just doing it to meet young girls... I mean he is bringing the Clinton years back. ;)

    2. Re:Facebook by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wonder if through ANY of this, Obama is going to keep one of his election stump promises, to publish every bill he's going to sign, in its entirety at least 5 days before he signs it?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Is it possible to have enemys on facebook? by alta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just like /. I want to make obama my enemy. Mod him troll/off topic/flamebait.

    Guess I should prep myself for the poor mods ;) I think my excellent karma can take it though

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:Is it possible to have enemys on facebook? by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just like /. I want to make obama my enemy. Mod him troll/off topic/flamebait.

      Guess I should prep myself for the poor mods ;) I think my excellent karma can take it though

      There are easier ways to get yourself put on an FBI watch list. Why not try the tried and true method of sending him a death threat through the mail? You'll be on his enemies list in no time flat.

    2. Re:Is it possible to have enemys on facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Guess I should prep myself for the poor mods ;) I think my excellent karma can take it though

      Around here, just saying that pretty much guarantees you will be modded up to +5.

    3. Re:Is it possible to have enemys on facebook? by bdenton42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      How is racking up $11 TRILLION in debt in 100 days going to help the economy in the long terms?

      Obama has contributed $500 billion to the national debt so far. The total national debt stands at $11.2 trillion, of which Bush II contributed nearly half (45%).

      But if Obama continues spending at the current pace he could pass Bush II around the end of his third year.

    4. Re:Is it possible to have enemys on facebook? by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Only if you're stupid enough to believe his projections. Not to mention that on the level the .gov plays at, cash accounting debt is almost utterly meaningless. Accrual accounting is all that's important, and the spending outlays Obama's attempting to ram through will make the current SocSec/MediCare outlays(Which rack up to somewhere between 70-90 trillion dollars) look like fucking chump change.

  3. "White House 2.0?" by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're just over 100 days in, people. How about "White House 2.0 RC1?" I don't think we're ready to go gold just yet.

  4. breaking news: by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Funny

    9:33 AM: gotta drop the kids off at the pool
    9:53 AM: shit, no tp

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  5. I've been watching this for a while by mc1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Obama administration is just leveraging all the tools they have available. More people can be reached via the web than anywhere else. I guess the only reason this is really news is that its an outbreak of common sense for a government agency to use these tools. I'm hoping it will allow for more transparency, but then again its just as easy to lie and fudge numbers online as it is through traditional media outlets.

    1. Re:I've been watching this for a while by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It may be partially about transparency in government, but it's much more about the perpetual campaign season. These days, politicians are always campaigning. The new mantra is it's never too early to start campaigning for the next race.

      The Obama administration will use these tools to release a constant stream of positive spin. In the old days, Presidents had to rely on weekly radio addresses that no one listened to, daily press briefings that no one listened to, and press conferences that either happened too infrequently to sustain a message or so frequently that people got sick of them.

      Now, with these services, the administration has the opportunity to campaign continuously in a low-key and less intrusive way that will, they hope, be more effective. Time will tell how well it works.

    2. Re:I've been watching this for a while by emocomputerjock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree in principle, but the fact of the matter is that the sites they're choosing to use to spread that information have some of the most godawful security records. If we're relying on Obama's tweets for information, it's going to suck when some staffer gets hit with a worm while checking out some hot chick's profile and the next thing the rest of the world sees is something akin to Russia being outlawed.

    3. Re:I've been watching this for a while by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may be partially about transparency in government, but it's much more about the perpetual campaign season. These days, politicians are always campaigning. The new mantra is it's never too early to start campaigning for the next race.

      Are you new? The first job of every elected politician has always been reelection.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I've been watching this for a while by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure, but the active campaigning was usually reserved for the campaign season, meaning the several months before an election. The rest of the time was spent governing, albeit doing so in a way that would play well with the electorate come campaign time.

      Now, it's all about "managing the message" and staying in campaign mode all the time. It's not about doing things that will "play well in Peoria", it's about constantly reinforcing the message that whatever it is you're doing is good for the people. It's the difference between doing the people's work and making sure the people think whatever it is you're doing is the people's work.

  6. Everyone is doing it....or else? by Bob_Who · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I understand that these three social networking applications are popular, but I am already burning out on this trend. I was an early adopter but find myself just wanting to take a step back from the herding masses and regroup. I wonder if these proprietary web applications are really worthy of such Presidential endorsement. Perhaps we're just piling on the craze with Ellen, Ashton, and Oprah, as well as every texting teen and their friends with benefits. Its a good thing to see alternatives to newspaper start taking a hold, but I can't help but feel a little bit as though "we the sheeple" are being herded into this arrangement. Like cellular, its promise comes at a price, and with a commitment to corporate media monoliths. And I just hate feeding corporations in order to participate in the public community. I'll be interested to see how the White House copes with this bold dive into the national social networking media blast.

  7. In related news... by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    In keeping with the Obama administration's open adoption of modern American Pop Culture. The Whitehouse announced today of plans to start filming a new reality show called "Obama's BFF." The show will closely follow Obama in his search for a friendship with a world leader, akin to the Bush-Blair relationship. 16 world leaders will live in the Whitehouse for 8 weeks as they compete for Obama's friendship.

    Who will be America's next ally? Find out this summer, only on Fox.

    1. Re:In related news... by Xiozhiq · · Score: 5, Funny

      Barack of Love: President Obama tours the world in Air Force One with the other leaders present at the G-20 summit. They face off in a series of challenges designed to test their mettle, in a style reminiscent of American Gladiator meets Real World meets Bromance, to see who is worthy of becoming Obama's best friend and top advisor. 19 enter, one will remain... 8PM / 7 Central, only on Fox.

      In all seriousness though, I'm intrigued by the Twitter feed. Not so much the Facebook / MySpace thing.

    2. Re:In related news... by Andy_w715 · · Score: 3, Funny

      at the end of each episode PresBo will hand out stimulus money "Will you accept this gift from the taxpayers of the US?"

    3. Re:In related news... by geobeck · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who will be America's next ally? Find out this summer, only on Fox.

      If it's on Fox, they'll rig it so his BFF is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Hilarity will ensue when Barak loses his half of their BFF bracelet and Mahmoud introduces Barak to his 'civilian nuclear program'.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  8. Ah by fulldecent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How interesting. All these sites, unlike slashdot, allow you to state your friends; not foes.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  9. Stupid waste of taxes by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it is a waste of taxes to have people writting post in twitter. Seriously. I'm not american so they're not my taxes, but still looks stupid.

    1. Re:Stupid waste of taxes by geobeck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it is a waste of taxes to have people writting post in twitter.

      Considering the cost of having a couple of interns posting social updates when they're not getting coffee for Michelle and helping Joe match his socks, this is probably one of the less worrisome taxpayer burdens in recent memory.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  10. Re:Hopefully.... by StreetStealth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only in Hollywood.

    I don't think the Commander in Chief or anyone in his cabinet will touch these once over the next four years.

    This is almost certainly handled by the Office of the White House Press Secretary, and I would imagine there are several staffers who will do the actual writing before passing it by the Secretary himself for approval.

    The Press Secretary is probably the only cabinet member who will even have this on his mind.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  11. More communication = more accountability? by ODiV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the Whitehouse is putting more down in writing, on the Internet where it can easily be archived and searched through, will this lead to greater scrutiny from the public? Will they be more likely to be called on their backtracking?

    Or, more likely, will they just make sure to never say anything of substance?

  12. The obvious next step by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 3, Funny

    Towards the end of his tenure he will end up on FML.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  13. Re:More communication != more accountability. by dyingtolive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the Whitehouse is putting more down in writing, on the Internet where it can easily be archived and searched through, will this lead to greater scrutiny from the public? Will they be more likely to be called on their backtracking?

    Or, more likely, will they just make sure to never say anything of substance?

    It doesn't really matter if they're scrutinized or called on for their backtracking. There are entire TV shows (Daily Show) dedicated to pointing stuff like that out. I remember watching an episode where they were talking about the bailouts and showing footage of congressmen talking about how good the bailouts were going to be and then cutting to another clip of the same person talking about how much they were against the bailouts and never supported them to begin with. People chuckle about it, but no one really cares. Its sad that it turned out like that, but short of forcing open revolt and exile, I don't know what can be done. Chances are the next bunch would be just as bad as the current, if not worse.

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  14. FDR's socialist policies fixed the depression by spun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Modding me down won't change the facts. Look at the economic data from the time. This is why everyone loved FDR. This is why he was elected for FOUR TERMS. He fixed things with socialism, where Hoover had left things up to the free market and made them worse.

    You may hate the truth, but the truth doesn't care.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton