Slashdot Mirror


Tesla's New York Laboratory Up For Sale

Ziest points us to NY Times piece on the battle over the site of Nicola Tesla's last failed experiment. Tesla's laboratory, called Wardenclyffe, located on Long Island, has been put up for sale by its current owner, Agfa Corp. Local residents and Tesla followers were alarmed by a real estate agent's promise that the land, listed at $1.6 million, could "be delivered fully cleared and level." Preservationists want to create a Tesla museum and education center at Wardenclyffe, anchored by the laboratory designed by Tesla's friend, Stanford White, a celebrated architect. "In 1901, Nikola Tesla began work on a global system of giant towers meant to relay through the air not only news, stock reports and even pictures but also, unbeknown to investors such as J. Pierpont Morgan, free electricity for one and all. It was the inventor's biggest project, and his most audacious. The first tower rose on rural Long Island and, by 1903, stood more than 18 stories tall. ... But the system failed for want of money, and at least partly for scientific viability. Tesla never finished his prototype tower and was forced to abandon its adjoining laboratory."

183 comments

  1. If past performance is a current indicator... by zifr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We'll level the place. We still can't figure out how some of his projects worked and much of his work was seized after his death, according to the History channel. Might as well level it and trash any chance at learning his knowledge while we're at it. Brilliant man.

    1. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, a loon.

      Nothing there anymore except the poisoned ground.
      There really isn't anything to learn there anymore.
      It's not like there going to level the building and store rooms full of stuff.
      OTOH, a pool of people that wanted to turn it into a museum could probably be brought together for some fund Raisers.

      Hell, you do it. Contact the real estate agent and find out what kind of time you have. Get some on line organization going and hit all the Tesla Forums.

      You would be the first person to do this type of thing successfully. If you really want to save it, there is no reason you can't give it a good effort. None.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We still can't figure out how some of his projects worked

      Uhuh. I see this kind of claim all the time from creators of perpetual motion machines:

      "Well, of course those 'scientists' can't replicate my results! It's because they don't understand my genius!"

      Uhh ... no. If we're unable to get it to work, chances are it never worked in the first place.

      and much of his work was seized after his death, according to the History channel

      Yeah, seized by the Stonemasons! Just ask Homer ...

    3. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm. He was a loon and we do know how his projects worked and didn't.
      They where all interesting but as with many brilliant but crazy people most where not practical and none of them are past our understanding today.
      His lab is still there as are the foundations of the tower. Simple answer declare it a historical site and it becomes just about impossible to destroy no matter who owns it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by mazarin5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My take on it was:

      REALTOR: We'll sell this historic land for $1.6 million dollars
      CONDO BUILDER: I'll buy that
      REALTOR: Do you want us to demolish this historic site also?
      MUSEUM BUILDER: Oh hell no! $2 million!

      --
      Fnord.
    5. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, if the damage hasn't already been done, there's a price tag on preservation: $1.6 million. Not much more than an equivalently sized residential property in the area.

      What's the issue again?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Elon Musk should snap it up.

    7. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      I suggest you read more about his latter life. He was a loon. Actually I know a lot about his projects. My favorite is the Telsla turbine. It is a terrible turbine for air. It makes a great pump for solid-fluid mixtures but as a turbine it is no where near what more traditional turbines can do.
      His power transmission also just doesn't work. His work on AC power transmission and his AC electric motor. Brilliant.
      Time travel, death beams, free power... Loonie.
      It is a shame that so many of his fans do him a disservice by pushing his fantasy achievements.
      They are as loonie as was in his later life. His decline into mental illness should be forgotten and his real achivments should be remembered.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Both should be remembered. It's important to remember that no matter how brilliant some humans are, they're still human. Genius in a specific pursuit does not imply genius in all pursuits.

    9. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny

      REALTOR: We'll sell this historic land for $1.6 million dollars
      CONDO BUILDER: I'll buy that
      REALTOR: Do you want us to demolish this historic site also?
      MUSEUM BUILDER: Oh hell no! $2 million!

      Well, shit! Dr. Evil doesn't even get a say in this kind of real estate market!

    10. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by RevWaldo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A loon who understood how alternating current works.

      Unlike some other loon inventors back then.

      Lookin' at you, Thomas Alva.

      (Topsy the Elephant, RIP)

    11. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you do realize that many of the technologies mentioned in the article do exist today (like wireless video transmission, stock quotes etc.) but in 1903 few people if any could explain how to make that work. and the other ideas, about providing wireless electricity? those arent so far fetched either

      2008: Intel reproduces Nikola Tesla's 1894 implementation and Prof. John Boys group's 1988's experiments by wirelessly powering a light bulb with 75% efficiency. wikipedia.org (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transmission)

      just because you and 99% of people dont understand something dosent make it a hoax. i mean hell look at how many people dont realise the internet isint some kind of truck.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    12. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, seized yes, but not the Stonemasons. Many items were seized by the FBI and many of his patents, to this day, remain classified.

    13. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      it surprises me that people cant envision wireless power transfer, and free at that. its as though you've never seen lightning. just because you or i dont have the vision or ability to make it work dosent mean it cant be done!

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    14. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suggest you read more about his latter life. He was a loon.

      Like many innovators. Clinically speaking, he was obsessive-compulsive, and this had some very specific effects on his activities but did not prevent him from inventing a dozen things in the room I'm in right now (including radio and flourescent lighting, of course). Edison, by contrast, was a mild meglomaniac and paranoid.

      Actually I know a lot about his projects.

      Well, let's see about that....

      My favorite is the Telsla turbine. It is a terrible turbine for air.

      The one I built works rather well as a air-powered motor. Oddly enough, it works like Tesla said it does (not like the modern Tesla worshippers claim, though - it won't power a spaceship to mars).

      It makes a great pump for solid-fluid mixtures but as a turbine it is no where near what more traditional turbines can do.

      I'm not sure you know what you're talking about here. You can pump mud with a "Tesla turbine" type pump, but Tesla had some other pump designs that worked better. Also, what do you consider a "traditional turbine"? There is no single accepted turbine design, nor was there in Tesla's time. (I'm partial to the Loeffel Francis myself, but it's not all that popular outside the hydropower field.)

      His power transmission also just doesn't work.

      "Just doesn't work?" Since he was not able to complete his work, yet was able to light up lamps from a quarter mile away and throw mile-long lightning bolts, I think "just doesn't work" is a bit of a facile dismissal from an Internet naysayer.

      His work on AC power transmission and his AC electric motor. Brilliant.

      AC power is a doddle, but yes, the universal brushless motor is indeed brilliant.

      Time travel, death beams, free power... Loonie.

      Time travel? Never heard that one. And of course, being killed by a beam of coherent energy will never happen (oh, wait, it did? Never mind).

      Here's all you need to know about Tesla's insight: In 1915 he tried to convince everyone that burning petroleum was wasteful and foolish, and that we should develop sources of energy that relied on the great movements of the cosmos - spinning planets, cycling winds, geothermal, solar radiation, etc... and people said "what a loonie!"

      It is a shame that so many of his fans do him a disservice by pushing his fantasy achievements.
      They are as loonie as was in his later life. His decline into mental illness should be forgotten and his real achivments should be remembered.

      We got no disagreements there, bud. But he was never any more subject to mental illness than the inventor of Bittorrent - his madness did not significantly affect his work, and may have helped him to focus on the insights that others blithely dismiss as insanity.

    15. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple answer declare it a historical site and it becomes just about impossible to destroy no matter who owns it.

      Unfortunately not so simple. Owners, unless they are government entities, have a right to refuse listing on the National Historic Register.

    16. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by carlzum · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm familiar with the area from my childhood, but couldn't recall anything on the site other than dead grass and a dilapidated parking lot. I read through the article and searched the web looking for remnants of the tower or something and found one article on what may be of value there. According to the 2002 article the 94x94 ft. lab is still in good condition. I would like to see Agfa sublet the property and at least donate that building. After all, they did poison the groundwater (well, the company they acquired did), it seems like a reasonable goodwill gesture to the community.

    17. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by mangu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Intel reproduces Nikola Tesla's 1894 implementation and Prof. John Boys group's 1988's experiments by wirelessly powering a light bulb with 75% efficiency

      The problem is 75% of which power?

      Unfortunately, it was 75% of received power, not transmitted power.

      About 99.99% of the transmitted power went to other directions, it heated neighboring rocks and nothing else.

      Unless you have a directional antenna, any sort of wireless power transmission will waste a lot of power. And, to have a directional antenna, you need to know in which direction your receiver will be. Then it starts to look pretty much like a wired power transmission setup...

    18. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >We got no disagreements there, bud. But he was never any more subject to mental illness than the
      >inventor of Bittorrent - his madness did not significantly affect his work, and may have helped him
      >to focus on the insights that others blithely dismiss as insanity.

      At least, until he got obsessed with pigeons.

    19. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by meepzorb · · Score: 4, Funny
      You would be the first person to do this type of thing successfully. If you really want to save it, there is no reason you can't give it a good effort. None.

      Ah, I love the smell of hipster nihilism in the morning. It smells like... defeat!

    20. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      i'm not saying that it necessarily would have worked i'm saying that his ideas werent taht far-fetched. sure he didnt get everything right, but he was definitely on to some good stuff. good pointing out though about the 2008 intel experiment, i think they used a directional antennae, IIRC.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    21. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by ae1294 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the heck is your point?
      The guy came up with the idea way back in 1894 so who really cares about its efficacy..

      Everything we plug in today has Nikola Tesla's I.P. in it. AC transmission won the current war over the DC method.

      Anyone who try's to belittle Tesla's work really has no idea what they are talking about. But yeah he had lots of crazy ideas but it was 1894 for god sake! Everyone who has ever invented something useful also probably had at least 100 bad ideas as well..

      ae

    22. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by evanbd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Tesla turbine is a really interesting idea. It may be inefficient for most applications, but in others it is the only design in serious use -- pumping live fish, for example.

    23. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, we're still pretty unsure how he did quite a few of his experiments, I guess you're unfamiliar with him transporting energy to a field MILES away and lighting up hundreds of bulbs with it, while modern scientists get excited at energy transfers of a few feet.

    24. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Tesla must have been on some shit. Like mushrooms or some other psychotic food additives. It would help creativity, but gets one a bit loony too. Like, he did not only dream of powering light bulbs from a few meters, but providing free electricity to all the farmers in the whole world from his towers on Long Island. That's kinda loony, don't you agree? It's like microwaving everyone in NY just so you can send a decent power output to Texas from Long Island?

    25. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it surprises me that people cant envision wireless power transfer, and free at that.

      I can certainly envision it -- but I can't see how it would be free. After all, that power has to be generated somehow before it can be transferred, and generating power costs money.

      It's also not clear how to broadcast power efficiently over long distances. (I'm not saying it's impossible, just that I don't know how you would do it. Narrowcasting power might be done efficiently with a laser, but broadcasting it to everyone? Hmmm)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    26. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      you do realize that many of the technologies mentioned in the article do exist today (like wireless video transmission, stock quotes etc.) but in 1903 few people if any could explain how to make that work. and the other ideas, about providing wireless electricity? those arent so far fetched either

      Jules Verne also published a lot of technology ideas with no practical details on how to make them a reality. Back then these ideas were considered fantastical fictional works. Today they're considered the basis of science fiction. We also have working examples of many of these ideas. But it doesn't mean at any point real science was involved.

      That doesn't mean Nikola Tesla was not a scientist. But it does point out that making predictions that one can later find functional examples of holds little weight when talking about scientific achievement.

    27. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's like microwaving everyone in NY just so you can send a decent power output to Texas from Long Island?

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    28. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we do know how his projects worked and didn't"
        ^^
      who is this "we"? as if to infer you and i.

      please don't display your ignorance so clearly.

      Tesla's idea's are past our understanding today;
      as they were 100 years ago. And with people like
      you, they will remain past our understanding for
      the next 100 years.

      Sad.

    29. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      just because you or i dont have the vision or ability to make it work dosent mean it cant be done!

      That's not the reason it can't be done.

      The reason it can't be done is found in Maxwell's equations.

    30. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by SlashWombat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, but we owe AC power, its generation, etc to Tesla. He also kicked Edison's arse (A good thing IMHO). It should be remembered that Edison was a well known patent troll of the late 19th century, who patented many of his employee's inventions under his own name.

    31. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      "Just doesn't work?" Since he was not able to complete his work, yet was able to light up lamps from a quarter mile away and throw mile-long lightning bolts, I think "just doesn't work" is a bit of a facile dismissal from an Internet naysayer.

      I have (and have read) a bound copy of his Colorado Springs notes and books of his patents. It's been a long time since I read them, but I never recall seeing any such claims. He did report that he could light up bulbs set some unspecified distance from his lab in Colorado Springs, but the pictures look like they're just out back of the lab, not a quarter mile away. There's also some discussion in the notes that it was tough to take the pictures in enough light to see the coil, background and light at the same time because the bulb was fairly dim.

      I can buy lighting bulbs from maybe 100 feet, and maybe 100ft discharges, given that he had a fairly large amount of power at his disposal there. But I can't buy 1/4 mile power transmission and 1 mile discharges.

      Time travel? Never heard that one.

      Same here--the only place I've seen mention of him talking about time travel is in kook books and websites. Of course, even if he did, I don't see why the GP thinks it makes him a loon; plenty of famous physicists have speculated about it, and as far as I know there's still not a definitive answer about whether it's possible or not.

      Here's all you need to know about Tesla's insight: In 1915 he tried to convince everyone that burning petroleum was wasteful and foolish, and that we should develop sources of energy that relied on the great movements of the cosmos - spinning planets, cycling winds, geothermal, solar radiation, etc... and people said "what a loonie!"

      Hey, there's still people calling others loonies *now* for saying we should cut back on petroleum use. At least that hasn't changed... ;)

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    32. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      If I'd heard this before, I'd forgotten it, but in Telsa's Wikipedia article it says, "Shortly before he died, Edison said that his biggest mistake had been in trying to develop direct current, rather than the vastly superior alternating current system that Tesla had put within his grasp."

      I wonder if Edison honestly believed it was superior, or if he was just sad that he missed out on his share of the metric shit-ton of money that other people made with Tesla's AC ideas.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    33. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The guy came up with the idea way back in 1894 so who really cares about its efficacy.

      What the heck is YOUR point? It wouldn't matter if he came up with it in 1498 - a crappy idea is a crappy idea, regardless of when it's thought up. If your "invention" requires 50,000 killowatts to power a friggin lightbulb, there's a bit of a problem there, especially when you're making use of a well known effect rather that inventing something new. Induction was discovered in 1831, so it's not like Tesla was discovering a new aspect of the physical world - he simply made use (in an extremely inefficient way) of a principle discovered by Faraday.

      Everything we plug in today has Nikola Tesla's I.P. in it. AC transmission won the current war over the DC method.

      Which is not necessarily a good thing. The only advantage of AC current is that it can be easily modified by transformers. Long-distance power transmission (between grids) is DC because it doesn't require phase synchronization and it's less wasteful, and the difference adds up nicely over longer distances. AC didn't replace DC - the two systems are complimentary.

      Also, while Tesla did invent a three phase AC generator, he didn't exactly come up with the idea of AC current, nor was he the only one working on it.

      Anyone who try's to belittle Tesla's work really has no idea what they are talking about.

      Anyone who tries to deify a mad scientist isn't firing on all cylinders.

      Everyone who has ever invented something useful also probably had at least 100 bad ideas as well.

      Exactly - the problem here is that the Tesla Cult like to pretend that his 100 bad ideas were actually 100 GREAT ideas which we "can't understand yet". Which is, to be blunt, bullshit. You can idolize the man for the great things he did, if you want, as long as you're not trying to prop up his shitty ideas at the same time.

    34. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      you do realize that many of the technologies mentioned in the article do exist today (like wireless video transmission, stock quotes etc.) but in 1903 few people if any could explain how to make that work

      Replace "few people" with "no people, including Tesla", and we'll agree 100%.

      What's your point?

      That such a fact-free comment was modded +5 insightful says horrible things about the credulity of the average slashdotter.

    35. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC power!

    36. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    37. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tesla must have been on some shit. Like mushrooms or some other psychotic food additives

      Indeed he was. You've heard of "ecstasy"? Well, Tesla was on "imagination".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    38. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We already stole everything we could comprehend, and probably many things we couldn't. Since then we've only been doing bad tesla imitations. HAARP is one such... Read the patent, or for that matter watch the "documentary" HAARP: Holes in Heaven which has an interview with its author. (The film is pretty shlocky but it has some cool interviews.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    39. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      alternate current, not anonymous coward.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    40. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by BForrester · · Score: 1

      Google maps / Google Earth location:
      40.947261,-72.898268

      You can see the footings for the tower, a few buildings, and not much else.

      It's wedged much closer to residential space than I would've thought.

    41. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tesla must have been on some shit. Like mushrooms or some other psychotic food additives. It would help creativity, but gets one a bit loony too. Like, he did not only dream of powering light bulbs from a few meters, but providing free electricity to all the farmers in the whole world from his towers on Long Island. That's kinda loony, don't you agree? It's like microwaving everyone in NY just so you can send a decent power output to Texas from Long Island?

      If you had ever read anything about what he was trying to do, you'd realize that he was trying to create electromagnetic waves that would travel across the entire globe, and feed the amplitude of that wave by precise timing of the bursts. The technology he was experimenting with was seized by the US government, and is currently being explored in the HAARP project.

      The wealth of most of the northeastern United States can be traced to the Niagara Falls dam, and the vast amounts of energy it provides without the need for human effort. Which means it can be traced directly to Tesla. He's one of the greatest benefactors of the human race in recorded history. You might want to remember that when you're pissing on his name, and maybe question the way you calculate the measure of a man.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    42. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he also didn't torture kittens.

    43. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You are correct about the time travel. That does come from the Tesla kook sources and not the him. And using the term loon is a bit unkind. Mentally ill is the correct term. I still feel that it is a real shame that so much of his brilliant work has has been over shadowed by the fantasy of his fans. His work on the AC power system should be enough to make him the equal of Bell and Edison but the fantasy of his fans and his own mental illness really have made it too easy to marginalize his memory.
      Maybe he is better off than Sir Frank Whittle. Very few people know who he was but his little invention and work sure did change the world.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    44. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Informative

      Link: Right off Tesla St., in fact.

    45. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of scientists have speculated about the possibility of time travel. And the US military seems to think it can create lasers powerful enough to heat up a fuel tank enough to cause it to explode mid flight from a fair distance away. Sounds pretty close to a death ray to me, even if he didn't have an idea for a working product. I also think the word "loon" is one of those words used by people with a poor understanding of psychology or someone wanting to be insulting.

    46. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 4, Funny

      The reason it can't be done is found in Maxwell's equations.

      That's not the reason it can't be done.

      The reason it can't be done is because even if it were possible, it would be impossible to meter.

    47. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by quenda · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a directional antenna, any sort of wireless power transmission will waste a lot of power.

      I see you subscribe to the particle model of electromagnetic radiation.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transmission#Resonant_induction

    48. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You see to make it possible you must build the transmitter out of Unicorn poop and Fairy farts.
      No really it is impossible to do long distance none direction broadcasting of power with any efficiency. Maxwell's equations pretty much prove that. Even using a laser you conversion steps that drop the efficiency. BTW microwaves are much better but you don't want to be in the beam.
      Imagine it sure. Build it? Nope and Telsla couldn't make work because it couldn't work they way he though it could.
      Now over short distances you can use magnetic induction but again that is very limited in range.
       

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    49. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by loonwings · · Score: 1

      Leave us out of this.

    50. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I think you just have to have the frequency right at about 420khz or mhz or something like that.

      He was talking about long range transmission by bouncing it off the ionosphere. That might create some ozone or destroy. Who knows. You wont know until you build it full size and test it.

    51. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

      Maybe he is better off than Sir Frank Whittle. Very few people know who he was but his little invention and work sure did change the world.

      Yeah, I never could hit a real baseball very well, but that little plastic ball with the holes in it was sure easy to... Hey, wait a minute. You hit the wrong key twice in a row.

    52. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --I suggest you read more about his latter life. He was a loon. Actually I know a lot about his projects. My favorite is the Telsla turbine. It is a terrible turbine for air. It makes a great pump for solid-fluid mixtures but as a turbine it is no where near what more traditional turbines can do.--

      True but that turbine does indeed have some special uses and is being made better now that we have better process to make it.

      --His power transmission also just doesn't work. His work on AC power transmission and his AC electric motor. Brilliant.--

      You posted without AC power? It's everywhere and has been proven to work.

      --It is a shame that so many of his fans do him a disservice by pushing his fantasy achievements.--

      Your guessing again. Build the device with modern materials and see if it works. The turbine actually did?

      --They are as loonie as was in his later life. His decline into mental illness should be forgotten and his real achivments should be remembered.--

      Perhaps, but even so, sometimes old ideas are still valid but at the time they were tried there was not a way to manufacture a certain part that it needed to make it work that we might now have. All possibilities should be examined.

    53. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by _johnnyc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mods, how on earth is this comment "insightful"? More like a troll!

    54. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by _johnnyc · · Score: 1

      Time travel? Where on earth did you get that idea? Care to source that?

      Death beams? He was just looking at an efficient weapon because he was under the idea (or delusion), like those physicists in the Manahattan Project, that a powerful weapon would end all war. His notion was that this could be done by harnessing electricity. Is this what you mean by a death beam?

    55. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My favorite is the Telsla turbine. It is a terrible turbine for air. It makes a great pump for solid-fluid mixtures but as a turbine it is no where near what more traditional turbines can do.

      How terrible to have a turbine which is only a fantastic pump for solid-fluid mixtures. Imagine the agony.

      The big problem with the Tesla turbine is that you basically need variable disc spacing in order to achieve useful efficiency across a broad range of inputs. To the best of my knowledge, nobody has ever worked out a way to do this gracefully. If someone does, I suspect the thing will be rather more useful.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hans, is that -you-?

    57. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, seized by the Stonemasons! Just ask Homer ...

      I think you mean the No Homers club, formally known as the Stonecutters.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    58. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....and I hear he is still alive...living in a gay relationship with Marconi in a house under the face temple structure on Mars!

    59. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it helps, you don't need an antenna to get resonant induction. Any metal mass will have currents induced in the mass by sufficient electromagnetic radiation. That metal is indeed all around, in structural reinforcing rods, plumbing and - yes - in iron pyrite inclusions in granite and other rocks. If you don't believe me then put a metal plate in your microwave.

    60. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he may have been a brilliant physicist, but he wasn't to hot on economics or political science.

    61. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      The only advantage of AC current is that it can be easily modified by transformers

      You say that like it's a small thing. Transformation and induction have a LOT of uses that you're glossing over by a statement like that.

      Long-distance power transmission (between grids) is DC because it doesn't require phase synchronization and it's less wasteful, and the difference adds up nicely over longer distances

      Long distance power transmission is NOT DC as you claim it is. In fact, AC current transmits much more nicely than DC does.

    62. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Actually, I must recant my prior link, as it seems the truly LONG distance transmission lines are indeed often DC current. I contend that the majority of electrical distribution grids are indeed AC. I will also remain by my point that minimizing the advantages of AC current doesn't really make a lot of sense.

    63. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You say that like it's a small thing. Transformation and induction have a LOT of uses that you're glossing over by a statement like that.

      You're partly right - in the past, stepping up/down direct current was impractical for most applications - generally the devices needed were inefficient and expensive. However, the situation has changed significantly since then. If we were to design a grid from scratch today, it would make sense to ditch AC entirely, because we are now able to manipulate DC more effectively, and because DC transmission is more efficient.

      The problem with making the switch now is the same as the one faced by Microsoft every time it tries to make major changes to it's OS - you can't make changes to the underlying infrastructure if it means breaking compatibility with all legacy devices. In order to switch the grid to DC you'd have to place converters in every building which would then convert the direct current back to alternating current for use with todays devices. That process would likely eliminate most if not all of the energy saved by using DC for transmission. There are other ways of approaching the problem, but all would be costly, and would take decades to implement fully. They'd make the current digital-TV switch look simple, in comparison.

      Since you corrected your second point, I won't touch on it much, except for this bit from your follow-up comment:

      I contend that the majority of electrical distribution grids are indeed AC.

      That's never been under contention. As I said, at the time when we were first developing this infrastructure, it made sense to go with AC. The vast majority of electrical distribution networks are in fact AC, and will be for the foreseeable future.

    64. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by ae1294 · · Score: 1
      Firstly it's not a crappy idea. More than likely, in the near future, your cell phone and other small gadgets will be charged using a similar method. This is why people are revisiting the wireless power idea in the first place. But sure your right! Tesla never did anything useful, which is why, the grand U.S. hero of the time Edison couldn't force people into using DC by advocating the use of AC current for the electric chair. His point was it was so much more dangerous and lethal. (LoL, It's the other way around by the way) Tesla was also an emergent.. Do you have any idea what that meant for him at that time? It's remarkable that he could go toe to toe and win much of anything as logic didn't really mean as much back then.

      (in an extremely inefficient way)

      You know what else sucked... the 8088 processor.. I mean it couldn't crunch numbers worth a darn.. lets bash it's inventor too. And to your other point about not inventing something new... Is that even a point? Everything invented by man is on the back of things that we invented or learned yesterday so are you arguing that he didn't put everything together and make a working system that we still rely on to this very day?

      You can idolize the man for the great things he did, if you want, as long as you're not trying to prop up his shitty ideas at the same time.

      If I want? So basically you dismiss him and his good idea's because crazy people latch on to his bad idea's, which by the way, where not all even bad idea's at THAT time? If you knew anything about the time period, you'd know the world was full of totally insane idea's.. God forbid you had to goto a doctor of that time.

      Which is not necessarily a good thing. The only advantage of AC current is that it can be easily modified by transformers. Long-distance power transmission (between grids) is DC because it doesn't require phase synchronization and it's less wasteful, and the difference adds up nicely over longer distances. AC didn't replace DC - the two systems are complimentary.

      Umm you can have your 120 DC in your own walls if you want.. I for one know what happens when a person comes in contact with DC current and it's not as pretty as AC...

      Anyone who tries to deify a mad scientist isn't firing on all cylinders.

      Great point you made there.. he was mad so I'm crazy because I respect him for the good he did... Did I say I was a fan of anti-gravity and tin foil someplace cause i'm not?

      The bottom line is the man did great things, changed the world for the better and diserves some repesct for that. Sure he had nut job idea's but it was 1901... You know what I think is a nut job idea? Twitter.... do you think in 100 years people are going to be saying WOW twitter was so great what would we do without it! yeah.. I doubt that...

    65. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      2008: Intel reproduces Nikola Tesla's 1894 implementation and Prof. John Boys group's 1988's experiments by wirelessly powering a light bulb with 75% efficiency. wikipedia.org (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transmission)

      Tesla might have had the right ideas; but in order to make them work, he would have had to build on top of lots of technology that didn't exist at the time.

    66. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The wealth of most of the northeastern United States can be traced to the Niagara Falls dam, and the vast amounts of energy it provides without the need for human effort.

      All of the Niagara power plants combined - including the Canadian (incidentally, the biggest) ones - produce about 4.4 GW of electrical power.

      New York state alone uses more power than that, without taking into account the power generated for transport via internal combustion engines, or power generated for various industrial uses which do not feed off the grid.

      The US as a whole consumes more than 3 TW of power if we include all energy consumption (industry and transportation take a big chunk). So, while the falls are an excellent resource, you're vastly overstating their importance.

      The technology he was experimenting with was seized by the US government, and is currently being explored in the HAARP project.

      Well then. It's a good thing you've got that tinfoil helmet to protect you, huh?

      These HAARP conspiracy theories are amongst the most bizarre in the world. About the only sillier one I've heard is the idea that the Hubble telescope is actually a spy satellite. You people live in a whole different universe ...

    67. Re:If past performance is a current indicator... by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      What the heck is YOUR point? It wouldn't matter if he came up with it in 1498 - a crappy idea is a crappy idea, regardless of when it's thought up.

      That you can base future good ideas on current bad ideas.

  2. TVTropes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    BigNo goes here.

  3. Secrets stashed in building? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if.

    Destroy it and we might never know.

    1. Re:Secrets stashed in building? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Destroy it and we might never know."

      Disassemble it thoroughly during demolition, dig up any interesting areas, then level the place afterwards.

      There is nothing architecturally compelling about the site.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  4. Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by JoshuaZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How would these towers effectively transmit electricity? I'm having trouble seeing how this would work effectively given the inverse square law. Either the towers would only be able to cover a small amount of area or the area directly around the tower would be really unpleasant. Either way, this wouldn't be as efficient as wire transmission. Or am I missing something?

    1. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Imagine the upper layer of the atmosphere as a copper shell. Any high voltage alternated current deposited there could be harnessed by a sufficiently high tower that could "touch" the copper shell.

      Square law doesn't apply because its a conductor that captures the wave and prevents it from spreading in 3 dimensions just like it doesn't apply in wires.

      All the viability is in how closely ionized upper atmosphere resembles a copper shell and also in how hard it is to effectively "touch" this layer with lots of air in between you and it.

    2. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 4, Informative

      See http://blogs.intel.com/research/2008/10/rattner_the_promise_of_wireles.php . Tesla was, obviouly, much omre ambitious.

    3. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      They don't. Or rather, you get to choose between "not transmitting enough power" and "nontrivial risk of setting things on fire".

      This is why we have a cellphone on every hip and wifi in random $100 consumer electronics, while point-to-point transmissions of a couple hundred watts, with lousy efficiency, tuned directional antennas, and an EE to man the thing, are still in the realm of laboratory/trade show curiosity.

    4. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Magic.

      He did a lot of incredibly smart things, but some of his stuff was just loony.
      That might not be fair, perhaps experimentally ignorant. But with that time period and electricity, everyone was.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well I do believe he was toying with using Earth's resonant frequency to essentially generate electricity using the atmosphere (by putting in a small amount he could receive a lot back and I think there was a story about him blowing up some power plant's generators doing this). Just some of the crazy things he did...

    6. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by skine · · Score: 1

      Basically, his idea was to create a giant Tesla coil that would transmit electricity, which would make the ground resonate and carry the electricity as far as the resonation would go. He even claimed to make 200 incandescent light bulbs glow from 26 miles away, but it's unverified obviously.

      His principles for thinking that this would work is that a moderate sized Tesla coil can make a fluorescent bulb light up remotely, though it's limited to a few feet.

      http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/934/whats-up-with-broadcast-power

    7. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It couldn't and your not missing a thing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      while point-to-point transmissions of a couple hundred watts, with lousy efficiency, tuned directional antennas, and an EE to man the thing, are still in the realm of laboratory/trade show curiosity.

      Did and done back in 1975.

      34 kilowatts, 1.5 kilometers with an efficency of over 82%. That's hardy "a couple hundred watts, with lousy efficiency".

    9. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see, the free electricity was to have been *collected* by the towers, but still distributed by wire; is that what you're saying? I think the GP post thought that Tesla was suggesting that the towers would broadcast the electricity through the air.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    10. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

          I think the better example is how ham radio, or UHF stations can bounce in the atmosphere to reach long distances.

          For example when I was a kid in West central Florida, if the weather was right, we could watch TV from Texas with a regular mast mounted antenna (50' tall). We required the same antenna to pick up UHF and VHF stations in the next major city, approximately 100 miles away.

          I'm familiar with Tesla's work. It's all really interesting stuff.

          There really isn't anything left at the site, which is a terrible shame. It could be recreated, but would cost a fortune, and without Tesla there to make it work (or work out the bugs), it's seriously doubtful the casual hobbyist could make a working replica.

          His wireless power on a global scale idea would require much more than just the Wardenclyffe site. The plans indicated many transmitters globally. This would never happen, as it takes the control away from too many huge money making industries. No government would allow it either. During a military operation, one of the first strategic moves is to disable the infrastructure (power, communications, water, and transportation). Once an enemy is blinded, the aggressive forces have a significant advantage.

          I was always curious about long term effects. Non-ionizing radiation is proven to cause various illnesses. For example, some schools were built on cheap property in close proximity to large power transmission lines. That caused an unusually high rate of leukemia in the students. Prolonged exposure (living or going to school) at 200 meters raised the chance of getting leukemia by 70%. 200 meters to 500 meters raised it by 20%. Obviously, no research was done with Tesla's unfinished work. And for those asking for citations, search Google for "power lines leukemia" .

          Some of Tesla's earlier work in Colorado Springs caused sparks to jump out of water faucets and from peoples feet as they were walking. It would have been interesting to see, but I'm sure quite unnerving after a while. I don't know the Wardenclyffe facility would have caused the same effect, or if he corrected it by possibly changing the frequency that he worked at.

          The only people with enough documentation to know are the US Government, who seized all of his work materials when he died.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by darkstar949 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am not an electrical engineer (IANAEE) but I have a read a couple of books on Tesla and struggled through some of the papers he wrote and one thing that seems to be constant is that he was way ahead of his time. However, reading through some of the annotated papers something that stands out is that he was actually working with some stuff that we didn't even have the correct terminology for and that Tesla seems to be a lot more of an intuitive experimentalist than someone that worked with electrical theory. Thus, this tends to mean two things, to me at least, in regards to Wardenclyffe, namely that the only person that would likely know what Tesla was planning on doing is Tesla and there is a pretty good chance that people might also be assuming that Wardenclyffe was intended to do more than it was meant for.

      I would have to get the books out, but I seem to recall that Wardenclyffe was partly a proof-of-concept demonstration based upon his Colorado Springs, CO experiments so I find it hard to believe that it wouldn't work like he intended. Also, one of his papers on the wireless transmission of electricity explained that a series of towers similar to Wardenclyffe would be needed throughout the world in order to achieve his goals.

      However, I am willing to concede that the plans might not have worked out as Tesla had hoped for even if he did not encounter the financial issues due to a lack of full understanding of electrical theory. All told though, it would be a shame to have museums dedicated to Edison here in the US, but you have to the Tesla Museum in Serbia if you want to learn about him outside of books.

    12. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      wiki wireless power transmission.
      2008: Intel reproduces Nikola Tesla's 1894 implementation and Prof. John Boys group's 1988's experiments by wirelessly powering a light bulb with 75% efficiency.

      very. cool. stuff.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    13. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Well I do believe he was toying with using Earth's resonant frequency to essentially generate electricity using the atmosphere (by putting in a small amount he could receive a lot back and I think there was a story about him blowing up some power plant's generators doing this). Just some of the crazy things he did...

      +4 informative? Let me try... I heard he was tapping into the sub-ether (which normally cancels out the regular ether, see Michelson-Morley experiment) which can start a cascade reaction to generate electricity. I think there was a story about him blowing up some power station's transformers doing this. Just some of the crazy things he did...

    14. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google for "power lines leukemia"

      There's a big difference between searching google

      ...and searching google scholar. Have a look ;)

    15. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably just was thinking of using plasma clouds, this is possible and would make sense in the context of the know, but the main problem is to keep such a cloud stable, it costs a lot of energy, hence traditional wires are cheaper!

    16. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by moj0joj0 · · Score: 1

      I read a few books on his theories many years ago, the thing that stuck with me the most was his concept on the transmission frequency. He postulated that it would actually be healthful. I don't that frequency was ever mentioned, but I also recall that it was supposedly at the "resonant frequency of the earth." His concept was to give out free electrical power, that had health benefits. Most importantly, to me, is that he honestly believed he could do it. A recent History Channel show mentioned that his lab was still intact, used as a storage facility and that the tower was gone, destroyed by the people who owned the property at one time or another, although, the foundation of the tower was still intact.

    17. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by iron-kurton · · Score: 4, Funny

      The plans indicated many transmitters globally. This would never happen, as it takes the control away from too many huge money making industries. No government would allow it either.

      He tried to get it funded by JP Morgan. One day, he got a telegraph:

      "No interest in wireless power. Nowhere to put the meter."

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    18. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by iron-kurton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      even if he did not encounter the financial issues due to a lack of full understanding of electrical theory

      His financial troubles were caused by a much more wealthy and sinister Edison whose inferior design did not match up to Tesla's. Edison constantly and consistently tried to undermine Tesla evidenced with the famous plug-a-cat-into-ac-adapter demonstration. There is also speculation that Edison has something to do with Tesla's lab mysteriously bursting into flames.

      In the early days when Tesla first moved to the US, He partnered with Edison only to have his plans stolen and the promised research money never delivered.

      Where Tesla was an inventor, Edison was a businessman. To me, Edison having a museum is like Warren Buffet or Donald Trump having one, a waste of good museum real estate.

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    19. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Prolonged exposure (living or going to school) at 200 meters raised the chance of getting leukemia by 70%. 200 meters to 500 meters raised it by 20%. [...] And for those asking for citations, search Google for "power lines leukemia" .

      I did. Half of the results I got were of the "study finds no link between power lines, leukemia" type. The rest seemed to be written by internet nuts with no clue what they were talking about. Assuming then you meant to search without the quotes, I repeated the search. This time I found more that substantiate what you said, but realising that half of them didn't know what they were talking about I repeated it on google scholar (as should anyone interested in what actual scientific research on a subject says).

      Results: "no relationship was found between leukemia and electric power line configurations", "Residence near high-voltage lines did not increase risk", [test subjects who lived] within 300 metres [of a power line showed a] relative risk [with] 95% confidence interval [of one kind of leukemia of] 0.8-3.5 [, or for another] 0.7-3.8 [, or if exposure was prolonged] 1.0-4.6 [or] 0.9-4.7" (i.e., for those who don't understand how to interpret that last one, no statistically significant effects -- note that this is the study that's usually cited _in favour_ of arguments about power lines causing leukemia). "the risk was not significantly associated with either residential magnetic-field levels ", "The study provides [...] no support for an association between leukemia and [magnetic field exposure]", "the results suggest that typical magnetic fields of high-voltage power lines are not an important cause of leukemia in adults", "These results provide little support for a relation between power-frequency EMF exposure and risk of childhood leukemia", "For residential exposure >= 0.2 uT, the relative risk for leukemia was estimated at .. 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.2" (i.e. not statistically significant). That's the first page of results finished with; I don't see any evidence fdor your assertion of a 70% increase in risk, and I would be cautious at claiming even that there's a link. Google scholar selects widely cited papers first, and papers with the most provocative results are likely to be the most widely cited. Given the number of studies that have been conducted on this subject, we'd expect at least some to come up with postive results based on random variation. That none of the ones I've looked at have even had statistically significant results suggests there's nothing to this, and it really is just random variation we're seeing.

    20. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I present you with:

      http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/emf.html

      May you be enlightened.

      Brilliant, the captcha asks me for reputes.

    21. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by IsThisWorking · · Score: 1

      I was always curious about long term effects. Non-ionizing radiation is proven to cause various illnesses. For example, some schools were built on cheap property in close proximity to large power transmission lines. That caused an unusually high rate of leukemia in the students. Prolonged exposure (living or going to school) at 200 meters raised the chance of getting leukemia by 70%. 200 meters to 500 meters raised it by 20%. Obviously, no research was done with Tesla's unfinished work. And for those asking for citations, search Google for "power lines leukemia" .

      I did. Fourth result: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/emf.html From the link:

      3. The initial study was flawed. Wertheimer and Leeper did not actually measure magnetic fields from power lines. Instead, they classified the homes according to their wiring code. The wiring code was then used as a surrogate for the powerline magnetic field, which was unmeasured and unknown. This is a flaw in the study. Later studies actually measured the magnetic fields from power lines and found no consistent relationship between measured magnetic field and incidence of cancer [13]. It is important to realize that there are important possible confounding factors in such epidemiologic studies. For example, one possible confounding factor is an income effect. Living right under electric power lines is not a desired residence, and often is a low-income housing location. People living near power lines tend to be poorer than the control group, and there is a strong and well-known epidemiological relationship between poverty and cancer. Gurney and others showed that the homes with the presumably higher-current wiring code tended to be lower income [14]. Thus the original Wertheimer-Leeper study was biased. In addition, it was based on a relatively few cases, and the statistics were consequently rather poor.

      In summary: non-ionizing radiation has not been proven to cause various illnesses.

    22. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Zouden · · Score: 1

      "No wireless power. No space for meter. Lame"

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    23. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      The only people with enough documentation to know are the US Government, who seized all of his work materials when he died.

      Not fully true. About half of his papers were taken by the U.S government,and the rest were taken by his family to Belgrade (along with his Urn) in accordance with his last wishes.

      Eventually the Government gave back most of his papers, but kept some of the more interesting stuff (like a good chunk of the plans for his death ray). These are now housed in the Nikola Tesla Museum in Belgrade.

      I went there as a kid, and it was Tesla's work that got me interested in Electronics. I got to see his original papers (no touching tough), as well as replicas (and some original) experiments/demonstrations of his. There was also a huge Tesla Coil that they would fire up for demonstrating wireless power transmission. Nothing fascinated me more back then than the ability to hold an unconnected fluorescent tube and have it light up in my hands, it was awesome!

      Yeah, it left quite an impression on me ^^

    24. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I became interested in a similar fashion. It was before I knew Tesla had even existed (I was young, and he wasn't well taught). We drove out onto power company owned property under large transmission lines. If I stood in the back of our truck, and held the light up at arms length, it would light. I wanted to find out more, and did.

          And for those who replied saying there is no association between EMF and leukemia, the most notable case that I remember from when I researched this 20+ years ago was a school build under transmission lines. In the first year, they had a notable number of cases. By the 3rd year, it seemed like an epidemic at the school. Studies followed, and by the 5th year, the school was closed.

          There are plenty of studies that back this up. Of course, the industries who have the most to lose (namely power companies) have funded many studies that say exactly the opposite, to limit their liability.

          The study I referenced was with three groups, each within the parameters that I outlined. Each subject group was of 20,000 people. That corresponded to the other studies I've read.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    25. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...And interestingly enough, all those studies were funded by companies in the power/radio/telecom/mobile industries... On the other hand one can observe the rate of brain tumors among train drivers. (In countries with fully electrified railways systems, of course). But I presume that only proves that you have to be predispositioned for a brain tumors to be a train driver? :>

    26. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by argiedot · · Score: 1

      Well, you're certainly right about that, but maybe you should have explained what you meant? I just read the first four results and two observed no elevated risk, but these two report an increased risk for certain kinds. I only read the results and do not know how to interpret them properly, what do you think?

    27. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by julesh · · Score: 1

      And interestingly enough, all those studies were funded by companies in the power/radio/telecom/mobile industries

      Citation please. The only one I see any overt link to such a company is actually the one most favourable to the OP's position. I'll happily ignore this paper; the rest of my point still stands.

    28. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      He postulated that it would actually be healthful. I don't that frequency was ever mentioned, but I also recall that it was supposedly at the "resonant frequency of the earth." His concept was to give out free electrical power, that had health benefits.

      In electricity's early years, this was not an uncommon claim by some. You can look here for some of the more silly examples. Even today we have crazy Japanese people using beds with huge electromagnets embedded in them (citation needed).

    29. Re:Someone with electrical knowledge explain this by julesh · · Score: 1

      On the other hand one can observe the rate of brain tumors among train drivers. (In countries with fully electrified railways systems, of course).

      You can, but the studies involve very few cases and are therefore very cautious in drawing conclusions: "For brain tumor (astrocytoma), the observed relative risk was close to one"; "95% CI: 1.2, 21.2". It looks like there is a small effect in this case, although it should be noted that the exposure to magnetism of the subjects in the second study there was over 100 times higher than exposure in the 200-metres-from-HT-power-line scenario the OP was talking about, which is I believe in the order of 100 times higher itself than mobile phone masts (a topic you hint at in your post).

      Yes, there is some evidence that magnetic fields can have health effects, I'll admit it. But the evidence is overstated and the risks exagerated repeatedly by people like the original poster who seem to be spreading anti-electricity FUD for all I can see (probably not intentionally; few people have done the research and read the reports here).

  5. Can you cut down on the long words, please? by redcaboodle · · Score: 0, Troll

    I read lavatory.

    Just call it a lab, will you. It's half past one in the night over here.

    --
    -- Put crudely, the world is an extremely large problem instance. (Russel/Norvig Artificial Intelligence)
    1. Re:Can you cut down on the long words, please? by uberjack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then someone will assume it's a Labrador Retriever, and PETA will get involved.

    2. Re:Can you cut down on the long words, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You really want a site that often covers technical issues to avoid polysyllabic words? Okay, I'll try:

      Your post makes me sad.

    3. Re:Can you cut down on the long words, please? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      and PETA will get involved.

      As long as they send Eva Mendes to kick my ass, BRING IT.

      Please?

    4. Re:Can you cut down on the long words, please? by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

      polysyllabic

      I don't get it.

  6. Article text by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Subscription-free, minus the pictures and maps.

    A Battle to Preserve a Visionary's Bold Failure

    By WILLIAM J. BROAD
    Published: May 4, 2009

    In 1901, Nikola Tesla began work on a global system of giant towers meant to relay through the air not only news, stock reports and even pictures but also, unbeknown to investors such as J. Pierpont Morgan, free electricity for one and all.

    It was the inventor's biggest project, and his most audacious.

    The first tower rose on rural Long Island and, by 1903, stood more than 18 stories tall. One midsummer night, it emitted a dull rumble and proceeded to hurl bolts of electricity into the sky. The blinding flashes, The New York Sun reported, "seemed to shoot off into the darkness on some mysterious errand."

    But the system failed for want of money, and at least partly for scientific viability. Tesla never finished his prototype tower and was forced to abandon its adjoining laboratory.

    Today, a fight is looming over the ghostly remains of that site, called Wardenclyffe - what Tesla authorities call the only surviving workplace of the eccentric genius who dreamed countless big dreams while pioneering wireless communication and alternating current. The disagreement began recently after the property went up for sale in Shoreham, N.Y.

    A science group on Long Island wants to turn the 16-acre site into a Tesla museum and education center, and hopes to get the land donated to that end. But the owner, the Agfa Corporation, says it must sell the property to raise money in hard economic times. The company's real estate broker says the land, listed at $1.6 million, can "be delivered fully cleared and level," a statement that has thrown the preservationists into action.

    The ruins of Wardenclyffe include the tower's foundation and the large brick laboratory, designed by Tesla's friend Stanford White, the celebrated architect.

    "It's hugely important to protect this site," said Marc J. Seifer, author of "Wizard," a Tesla biography. "He's an icon. He stands for what humans are supposed to do - honor nature while using high technology to harness its powers."

    Recently, New York State echoed that judgment. The commissioner of historic preservation wrote Dr. Seifer on behalf of Gov. David A. Paterson to back Wardenclyffe's preservation and listing in the National Register of Historic Places.

    On Long Island, Tesla enthusiasts vow to obtain the land one way or another, saying that saving a symbol of Tesla's accomplishments would help restore the visionary to his rightful place as an architect of the modern age.

    "A lot of his work was way ahead of his time," said Jane Alcorn, president of the Tesla Science Center, a private group in Shoreham that is seeking to acquire Wardenclyffe.

    Dr. Ljubo Vujovic, president of the Tesla Memorial Society of New York, said destroying the old lab "would be a terrible thing for the United States and the world. It's a piece of history."

    Tesla, who lived from 1856 to 1943, made bitter enemies who dismissed some of his claims as exaggerated, helping tarnish his reputation in his lifetime. He was part recluse, part showman. He issued publicity photos (actually double exposures) showing him reading quietly in his laboratory amid deadly flashes.

    Today, his work tends to be poorly known among scientists, though some call him an intuitive genius far ahead of his peers. Socially, his popularity has soared, elevating him to cult status.

    Books and Web sites abound. Wikipedia says the inventor obtained at least 700 patents. YouTube has several Tesla videos, including one of a break-in at Wardenclyffe. A rock band calls itself Tesla. An electric car company backed by Google's founders calls itself Tesla Motors.

    Larry Page, Google's co-founder, sees the creator's life as a cautionary tale. "It's a sad, sad story," Mr. Page told Fortune magazine last year. The inventor "couldn't commercialize anything. He could barely fund his own research."

    Wardenclyffe epitomized that kind o

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    1. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Today, his work tends to be poorly known among scientists,

      I was fairly well introduced to his work in my electrical engineering program.

      Later as power engineer I saw that what he did was fairly well known. After all we are using his induction motors and transformers. So I don't think you can say his is poorly known among scientists. It just depends on what type of "scientist" you're talking about.

    2. Re:Article text by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      "He was an absolute genius," Dennis Papadopoulos, a physicist at the University of Maryland, said in an interview. "He conceived of things in 1900 that it took us 50 or 60 years to understand. But he did not appreciate dissipation. You can't start putting a lot of power" into an antenna and expect the energy to travel long distances without great diminution.

      "It is absolute folly to imagine a rocket working in outer space, with no air to push against."(quote inexact)

      But, as more learned folk have said, the energy doesn't really have to travel long distances, so inverse square doesn't apply. Wardenclyff was not a radio transmitter; it was more along the lines of one coil of a rather elaborate transformer that basically used the Earth and its atmosphere as a giant capacitor and drew power from there.

      I dunno, bloody Atlanteans, coming back and expecting us to forgive and forget...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:Article text by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      Subscription-free, minus the pictures and maps.

      Subscription-free, with the pictures and maps.

    4. Re:Article text by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wardenclyff was not a radio transmitter; it was more along the lines of one coil of a rather elaborate transformer that basically used the Earth and its atmosphere as a giant capacitor and drew power from there.

      And one of the things they really ARE doing with HAARP is studying how to charge and discharge the ionosphere, and the author of the patent upon which it is based said that he was inspired by and based on the work of Nikola Tesla. So it seems especially probable that the scheme was possible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. ATHF by Pinback · · Score: 1

    I need to dig up a photo online. I keep getting the mental picture of the lab at the beginning of the ATHF episodes.

  8. Paging Dean Kamen by Loadmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems like this would be right up his alley. He always said he wants scientists to be appreciated like sports stars. Here's his chance to enshrine one of the most famous and far thinking of them all.

    1. Re:Paging Dean Kamen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could try to contact him through FIRST? (it would be natural to involve them anyway)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Is this it? by slummy · · Score: 3, Informative

    It appears there's a circular spot that had something there...

    Tesla's Laboratory?

    1. Re:Is this it? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, those are the grounds. The smaller building with the older-looking roof on the southeast of the building complex is the actual laboratory building (the one with the small tower in the center of the roof), and I presume his 187-ft tower was located in the concrete octagon to the south of the lab.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Is this it? by actionbastard · · Score: 2, Informative

      My grandfather used to have a farm on the south shore of Long Island, almost due south from Wardenclyffe. He took us there a couple of times when I was a kid. The site was a photo processing plant at the time, but we could peer through the south gate and see the pad where the tower was. The concrete octagon was the site of the tower that was demolished in 1917.

      --
      Sig this!
    3. Re:Is this it? by Jon_E · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah - you can see the remnants of the original building from the older looking roof - i believe the windvane is still on top there .. there were train tracks that ran a separate line behind the laboratory, and yes - the octagonal shape i believe is the foundation for the tower that was blown up by the US Army in 1917 (they were worried that the Germans might use it either for a landmark for their submarines or as some sort of communication device) .. it was rumored that it took multiple attempts to actually destroy the tower given the solid construction and size of the wooden beams that were used.

      It looks like much of the connecting area between the laboratory and the tower where the tunnels/connections should be are now filled in .. presumably AGFA was dumping their toxic photographic chemicals there - i guess filling it all in with cement constitutes their long cleanup ..

    4. Re:Is this it? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      the octagonal shape i believe is the foundation for the tower that was blown up by the US Army in 1917 (they were worried that the Germans might use it either for a landmark for their submarines or as some sort of communication device)

      You're hilarious.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. i will buy it by ifeelswine · · Score: 3, Funny

    and use it to figure out how to manufacture a pork samich without a bone in it. i will be rich.

  11. Get congress to Earmark it. by tjstork · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously... Blowing a couple of million bucks on the site, along with perhaps a reconstructed museum and tower, is honestly a good way to waste Federal money. There's a big war bill coming out of the House, and get the New York delegation to stuff some money in there for a national museum, and while we're at it, have the President declare it as a national heritage site.

    There will be some dopes at the National Review that will bitch about it, but even hard righties like me love national parks and the story of American industrialization and research. It's a lot better than Woodstock. I'd plug it on my right wing site, for sure.

    Come on libs, spend some money and save this place!

    --
    This is my sig.
  12. If wishes were horses... by earlymon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd ride mine down to cash in my winning lottery ticket, buy the land, and endow part of the fund needed to launch a world-class museum. You can visit Edison's lab in Greenfield Villiage (Henry Ford Musuem, etc) in Dearborn, Michigan - which, if you ever get the chance, do it - you won't be disappointed, I guarantee.

    It would be shame if Tesla doesn't become similarly remembered.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    1. Re:If wishes were horses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be shame if Tesla doesn't become similarly remembered"

      I've never been , but Belgrade has what I've been told is a very good museum dedicated to Tesla.

  13. Radio principle by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    He was basing this experiment on how radio works. Does the radio station see any difference in power if 10 people listen? How about 100,000 people? The station outputs the same power no matter who is receiving.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Radio principle by geekoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      What? yes, every person that listens takes power. It's a minute amount of power but it does. In this case it weakens the range of the broadcast.

      Do you even think about what you are saying? If that where true we would all be powering our devices from radio signal. You are saying 50K watts of power can power infinite devices, ir be broad cast to an infinite amount of radios with degrading the signal.

      THINK!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Radio principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it does. Not much in the case of a radio station as the amount of power taken out by a given receiver is extremely small compared to the station's output.

      You *could* concievably do a point-to-point with microwaves, but I suspect it would be technically difficult to transmit a large amount of power, not to mention expensive and likely with lower efficiency than wires. Not to mention the safety issues.

    3. Re:Radio principle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, please, exactly, think
      if i speak, whats the difference between 1 person listening and 10?
      does that one person listening take away from the other nine?
      i think not.

    4. Re:Radio principle by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      That's what the RIAA has been trying to tell us for the past decade!

    5. Re:Radio principle by julesh · · Score: 1

      Do you even think about what you are saying? If that where true we would all be powering our devices from radio signal. You are saying 50K watts of power can power infinite devices, ir be broad cast to an infinite amount of radios with degrading the signal.

      Inverse square law prevents that without having to speculate that receivers diminish the signal. The energy density over any area is never greater than the power put into the transmitter multiplied by the length of time over which its transmissions can be received in the area in question, so for any given area the total energy you can receive in that area is less than the total energy transmitted. The smaller the area, the smaller the amount of energy you can receive. Receivers cannot overlap, so there is no possibility of receiving more energy than is transmitted, even without taking into account effects receivers have upon each other.

    6. Re:Radio principle by pbhj · · Score: 1

      Back when I was a patent examiner I had an idea about harvesting power from radio waves, we're submerged in a sea of radio broadcasts. Capturing some of this seemed like free power.

      Then I thought, would this work on a large scale - it seems like free energy - but the issue you (geekoid) mentioned popped to mind and I discounted it as a "maybe someday I'll mess with that" idea.

      Then last week on the Gadget show I see wireless power transmission for gadgets ... but also mention of harvesting power from radio waves (without mention of the downside of scaling it).

      Perhaps there's enough cosmic background radiation in the right frequency bands that we can use that instead. (I'm thinking radio, microwave rather than visual).

    7. Re:Radio principle by jrade · · Score: 1

      Yes, please, exactly, think if i speak, whats the difference between 1 person listening and 10? does that one person listening take away from the other nine? i think not.

      Actually yes. Sound will bounce around in the ear and less vibrations will continue to the other nine people, therefore 'taking away sound' (can a physicist chime in here please). If I am talking to you and someone puts a board in between us, my voice hitting your ears would sound quieter.
      --
      Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something - Plato

      --

      Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at Sig.setCleverSig(Sig.java:42)
  14. I think the idea was to couple to the ionosphere.. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How would these towers effectively transmit electricity? I'm having trouble seeing how this would work effectively given the inverse square law.

    I'm not Tesla but I can take a guess.

    I think the idea was to couple to the ionosphere - treating the conductive ground and one of the layers of the conductive ionosphere as the two walls of a resonant cavity and pumping one of its resonances. The energy would not propagate away into space but would stay in the cavity until removed by a load or resistive losses due to the imperfect conduction of the cavity walls and its contents (dirt, buildings, birds, people, ...). It would be an extremely high impedance - enormous voltage (because of a nontrivial voltage gradient - in the ballpark of the atmospheric DC bias - multiplied by an enormous height) combined with minuscule currents through the tiny (though physically large) apacitances.

    At the relatively low (compared to radio) frequencies involved you wouldn't have appreciable currents in anything that wasn't also a resonator and strongly coupled to the cavity (by being tall and broad at the top), i.e. a "raised capacitance" (Tesla's term for that big sphere-ish conductive shape on the top of the structure) and a big coil between it and ground, forming a tank circuit tuned to the carrier frequency and cavity resonance.

    Buildings and metal towers might have nontrivial unintentional currents. But they'd be reactive currents because of the low resistance of the buildings' structural members. So they wouldn't suck out much power - just shift the phase of the power carrier signal in the area near them.

    But a resonant circuit between a big raised conductor and ground would be able to efficiently power out of the cavity and couple it to a secondary coil around the main coil - shifting the voltage/current ratio from the extraordinarily high impedance of the transmission system to a lower impedance more convenient for use (though still at the carrier frequency so probably in need of rectification or other frequency conversion).

    At least I think that may be what he intended. Whether it would work or not is still "up in the air", pun intended.

    One nice thing: At the frequency involved you shouldn't be interfering with any existing information services. If the losses are low enough for it to be practical for power transmission it would be constantly "ringing" from lighting excitation. (Or maybe that's the ELF band where the US is talking to submerged submarines...)

    (Heh. Thinking about this I just recognized the details of the broadcast power that was a throwaway background item in Eric Frank Russel's novel _Wasp_. Cars were "dinos" with the car body for "raised capacitance" and a dynamotor for frequency conversion. Disconnecting the "intake lead" and striking it against an "earth terminal" would produce a thin thread of arc if the distant power transmitter was on. And the energy density necessary to operate an automobile on this was completely ignored, of course. B-) )

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  15. Cats, hats, and wolverines... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    The building's dark interior was littered with beer cans and broken bottles. Flashlights revealed no trace of the original equipment, except for a surprise on the second floor. There in the darkness loomed four enormous tanks, each the size of a small car. Their sides were made of thick metal and their seams heavily riveted, like those of an old destroyer or battleship. The Agfa consultant leading the tour called them giant batteries.

    "Look up there," said the consultant, Ralph Passantino, signaling with his flashlight. "There's a hatch up there. It was used to get into the tanks to service them."

    Tesla authorities appear to know little of the big tanks, making them potential clues to the inventor's original plans.

    Boy are they going to be surprised when they open them and find hundreds of hats, dead cats and human corpses with huge bone claws on their hands crammed in there.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Cats, hats, and wolverines... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had to read that twice before I realized they weren't talking about 'tanks' the vehicles.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Cats, hats, and wolverines... by TheGothicGuardian · · Score: 1

      I thought it was going to be a Dalek joke...

    3. Re:Cats, hats, and wolverines... by PiSkyHi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Tesla is Ziggy Stardust.

  16. Elon Musk... by brianc · · Score: 1

    ... should buy it. And start an east coast presence for Tesla.

    Elon Musk's latest gig

    --


    SIGLOST && SIGUNUSED && SIGQUIT
  17. amazing how this news keeps changeing by lunatick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work across the street from his old lab (on Tesla st no less) The place is in serious disrepair, but it would be nice to see it preserved. His transmission towers are in wreckage all over the DEC property on the south side of 25a in rocky point.

    Last I heard 1 week ago the museum was a go, guess things change.

    --
    The Lunatick, Carpe Corpus!
    1. Re:amazing how this news keeps changeing by a09bdb811a · · Score: 1

      I work across the street from his old lab (on Tesla st no less)

      What work do you do there?

      Not that it's any of my business. Google Maps just makes me curious.

    2. Re:amazing how this news keeps changeing by elaykyd · · Score: 1

      Agreed, buy it now and buy it cheap, I lived on Tesla Avenue in L.A. back in the 60's prior to reading anything about Mr Tesla's rather fascinating and energetic work. I currently work a block from Tesla Motors on Santa Monica Blvd in West LA, where 1.5 Mil is about 3 bentleys and a couple sporty italian rides worth of chinga. Since I can't find a house for less than a eight hundred thousand that Million and a half or so is considerably cheap for most adults, it is a shame a few people from Google who apparently have some net worth still intact could not see the long term rewards that would come from a simple write off and later profit line after investing in a new venture...imho...get it while he still lives...

    3. Re:amazing how this news keeps changeing by lunatick · · Score: 1

      Paramedic.
      If they take the place down I will be very disappointed. It's nice to be able to look at history almost every day.

      --
      The Lunatick, Carpe Corpus!
  18. Re:I think the idea was to couple to the ionospher by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    A thing to remember is that Tesla was working when the concept of an electromagnetic wave was just being developed. He did a lot of stuff with resonance phenomenon, transformers, and low-pressure gas plasmas and so was probably thinking in terms of circuit components even when he invented radio - ahead of Helmholtz/Hertz/Maxwell/etc. who had the theory of transverse electromagnetic waves in free space.

    Then again he was a math whiz and he might have been quite aware of this work and trying to use longitudinal waves in a cavity or the ionospheric plasma rather than the transverse electromagnetic waves of free space. (These CAN exist in these places, though not in free space.)

    Or he might have just been hacking, back when the theories were still being developed.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  19. Re:I think the idea was to couple to the ionospher by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the interesting summary. My question is, doesn't the charge that defines the ionosphere help protect us from solar radiation and who-knows-what-else? Even if this did work, I shudder to think what would happen if we started removing gigawatts from the ionosphere to power our doo-dads.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  20. If a company the size of AFGA by geekoid · · Score: 1

    is scraping for 1.6 million, they might as well give it away, becasue there not going to be here in a year anyways.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:If a company the size of AFGA by julesh · · Score: 1

      is scraping for 1.6 million, they might as well give it away, becasue there not going to be here in a year anyways.

      If they're in that kind of financial trouble, they're not legally allowed to give it away. A company that is expecting to be liquidated must not give away assets, because technically from the moment it is considered likely that liquidation will occur those assets effectively belong to the creditors.

  21. Tesla Einstein Notes Found in Chelsea Hotel by Richard0Thomas · · Score: 1, Informative

    It would be unfortunate if some material was still hidden there. Even more so because there was a hint of papers found, which may be an exchange between Einstein and Tesla. There was something about it here http://godparticle.net/

    1. Re:Tesla Einstein Notes Found in Chelsea Hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I that a site for some kind of strange cult of deranged physicists? or a joke? I'm not quite sure what to make of it when it says things like "The LHC may create a black hole, and it will suck away all the worlds fictions"

  22. Re:I think the idea was to couple to the ionospher by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    My question is, doesn't the charge that defines the ionosphere help protect us from solar radiation and who-knows-what-else?

    I don't think so. It's more a byproduct of the processes that DO protect us (mainly the magnetic field deflecting and/or trapping the charged particles of the solar wind.)

    Even if this did work, I shudder to think what would happen if we started removing gigawatts from the ionosphere to power our doo-dads.

    Why not if we put the gigawatts up there first?

    We're not talking about removing and eating the charge (DC) of the ionospheric layers. We're talking about using their conduction (or pressure waves within their sea of charged particles) to carry AC around without radiating it away into space - or having to string wires when there's already a planet-sized "wire" hanging up there in the sky.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  23. Re:If past performance is a current ReCOIL? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Well, if the fans of that facility want to generate some sizzle and buzz, they can just become angry enough and recoil from the light of speed to the speed of light, put some copper and argon in the air, and zap the naysayers. Buzz and hype will drive the media into a shock frenzy.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  24. C'mon, folks! by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This perhaps the single greatest opportunity ever to cross paths with Slashdot!

    If we each pitch in a buck a piece...

    Can you imagine the fun a few million /.ers can have with this stuff?

    Projects/experiments can be decided democratically (!) via the moderating system and we can further fund the entire project from the click-throughs generated by poster signatures.

    1. Re:C'mon, folks! by RGRistroph · · Score: 1

      I would be interested in helping. As in, I won't just cheer you on on the internet, I might pitch in real money.

      I am not so interested in a museum, or at least not just a museum -- some sort of museum seems appropriate for the place. I would be more interested in something like a "Hacker Space" with labs and workshops and possibly living arrangements, but on a bigger scale than hacker houses; more like a self-run graduate or research institute. I would like to be able to use the facilities like a Tech Shop ( http://techshop.ws/ ) if I lived close enough, pay a fee to be able send a design in to be made on a rapid protyping machine if we go that router, add myself to a waiting list to be able to live there a semester and take / teach classes, etc.

      The structure should be some sort of corporation, with "members" buying shares, and each share should be priced high enough to keep the numbers manageable and low enough that not very many people would be economically excluded -- I would suggest 500 or 1000 dollars. Enough shares should be sold to fund what we want to do with a margin, and then no more; subsequent members would buy out an existing member's spot.

      Decisions would have to be done democraticly via a system such as Debian uses or using something like DeliberativeAssembly.com . Of course officiers and a board would carry out actual immediate tasks, and long term decisions would be voted on at large, and the officiers and board be regularly elected, etc.

      This particular piece of property might not be on the market by the time something was organized, but there are other places. If we make up a list of appropriate parameters -- size of space, with X miles of an airport, in a town with an Amtrak stop, etc, I am sure some structurly sound but unused factory building can be found somewhere away from the coasts for much less than 1.6 million.

    2. Re:C'mon, folks! by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty good idea - short of the project/experiments and democratic voting process.

      It should be a museum - not a research lab. Well - maybe a small one in the back. :-) You'd need trinkets to sell to keep the facility operating, so might as well dedicate part of it to just developing those. heh a mini desktop Tesla coil or something equally useless but cool to have.

      Like, what would you seriously do in a residential neighborhood using century old equipment?

  25. Tesla was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Methinks Tesla was 100+ years ahead of his peers, much like Pons and Fleishman were 20 years ahead of theirs. (Cold Fusion became legitimate again last month. Nuclear reactions at room temperature, oh my!)

    The Orion Project mentioned Tesla in one of their mailings this spring. People like to scoff, but the ones who scoff the loudest eventually have to hide the crow feet hanging out the side of their mouth.

    The battle for credibility and redemption for the field [Cold Fusion]has been long and hard-fought. German physicist Max Planck predicted the nature of such scientific revolutions.

    "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light," Planck wrote, "but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."

    Almost poetically, John Maddox, the editor of Nature magazine and prominent opinion leader in the academic battle to dismiss "cold fusion" outright, died Sunday. He was widely quoted for his comment, "Broadly speaking, it is dead, and it'll remain dead for a long, long time," referring to "cold fusion."

    -Cold Fusion - real science, real hope and, quite possibly, a real source of energy. (emphasis added)

    I'm certain that Tesla's vision of free wireless power will come to pass - probably even in the next few years. This would be a black swan that would prevent the economic collapse from developing into a new dark ages.

  26. How much for.... by VinylRecords · · Score: 1

    How much for the cloning machine from 'The Prestige'?

    1. Re:How much for.... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Cloning machine?! Oh, man. Now you totally ruined it for me, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:How much for.... by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a "cloning machine" so much as a "transporting machine" with a few "unintended side-effects" i.e. duplication of the transportee.

  27. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather shocking isn't it?

  28. these were popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These were popular back when I was a kid. Listened to mine for like..dunno, hundreds if not thousands of hours probably, back in the 50s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio

  29. Re:I think the idea was to couple to the ionospher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the interesting summary. My question is, doesn't the charge that defines the ionosphere help protect us from solar radiation and who-knows-what-else? Even if this did work, I shudder to think what would happen if we started removing gigawatts from the ionosphere to power our doo-dads.

    The siphoning off of the EM shield on the planet would have a number of changes. Chiefly, the decrease of deflection of "hot" particles. As a result, more "hot" particles would strike the earth, slightly increasing its temperature. Over time it would have resulted in a horrible climate change, leading to the melting of the ice caps, first in the North, then in the south.

    Sort of like global warming, but without the extra plant growth from CO2 :p

    Keep in mind, much like Republicans other than Ron Paul, I pulled those facts out of my ass.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Missing Option by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 1

    in the contract. Does it include rights to the underground tunnel between Wardenclyffe & the base at Montauk Point? That is where the alien collaborators traveled back and forth while helping the government distort time & torture young children.

  32. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did J. Pierpont Morgan ruin Tesla? Also, on another note, is that the same person whose legacy is Chase bank? (The one which ate WaMu I think.)

    Please correct me if I'm wrong. I may be.

    1. Re:Hmmmm by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      Short answers, yes and sort of. I think JP Morgan merged with Chase at some point, so there you go.

      JP Morgan only ruined Tesla in the sense that whatever Tesla was doing wasn't financially viable for JPM, but I don't think there were any malicious actions by JPM (unlike Edison, who actively undermined Tesla).

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
  33. Two Words by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    Hells... YEAH!

    --
    The game.
  34. Whats with the nihilism? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    RIP Nicola Tesla. Towards the end of his life, he seems to have descended into mental illness . Now our portrayals of him are doing the same - for example, the TV series 'Sanctuary' apparently shows him as a vampire.

  35. Recurring fees by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, $1.6m to buy the land.

    Then what is your plan to pay property taxes, or upkeep to meet building codes?

    You're talking a lot more than $1.6M even just to keep it as is, never mind building a museum...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  36. LOWLY FUCKING SHAMEFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IN ALL CAPS.

  37. Slashdot armchair scientists strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Some of the posts here are hilarious, the ones from people who assume to "know" what Tesla had in mind 100 years ago when he did all these things, or how he felt about things, etc.

    Others even go into lengths to diagnose Tesla with some mental illnesses or call him a "loon."

    Time and time again I'm reminded that /. often gathers a pool of most close minded wikipedia (and similar sites) regurgitators who have no practical experience of their own.

    This "select" group could not distinguish their head from their ass if their life depended on it, yet they play heroes here.

    Kudos to all the posters who were inquisitive and kept their mind open to possibilities, just like Tesla ones did, through their ideas and posts.

    If it wasn't for such people, we would still be squinting at the dim DC powered lights in some dark corner of one's room...

  38. Nothing left at Wardenclyffe, read his papers by ahowlett · · Score: 1

    The tower was blown up in 1917. All that remains is a brick building which has been stripped and used as a factory.

    http://www.teslasociety.com/wardenclyffe2.htm

    You won't find any Tesla insight at Wardenclyffe. Better to spend your time reading his papers.

    http://books.google.ca/books?id=rwekkS3oD0EC

  39. Tesla: New York's greatest mad scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a huge Tesla fan! I even traveled to Belgrade to visit the Tesla museum. A while back Studio 360 on WNYC ran nearly a whole show about Tesla. It was amazing!

    Here's the link: http://www.studio360.org/episodes/2008/01/25

    It includes a discussion of a book about Tesla, a performance about Tesla's life and conflict with Edison, and even a bit about Tesla's friendship with Mark Twain. Check it out!

  40. delivered fully cleared and leveled by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Such a loss. Has mankind totally lost its mind and cant appreciate the past?

    Or are we just doomed to repeat it, again.

    One of most brilliant men *ever* to exist. At least Davinchi gets credit for his work.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  41. Tesla was ahead of his time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The feats that he performed with static electricity (Holding fireballs in his hands, etc) were nothing short of amazing and have never been recreated to this day as far as I know.

  42. lab changed? by hurfy · · Score: 1

    Anyone view the slideslide and explain why the lab doesn't look right?

    "in it's prime" = white, 3 arches and sloped roof
    "for sale" = brick, 4 arches and flat roof

  43. Nah... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    He was the man who fell to Earth.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  44. You internet clowns need to shove off by Lucidmode · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm no electrical genius, however I am a realist, and I do believe in progress. We live in a world today where everyone expects every product or technology to 'just work'. If its not perfect, or doesn't do what it was intended to do at 100% efficiency the first time around, the internet experts are the very first ones to run screaming. You talk about Tesla's inventions as if A) You could have done it better and B) the concepts and technologies would have never improved! Its a shame that many of his inventions came to a halt. Not because they were insanely awesome (for the time they were), or because they worked with such flawless efficiency (some did). But more because of what the rest of the world has missed out on, which is 'what those inventions COULD have become'. Take for example an early 1902-1910 V8 internal combustion engine, versus a modern day V8 internal combustion engine. Back then they created a whopping ~30hp from as much as 3500-7700cc (200-474cu) engines and the automobiles they were eventually on used massive copper piping that made the cars as heavy or heavier than a modern day F-450. Now with todays advances, a 281cu (4601cc) V8 can be built to produce thousands of horsepower somewhat reliably (and by reliable, I mean several track runs). So imagine a world where some of Tesla's more 'looney' inventions may have experienced similar advances? Maybe we (as internet experteers) don't understand electrical theory quite like he did. Maybe we're not smart enough to make wireless power transmission more efficient. But someone might be, or might have been. What would the world be like today? It would be a completely different place, thats for sure.

  45. Edison and Tesla by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    On the point about Tesla having his work seized after his death, yes, Wardencliffe Tower was supposed to have been seized and sold off for the value of its lumber to pay off debts. No conspiracy theory, just a tragic footnote that the guy's final research, which he sunk the last of his money into, ended up being torn down for the value of its wood.

    No need to make disbelieving remarks and mocking references to Homer Simpson and secret societies, Tesla simply ran out of money. If you owe people enough money, the courts allow their agents to seize your stuff. It's just unfortunate that some of Tesla's stuff seems to have been torn apart for the value of its materials before anyone had a chance to take a good look at it.

    1. Re:Edison and Tesla by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      On the point about Tesla having his work seized after his death, yes, Wardencliffe Tower was supposed to have been seized and sold off for the value of its lumber to pay off debts

      From what I understand, the tower wasn't seized - he sold it off in order to pay his bills. I think the FA even mentions that.

      Regardless, though, let's say you're right; that kind of "seizure" is not what was (seemed to be) implied in the original statement. If you scroll up a bit, you'll see an AC making silly allegations about the FBI stealing Tesla's research and patents. It's possible that the original commenter WASN'T being a goofball, but until he clarifies the meaning of that sentence I'm going to go with my original assessment.

      It's just unfortunate that some of Tesla's stuff seems to have been torn apart for the value of its materials before anyone had a chance to take a good look at it.

      I agree - his work would have made for a fascinating museum exhibit, and displaying it in such a manner would have helped quell the cult following he's developed. It's easy to develop conspiracy theories when the objects being discussed have been destroyed - much harder when they're available for examination by the public.

  46. the Wardenclyffe tunnels, UV ionisation by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    Tesla seems to have understood the fact that conventional EM aerials are pretty useless at transmitting power efficiently over long distances. He said as much in his descriptions of his proposed defensive particle-beam weapon, "Teleforce", explaining that it shouldn't be called a death ray, because "rays" dissipate too much to be useful for long-range focused power.

    Wardencliffe wasn't a conventional radio transmitter. Tesla's reported as saying that most of the cost associated with building the tower was actually the building of the underground infrastructure below it, and if that's true, then that underground network should still be down there. The people who currently own the site, and are trying to sell it, ought to try to get some idea of what's down there, otherwise the buyers might think that they'd buying a conventional piece of land. If there's a lot of ancient underground tunnelling down there, that might affect the cost of preparing the land for other use.

    Incidentally, Tesla's idea of using an ultraviolet beam coupled with an ultra high tension source to "drill" an ionised conducting path from the top of a tower to the Earth's upper atmosphere has since been reinvented by lightning researchers.
    They now use U-V lasers to create conducting ionised paths to direct lightning downwards towards their target sensors.

  47. Your post was enabled by tesla by c0d3r · · Score: 1

    How can you put down a man who enabled you to post your opinion. Why don't you move to the desert or country and try living without AC power?