An Early Look At What's Coming In PHP V6
IndioMan writes "In this article, learn about the new PHP V6 features in detail. Learn how it is easier to use, more secure, and more suitable for internationalization. New PHP V6 features include improved support for Unicode, clean-up of several functions, improved extensions, engine additions, changes to OO functions, and PHP additions."
Update — May 7th at 16:47 GMT by SS: IBM seems to have removed the article linked in the summary. Here's a different yet related article about the future of PHP, but it's a year old.
It's about time PHP has native support for unicode.
I am definitely no PHP expert so perhaps I am wrong but it seems that much of what is being changed is backtracking due to bad language decisions from the beginning. Sadly I think PHP developers with legacy code are going to be paying the price for several versions to come.
Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
Gotta break some eggs to make an omelet.
Hopefully this will include cleaning up the argument lists of the string and array functions so that they hall take f($needle, $haystack) in a consistent order. Fixing the argument lists isn't in TFA, but it's a really obvious place to start.
At work, it may give me an excuse to rewrite a horrible old app that's been holding us back since the days of PHP4. I suspect I am not alone in wanting to see some old (buggy, slow, insecure, poorly designed) PHP apps get ruined so that they can be redeveloped now that PHP5 is actually a decent language.
are these ass clowns still planning on using \ for namespaces?
Do you even lift?
These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.
Given that PHP 6 was "rumored" to be out at least a year ago. I can't decide if the title "An Early Look" is meant to be ironic, or is just a sad indicator of progress.
Despite that, I would say that three things have recently happened demonstrating the improvement in quality of PHP:
I would say that (1) and (2) easily are more important for the language than is (3). PHP 5.3's improvements should be a huge change: Namespaces (I know there's a huge amount of hate for this implementation: get over it. It's going to be very useful), Closures / Lambda Functions, and Late Static Bindings in particular make it hard to wait so long for PHP 5.3.
So, stop talking about PHP 6! Lets get PHP 5.3 out.
clean-up of several functions
Does that include safe_quote_string_this_time_i_really_freaking_mean_it, or do_foo(needle, haystack) and foo_do(haystack, needle)? At least it gets namespaces after all this time, even if they're almost deliberately ugly.
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
My items to fix: - Remove the "goto" statement that will be introduced in 5.3 (WHY JESUS, WHY??); - Stardandize function names (current samples: str_replace, html_ entity_ decode, htmlentities, htmlspecialchars_decode); - Improve array speed (for simple arrays, use internally one simple C array/list - current days, any array is a map); - Insert optional configurations by project (and not by host); - Remove function alias; - Provide optional typing for functions and parameters, but in a simple and consistent way (no strange notations); - Remove old extensions, like PDF paid extensions (and please, insert any open and official PDF extension); - As any language, provide a way of store compiled regex, avoiding compile them all the simple regex call for the same task; - Provide legacy support for PHP5 application as separated download (or at least allow PHP6 and 5 in the same host - we suffer a lot to find PHP5 Hosting in the earlier times, due the impossibility of run PHP4 and 5 at the same host).
One of these things just doesn't belong
python:
myArray.append(myvalue)
ruby:
myArray.push(myvalue)
objective-c:
[myArray addObject: myvalue]
smalltalk:
myArray add: myvalue
PHP:
array_push($myarray, $myvalue)
In the finest tradition of PHP, they made Unicode behaviour dependent on a setting. Have these people learnt nothing from the past? magic_quotes anyone? Bleh. All languages have their warts, but the amount of bad design decisions in this one is just staggering.
Say that $Foo=3
It will print
Hello 3
Because the namespace begins with a backslash ('\foo\n') and when using it inside double quoted strings must be "\\foo\\n".
Perhaps your customers freak when they read your spelling.
Market share: PHP 50%, ASP 49%, rest perl.
When PHP and ASP don't totally dominate the job listings, please come back to me again. In the meantime I know which of the function calls pays for my food.
Oh and $array[] = $value;
Coding, you should learn it.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
Loading 88MB file into memory is not going to work by default anyhow, unless you set the memory limit in PHP from the default you will get out of memory errors every time. I think even a find/replace in a Windows app like Notepad or Notepad++ will "work" but it will definitely be slow. When I used to search large logs I would use some sort of file splitter and search each file itself.
And here the rest of us are grepping and sedding multi-gigabyte files without thinking twice. Seriously, what's your idea of a large file?
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
PHP5 has a fairly proper inheritance and member visibility model and is truly reference based (i.e. $objX = $objY means, in PHP5, that they are reference to the same object instance... opposed to PHP4 where $objX = $objY made a FULL copy of the object to $objX).
So they've got to the level of Java 1.0. Congratulations!
Oh, actually, sorry, they didn't, since there are still no namespaces. But there will be soon, and then it'll be at the level of Java 1.0. Once again, congratulations!