Slashdot Mirror


Borland Being Purchased By Micro Focus

An anonymous reader tips news that Micro Focus is in the process of buying Borland Software for $75 million. They also picked up Compuware's application testing and automated software quality business. Quoting ZDNet: "The boards of both companies agreed to the deal, which is expected to complete around mid-2009. ... In 2008, Texas-based Borland made a pre-tax loss of $204m, almost four times the size of the previous year's loss. It had revenues of $172m, part of a consistent downward trend since at least 2004. ... Borland was one of the oldest software companies in the PC software business, having been founded in 1981. Its most successful era was in the late 1980s via massive sales of Sidekick, a DOS-based terminate-and-stay-resident personal productivity application, and development tool Turbo Pascal, which challenged Microsoft's dominance in the application-development market."

11 of 351 comments (clear)

  1. Who is Micro Focus? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Micro Focus Net Express® is the market-leading COBOL development environment"

    So, a company that should've died off in the nineties is being bought by a company that noone has ever heard of that should've died off in the eighties. Weird.

    1. Re:Who is Micro Focus? by SCPRedMage · · Score: 5, Interesting

      First thing to cross my mind when I read the headline was "holy crap, Borland's still around?"

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    2. Re:Who is Micro Focus? by syrinx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Believe it or not, the also push OO COBOL.

      Presumably that's called ADD 1 TO COBOL?

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  2. So Long... by djbckr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's too bad the company went under like that, but I would have to blame the executives for making such massively bone-headed business decisions.

    Anybody remember Inprise? After about a year of incredible downturn, they decided, "You know what? Maybe Borland wasn't a bad name after all"

    Idiots

    Delphi *was* my favorite language

  3. turbo-Pascal by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Funny
    Man - bring me back to the 80s - when EVERYTHING was "TURBO". Go shopping for flatware "get this new stainless steel TURBO flatware - the spoons are extra-round!". You get your fucking cable bill and it's not delivered by letter post, it's deliverred by TURBO letter post. And the computer had a TURBO button on it to make it go faster. And the cooling fan the kicked in made you think - "hey maybe there IS a turbo in there!". And you go to the deli to pick up some fish, and they're selling TURBOT, but not just ANY TURBOT, but TURBOTURBOT!!!

    Man - between all that bullshit and bands like "A Flock of Haircuts" it was enough to make Max Headroom hurhurhur-HURL!

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:turbo-Pascal by Rary · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm glad the "turbo" trend died. Long live "X-treme"!

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  4. Re:How many more by sopssa · · Score: 5, Informative

    Being a Delphi programmer I noticed this news and thought wtf, but it must be noted that Delphi along other programming stuff was moved under CodeGear a few years ago and wasnt included in the purchase.

    Still, I have high respect for Borland and the fact they provided early Delphi's for free on my teenage years when noone else did. I still enjoy Delphi as the most rapid programming tool, because it nicely integrates easy of GUI design but still powerful and fast code.

  5. Borland raided by Microsuck... by GPLDAN · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.networkworld.com/news/1997/0512borland.html


    In the end, Microsoft strategy of simply throwing obscene salaries at the Borland talent ultimately worked. It was systematic, it was effective.

    Now go suck on Visual Studio.

  6. Re:Borland Turbo Assembler by Jerrry · · Score: 5, Informative

    Turbo C++ came years after Borland's original product: Turbo Pascal.

    I started with Turbo Pascal with version 1.0. At the time, it was a revelation because it cost $49.00 in the days when PC development tools typically cost many hundreds of dollars, and because of its speed. It could compile a several thousand line Pascal program in just a few seconds. Other compilers of the time, such as Microsoft Pascal, took many minutes to compile the same code. It was limited, however, to 64K of code because the compiler created .COM files.

    The compiler was so fast that Turbo Pascal was the rapid development tool of the 1980s on the PC. Nothing else could approach its speed.

    While Phillipe Khan always maintained that he was the developer of the Turbo Pascal code, it was actually Anders Hejlsberg, the architect of C#, that actually wrote the code.

  7. Re:How many more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    BTW Delphi 2009 supports C# style generics, anonymous methods, inferred typing and deferred execution all in native code w/o .NET

    Delphi is still very much a viable platform for new software!

  8. This is not Borland by ZioPino · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked in Borland, when it was indeed Borland. Great company, you could not find another place with so many fine minds.
    What is called Borland today is not the company that people knew. The management stole the name, connected it with mindless, buzzword-rich nonsense and moved the headquesters from Scotts Valley to Texas. They were selling nothing and that's what MicroFocus is buying: nothing.

    The core of Borland's business, compilers and IDEs was spun off as CodeGear, recently purchased by Embarcadero Software. CodeGear is still located in Scotts Valley with many of the original developers in the group. Great people with a passion for tool development.
    It's not a coincidence that Borland, the travesty, has been losing money at incredible speed after CodeGear was gone. The only part of the business that made sense, that generated revenues, was let go by a management simply unable to understand what a compiler is.
    That the name Borland, which was synonym of innovation and "barbarian" spirit, is now associated with the leading name in a technology that was an embarrassment in the 80s, COBOL, is a shame that makes me cringe to no end.
    Remember, this is not Borland, the real Borland, the one that brought us such gems as Turbo Pascal, C++ builder, Paradox, JBuilder etc, and that in general taught Microsoft how to write IDEs, is called CodeGear.
    The company mentioned in this article, is a travesty and a sham.