Slashdot Mirror


Repairman Steals Hard Drive And Charges To Reinstall It

Phase 1: Break into a realty office, and steal a computer hard drive.

Phase 2: Ask if they will pay you $50 to fix the computer.

Phase 3: Get charged with theft and receiving stolen property!

181 comments

  1. I Wonder How That Conversation Went by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    "So, uh, I heard your computer wouldn't start because it's missing a hard drive. This is very common in our neighborhood. You're lucky though, I happen to be fully bonded and certified at returning computers without hard drives to their normal working states ... "

    Michael Scott could see through that.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happens with car batteries all the time. Steal the battery, wait in repair shop down the road to help customer who has had their battery stolen.

    2. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quantum RAID with drive level parity.

      Allows you to recover from the complete disappearance of your drive, and any new drive you choose to buy, will have all your data on it.

    3. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quantum RAID with drive level parity.

      Allows you to recover from the complete disappearance of your drive, and any new drive you choose to buy, will have all your data on it.

      The catch, you ask? You won't be certain your data is there until you look...

    4. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Police then discovered Lutes' car, with a computer repair sticker on the door, was seen parked in front of the office on the night of the break-in.

      Reminds me of that fantastic Christopher Walken quote from True Romance.

      Cocotti: They snatched my narcotics, and high-tailed it outta there. They would've got away with it, but your son, f**khead that he is, left HIS DRIVER'S LICENSE in the dead guy's hand.

    5. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Scott? More like Stevie Wonder.

    6. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you own a Prius, you can easily spot the thief from their hernia operation scar.

    7. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Golddess · · Score: 1

      The difference, of course, being that the "new" battery has no "data" to speak of, any car battery of the same specifications would get your car rolling again just as well.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    8. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Romancer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quotes from this guys profile on skillwho.com:

      "i am here to help with all computer related needs, anything that needs done can be done."

      I guess anything really means anything.

      http://www.skillwho.com/users/computers/pa/bethlehem/kevin-lutes/43e1a4e7-eea7-4516-bbbf-61ee2bd5e9e6//

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    9. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 3, Informative

      A girl in my dormitory dropped her computer and destroyed her hard drive. Being the CS guru that I am, I assured her I could fix it... sans harddrive. She had already sent the Harddrive back to the manufacturer. There was now a gaping hole in the bottom of her laptop where her harddrive used to be. I told her I could STILL get it to work.

      "But there's no harddrive!"
      "Don't worry, I can fix it."

      So I take her USB drive, load DAMN SMALL LINUX on it, plug it into her computer, and voila! You should have seen the look on her face when I booted up Mozilla and had Facebook running on a computer without a harddrive.
      The media likes to portray us geeks as sorcerers, and sometimes, you can see why.

      She's back on the internet, she's got webmail, she's got facebook, she's got text editors, she's got practically everything she needs for school. (Naturally, I ask her if she's doing anything later, and of course she's 'busy.' Oh well.)

    10. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      ALthough, that catch applies to everything. I'm not sure there is milk in my fridge until I look. Actually, there probably is, maybe expired... I don't know.

      --
      signature is pants
    11. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Erikderzweite · · Score: 2, Funny

      >The catch, you ask? You won't be certain your data is there until you look...

      Also known an Schroedinger disk.

    12. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Quantum RAID with drive level parity.

      Great -- except that now they'll take all the drives, not just the one.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    13. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'd bet that a lot of people wouldn't know the hard drive is missing.

      Victim: "My computer won't start. I turn it on and the screen is black and it says 'No boot disk found.' Can you fix it?" (The average layperson doesn't know what that error message means, remember.)

      Crook: "Sure, but it will take me about a week. I'll throw in a discount for you, too - just $50/hr instead of $100/hr."

      Michael Scott would probably fall for that one.

    14. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you own a Prius, you ain't spotting anything over that dashboard or back deck without a periscope.

    15. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 4, Funny

      ya shoulda gone with Damn Large Linux instead, cuz now she just thinks all your equipment is Damn Small. Either that or you smell like elderberrys.

    16. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Names like "Damn small Linux", "USB stick" and such, doesn't allow a CS geek to operate *his* "harddrive" at its full potential...

      We're punishing ourselves by choosing wrong names for gadgets...

    17. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Say, that's a nice hard drive you got there.

      Be a shame if something happened to it.

    18. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Naturally, I ask her if she's doing anything later, and of course she's 'busy.' Oh well.

      At least you know what to say next time she comes around with a IT problem. Don't forget to make a slight pauze in your speech, as if you're trying to remember her exact words, just before you say the word 'busy' with a smug yet subtle smirk on your face.

    19. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Naturally, I ask her if she's doing anything later, and of course she's 'busy.' Oh well.)

      Your mistake IMO was to ask her after you fixed her laptop. It then made the offer seem like a transaction (fixing computer = sex!) which is unlikely to inspire anyone unless they're desperate. Plus, being too nice doesn't help either.

    20. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you call yourself a geek? Where is cron task that will disable her computer after a while, so she cant USE you? Or at least not for free...

    21. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have made the deal with her ahead of time

      us geeks have to use our skills to get the upper hand

    22. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by torkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why you BET her you can fix it. Bet her dinner - her treat. That not only guarantees you a free meal but the date you were denied as well.

      You'd think a CS guru would know a bit about social engineering ;)

      Magic should have it's uses!

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    23. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by itwerx · · Score: 1

      Is that the milk Schroedinger's cat drank? (Or did it?)
      You are in a maze of twisty little analogies, all alike...

    24. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cocotti: They snatched my narcotics, and high-tailed it outta there. They would've got away with it, but your son, f**khead that he is, left HIS DRIVER'S LICENSE in the dead guy's hand.

      This reminds me of an incident that happened in my family.

      One morning, around two o'clock, some drunk lost it and crashed into the house where my daughter and son-in-law were living. Aside from totaling the Explorer parked outside, he nailed the space between that place and the one next door.

      So he backs up and heads down the street. A neighbor across the street, just arriving home, chased the guy until the cops could pick him up.

      It turns out the bozo had a camper shell on his truck. The impact popped out (onto the ground) the side window of the shell, including the taped-on "For Sale" sign, complete with the bozo's phone number.

      My son-in-law considered calling the number the next morning and saying, "I'm calling about the truck you have for sale. Oops, I forgot -- I already own it."

    25. Re:I Wonder How That Conversation Went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

  2. Summary error... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 5, Informative

    He charged $50 an hour. For 40 hours of "work".

    --
    My sig can beat up your sig.
    1. Re:Summary error... by curtix7 · · Score: 1

      i was gonna say, seems like a lot of work for 50 bucks

    2. Re:Summary error... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      $2,000 makes it a better read. People are thinking, "How poor are the people in this town that they would risk imprisonment for $50?"

    3. Re:Summary error... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How did he charge for 40 hours of work in that time frame?
      The article date it May 5th. The break in happened April 28th (Tuesday). They called him and had him come in the next day, April 29th (Wednesday). If he returned in Friday (May 1st) then that means he worked 13 hours a day for 3 days. Of course you have to take into account the time he picked it up and office hours for bringing it back on Friday. It just doesn't work out or he one dedicated guy.

    4. Re:Summary error... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      You know, I've heard the guy called a lot of things, but "smart" just wasn't one of them...

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    5. Re:Summary error... by pla · · Score: 1

      seems like a lot of work for 50 bucks

      I've taken machines from boxes-o'-shrinkwrapped-parts to running XP in under an hour or actual work (I wouldn't count the two "click once then go away for half an hour" steps as billable work unless they failed for some reason on the first try and I needed to babysit it). I'd feel bad about trying to charge a full hour for just that part...

      And as for the file recovery, you generally have two situations - Either the old HDD works just fine (except for a broken Windows install) and you just need to copy it over to the new one, or no one has any shot of recovering it. So another hour, tops.

    6. Re:Summary error... by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Hey, there were THREE lines in the summary...at least one was bound to be wrong......

    7. Re:Summary error... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2, Informative

      seems like a lot of work for 50 bucks I've taken machines from boxes-o'-shrinkwrapped-parts to running XP in under an hour or actual work (I wouldn't count the two "click once then go away for half an hour" steps as billable work unless they failed for some reason on the first try and I needed to babysit it). I'd feel bad about trying to charge a full hour for just that part... And as for the file recovery, you generally have two situations - Either the old HDD works just fine (except for a broken Windows install) and you just need to copy it over to the new one, or no one has any shot of recovering it. So another hour, tops.

      Err... did you read the article? I think the parent poster was referring to the work of breaking into the realty office and removing the hard drive in the first place.
      The thief didn't have to recover any data, all he needed to do was simply reinstall the hard drive he stole, but going to the trouble of breaking in and stealing it would be a lot of hassle for just $50. (of course, that was not the case - he charged $2000)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    8. Re:Summary error... by narcc · · Score: 1

      So you wouldn't even TRY to recover the data from a damaged partition? Lazy.

    9. Re:Summary error... by philipgar · · Score: 1

      you've apparently never been to south bethlehem...

    10. Re:Summary error... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.

      It looks like the "new-geek-squad-terms-of-service dept." needs to graduate from the "learn-how-to-do-your-grade-school-multiplication-again."

    11. Re:Summary error... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That is why you make your money selling the "full package" treatment.I take those couple of hundred bucks worth of parts and sell it for $500 and have customers sending their family and friends to get boxes built from me. Why? Because when you get an XP PC from me you get a "just flip the switch and go" solution.

      First I find out what they are going to use it for and tailor the hardware to their requirements. Then when they power it on the find it has antivirus and spybot already installed and set to do their nightly scans and updates when they aren't using it, they have Oxygen Office and Gnucash already to go for any office work they need to do, they have Firefox with ABP already installed for ad free web browsing, they have Klite Mega Codec pack so any video format they run into "just works" out of the box, I give them Songbird for their music needs, and if they bring the discs for anything proprietary they own(cameras, printers, etc) i install that too. That way when they get home all they do is "plug in and go" and they are quite happy to pay for that convenience.

      So it is all about providing that extra bit of effort, adding that extra value. Of course they don't need to know that thanks to Almeza Multiset, or as I like to call it the PC guy's little helper, it is all pretty much "stick in the disc, hit go and go have a smoke" but what matters to them is that they don't have to fool with it. No hours installing stuff, or dealing with crapware, they just flip the switch and enjoy. So if you feel bad about charging for the time pick up a copy of Almeza, make you a few unattended CDs with it, and then offer Packages with your repairs. You'd be surprised how many folks are happy to pay to have the PC just "do what they want" out of the box with no fuss. And it will give your customers a reason to rave about you to their friends/family/coworkers. And more business in this economy is always a good thing ;-)

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:Summary error... by anagama · · Score: 1

      He should have just overwritten the MBR. He'd still get the work, but the computer manufacturer would not have pointed out the impossibility of recovering data from a non-existent drive.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    13. Re:Summary error... by SCPRedMage · · Score: 1

      I doubt that idiot had ever HEARD of the master boot record, let alone know what it is.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
  3. How to tell when someone is screwing with you... by Morphine007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... they tell you that they can retrieve the files that you had on the hard-drive that was just stolen from your office.

    /facepalm

  4. Phase 4: ??? by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Phase 5: Profit!

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  5. mcall? by Thornburg · · Score: 1

    How often does a story on the Morning Call get posted to slashdot?

    This would be like reading about the construction on Route 309 in the Wall Street Journal, or something...

    (I'm from the Lehigh Valley, in case that wasn't clear).

    1. Re:mcall? by CajunArson · · Score: 1

      The crime's in Bethlehem and it probably won't be making any other papers either. And the construction is usually on 22 (and has been since about 1950) but that tends to back up 309... another story entirely.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    2. Re:mcall? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't know, Emeril is opening his first restaurant in the Northeast at the Sands casino going up in Bethlehem.

      Yeah, I know. I had the same opinion.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:mcall? by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      How often does a story on the Morning Call get posted to slashdot?

      That just what I was thinking! One would imagine it would be on the Express Times. Wow...so /. has more Lehigh Valley folk than I thought.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    4. Re:mcall? by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Rated you up because you're from the LV, and I gotta support my droogs. The best part about it is that its one less technician to compete with. Good riddance to bad rubbish. Speaking of which, I've got to call them tonight and offer up my repair services.

    5. Re:mcall? by coobal · · Score: 1

      Always nice to see the Valley get represented. I'll have to watch out for his resume.

  6. Re:A Bethlehem Computer Repairman? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

    Bethlehem PA brotha.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  7. Charges filed... by Chabo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's what I'm curious about: how did he get charged with theft and receiving stolen property?

    Was it just that he had possession of the stolen property, so they knew that one would stick, so it was a lesser included offense, just in case they couldn't prove the theft?

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    1. Re:Charges filed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably can't prove that he was the one to break in and steal the hard drive.

      I would hope no jury would find him guilty of both. When I had to do jury duty (didn't try to get out of it) I was scared straight. To think that those 11 people could be between me and freedom was a sobering thought.

    2. Re:Charges filed... by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      Actually, he could probably be convicted for both if it was proven that he didn't break in, but instead commissioned the theft. I don't think there's a "Conspiracy to thieve" charge, so they went for the next best. Thus, he's the proximate cause of the theft, and received the stolen property.

      Granted, that's all *really* convoluted. So it'd probably never happen.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    3. Re:Charges filed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here's what I'm curious about: how did he get charged with theft and receiving stolen property?

      Was it just that he had possession of the stolen property, so they knew that one would stick, so it was a lesser included offense, just in case they couldn't prove the theft?

      He stole a camera too...

    4. Re:Charges filed... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Here's what I'm curious about: how did he get charged with theft and receiving stolen property?

      He stole it, then sold it to himself.

      He was also charged with sexual assualt, of himself, because when they picked him up he was looking at porn.

    5. Re:Charges filed... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think there's a "Conspiracy to thieve" charge, so they went for the next best.

      That's why it's simply "Criminal Conspiracy". That way it can be paired with any crime.

      Perhaps they just can't prove whether he had conspirators or worked alone.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:Charges filed... by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      See, this is what I get for being Canadian. Most of my US Criminal Law knowledge comes from Law & Order, and early teenhood spend reading various law sites in a vague interest to becoming a lawyer.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    7. Re:Charges filed... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      He was also charged with sexual assualt, of himself, because when they picked him up he was looking at porn.

      No, that was consentful by way of a handshake agreement.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    8. Re:Charges filed... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      This is why you'll sometimes see murder suspects charged with 1st degree, 2nd degree, and manslaughter for one dead body. It gives the jury the option to choose which charge they think actually applies based on the evidence.

    9. Re:Charges filed... by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Theft is taking something for your own that legally belongs to someone else.

      Receiving stolen property is selling or attempting to sell property that you know or believe to be stolen. If you're in the business of buying/selling used goods, you must take due diligence to ensure that either the item isn't stolen, or that the person that sold it to you can be found if need be.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    10. Re:Charges filed... by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      He is being charged in the alternative. Either he stole the hard drive himself, in which case, he would be a thief, or he receive the stolen hard drive from a third-party culprit, in which case, he would be a receiver of stolen merchandise.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    11. Re:Charges filed... by RabidTimmy · · Score: 1

      I think they mean that he was only charged with theft. The receiving stolen property charge was leveled against the realty office for accepting their stolen hard drive.

    12. Re:Charges filed... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      People are not charged with illegally receiving their own property. (I don't know if they can be, but they aren't.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  8. Re:A Bethlehem Computer Repairman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lame

  9. Re:A Bethlehem Computer Repairman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bethlehem PA brotha.

    Oh? How far away from that is Bird-In-Hand, PA?

  10. And it would have worked too. by UseCase · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it weren't for those meddling kids!!!!

    1. Re:And it would have worked too. by Abreu · · Score: 1

      ...and their dog!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  11. $2K by JoeF · · Score: 1

    From TFA, he wanted to charge $50 per hour for 40 hours.

  12. Re:Phase 4: ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phase 4 is: Review your math skills and realize that $50/hr x 40hrs = $2,000 not $50.

  13. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they tell you that they can retrieve the files that you had on the hard-drive that was just stolen from your office.

    /facepalm

    P.S. I'll sell you your hard drive, er, I mean a hard drive similar to yours with all your files on it...uh.. well how much will you pay me for your hard drive? :)

  14. he could have swung it if.... by goffster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He replaced good hard drive with
    a bad hard drive when he stole it.

    1. Re:he could have swung it if.... by CDOS_CDOS+run · · Score: 1

      The kicker is the office probably didn't notice the missing hard drive, he probably told them. He didn't even need to leave a dummy HDD, he just needed to shut up. {of course this is conjecture}

    2. Re:he could have swung it if.... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Hey, now I know why I've been hanging onto that hard drive that spews SMART errors. I knew there was a good reason to hang onto it.

    3. Re:he could have swung it if.... by foxx1337 · · Score: 1

      maybe he didn't have one handy

  15. How do a idle story go on to the main page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And without an idle logo?

    Just curious.

  16. He should have put in a blank hard drive by pfunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He should have replaced the hard drive with a blank formatted hard drive. Then when the realty office tried to start the system and it wouldn't boot, take the computer back to his office or shop and retrieve the "lost" data.

    1. Re:He should have put in a blank hard drive by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      Look, if the guy was smart enough to think of something like that - he undoubtedly wouldn't be doing stupid stuff like stealing a HDD and trying to sell it back to the folks he stole it from for 2 large.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    2. Re:He should have put in a blank hard drive by damburger · · Score: 1

      Criminal? Yes. Greedy? Yes. Stupid? No.

      Pulled off correctly this would be a very lucrative scam. Scrap all the repairman shit - just openly steal drives from businesses without a good backup policy, and demand ransom.

      This guy didn't have the brains, organisation, or discipline for that though.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    3. Re:He should have put in a blank hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too stupid if it works....

    4. Re:He should have put in a blank hard drive by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Based on the comments in the article, he'd already done it at least once and it worked. The only reason it didn't work this time is that the owner of the company called the manufacturer (probably Dell) to ask if the guy could recover the data based on the error message. They said "no way" and the owner called the cops. They checked the camera and found dumb-asses car with his company info on it. Yea, he was an idiot but it did work.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:He should have put in a blank hard drive by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Don't companies already do this? (well, without the active theft part)

      Data recovery, transfer, and backup are all very lucrative!

    6. Re:He should have put in a blank hard drive by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Here's the funny thing - Dell was right by luck alone - or they had the customer pull the side panel to verify the drive was there/missing.

      That error can also happen when (yes, they are rarer cases - but they do happen):

      - A cable comes loose on a drive (seen it happen)

      - A disk controller dies

      - A BIOS setting gets "horrendously" screwed up (ie: IDE/SATA port shut off - I've bought older boards where that's the default - and I've had BIOS's that have reset themselves).

      - A SATA/IDE cable goes (severely) bad.

      - A channel on a "multi-channel" power supply dies (the one that the drive is on)

      Of course, as I noted, those are a more rare cause of that message... or are they? Perhaps the number of drives that fail in one of those ways is actually greater than the number of drives stolen?

      Wouldnt it (not) be funny if the controller on the drive died, and this guy simply replaced the drive and restored a backup he made when he was last there (and charged a fortune)? Or the controller died and he pulled a working one from the same model drive and replaced the dead one?

      OK, maybe it's not likely... but then again, they dont seem sure they can even prove he stole the drive to begin with...

      I wonder what the rest of the details in this are. Yeah, he's probably guilty... but there are other possibilities to this. I'd say they may end up needing a bit more proof than that his car was in the parking lot.

    7. Re:He should have put in a blank hard drive by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      If the on-drive controller of an IDE/ATA drive fails completely, it can look to the interface on the motherboard as if the drive is completely missing, too. It's rare these days, but I'm guessing it's still possible.

      We used to have to make up WD Diag error codes to get Dell to give warranty RMAs on drives that worked one day and then just couldn't even be detected. The replacement drives worked fine hooked to the same port with the same cable. The drives were just... dead. No read/write errors, no SMART errors, no bad sectors, and no controller reports. One morning a system wouldn't boot, and the BIOS nor the diagnostic software could tell there was a hard drive present. It was a real problem with Western Digital 6 to 8 GB drives in certain Dell Optiplex business desktops. Some went through three or four drives while under warranty.

      Before that time range and after, I've never had much problem with Western Digital drives. I've always wondered if the systems were providing them with insufficiently controlled voltage or current, but we couldn't bill the customer for that kind of test when replacing the drives under warranty and restoring their disk image got the systems working.

  17. Pennsylvanian Humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A Sunday School teacher asks a boy where Jesus was born. The boy answers "Allentown." The teacher corrects him, "No, it was Bethlehem." The boy replies, "Well, I knew it was some place along Rt. 22"

  18. Article comments are good too by Bigbutt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the comments are good too. "yeah, he did the same thing at another company, we just didnt report him. he will be reported now." and the link to his meetup page, "am looking for a new way to improve my business"

    You couldn't make stuff up this good.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
    1. Re:Article comments are good too by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      Haha, he even helped the police by providing a mugshot.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Article comments are good too by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you look at another of his profiles, it has a picture of his company's logo.

      I think I know what the problem is.... The mouse, is connected to the monitor.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    3. Re:Article comments are good too by internerdj · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm willing to consult to him on his business model. I'll charge him $2000 a week.

    4. Re:Article comments are good too by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Heh, "have great interest in helping others with many things that they can't figure out for themselves",

    5. Re:Article comments are good too by iceOlate · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Notice also that he has only ONE friend (which is the default friend for SkillWho, which basically means NO friends, no recommendations, and no friends on his meetup page. He has no references, and I'm sure what he refers to as his education is complete BS as well. In this business, reputation is VERY important, and he had none, and now he'll be lucky if anyone will hire his dishonest dumb ass anywhere... I don't know why anyone would have hired him in the first place. Piece of shit got what was coming to him...

    6. Re:Article comments are good too by scheme · · Score: 1

      I think I know what the problem is.... The mouse, is connected to the monitor.

      Huh? Quite a few people have usb mice that are connected to their computers using the usb hub on their monitors.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    7. Re:Article comments are good too by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      iMac sitting on coffee table?

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    8. Re:Article comments are good too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes... my mouse is connected to my monitor.

      Hello, USB.

    9. Re:Article comments are good too by un1quen1ck · · Score: 0, Troll

      Karma burning flamebait for M$ fanbois follows...: This poor guy is not challenged in one way only....: " Resume Work Experience: Have own my own computer consulting firm for the " LOL! "....Education: Degree in computer science, mcse, ccna, microsoft" ROFL! oem system builder, microsoft partner, cisco " ROFLMAO!!! "Organizations / Affilations: Recommendations from Other Members Currently, this member has no recommendations. " Oh, and I thought MCSEs were THE ueberpros....

  19. Well, hold on there.... by raehl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...wouldn't incompetent jurors favor a criminal career path?

    If jurors are competent, innocent people would remain free and guilty people would go to prison.

    If jurors are not competent, sometimes innocent people will go to prison and sometimes guilty people will go free.

    so, the more incompetent jurors are, the lower the penalty for criminal behavior.

    1. Re:Well, hold on there.... by Ceiynt · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of it has to do with the quality of the lawyers silver tongue as well.

    2. Re:Well, hold on there.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, the more incompetent jurors are, the lower the penalty for criminal behavior.

      I think your logic is simplistic.

      What is "criminal behavior"? I'm not sure that this term, as commonly used, actually means committing crimes. It certainly has no legal significance.

      While legally we are innocent or guilty of specific crimes, not all innocent people are equally likely to be brought before a jury or found guilty by an incompetent jury.

      The knowledge that juries are incompetent may make it more wise/important to appear "straight" - avoid physical proximity to crimes, "criminal behavior", association with "sketchy" people, etc. even if you are a completely law-abiding citizen. And it may make it more wise to avoid committing lesser crime A that can be mistaken by an incompetent jury for greater crime B.

  20. Criminal masterminds... by Ogive17 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reminds me of the (somewhat) local story I read this morning. A man shop lifted a bunch of clothes from a department store, on is way out he stopped at the front desk to fill out a job application. Sure enough he listed his real information. When the cops showed up he was busy putting away all the stuff he had just walked out with.

    He beeped on his way through the door but still was allowed to leave (those things beep so often most employees probably ignore them now). If he didn't give them his personal information, he probably would've gotten away with it.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    1. Re:Criminal masterminds... by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 0

      What? He stole clothes, but put them back, so what did he steal? He set off the alarm but was allowed to leave so how did he get away? Are all of your local news reports in zen koan form?

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    2. Re:Criminal masterminds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A retail store I worked in had an unwritten policy that they will take a return on items without receipts and give store credit in the amount of the lowest price the item has been on sale in the last 3 months. One day I saw a person pick up an item from the shelf, walk over to the Customer Service desk and attempt to return the item for store credit. We grabbed him, Police was called but since this man swore up and down that the item was his and he just didn't have proof of purchase he got to leave scott free. On the bright side, Police confiscated the item until he provided proof of purchase within 30 days (he never did and we got the item back) but I have no doubt he had gotten away with it many times before.

    3. Re:Criminal masterminds... by rts008 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? He stole clothes, but put them back, so what did he steal? He set off the alarm but was allowed to leave so how did he get away?

      Apparently he stole your reading comprehension.

      He never said anything about the guy 'putting them back', you fabricated that one all by yourself.

      He set off the alarm but was allowed to leave so how did he get away?

      He got away by leaving.

      Are all of your local news reports in zen koan form?

      I'm pretty sure you have no clue what a 'zen koan' actually is.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:Criminal masterminds... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      No, you just rolled a 1 on your reading comprehension check. It made perfect sense.

      Man takes clothes from rack. On way to exit he stops to fill out job app. Heads for exit. Stolen clothes beep at door. Employee lets him leave. Afterwords, employee realizes he was dumb, calls cops, sends them to address listed on job application. Cops get to his house while he's putting stolen clothes in his closet.

      Simple enough?

    5. Re:Criminal masterminds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was at his house putting the stuff up. He listed his real address on the job application.

    6. Re:Criminal masterminds... by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

      The OP gives a very unclear description of the events.
      When the cops showed up he was busy putting away all the stuff he had just walked out with.
      I take "just walked out with" to mean "just walked out of the store". After re-reading the account for the 3rd time, I figured he was "putting away all the stuff" into his car parked just outside the store.

    7. Re:Criminal masterminds... by cwiegmann24 · · Score: 1

      Or the cops showed up at his house, where he was putting away all the clothes he stole. Perhaps into a dresser.

    8. Re:Criminal masterminds... by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Apparently he stole your reading comprehension.

      He never said anything about the guy 'putting them back', you fabricated that one all by yourself.

      When the cops showed up [at the store] he was busy putting away[^H^H^H^H back on the shelves] all the stuff he had just walked out with.

      When the cops showed up [at the man's house] he was busy putting away all the stuff he had just walked out with [into his dresser/closet].

      Pick one

      I'm pretty sure you have no clue what a 'zen koan' actually is.

      From Wikipedia: A koan is a story, dialogue, question, or statement in the history and lore of Zen Buddhism, generally containing aspects that are inaccessible to rational understanding, yet may be accessible to intuition.

      I think GP got it about right, in that GGP's post was not quite complete enough to warrant rational understanding, but, with varying perspective, could be taken a number of ways.

    9. Re:Criminal masterminds... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Or, given that the address mentioned on the job application was stated as the reason he was caught....see what I already said.

      It wasn't unclear. A bit convoluted. But perfectly clear.

    10. Re:Criminal masterminds... by mrbene · · Score: 1
      Context:

      A man shop lifted a bunch of clothes from a department store, on is way out he stopped at the front desk to fill out a job application.

      Both the text shop lifted and on is way out indicate that he left the store. IE, if I go into a department store, pick up a bunch of clothes, fill out an application, then put the clothes back on the shelf, I will not have shoplifted.

      Additionally, the text putting away is slightly more likely to indicate "to put in a new location" rather than "to return to the original location", and had just walked out with fairly strongly indicates that he has left the store. I disagree that the original post lacked enough information to generate a rational understanding of the situation. I agree that it could have been more clearly related, to reduce the onus on the reader to understand complete context.

    11. Re:Criminal masterminds... by lord+sibn · · Score: 1

      Lots of places (like mine) offer a financial incentive of a few dollars to respond to the pedestal giving that warning "BEEP" sound. However, there are rules to follow as well. Do not chase a customer. Do not accuse a customer. Do not follow a customer out of the building. And under no circumstances, ever imply that the beeping is a result of theft. Even if the person openly stealing stuff, offer to deactivate the tag that set off the alarm and let them go.

      This is like a lock on your front door - it serves only to keep honest people honest.

      The thing I think is actually funny is that the employee door is also a fire exit; and that alarm goes off all the time. So if there is ever a fire, nobody will look up or care.

    12. Re:Criminal masterminds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He beeped on his way through the door but still was allowed to leave (those things beep so often most employees probably ignore them now).

      Let's put you in their shoes.

      Two possibilities: Could be a faulty sensor, the person walking out is going to be kind of pissed off when you accuse them of shoplifting. Or, it could be someone trying to openly steal shit from your store and that person isn't going to pay any attention to you anyway.

      The correct response is to ignore it, maybe wave them on out if they look confused. And let the security camera keep rolling.

    13. Re:Criminal masterminds... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what all the fuss is about, makes perfect sense to me! :)

      After reading what I wrote a second time, I'd agree it's not the best post. The problem was I wrote something, then I switched to a work email before coming back to finish the post. I do that often...

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  21. Pic by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    Look at the moron, I doubt he is smart enough to know how they caught up with them. The bad thing is others said he did the same to them...but was not reported. http://www.meetup.com/referralweb/members/7717367/photos/

  22. SlashFark by rindeee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, so Slashdot is trying to be snarky like Fark these days. It's kind of like that one kids dad who picks him up at school wearing baggy pants and a hoodie. It not only doesn't work, it's embarrassing for those who have to see it.

    1. Re:SlashFark by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Mostly it just makes him look like either a pedophile or a serial killer.

    2. Re:SlashFark by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      You are completely right. Up untill today, Slashdot has been the paragon of anti-snark.

    3. Re:SlashFark by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      It's kind of like that one kids dad who picks him up at school wearing baggy pants and a hoodie. It not only doesn't work, it's embarrassing for those who have to see it.

      Mostly it just makes him look like either a pedophile or a serial killer.

      Mostly it makes him look just as stupid as all the kids wearing baggy pants and a hoodie.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
  23. Error of scale by sjames · · Score: 2, Funny

    He had the right idea, but got the scale wrong.

    Had he stolen 1 MILLION hard drives and then demanded $2000 each to put them back, he would be "too big to fail" and then he would just have to give everyone a $1 off coupon on their next HD install.

    He could have done worse though. Had he hacked in and disabled the drive remotely, he would be up for a MUCH longer sentence.

    1. Re:Error of scale by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      He could have done worse though. Had he hacked in and disabled the drive remotely, he would be up for a MUCH longer sentence.

      He could have done even worse. Imagine what would happed had he downloaded a Metallica MP3...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Error of scale by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      What if he'd stolen a hard drive full of Metallica MP3s?

      The mind boggles. He could have sold it back to them for trillions of dollars.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  24. Suddenly, I understand why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my computer repair business isn't making enough money to pay me minimum wage!

  25. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Well... check the current state of your genitals and orifices: that will certaintly provide some clues.

    --
    NO SIG
  26. Re:Phase 4: ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    no Phase 5: getting butt-raped in jail by tito

  27. Re:A Bethlehem Computer Repairman? by Sinning · · Score: 0

    Approximately 80 miles Bethlehem to Bird-In-Hand

  28. every time I see this type of comment I think: by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear AskSlashdot:

    I am planning on stealing Hordware/software/company secrets/customers from my company/boss/girlfriend(mother)/government, but I don't want to get caught because that's bad. What's my best course of action and is there anything I should look out for?

    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    1. Re:every time I see this type of comment I think: by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you're stealing customers from your girlfriend...can I have her number?

    2. Re:every time I see this type of comment I think: by damien_kane · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you're stealing customers from your girlfriend...can I have her number?

      You want him to steal you too?

    3. Re:every time I see this type of comment I think: by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to make a joke about dead hookers and floorboards here, but then I decided I like not having to explain macabre humor to the FBI.

  29. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    And without coming up with some technobabble that the data was still present in the interface buffer and you just need to subject the system to your multiphasic polydynamic transducer to get it to flush the buffer to the new drive to recover all the files.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  30. reminds me of the liquor store thief video by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    ...on Youtube.

  31. Re:A Bethlehem Computer Repairman? by FiloEleven · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why go to Bird-In-Hand when you can go through Intercourse to get to Paradise? Too close to Blue Ball?

  32. Re:Phase 4: ??? by damburger · · Score: 1

    wtf? He was fairly badass fighting the Nazis, but I'm fairly sure he is dead, and not in a US prison.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  33. stupidity or hubris? by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I hear stories like this, (and they are legion) I have to wonder if the tech was really that stupid, or did he believe that a lack of computer expertise in his customers meant they were that stupid. Speaking as a geek, I've noticed a tendency among a (fortunately small) subset of geeks to believe that having a deep expertise in one area makes them generally more competent in everything, including areas completely out of their expertise, like, say, crime.

    When I was in college, two roommates apparently had such a misunderstanding, which led to a "foolproof plan" to pay off their student loans and retire in geek luxury. Their criminal career lasted a mere 24 hours. I still have the front page showing them spread-eagled against a cop car.

    Sometimes I wonder if extreme geeks -- meaning not the truly hyper-intelligent, but the self-sequestered wannabes -- lacking normal social interaction, have less of an understanding of basic morals than the rest of us.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:stupidity or hubris? by iceOlate · · Score: 0

      He definitely lacked the social interaction skills, as you can see he has no friends, recommendations or references on his online profiles...

    2. Re:stupidity or hubris? by GrifterCC · · Score: 1

      Wut was teh foolproof plan??? I have studet loans aswell!!!

    3. Re:stupidity or hubris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college, two roommates apparently had such a misunderstanding, which led to a "foolproof plan" to pay off their student loans and retire in geek luxury.

      Details, please?

    4. Re:stupidity or hubris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? What was the plan? Don't leave us hanging; we might be able to perfect it!

    5. Re:stupidity or hubris? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      I'll second the "Details, please!" request, in case you've blocked AC's.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    6. Re:stupidity or hubris? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Sigh, alright. Let's call them Moe and Larry. I learned the details later, partly from the police report and partly from Moe when he got bailed out and came back to the apartment for his stuff.

      Larry worked in a big warehouse-type store, the kind where you pay for your purchase in one part of the store and then take your receipt to the stockroom entrance to receive your merchandise. Moe and Larry thought it was a really stupid system that just begged to be abused.

      Their foolproof plan was for Larry to fake a bunch of receipts, and Moe to take them to the stockroom and collect the merchandise. They didn't have a clear plan to fence the stuff, but thought it should be a simple matter for two smart guys to find a way to sell the products they didn't keep and use the funds to pay off their college debts, set themselves up in a house furnished by the rest of the stolen goods, and live like kings.

      This was in the days before ubiquitous CCTV, but even then, they had apparently never heard of inventory control, or that there was only a few people who had access to the forms, or that the store could narrow down to the shift what time the shortages had occurred, or that the stockroom would notice that one guy (Moe) was apparently buying a quarter million in merchandise a few thousand at a time. Or even, apparently, that the forms were numbered.

      My understanding is that during the investigation, Larry was questioned and released, and then he and Moe spent a hair-raising evening run along a lonely country road tossing merchandise out of the truck. This ingenious plan to cover their tracks, sadly, was not sufficient, and they were arrested the next day.

      I lost track of them after that, but heard later that they had figured out the flaw in their plan, and decided that the thing to do was to pull one big caper instead of a lot of small ones. Their new plan was to rent a van, break into the warehouse, load up, drive far far away to a different state, fence the goods, pay off their tuition, and live like kings. I understand their next arrest was courtesy the FBI. I can't imagine they're any more gentle than the local cops.

      As far as I know, Moe and Larry are currently two really smart guys in orange jumpsuits.

      Parenthetically, "white collar" crime was surprisingly common in college. In those days student loans were easy to come by, and it was pathetically simple to run up huge debts while partying your college days away. Sometime around junior or senior year, some of these geniuses came to the cold realization that they were in the bottom third of their class with a debt they couldn't pay off in their lifetime. Little surprise that the more opportunistic looked for a way to leverage their natural intelligence to fleece the proles. And then they found out society was more prepared than they expected.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:stupidity or hubris? by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      Good story. Thank you.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    8. Re:stupidity or hubris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just think this leaves no place for confusion or clichés: both the tech guy and your roommates were criminals. Criminals have a plethora of reasons to behave like criminals, geeks are no exception: lack of parental support, lack of money, lack of moral education, lack of principles... who cares ?
      I remember that in college, two guys stole TOEFL exams and broke into profesors property. Of course they were caught. They weren't less geeks than you and me.

    9. Re:stupidity or hubris? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      How is stealing from Ikea "fleecing the proles"?

      --
      Property is theft.
    10. Re:stupidity or hubris? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      It's the general rule that people who are very incompetent at something don't know they're incompetent, or even what competency looks like in others. There's a paper on that somewhere, I used to have it bookmarked.

      Crime has never been the exception.

      In fact, it's always sorta been the anti-exception, as people tend to interact with other people, and some of their knowledge will rub off and make them aware of how little they know. Like if I know an auto mechanic who talks about his job, I might become vaguely aware of how cars work and how little I know, and thus my estimation of my competency will go down.

      Criminals are the huge exception to that, as they obviously rarely openly discuss their jobs with non-criminals. Most people's understanding of crime comes from police procedural, which often hilariously over and understate the different way criminals get caught.

      So would-be criminals fail to realize that almost all crimes are solved simply by looking for the most obvious suspect, and poking around a bit to discover that, in fact, they did it. Seriously, something like 90% of solved crimes are just 'Okay, who had the motives, means, and opportunity to do this? Let's search his house. Hey, look, it's his bank-robbing outfit and the money.'

      They like to imagine they're living in some convoluted TV plot and wear gloves to keep from leaving 'DNA', when in actuality they parked their company car in the parking lot and got out on video cameras. If they had any basic interaction with criminals they'd know that, but it's all TV.

      I don't know if people who are more intelligent are prone to this more, or if they just choose different crime. The two guys you're talking about, if they were dumber, would have done something like tried to hide in the store after closing and walk out with the stuff...the method might change, the incompetency does not.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:stupidity or hubris? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      A rather large competency failure-mode in criminals is to assume that everyone is very very incompetent.

      The very very very first thing anyone should ask themselves before committing a crime is 'If I wished to prevent this crime, what would I have done?'.

      I mean, it seems such a basic first step.

      And the next step is 'If I wished to find out who committed this crime, what would I do?'.

      Not that criminals often know those things, it's often totally pathetic about how unaware they are of actual investigative procedure and that real life usually doesn't throw five red-herrings in front of the investigator like what happens on TV. Most criminal investigations are like L&O except the first guy they suspect is the right guy and there's no other suspects. Like a ten minute L&O.

      But you'd think they would at least be aware enough to ask the questions and attempt to answer them.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    12. Re:stupidity or hubris? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      When I was in college, two roommates apparently had such a misunderstanding, which led to a "foolproof plan" to pay off their student loans and retire in geek luxury. Their criminal career lasted a mere 24 hours. I still have the front page showing them spread-eagled against a cop car.

      Hey, stop teasing! Tell us the story - what was their plan? That sounds like it might be more interesting than this story.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    13. Re:stupidity or hubris? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      When you're a genius, the whole rest of the world are proles.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:stupidity or hubris? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Your sample space is made up entirely of the criminals who _did_ get caught. I'm pretty sure the successful ones aren't around to comment...

    15. Re:stupidity or hubris? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, the would be criminals who are clever enough to get away with it... don't make it into the papers, ever. Have a look some time what the 'write down' of any given company is, and you'll see quite scary numbers. I can tell you for sure that a large bank I work for goes through billions each year in fraud. Stuff that they cannot reclaim or take legal action over, even with their rather impressive mutual agreements with other banks for return of funds.
      That's crime, but it doesn't get reported or prosecuted, simply because ... they have no idea who did it and how.

    16. Re:stupidity or hubris? by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I didn't mean to imply that most criminals are this way.

      Maybe not even most caught criminals. Some are, indeed, caught after a lot of actual work tracking them down.

      I was just saying 'assuming no one else knows what they are doing' is a fairly large failure mode of criminals.

      Especially amateur, first-time criminals, who often fail to consider what basic security the victim could have. Like threatening people with a knife from ten feet away...if they have a gun, or even mace, that's rather stupid behavior. Or breaking into businesses at night without bothering to figure out if they have an alarm system.

      If there was a list of the origins of criminal's mistakes, that would be right at the top. 'Failed to consider what sort of basic steps someone who was trying to stop this crime would take'.

      And the same with getting caught afterwards. Like the moron in this story, who robbed a place, with video cameras, using a car with his company logo on it. 'Failed to consider the trivially easy way of figuring out if he did it or not.'

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  34. Proof Geeks are smart by J4 · · Score: 1

    Because only a geek would be stupid enough to think he could get away with it.

    The real equation

    Normal person == stupid
    Geek == normal person cognitive issues

    I hope he likes anal

  35. Sounds Vaguely Familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This case sounds a bit like the Florida Elections Commission charging for recounts.

  36. This was my companies business model by revjtanton · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm ruined...

    1. Re:This was my companies business model by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      You did patent your business methods, correct?, you should just sue him for imfringment.

  37. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't forget to modify the deflector dish.

    Hey does that mean that Geordi was actually working with the Borg? Seems like a bit of routine. The Borg attack. He modifies the deflector dish to do something clever. The Borg leave. I bet he deliberately caused all those problems with the holodeck too.

  38. A lesson to all: by Trojan35 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's amazing how many people that know something better than me--say, fixing a car or being a web developer--assume that they know everything better than me and everyone else in the world. Those people are the most dangerous stupid and if they don't have morals will often land in jail.

  39. Re:A Bethlehem Computer Repairman? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    Nazareth?

  40. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by Bigbutt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well the problem is that the people probably turned on the "appliance" and it didn't work. So they called their repair guy who said he could recover the data for them. He was able to scam them because they didn't know how the computer worked.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  41. Phase 4... by Handlarn · · Score: 1

    Phase 4: ???

    Phase 5: PROFIT!

  42. placing bets by voudras · · Score: 1

    I bet he is a+ certified

  43. From TFA: not $50, but $2000 by shrikel · · Score: 1

    He tried to charge them $50/hr for 40 hours. That's $2000, not $50.

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  44. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by Locutus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    come on now, this was a very intelligent computer owner, he called the computer manufacturer and asked if data could be recovered from a missing drive and they said no.

    The "repair man" probably did this to a few hundred other computer users before getting caught.

    Let me tell you a story. Some friends had a laptop which the husband said was running slow and that was a problem. I told him it was most like Windows XP and it just needed to be reinstalled because that's pretty common. He did nothing and about 2 weeks later I was back over there and booted the laptop with a Knoppix CD and it was nice a snappy. I even showed him Firefox loading pages. About a month or so later, he tells me his computer guru neighbor fixed his computer because it had a bad hard disk and now everything is nice a fast again. I ask if he reinstalled Windows and he looked at me blank faced. I then asked if the desktop background was different or if the browser bookmarks or homepage was different and he said yes. I told him that Windows was reinstalled and they probably didn't need a new hard disk. Most computer users are bumbling idiots and only know who to do what they do by trial and error without any understanding of the most basic concepts. That is what I see here in the USA.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  45. Idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have just unplugged the sata cable. The computer still doesn't start, but he's not left with hauling evidence in his car.

  46. True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for a company that shall remain nameless. Old computer components were disposed of in the dumpster. Whenever this occurred, one individual would "dive" for some of the components later that night. He gave the parts to a buddy of his who ran a computer company that already had a relationship with the company that disposed of the hardware. That individual would then resell the same components back to the same company as "new". Absolutely true. Probably happened a lot back then when components were pricey.

  47. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by DavidTC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are three kinds of computer repair people out there.

    There are the scam artists, who take a 'broken' computer, reformat the drive, spend five minutes starting a non-legal Windows install, and charge $500. And possibly with some imaginary added hardware costs tacked on too. Person gets a computer they're going to get spyware on six months and it will be messed again. Usually they don't resort to deliberately breaking computers, but who knows.

    And then there are the legit repair centers, who tend to take the easy way out, but at least they are honest. Most of the time the easy way is 'replace the computer' so people lose their data, though.

    Then there are the good guys, who sit down, don't reformat the drive, work for two hours installing AVG and Ad-Aware, give an hour of instruction during that, and think it's worth maybe $20 and a Coke from their fridge.

    All you good guys out there, start charging more. Honestly. You are not charging for work, you are charging for knowledge.

    Or think of it this way: The alternative to what you're doing is requires $200 of (legit) repairs or a $300 new computer. You can, indeed, change them $100 for that.

    Your time is not worth what you think it's worth. For you, half of it is a game, and the other half is satisfaction at a job well done, but you don't set the value for your time.

    Your time is worth what they think it's worth, and I assure you, you're a hell of a lot cheaper than the alternatives. (And provide better value, considering that half the time you're sitting fixing stuff you're providing a computer class in how to not have this happen again.)

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  48. Umm, I doubt it . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From his Skillwho page:

    Education:
    Degree in computer science, mcse, ccna, microsoft oem system builder, microsoft partner, cisco partner.

  49. Mmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He sounds like a Democrat politician.

  50. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

    Very very true... and you'll get high praise, recommendations to others, and repeat business. Many people would be surprised at how taking the time to explain how to prevent a problem, or how something happened (in terms a customer can understand) goes a long way when combined with honest, good service.

  51. Phase 4: PROFIT! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Get charged with theft and receiving stolen property!

    Well, now we finally know what "???" stands for. But it seems that the profit the guy hoped for didn't materialize.

  52. heh by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    Karma's a bitch.

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  53. profit? by arnodf · · Score: 1

    profit?

  54. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by ajmilton · · Score: 0

    Then there are the good guys, who sit down, don't reformat the drive, work for two hours installing AVG and Ad-Aware, give an hour of instruction during that, and think it's worth maybe $20 and a Coke from their fridge.

    All you good guys out there, start charging more. Honestly. You are not charging for work, you are charging for knowledge.

    I do. And they pay it happily once I explain that they're not losing any data. Although I haven't used Ad-Aware in a while, it got too bloated for me to want to use. Plus, their installer was all sorts of messed up the last few times I tried to install it.

  55. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by cojsl · · Score: 1

    he tells me his computer guru neighbor fixed his computer because it had a bad hard disk and now everything is nice a fast again.

    Did you test the hard drive? Your friend may well have had a good drive, and only needed a windows reinstall. The neighbor may have tested the drive, or came across bad sectors in the process of cloning the drive. Drives are so inexpensive compared to the labor required to reinstall a second time, that it's silly not to replace them if there's any sign of trouble.

  56. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by eekygeeky · · Score: 1

    This is categorically untrue. One does in fact set the value of one's time.

    You think you're worth $100/hour, you don't take $50. this is an iron law in service work from hairdressers to auto mechanics to software consultants.

    the client doesn't set your rates, or you'll work for free. YOU set your rates.

    whether or not you have accurately valued your skills, your market and your costs determines how much work you have.

    this is why so many, many, many geeks fail at businesses, esp. small businesses. You have no idea how stuff like this works and you end up working for free or or blowing your earnings out of the water with costs.

  57. Yeesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they wonder why geeks never get laid.

    With social skills like that I'm amazed even your hand comes anywhere near you.

  58. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by jabithew · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of neighbour tech support. They had a computer that wasn't working, they'd called MS and had hung up when they wanted £50. I went around and (eventually) worked out that a capacitor had blown on the graphics card, something an MS helpline could never have worked out. I told them which graphics card to get as a replacement and went home without charging a penny. Was pleasantly surprised to get a voucher for £20 through the letterbox.

    In retrospect that's underpayment, but they're good friends so I don't care.

    It made me very angry for the tech support line to try and charge them when they couldn't hope to fix the problem. It was obvious from the error message that the problem was with nVidia anyway.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  59. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by jabithew · · Score: 1

    Well, it's a market. So you and your clients come to a mutually acceptable value on your time. The issue at hand, though badly expressed, is still true; geeks have a habit of severely undervaluing our time and knowledge.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  60. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, us "good guys" are making you look like the greedy scum-sucking pig that you are....

  61. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by Christopher+Fritz · · Score: 1

    Although I agree with you very much, I'll mention that you can format the hard drive as a good guy, too. It's not something necessary in all cases, but there are some where it is.

    Consider a computer so flooded in Bad Stuff that all anti-virus software sites are blocked, and visiting any web site other than a popular search engine takes you to a spammer's web site made to look like a legitimate web site. (Example: You go to Yahoo, put in a search for hsn.com, then click the first link, for HSN's web site, and you instead end up at a car sales web site which isn't really a legit car cales web site, but it -looks- legit. Note that the user of this computer is an older user, and has very little computer knowledge, although there's been a lot of self-taught progress over time.)

    Now you get to this computer, and you can't download any anti-virus software, or AdAware, Spybot, etc. No problem, they're either on a thumb drive you always carry around, or you can download them via your laptop. Only, when you go to install them, they're being blocked from installing by something.

    At this point, I see two options: 1) Spend more time than it's worth trying to clean the computer, or 2) Move all the user's files to an external hard drive, format the hard drive, reinstall Windows (which is easy when there's a Windows XP recovery partition on the hard drive), then re-create the users and return their files to where they should be.

    While "repairing" computer software issues isn't "what I do" commonly, it's something I do from time to time. I definitely undervalue what I do, but I let it be known what it would cost to take the computer in to a repair shop, etc., and that typically makes the computer's owner realize that they're saving a -lot- of money with my services, so they're willing to pay more than they might have otherwise. (And it's legit, as they -are- saving a lot.) I like to give them a price range, such as "$50 to $150, depending on what it's worth to you to be able to do such-and-such with your computer again", so they realize right away that $10 isn't going to cut it.

    That said about undervaluing my work, even though it's infrequent that I do this, I've learned quickly that my time is worth too much to spend it trying to clean a really infected system. It's less time and effort for me to to relocate the files and give the system a fresh install. Sure, some settings are lost in the process, and programs need to be reinstalled, but that's less painful than cleaning the infection, and the computer'll run better for a while (which seems to be true of any fresh install, be it Windows XP, a freshly installed new version of Ubuntu, or even wiping out ~/.kde/ [sans important files]).

    If I were doing this sort of thing more often, I'd carry with me 1) an external hard drive to copy files to, 2) an external DVD drive (some people have $199 computers with -slow- drives), 3) a Linux LiveDVD (easiest way to copy files over), and 4) I'd write a script to automate copying files to the external hard drive, then back to the computer's hard drive after re-installing Windows.

  62. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    You apparently didn't read my post, where I said exactly what you said, except you said it in a stupider way.

    People who are actually skilled at computers undervalue their time and knowledge in repairing them.

    You, for some reason, acknowledged this, but then said that they should set the value of their time, in some hypothetical universe where they think they're worth more than they're actually asking for.

    Which, of course, not the actual situation...all people, great or small, ask for what they think their time is worth. Otherwise they wouldn't be doing the job in the first place. (Barring exceptions like desperation jobs, which is not what we're talking about, we're talking about people who repair computers in their spare time.)

    Thus suggesting that they should 'charge what they think they are worth' that is somewhat idiotic.

    The actual problem in the real universe is they think they're worth less than what they're asking for. Computer repair amateurs underestimate their value, because they don't understand how valuable their knowledge and skills are.

    And, incidentally, both the clients and service people set the rate. That is, in fact, how the free market works. Two people agree on a set amount of money in exchange for goods or services.

    What I was actually suggesting is that people judge their rates by the opportunity cost of the client, to ask themselves 'If I did not exist, how much would this cost them'. Once repairmen have that in their head as a reasonable cost of 'the problem', they'd can knock off $100 or so and still feel comfortable with themselves. I.e, don't charge based on how much work it is to you, charge based on how much cost it would be if you weren't there and they had to go to a real repairman.

    Which, as you're apparently failing to grasp, actually means charging more, not less, because this advice is for people who underestimate their value because 'they didn't do much'.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  63. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Dude, I'm don't do computer repairs at all. I've never done them professionally.

    Although I have done a few amateur ones, years back, and I always undercharged because I, like everyone else, knew it 'wasn't a lot of work'.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  64. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up! Don't be charging $20, or a drink, or whatever, for fixing peoples fucked Windows boxes.

              You're a dying breed if you are a) good with computers *AND* b) still deal with Windows. The top computer types I know all abandoned Windows years ago, I think I know 1 person who could clean a windows box; the remaining Windows users would not have the knowledge and would do a reinstall (if they could figure out the problem at all), and the remaining top computer types all ditched Windows in favor of better OSes years ago.

              Personally I WAS doing computer cleanups for $50.. but quit. I had 4 big factors:
              1) My "magic bullet" AVG+Ad-aware live cd, the updates were going to run out soon; the newer versions of AVG + Ad-Aware would not run form a LiveCD.

              2) I haven't PERSONALLY used Windows in *years* (I had a virtual machine I used ONLY for making this LiveCD), so my knowledge of what ELSE goes wrong with Windows is increasingly falling behind. This ties in with #1 a bit too, I didn't use Windows enough to want to dig up some *other* virus scanner + spyware scanner that'd work off a CD.

              3) Vista. I worked on one Vista box (no not due to viruses) and it was PAINFUL. Slow, UAC pissed me off, it was a real piece of shit. I'd quit rather than work with Vista, so I did. This ties in with #2, I'd NEVER find out about Vista-specific problems since I don't use Windows at all.

              4) Pride in work. It sure isn't my fault, but I felt at least a twinge realizing I was cleaning people's systems, telling them "use firefox instead of IE, here's the icon for it, and definitely don't go to these sites again", just to know they definitely WILL run IE and WILL go to those sites again, and get reinfected within a week. If anyone now asks me for advice I advise to ditch windows for Ubuntu or a Mac, that Windows is a lost cause. If they run some specialized (Windows-only) software, then I recommend keeping the Windows machine non-internet-connected (which of course they never do), and keep the hell away from Vista (which, surprisingly, everyone knows.. I've had people who tell me they're running "Windows 99" or some crap (i.e. can't even tell what version they are running) tell me they've heard how crappy Vista is.)

  65. Re:How to tell when someone is screwing with you.. by eekygeeky · · Score: 1
    Its the difference in thinking about it like a nerd person and thinking about it like a business person, then. All I quibble with is your assertion, correct from one perspective, that one should think about what the client is willing to spend on what you are giving them.

    "Your time is worth what they think it's worth, and I assure you, you're a hell of a lot cheaper than the alternatives. (And provide better value, considering that half the time you're sitting fixing stuff you're providing a computer class in how to not have this happen again.)"

    this is true; its just that to a business person, this is the wrong end of the snake to grab. the right end is "how much money do you want to make?" and then you derive the answer from that point by weighing your skills, what the market is willing to pay, etc., and arrive at a) a target market segment or b) the realiztion you need to make some changes to reach your goal.

    see? this is an ontological difference here, and it's why business people succeed despite have little or no actually useful or interesting skills and contributing nothing to mankind, and why geeks fail, despite being bright and competent and doing interesting and valuable things.

    we're not in disagreement over the issue, we're is disagreement over how to give advice on it. My advice is, learn fundamental business practices to a high level of competency and follow them, just like you do in app dev. Don't muddle through it by experimenting; learn the rules and apply some rigor to your process when you set up a business.

    Good coders don't fumble around trying different shit until it just kind of works, they know how to organize, explain, attack and solve the problem in a structured way. same thing in the money world.