Slashdot Mirror


Emailaholics Reveal Their Habits

KentuckyFC writes "People can be accurately classified according to their email habits, say scientists from Yahoo Research in NYC, who have been studying the way 125,000 people use email on university campuses in the US and Europe. The team found that people fall into two clearly distinct types of emailer. The first group, 'day labororers,' tend to send emails throughout the normal working day between 0900 and 1800 but not at other times. On the other hand, 'emailaholics' tend to send emails throughout the waking hours from 0900 to 0100. These groups are pretty stable: roughly 75% of users stay in the same group over a two-year period. That gives a pretty good way of classifying individuals that could be used by demographers. Interestingly, the technique can also be used to spot spambots which do not fit into either group."

23 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. I Don't Know If I Buy This by pleappleappleap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My email habits change very frequently. Where do I fit in?

    1. Re:I Don't Know If I Buy This by click2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You should start by admitting you have a problem.

      "I'm an emailaholic. I drink 4 bottles of emailahol every day."

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:I Don't Know If I Buy This by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These groups are pretty stable: roughly 75% of users stay in the same group over a 2 year period.

      My email habits change very frequently. Where do I fit in?

      You fit into the other 25%.

      --
      /...
    3. Re:I Don't Know If I Buy This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you were an emailaholic you'd be drinking a fifth of emailahol a day - not showing up for work, getting fired, ruining your relationships, having an email in the morning to get going, just one big fucking nightmare of a life.

    4. Re:I Don't Know If I Buy This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are obviously a spambot.

  2. Overly simplistic criteria by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So basically anybody that uses e-mail outside of working hours is an "emailholic"? Doesn't that include pretty much every person who has a computer at home?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Overly simplistic criteria by wjh31 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      if you look at the graph in TFA, there appears to be a third small cluster in the region of the 'A' marker, which is people who start emailing early evening, and finish late at night, which i guess is those who use their e-mail accounts at home after work

      there is not much info about the email accounts montiored. Im guessing the day labourors are those who use their account just for work, with a sperate for personal stuff, and the emailaholics are those with one universal address. The subgroup i pointed out could then represent the personal accounts for the day labourors

    2. Re:Overly simplistic criteria by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

      According to the article that makes both of you spambots.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Overly simplistic criteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Sir/Madam

      Fire! Fire!
      Help me!

  3. Xaholics by PhilHibbs · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is the "aholic" suffix really any worse than "-gate" for any scandal?

    1. Re:Xaholics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you for bringing our attention to this Aholicgate scandal, you Gateaholic.

    2. Re:Xaholics by unlametheweak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is the "aholic" suffix really any worse than "-gate" for any scandal?

      You sound like another email abuser who is in denial about your habit. You are in stage 3 of your addiction (Ref. Addictions Anonymous, 12: The Stages of Addiction and Recovery).

    3. Re:Xaholics by TinBromide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess that being an alcoholic is a step down from being a drug addict. I posit that an Addict is a term applied to someone who abuses something in a fashion that could get them sent to jail. I.E Sex Addicts and prostitutes, Drug addicts and controlled substances. While some college towns will have you believe that being drunk is a crime, getting sloshed is not provided you don't then do anything stupid (beat people, get into fights, drive, etc).

      Since you can't get sent to jail for sending normal email, it gets the -aholic, I guess that spammers could be deemed spam addicts, but nobody has latched onto that.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    4. Re:Xaholics by FilterMapReduce · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, you do have problems - using aholic as a prefix and a suffix.

      Clearly an aholicaholic.

  4. "People" is such a loaded word by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I was a student we still corresponded with one another using paper and ink. There was none of this fancy computerized email. It was all email by hand back then, and if you were lucky, maybe your parents would foot the bill for a quill.

    But the key here is not the manner in which we wrote each other. Rather, it is simply that living in the isolated world of "university life", we had totally different writing habits than those who lived in the "real world".

    Take, for instance, the frequency of our letters. While I could average a good 4 or 5 letters per evening, it was because my workload was such that it permitted much more free time than the work-a-day man could ever hope to enjoy. Between classes and quaffing pints of ale, we still had plenty of time to enjoy each others' companionship, even if only through the quill.

    Now, with real work and real timelines to meet, I find that I have very little extra time to sit down to write a letter out by hand.

    1. Re:"People" is such a loaded word by BountyX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know if its just a bad description but you are correct. "People" does not describe the control group. It is ambiguous at best, so we have no idea if our habits fall into this study.

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
  5. I am a spambot by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first group, "day labororers", tend to send emails throughout the normal working day between 0900 and 1800... "emailaholics" tend to send emails throughout the waking hours from 0900 to 0100....the technique can also be used to spot spambots which do not fit into either group

    That means that I am a spam bot. I've always hated being labeled.

  6. Not as Simplistic as the Article Implies by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So basically anybody that uses e-mail outside of working hours is an "emailholic"? Doesn't that include pretty much every person who has a computer at home?

    Well, from the PDF linked on arxiv:

    The cascading non-homogeneous Poisson process we present is motivated by two key observations: first, individuals send e-mail during "sessions" of relatively high activity that are separated by periods of inactivity during which no emails are sent; and second, the likelihood of commencing an active session is modulated by daily and weekly cycles. For convenience, we define the start and end of a session by the first and last e-mails sent in that session respectively. We define an individual as "active" if they are in an e-mail session, where the time between consecutive e-mails within each session is modeled as a homogeneous Poisson process with intra-session rate p_a. Correspondingly, we define an individual as "passive" if they are between e-mail sessions, where the time between sessions is modeled as a non-homogeneous Poisson process with inter-session rate p(t), which explicitly accounts for daily and weekly cycles of activity.

    The paper seems to identify when you're in a session and when you're not and also extrapolates these cycles not only to days but also to times of the week.

    While it's not very useful, it my be interesting to behaviorists or some field I know nothing about. It's always dangerous to grab a graph from a paper with no explanation at all of what it is showing.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  7. Re:Anonymous Cowards are cool! by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this finds widespread use, it won't last long anyway:
    The spambots will start keeping regular working hours ;-)

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  8. My 'habit' by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I sometimes find myself logging into my email purely as a reflex action. Typing 'ma' in the url bar then down arrow once to highlight mail.yahoo.com, and typing my username and password in before I even realize that I'm doing it.

    I wish there was a yahoo email monitor that worked through the system tray. There's a widget, but it sits on the desktop and I hate having things permanently sitting in front of my other windows.

    1. Re:My 'habit' by socrplayr813 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about Yahoo, but with Gmail and others, you can set up pop or imap in Thunderbird, Outlook, etc. I'm sure you could find widgets to work with this setup.

      --
      The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
  9. Re:Straight-line cluster by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're looking at the cluster where start time is nearly equal to end time. Those might be people who check their mail only once a day.

  10. Next up... by Wolfger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cellphoneholics! People who use their cellphone when they're awake, and NOT JUST DURING BUSINESS HOURS! My gods, they're obviously addicted to cell phones.