Slashdot Mirror


Unclean Military Hard Drives Sold On eBay

An anonymous reader writes "The Daily Mail reports, 'Highly sensitive details of a US military missile air defense system were found on a second-hand hard drive bought on eBay. The test launch procedures were found on a hard disk for the THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) ground to air missile defense system, used to shoot down Scud missiles in Iraq. The disk also contained security policies, blueprints of facilities, and personal information on employees (including social security numbers) belonging to technology company Lockheed Martin — who designed and built the system.' Scary that they did not wipe it to Department of Defense standards, which I believe is wiping the whole disk and then writing 1010 all over it."

10 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. Unclean? by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess we'll need to format them in a purifying fire then.

    1. Re:Unclean? by auric_dude · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or use http://www.dban.org/node/68 - good enough for The Government Of Canada so good enough for these disks?

    2. Re:Unclean? by Nimey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since you apparently don't know what you're talking about: the 35-pass wipe is bullshit, and even the author says so.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gutmann_method#Criticism

      Essentially some of those patterns are specifically for obsolete MFM drives, and others are specifically for equally obsolete RLL drives. Nowadays you should just use random patterns, and even the DoD is fine with 7 passes.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  2. DoD wiping standards by mati.stankiewicz · · Score: 5, Informative

    "which I believe is wiping the whole disk and then writing 1010 all over it."

    Taken from DoD 5220.22-M Wipe Standard:

    "[...]DoD requires overwriting with a pattern, then its complement, and finally with another pattern; e.g., overwrite first with 0011 0101 [35h], followed by 1100 1010 [CBh], then 1001 0111 [97h]. The number of times an overwrite must be accomplished depends on the storage media, sometimes on its sensitivity, and sometimes on differing DoD component requirements. In any case, a purge is not complete until a final overwrite is made using unclassified data."

  3. Financial Firms Do the Same by __aajwxe560 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I perform computer forensics work, and part of my research towards obtaining my degree was going to the MIT Swap Meet (great event) and buying used hard disks from vendors on occasion. In about 90% of the cases, the user appeared to have simply "deleted" the files, with nothing more. Now, I would expect this for a normal home user, not knowing any better, but the biggest thing of concern was the number of drives that came from various corporate entities. I was able to see and read data from drives that clearly came from several major banks, including mortgage apps, SSN's, corporate planning documents, etc. Again, the files appeared to have been simply "deleted" by the IT folk, instead of securely wiped, making it trivial at best to read everything.

    So while this example is no better, I believe it highlights an ongoing problem that involves better user education and disk encryption helps solve.

  4. Little OT Anecdote by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used to work for a major OEM whose clients included the military, along with other branches of the US government. The military in particular had a "strict" policy about hard drives: they did NOT RMA them EVER. If a PC of theirs was to be returned or sent in for service, it arrived without the hard drive.

    What's the point of such strict policy towards your supplier if some dumbass from within will just pawn it off on Ebay?? It's not the first time this happens.

  5. Re:Scary that they sold the disk at all by s0litaire · · Score: 3, Informative

    i'd use "dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda" Urandom is slower but better..

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  6. For Highly Classified Data, it's more than a wipe by sirwired · · Score: 3, Informative

    I worked in a highly classified facility once. The wipe "standard" was to hire a lowly intern (such as myself), remove the platters from the case, take them out back, and sandblast them. The agencies scientists had decided degaussing wasn't good enough.

    SirWired

  7. Re:Scary that they sold the disk at all by rongage · · Score: 5, Informative

    Modern drives have "servo tracks" on them - used for setting the head position. If you use an eraser powerful enough to wipe the drive, then the servo track is most likely also wiped - rendering the drive totally useless to most folk.

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
  8. Re:Scary that they sold the disk at all by samos69 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yup, we just purchased a Verity degausser to wipe some drives before donating them to charity and have found that the servo track is wiped and they become completely useless... £1800 wasted, but it's damn fun to wipe things with!