Slashdot Mirror


The Biggest Cults In Tech

bobby f. writes "Infoworld has published its list of the biggest cults in tech — including Palmists, Newtonians, Commodorians, the Brotherhood of the Ruby, IBM power systems fanboys, Ubuntu-ists, and Lispers. A pretty fun read (unless you really are a cult member)." Although I think it's pretty clear that the Apple camp isn't an opinionated cult, they're just always right. Fire away.

38 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. Cult #1 by alain94040 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's been a very long time since I met a Newton or Palm cult member! Time to update the list.

    Allow me to change the definition of "cult" slightly to "whatever belief your smart friends want you to give up". Then cult #1 is:

    Name: Windows
    Established: 1995
    Gathering of the Tribe: InfoWorld and other magazines that pretend that everything except Windows is a "cult"
    Major Deity: Bill Gates
    Sacred Relic: 30-letter authorization keys
    The Antichrist: Linus Torvalds

    1. Re:Cult #1 by areusche · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh I can do this:

      Name: Mac OS

      Established: 1984

      Gathering of the tribe: Apple WWDC

      Major Deity: Steve Jobs, Woz

      Sacred Relic: A half eaten apple.

      Believed Antichrist: IBM

      True Antichrist: Bill Gates.

    2. Re:Cult #1 by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 5, Funny

      why would the cult of apple curse IBM!? did IBM not cometh and deliverith the sacred PC of power?

      Name: cult of free software
      Established: 1985
      Major Deity: RMS
      Sacred document: GPL
      Antichrist: !GPL'd software

      and

      Name: cult of debian
      Established: 1993
      Major Deity(s): Bruce Perens & people called Ian
      Sacred relic: Debian 1.0 discs
      Antichrist: ubuntu

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:Cult #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      did IBM not cometh and deliverith the sacred PC of power?

      You're forgetting the next verse of the Book of Jobs...

      And thus did the people of Apple rejoice for their Chips of Power were great and mighty, and Altivec did cause their enemies to quake in fear. But lo! There were cries from within the camp of Apple, for the faithful had placed the Chips of Power upon their lap and they were terribly burned. The people cast down their Chips of Power and took up the Chips of Core which merely singed their pants, and so the fallen IBM was cast out from the camp of Apple.

    4. Re:Cult #1 by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Funny

      why would the cult of apple curse IBM!?

      If you bled six colors, you wouldn't have to ask.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:Cult #1 by SpitfireSMS · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows isn't a cult.

      It's a religion.

      Exactly, just like scientology

    6. Re:Cult #1 by BluBrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Religion: A large popular cult
      Cult: A small unpopular religion

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    7. Re:Cult #1 by Shark · · Score: 4, Funny

      The oldest appointment I have dates back to Sept 2001.

      Bet it wasn't a girl...

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    8. Re:Cult #1 by adavies42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      schizophrenia: a one-man unpopular religion.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    9. Re:Cult #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The oldest appointment I have dates back to Sept 2001.

      Homeland security would like to have a word with you Mr.Dave.

  2. Fun Read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A pretty fun read (unless you really are a cult member).

    I belong to the Cult of Single Page Views, not 8-page clickfests.

    Not so much fun, actually.

    1. Re:Fun Read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I belong to the cult of "why the fuck you can not see the "print" link, you ass?" cult.

      http://www.infoworld.com/print/73433

    2. Re:Fun Read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ah, the cult of the Excess Apostrophe. See, ITS is ALREADY possessive, it doesn't need an apostrophe.

    3. Re:Fun Read? by LaskoVortex · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, the cult of grammar Nazi's.

      Name: Grammar Nazi Cult
      Established: 1383
      Gathering of the Tribe: Internet Comment Forums
      Major Diety: Geoffrey Chaucer
      Sacred Relic: Strunk and White
      The Antichrist: The Apostrophe Between "t" and "s" in the Word "it's" When "it's" is used as a posessive
      Purpose: Annoy Everyone not in the Cult

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    4. Re:Fun Read? by stuktongue · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thats "possessive." :-)

    5. Re:Fun Read? by earlymon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kindly have the decency to identify us correctly by our Sacred Relic - Strunk and White's Elements of Style, First Edition.

      I hope you did not mean for us to lump us in the Later Editioners - who eat off of their bellies, when there are perfectly good tables about for use of that function.

      In any case, your abbreviation of the Holy Name of our Sacred Relic may well have been alleviated by the acceptable, yet colloquial (although arcane), use of et cetera, hereby illustrated as per Rule 2, as you are but no doubt aware of so to do: Stunk and White, etc.

      (And yes, I thank you in advance for the opportunity of scoring points with my peers to compact my typography by ending a sentence with the abbreviated form of et cetera, thereby saving a full period. My deep appreciation is also given for the bonus points scored as well that the word period preceded it's synonymously named punctuation mark in the previous sentence. It is for this alone that I defer to kindness and not rag upon the lack of calendar year reference, similarly missing.

      After all, a good Grammar Nazi is never a quibbling Sematics Nazi, nor worse, a Syntax Nazi (this last reference having been given, quite naturally, with highest reverence to the ghosts of alt.syntax).) *

      Kindly remember, and please never forget: if something can be said with few words, it's worth saying very well; therefore, it worth saying with a great many words, in order to be at one's best, if for no other reason. (N.B., it is well and good that initiates question the validity of verbosity over being succinct, as an object lesson that the admonishment for clarity overrides.)

      In closing, I am further compelled to compliment you upon the quite deft class-naming used for our gathering place, indicating, as it does, this modern forum while simultaneously not excluding Usenet, that is, as goes without saying, our one true Kobol, with the codex modification as it applies, naturally, to the mythology presented only in the contempory BattleStar Gallactica.

      * Note the parenthetical salvation of the egregious Usenet syntax error had the sentence been constructed to end thus: alt.syntax.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    6. Re:Fun Read? by earlymon · · Score: 4, Funny

      You spelled semantics wrong.

      For the sake of newcomers, it's important to note that Guild of Grammar Nazis and the Spelling Nazi Brotherhood have a bilateral-cooperation agreement, thereby ensuring work for both unions' members.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  3. Lispers AND Apple Users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why did they list the same group twice?

  4. In my head I transposed the 'n' for a 'l' in cults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Strangely enough the article read much the same.

  5. Re:Cults in tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've always considered myself a Quaker.

  6. Nah, Apple fans.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..are more like Scientologists than an cult....

  7. Forth by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 5, Funny

    We friars of Forth our outraged at your constant disre...Hey, I'm talking here. Hey, pay attention, I'm talking here! Hrmph, Forth gets no respect. No respect at all.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:Forth by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      1 CONSTANT Funny
      Funny Moderation +!

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Forth by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      forth respect gets

      (come on, its STACK oriented. sheesh. do the joke correctly)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  8. Re:Perl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Name: Perl
    Established: 1987
    Gathering of the tribe: USENET
    Major Deity: Larry Wall
    Sacred Relic: All those O'rielly books
    The Anti-Christ: Ruby

  9. Re:Pretty absurd Apple is absent by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

    As yes, The Cult of Loose.

    Their won cult that never should of ben allowed.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  10. Re:Cults in tech? by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 2, Funny

    PC games and MMORPGS kick @$$ its not a cult its a way of life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  11. Re:Cults in tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    PC games and MMORPGS kick @$$

    I agree - Nethack FTW!

    Oh, wait - you weren't referring to the player next to two piles of money, after all.

    Never mind, then.

  12. Re:Cults in tech? by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always considered myself a Quaker.

    No DOOMsday cult?

  13. Re:C= 8-bitters instead of the Amiga?! by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are still people crowing about how Amiga is poised for a comeback. Everyone's going to realize how wrong they were for abandoning the platform. We'll all repent and be saved by the second coming of Amiga. They still go on and on about REXX and Video Toaster, as if those are relevant technologies.

    I for one am actively working to prevent this disaster by promoting... Atari TOS! TOS can save us all! Don't listen to the Amiga infidels! You only need 512 colors! MIDI, MIDI, MIDI! Those Amiga Cultists are all nutters! 16/32-bit Atari is the true path!

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  14. Re:Perl? by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Funny

    both perl and C++ are langs I dread to read others' code in.

    Other's code? I have enough trouble reading my own code a couple of months after I wrote it.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  15. They missed out C programmers by BikeHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those guys seem to think everything should be coded in C, even if it takes 10 times longer than coding it in another language, and results in a program filled with memory leaks.

    C is great, but lets be honest - at least 80% of C programmers shouldn't be programming, let alone programming in a low level language!

    I've seen more horribly malformed C than VB!

  16. Re:Cults in tech? by kzieli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes we could all add to this list. Lispers are correctly known as "Knights of the Lambda Calculus" Where are the Pythonistas and their sub groupings such as the followers of the flying pony. The Webites who hold that the browser is an operating system. The Vimpire Clans and the followers of the one true Emacs, or the XEmacs heresy. All these cults where missing from the list. And let us not forget the many many tribes of Trolls that inhabit the internet.

    --
    read my mind at http://the-willows.blogspot.com/
  17. Re:Pretty absurd Apple is absent by Kankraka · · Score: 2, Funny

    And let's not forget The Cult of Those Who Need to Correct Failure, but Fail Hard Themselves.

  18. Re:Linux by rts008 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's GNU/Linux, you freedom-hating blasphemer!

    Gather the HURD!! *draws katana*

    signed,
    RMS

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  19. Re:Cults in tech? by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Funny

    No DOOMsday cult?

    Of course not. That would just be Unreal.

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  20. Re:Cults in tech? by denmarkw00t · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm with the Church of Latter Day Megaman.

  21. AmigaOS by DingerX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Standing in awe at the historical wonder that is the Amiga, OS and hardware, is a natural human reaction, and therefore not the sign of belonging to any cult. The emotions that I've felt considering the Amiga are not unlike those I've experienced standing at the foot of the temple of Jupiter at Baalbek, or what I'd imagine would be the sensation of laying one's mortal eyes on the Temple of the Golden Pavilion. Actually, come to think of it, the Amiga was more Golden Pavilion than Baalbek: harmonious; perfect even in its flaws. So perfect, it should not exist on this flawed earth. A crazed monk burned the Temple of the Golden Pavilion -- that's cultism. There are folks who believe the AmigaOS will rise again to rule us all -- that's cultism. But admiring the sheer perfection of the Amiga as a computer system of its generation, and marveling at its unparalleled run as the most elegant and best-performing PC on the market? That's just appreciating historical reality.