Slashdot Mirror


Spirit Stuck In Soft Soil On Mars

cheros writes "NASA reports that the Spirit Mars lander is presently stuck in soft soil. The lander's wheels are halfway sunk into the soil and they are planning simulation tests to see if they can get it out again. I hope they can get it out of there because it's picking up enough new energy to operate; however, it only has 5 wheels left to get around on — one of the wheels hasn't been working for years. Fingers crossed."

30 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Call a tow truck by confused+one · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time to call AAA...

    1. Re:Call a tow truck by Megane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Alien Automobile Association?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Call a tow truck by rackserverdeals · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should get Opportunity to come by and fire it's grappling hook to tow it out with its winch.

      What?!?! We launched a bunch of space robots to an unknown, rocky terrain without a grappling hook and winch?

      They probably didn't include the lasers either. Good thing the people that carved the face are long dead.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    3. Re:Call a tow truck by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Opportunity is on the opposite side of the planet. Given how fast the rovers travel, Opportunity could be on the scene in late 2157.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Call a tow truck by Sentax · · Score: 5, Funny

      With the lack of spirit, there won't be much opportunity.

    5. Re:Call a tow truck by Onyma · · Score: 5, Funny

      So pretty much a normal road side assistance response time then.

      --
      Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
    6. Re:Call a tow truck by crashumbc · · Score: 3, Funny

      This always baffled me. Bread, ok. But WHY would you buy milk when there could be severe weather. If you're trapped in your house, your power will likely go out, and now you have a new gallon of spoiled milk.

      yeah it's not like its COLD outside or anything...

    7. Re:Call a tow truck by turgid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duh. Sharks can't live in space.

      Sharks can live under water. There is no air under water. There is also no air in space. Therefore sharks can live in space.

  2. Should have used show chains... by tippe · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... but I guess it's a little too late now. Oh well, better luck next time.

    1. Re:Should have used show chains... by ianare · · Score: 4, Funny

      How would they have helped, if they're only for show ?

  3. Re:Still the cheaper option? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes.

    same as your 20 minutes waiting is cheaper than buying you a new laptop with Usb 2.0 high speed ports.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. 5 out of 6 wheels?!? by DavidChristopher · · Score: 5, Informative

    SOURCE: Wikipedia
    On sol 779, the right front wheel ceased working after having covered 4.2 mi (7 km) on Mars. Engineers began driving the rover backwards, dragging the dead wheel. Ironically, although this has resulted in changes to driving techniques the dragging effect has also had a positive effect in the fact that the wheel dragging has partially cleared soil away on the surface as the rover travels and allows for imaging areas that would normally be covered in soil.

    http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/mission/images/rover1_detail_500.jpg

    NASA got awesome mileage out of this vehicle... considerably more than was initially expected- over 7700 meters! Hopefully they get it unstuck. According the the NASA website, they've gotten it backed up by a few CM over the last few Sols...

    --
    http://www.bistolas.net
  5. Life in slow motion... by yogibaer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In an era where time is the devil and speed is God, it's interesting and heart warming to see that there is actually an engineering job where you can spend weeks looking at the dust under your feet, comtemplate your (modest) goals (another 100 feet, yeah!) and then very, very slowly take you next step. And if a dust storm comes along, just wait for the next breeze to gently brush the dust of your panels and let the sunshine in. Envious. Quite envious.

    1. Re:Life in slow motion... by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the wonder of having an open ended mission without any specific goals. Go slow and produce something every once-in-awhile and you stay employed.

      They "go slow" for a reason. For one, they only get approximately 2 communication sessions a day. If you let the rover keep trying something on its own, it may end up even more stuck. Thus, they back out incrementally and slowly.

      Further, it takes time to set up simulations of specific situations. Before opportunity went down into its first big crater, they studied the pathway photos and reproduced a test-bed with similar-looking rock and gravel. They went to the local Home & Garden Depot and purchased a bunch of flat patio rocks, chiseled them to shape, and stuck BB's into notches to simulate the so-called "blue-berries" discovered in the area (and in the crater photos). The interns that helped work on that must have been tickled. "Mom, I built Mars in NASA's back lot! I hope you still have Tide."

      I see very little reason to rush things unless there's a known time-limit. Plus, the rover can take multi-spectrum photos and readings of the surrounding area while waiting. It takes times to send big photos back unless you compress all the good details out of them. It's like dial-up across 70 million miles. While on the move the rovers cannot stop to smell the roses very deeply as they can while waiting for something.

      And, I hope future rovers have bigger wheels. This is about the 5th time I've read of getting stuck in sand/soil to some degree.
         

  6. Re:Still the cheaper option? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    The next rover to mars is costing $1.8B to build. Spirit and Opportunity costs around $4M per year to operate. So I think you can fund a lot of years of operations for $1.8B. Hell what does a Delta IV heavy launch cost these days? $50M? $100M?

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  7. Inflatable Tires? by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if they could put inflatable tires on rovers and then manually adjust the pressure for each one to accomodate different soil types, a la WWII DUKW http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DUKW It might help the rover to better adapt to different kinds of soils.

    Of course, it would have to be designed for the different pressures of the martian atmosphere.

  8. When does this end? by wandazulu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's great to see that the rovers have lived on for so long, even if they are showing some wear-n-tear, but given the circumstances, they're clearly well built and I'd buy a used one off ebay any day (uh, shipper pays postage).

    I'm curious though, in a totally non-judgmental way, about the cost of the program in general; they expected the rovers to last, what, 90 days? So presumably someone budgeted so many resources here on Earth for people, etc., for that length of time. Since the rovers have been doing such a great job of defying expectations, what kind of effect does that have on the budget for the program; is it sufficiently small enough that it just gets lost in the wash?

    Also, since their plans were presumably all built for a 90-day time frame, how do they determine what to do now? Do they take requests from PhD candidates and researchers from around the world?

    1. Re:When does this end? by NETHED · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been wondering the same thing myself. I bet in the first 100 days, only very pre-planned experiments and moves were made.

      Now that we're what, 4 years in, I wonder if grad students are allowed minor joy rides in em. ("You published 2 Science papers, take Oppy for a spin").

      You know, now that I'm nearing the end of getting my PhD, it amazes me how science is done. And not in a good way. If you have not read the PhD Comic, you should, its funny because its (sadly) true.

      --
      --sig fault--
    2. Re:When does this end? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By far, the largest cost of the project was building the rovers and sending them to Mars. Every day of return amortizes the cost of sending the rovers to Mars. The scientists studying the data sent back would have been studying data regardless. This just means they have gotten way more data than they could have hoped for.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:When does this end? by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm curious though, in a totally non-judgmental way, about the cost of the program in general; they expected the rovers to last, what, 90 days? So presumably someone budgeted so many resources here on Earth for people, etc., for that length of time. Since the rovers have been doing such a great job of defying expectations, what kind of effect does that have on the budget for the program; is it sufficiently small enough that it just gets lost in the wash?

      Nothing gets lost in the wash in NASA's budget. Not only are there harsh internal reviews, NASA's line items are a popular target for Congressional review. Almost nothing NASA does is low profile, and politically (except for the really big programs) they're neutral - they have no strong constituency in favor, and they're a good place to hide a little pork from public view.
       
      That being said, if a program runs long NASA can (and does) reprogram funds from elsewhere to keep it running and then adds it into next years budget request. Programs are paid for annually, not in a lump sum up front.

  9. A comedy? by denzacar · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe a good comedy movie will do the trick.

    Like that recent JJ Abrams comedy based on Star Trek characters?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  10. Re:Still the cheaper option? by dotancohen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone know if managing the twins is still cheaper than sending a new rover?

    Sending a new rover for what? There is a new rover on the way, but that does not make Spirit and Opportunity any less valuable. Even getting stuck in soft soil is doing science: the things that the scientists learn from the experience (what soft soil looks like when you approach it, what techniques to use to get out, how to built a rover that can handle it) will be useful.

    And don't forget, turning up this soft soil may reveal something important. Many of Spirit's discoveries were because of soil turned over due to her stuck wheel.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  11. Enough of these rovers... by Rog-Mahal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's get some real people up there! Our unmanned rovers have given us a lot of valuable scientific data, but our space program needs some new life breathed into it. The days of the Shuttle are numbered, and technology such as ion rockets seems very promising.

  12. There is precedent by edremy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Grumman billed North American Aerospace for towing the crippled Apollo 13 command module back from the moon. Make it worth enough and I'm sure someone will be up there shortly

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  13. Re:Still the cheaper option? by rackserverdeals · · Score: 4, Informative

    How does a rover on Mars cost 4 million per year to operate?

    Long distance charges.

    I don't think the $4million number is accurate anyway. It's likely higher. Last year they were going to cut the budget by $4 million and turn off one of the rovers but then changed their minds. IT looks like the budget for the program is actually $20 million according to this article.

    Hmm... maybe they didn't change their minds and it's not really stuck.

    --
    Dual Opteron < $600
  14. Re:Still the cheaper option? by yuriyg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't be so quick to judge. If the GP is a highly paid professional, his time actually might worth more than a modern netbook.
    Same story with the rovers. That was a legit question.

  15. The Big Bang Theory by thespacemark · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, it is pretty obvious that someone at NASA is a fan of the show, and figured if it worked for Wolowitz... Hey, surely 'I' won't be so stupid as to get the rover stuck. Maybe they will discover life on Mars while stuck in the dirt.

  16. Re:Still the cheaper option? by Zordak · · Score: 4, Funny

    And don't forget, turning up this soft soil may reveal something important.

    Especially if the "soft soil" turns out to be warm poo.

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  17. Re:Still the cheaper option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Communications infrastructure maintenance costs and data warehousing maintenance costs probably don't come cheap for a project like this. I'm sure they don't communicate with these rovers over a walkie talkie.

    I don't know how many people are on the team that operate each rover, but lets assume five. I'm sure they're making a smidge more than $8/hr, so chalk up another million in pay and benefits right there.

    I read somewhere that your average local walmart has an operating cost between 1 and 1.5 million. These guys are performing science and maintaining a robot on another planet for a little less than 3 times that cost.

  18. Rover Driver's Blog by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At night, there's a small red light in the sky. On that light lives four hundred pounds of thinking metal sent from Earth. I tell that metal what to do, and it does it.

    Scott Maxwell, one of the rover's drivers, has a blog detailing the events of the mission exactly five years behind schedule.