Slashdot Mirror


Apple Tablet Rumors Again (Still?)

LSU_ADT_Geek writes "With a conventional netbook clearly out of the question, researchers for Piper Jaffray said Thursday there's mounting evidence to suggest Apple next year will introduce its own take on the market in the form of a tablet-based device that will sell for $700 or less."

165 comments

  1. no way by ilblissli · · Score: 1, Insightful

    no way in hell they will ever sell something that cheap. i predict the next iphone will cost something in that range. then again... maybe the next iphone will be their idea of a "tablet pc"

    1. Re:no way by ilblissli · · Score: 1

      why should this upset you? the only reason i can think of would be that you wanted to be the first post or something. either way lets keep it on topic

    2. Re:no way by ilblissli · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      lol I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that the mac mini was a notebook that didn't require you to purchase other peripherals to actually use it (read: monitor). While you are at it why don't you bring up the fact that apple also sells the ipod shuffle for 50 dollars? Its equally as useful as a notebook as a mac mini is, but hey back the truck up, at least its under 700 dollars! ;)

    3. Re:no way by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If $700 is a lot of money to you for a tablet sized/functioning computer...then you are not in the demographic that Apple is marketing to.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:no way by tulcod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      pix or it didn't happen

    5. Re:no way by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sticking to an extra large iPod Touch. Right now the Touch is a stripped down iPhone and really there's not a lot of reason to buy it. Now that 9-10" 10x6 displays are dirt cheap, now would be the time to build an iPod Touch out of one. It would be bigger, but the Touch electronics and battery are really small.... it would be like the screen of current netbooks. Toss in the standard mini webcam and mic (again practically free now) for taking audio notes and using pictures. They'll be unlocking bluetooth in the gen 2 Touch soon, so for a 10" screen hopefully they'd open up the Apple keyboard for input.

      Apple is committed to iPhone and the app store right now. I can't see any device smaller than a Macbook running the desktop OSX. They are also looking to roll their own chips now, so again hitting the low power tablet factor they don't have to share is definitely how they roll.

    6. Re:no way by supercrisp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I got an iPod touch for a graduation present. I use the thing all the time. It's an MP3 player. I watch TV shows on it when I don't want to bug my wife (a big plus: you can move from room to room to avoid wife's phone calls, screaming baby, neighbor's lawn mower). I use it for quick visits to the web to check TV schedules, weather, Digg, etc. I use it to check my e-mail when I'm out and about (free wi-fi at coffee shops). I use it to run my Azureus, um, Vuze (dumb name). I keep a shopping list on it, and it's replaced almost all the functions of my Sony Clie, which I finally retired after way too many years of use. I also play a few games on it. The only thing that really is a problem is the absence of a keyboard. I guess I'm not a tablet guy. Still, I'm surprised how much I use this little widget I formerly scoffed at. Then again, if I had a nicer cellphone, it could do most of this stuff. Or all of it. But I only get shite phones....

    7. Re:no way by zr · · Score: 1

      ipod touch is a very cheap very reliable console for all sorts of things, and as soon as 3.0 is out with its plug in apis ipod touch will shine even more. it'll be used everywhere from b&m store checkout points to specialized applications like (perhaps) wind turbine or solar array control panel etc. with such powerful development tools applications (pardon the pun) are endless.

    8. Re:no way by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. When you can pick up a net book for around $300 and you're wondering why Apple is selling something as cheap as $700? $700 is cheap? I got an MSI Wind I can let you have for $600.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    9. Re:no way by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I see this a lot with Apple - any criticism of them is hand waved away with "Well you're not in their demographic".

      Of course Apple want to maximise their profits, as do all companies. But unless you're actually a shill, we're talking from the point of view of consumers.

      If someone says "Company X is selling their product at a higher price than everyone else", it would seem odd to respond to that with "But you're not in their demographic!" Well in that case, what is their demographic? People who like to buy more expensive goods than the competition?

      It's completely meaningless. If you actually mean something like "Their demographic is those who want to spend more for something that I claim is better", than why not say "I think it's better than the cheaper products", and follow that up with evidence and reasons.

      Saying "the demographic" just means we have no idea what your explanation is - whether you're suggesting that some people like to throw away money (in which case, other people are right to ridicule it), or you have some reason for why a more expensive price is justified, but one you are unwilling to explain to us what it is?

    10. Re:no way by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Demonstrated on this site time and again has been the fact that apple is not in way expensive for similar hardware. You are like the Microsoft commercials, yes if you need a cheaper laptop without all of the features the Apple offers, go ahead and buy it.

      Show me a comparison where an Apple sells for more than $200 more than a PC without using the phrase "I don't really need X anyway". (This is almost impossible to do since no one else makes a 17" notebook that is less than an inch thick and has an 8 hour battery.

      Comparisons are tough, something like the Dell M1730 which has SLI but on a lesser card, also weighs 5lbs more, is nearly twice as thick and supports 4GB less RAM. The RAM on the dell is inferior too, 667 DDR2 versus 1066 DDR3. Why did I choose Dell? They are the only major manufacture with something in the neighborhood that actually costs less than Apple's list price on the 17" Mac Book Pro.

      If you want to get clsoer to the MBP form factor you can look at the Dell Studio 17. Still thicker and heavier with half the ram (and still DDR2 667), a slower CPU , and much less powerful GPU.

      The point of all this is that the Apple provides a nice balance of form and function that a lot of people like. There is a demographic for people that want their portable computers portable......

    11. Re:no way by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Demonstrated on this site time and again has been the fact that apple is not in way expensive for similar hardware.

      I disagree, but that's beside the point - that's not the claim the OP was making. He seemed to be conceding that they are more expensive, but then waffled about the demographics.

      The point of all this is that the Apple provides a nice balance of form and function that a lot of people like. There is a demographic for people that want their portable computers portable......

      Which clearly can't be related to the OP's point (whatever it was), as plenty of companies besides Apple make portable computers. The success of netbooks suggests that they are a right balance between size and power that people like.

    12. Re:no way by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      Does your MSI Wind have OS X or the great integration of hardware and the OS? You can keep the cheap MSI Wind and the cheap experience that goes with it. I admittedly pay a extra for a Mac because I get more for my money. I just can't go back to the horrible experience of Winblows or the extra work involved with maintaining Linux. Winblows. . .well blows, and Linux, while powerful, isn't ready for the home market yet.

      I understand if you just look at the price tag that you can get a cheaper machine, but a cheaper machine is usually cheaper for a reason.

  2. Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like the apple wheel

    1. Re:Cool story bro by YayaY · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Apple Newton all over again : Apple Newton

      --
      Votator.com implements a fair voting scheme (free
  3. Please stop these non-news rumours by tsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rumours are not news. They belong on Digg. Please please /., try to keep the quality of the post high and avoid speculation like this. It makes the site so much more worth reading.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rumours are not news. They belong on Digg. Please please /., try to keep the quality of the post high and avoid speculation like this. It makes the site so much more worth reading.

      It was clearly labelled as a rumor: "Apple Tablet Rumors Again (Still?)". If it weren't, I'd have a much easier time seeing your point.

      Sure, you could say that the holy absolute purity of the rest of Slashdot is forever tainted by the stain of the word "rumor" in this story but, eh, have you SEEN the rest of Slashdot? I think it'll be alright.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed, calling this a rumour is even stretching it a bit. Paraphrasing the article:

      Apple bought a chip manufacturer. The iPhone is too small to surf the web and needs a real keyboard. All the cool kids have portables with 10" screens. Wouldn't it be cool if my Macbook had the iPhone's multi-touch input? My Apple shares are idling due to the global financial crisis; I better start some badass rumour to spur on the fanboys. It's Apple, they haven't introduced some magical product for a while now.

    3. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by LSU_ADT_Geek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Please begin metamoderating news submissions in firehose if you don't find the quality of submissions to your liking, but it did bubble its way up because someone else thought it wasn't a bad idea to talk about.

    4. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by BlueKitties · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair, the topic classification tags say "!news", that's g++k speak for "not news."

      --
      "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    5. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Until the Firehose is no longer a UI abortion, I will abstain from moderating potential stories, and will instead gripe about the stories in the comments like we always do anyway.

    6. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Rumours are not news. They belong on Digg. Please please /., try to keep the quality of the post high and avoid speculation like this. It makes the site so much more worth reading.

      The diversity is what makes Slashdot worth reading. Frankly, that's all Slashdot's got.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by alfredo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One reason to post a story is to generate conversation. It doesn't have to be some mind twisting geeks only story, it can be fluff, it can be rumor or humor.

      From what I heard, Sir Isaac Newton liked a good fart joke every now and then.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    8. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by LSU_ADT_Geek · · Score: 1

      If you check out Google on the topic (http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&topic=t&ncl=dDKpmSnqnsICgRMLlq0sSKB8xpL8M) you will find there are ~50 different websites covering this.

    9. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by pwnies · · Score: 1

      ...have you SEEN the rest of Slashdot?

      I don't know what you're talking about. The new idle section is the pinacle of newsworthy news!</sarcasm>

    10. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Except we get a story about Apple every time there's mere speculation or rumour - why not for all the other companies out there? In some cases, even actual product releases from major companies (e.g., Nokia) go unmentioned, where as "Rumour that the Iphone might be able to do something that other phones did 5 years ago" gets front page headline news.

      Well, I suppose it means it can generate conversation about how it's been done 5 years ago, but I'm not sure that's useful.

    11. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple watching has been a favorite sport in our community for years. Steve Jobs is not just a visionary, he's a master showman. That's why Nokia and other companies haven't been able to generate media buzz. They lack a charismatic front man.

      It's not just manipulation of the media, it's also the great industrial design department. So far they've been able to back up the hype with attractive products.

      The US auto industry needs an Ives and Jobs team.

    12. Re:Please stop these non-news rumours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we get a story about Apple every time there's mere speculation or rumour

      Because otherwise they wouldn't be able to justify an Apple category.

  4. I can digg it. by BlueKitties · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I could definitely see something like this heading our way; While I'm not a Mac fan myself, they do seem keen on making "nifty" products (e.g. the iPhone, iMusicPlayers, etc.) If they do make something like this, it will probably have unique features (maybe a camera that lets you interact via hand motions, facial expressions?) Still, this seems fairly realistic.

    --
    "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
  5. way by dmarcoot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well since they already do sell things that cheap, you comment is idiotic.

    1. Re:way by ilblissli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      come now troll, you are aware that their cheapest notebook is 1k right? and you are aware that tablets are typically MORE expensive than a comparable notebook that doesn't have tablet functionality right?

    2. Re:way by mr_mischief · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Their take on a Netbook as a tablet:

      ARM processor, runs stripped-down iPhone OS, has a touchscreen, plays media, runs a couple apps at a time.

      Sounds like a next-gen iPod Touch. The current one costs $230 to $399 on Apple's own website. A little bigger, and it's Newton: TNG.

    3. Re:way by ilblissli · · Score: 1

      exactly, not a true tablet pc (at least how the world views them today) just a next gen iphone/touch

    4. Re:way by catmistake · · Score: 1

      runs stripped-down iPhone OS

      yeah, if it weren't for all that bloat in the OS, their phone might acually be successful... what they need is a fancier product that does even less

    5. Re:way by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it would be one with apps that are USEFUL and not junk!

      Tablet PCs never caught on because there's only 2-3 apps DESIGNED for tablets not made by Microsoft. The majority of apps on tablets in the real world I've seen are just VB programs for data entry with little benefits on a tablet versus a laptop.

      Apple has the app store and it has multi-touch apps that all do cool stuff with the hardware... Tablet PC had a 7 year run all by itself and nobody stepped up with the must-have apps. A 10" iPod Touch, with access to all the iPhone/Touch apps existing right now, would take off. Not to mention the new apps that might work on an iPhone but really need more real estate.. like editing photos or web browsing.

      Hardware wise, the current Touch probably supports a 10" screen in hardware so it would be really cheap and easy for Apple to release this. Rumor has also been that iPhone OS 3 has support for bigger screens and requires UI resolution independence so apps made for an iPhone or Touch will look correct on bigger screens.

    6. Re:way by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      since they already do sell things that cheap

      What, a mousemat?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an artist, they are much preferrable to the separate usb/wireless tablet inputs. Touchscreen tech for art creation is perfect and intuitive with a sensitive interface. It is as close to having actual media as you can get. For other applications, I completely agree that it is not very useful and is counterintuitive for text entry / most web browsing where a true keyboard is preferrable.

    8. Re:way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come now troll, you are aware that their cheapest notebook is 1k right? and you are aware that tablets are typically MORE expensive than a comparable notebook that doesn't have tablet functionality right?

      come now troll, you are aware that their cheapest notebook is 1k right? and you are aware that tablets are typically MORE expensive than a comparable notebook that doesn't have tablet functionality right?

      you werent talking that, you said Apple would never release a product under $700, including the iphone. That is a straw man argument becuase they already have sub $700 product, which includes the iPhone, of course. You know this to be true.

      You were wrong, ignored that you are wrong and when proven wrong change the subject to price of netbooks.

      If anyone is a troll, it is you sir

    9. Re:way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not how resolution independence works. You have it backwards. Resolution independence lets Apple decide to ship a new iPhone with a 640x960 screen (current iPhone is 320x480) with the same physical size and apps don't have to care. For a physically larger screen, the apps would have to either care, be run in a windowed mode of some kind so they have the right physical size, or look completely and utterly wrong.

      Now, if they do indeed have support for bigger screens, that's something separate. That said, I've been poking through the internals and I haven't seen evidence for either resolution independence or larger screens yet.

      Strictly speaking, most of the "resolution independence" stuff is already there in that they want you to use curves to draw things rather than bitmaps. The UI layer then rasterizes the curves and paints them to the screen. Hypothetically, well-behaved apps already don't care about the DPI of the screen.

  6. I'd go for it, if... by rindeee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they integrated all of the cool functionality (multi-touch screen, etc.) from the iPhone as well as the full OS X base (iChat w/video, real app support, etc.); I'd be all over it. I don't want an iPhone for this kind of stuff, nor do I want to carry around my MacBook (as I do now out of necessity). A tablet would be the perfect compromise for my needs.

    1. Re:I'd go for it, if... by TinBromide · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sell it to verizon to be subsidized some what like their HP netbook, give it unlimited wifi, and apple may have killed its iphone. Granted you can't stick an itablet, inote, isheet? into your pocket, but it takes what a lot of people view to be the compelling reasons to buy an iphone (always on internet, nifty apps, nifty user interface). I'm sure someone would hack skype or some other voip solution to work for it, then you could make free calls from anywhere, and it wouldn't quite be as redundant as making voip calls from your iphone.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    2. Re:I'd go for it, if... by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Have other people got some crazy whacky super-awesome cellular technology that I'm not aware of? I currently have HSDPA on "3" in the UK, and VOIP calls point blank do not work. I don't know any cellular technology that can sustain a VOIP conversation, or even come close.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    3. Re:I'd go for it, if... by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      iTab. You can get iTabs running X for just over a grand...sounds reasonable, right? It's part of the "in" crowd, the "hipsters".

    4. Re:I'd go for it, if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype has already been hacked to work on 3G (in fact there's a general hack for any app). So what's your point?

    5. Re:I'd go for it, if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a tablet!!! From apple now!! damn it!

    6. Re:I'd go for it, if... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      So why didn't the iPod Touch kill the iPhone?

    7. Re:I'd go for it, if... by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      no cellular internet access, no gps, no microphone, and for a similar price, you get a very similar thing where the difference is the phone. Add the fact that Steve Jobs has called the iPod Touch "training wheels for the iPhone" and you have a device that apple has positioned as a second fiddle. Apple devices are rarely sold to the fashion conscious masses based on what they ARE, but instead based on what they're told the devices are. If apple says "this will kill the iphone," then it will kill the iphone. If apple says "You should buy this before you graduate you our big boy toy," people will skip the training wheels.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    8. Re:I'd go for it, if... by alfredo · · Score: 1

      Offer a deal with newspapers so they can put content on the tablet in trade for a two year subscription. You know, similar to the iPhone/AT&T deal.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    9. Re:I'd go for it, if... by centuren · · Score: 1

      If apple says "this will kill the iphone," then it will kill the iphone. If apple says "You should buy this before you graduate you our big boy toy," people will skip the training wheels.

      Then why didn't the iPhone kill the iPod Touch? It's amazingly obvious: the touch lets someone have a cool gadget when they can't afford the iPhone voice/data plan pricing. One device is an iPod, one is a phone, and there's still separate markets for each of them to be highly desirable.

    10. Re:I'd go for it, if... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      If you're really interested in having always on internet or making free voip calls from anywhere, just keep in mind that Verizon keeps its cell phone "Unlimited data plan" limited to 5 GB per month.

    11. Re:I'd go for it, if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have HSDPA on Optus in Australia and VOIP works pretty well. At least as well as a web browser or mail client.

  7. Hey, howcum- by Gizzmonic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why you can't read the summary after you click the comments? Is Slashdot trying to discourage people from reading summaries? Not RTFA is bad enough!

    Also, why does that firehose keep loading stuff? I will hit "refresh" if I want more stories! Also, my shoes hurt. Waaah!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:Hey, howcum- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)

      Is that because it's the only way to see your own posts? You can change that stuff if you bother to play with settings.

    2. Re:Hey, howcum- by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      It's because it's worth the effort skipping over bad trolls to find the opinions that Slashdot groupthink has decided must be hidden.

      Although truthfully, it's not as much of a problem as it used to be. It seems that the user base has finally reached the critical mass for diversity of opinion to take hold.

  8. Like I said before by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like I said before, it will be sweet, groundbreaking, worth every penny and several hundred dollars more than a conventional netbook.
    So it will not be a netbook competitor at all.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  9. Newton 2 by Onyma · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I knew I kept my Newton for a reason... now I can be snotty and say "Oh yeah, I had one first" when it becomes popular. Now where did I put it...

    Seriously as said above I can't see it selling that cheaply but I really did love the Newton despite its quirks. I still believe it died because it was just a little too far ahead of its time. Palm drove the last nail in its coffin with a smaller, lighter, more practical device. I would be interested to see what Apple could come up with for a tablet now with their focus on touch egonomics and a decade+ of hardware advancement.

    --
    Play me online? Well you know that I'll beat you. If I ever meet you I'll "/sbin/shutdown -h now" you. -Weird Al, kinda.
    1. Re:Newton 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew I kept my baseball bat for a reason... now I can beat the hell out of people who say "Oh yeah, I had one first". Now where did I put it...

    2. Re:Newton 2 by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 1

      Is egonomics the study of what Steve Job's thinks will make money?

      --
      Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
  10. 3rd party conversion by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative
    There is already a company that does conversions of Macbooks to a tablet format, so the idea is not unprecedented and there must be a market for it.

    Axiotron Modbook

    Note that I am not connected with Axiotron nor do I own a Macbook

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:3rd party conversion by dwater · · Score: 1

      Hrm. I might go for this if it weren't running OS X (or rather Aqua). Can it run Linux?

      --
      Max.
    2. Re:3rd party conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't it? And why would you pay that much for an "Apple Tablet" if you weren't interested in OS X?

    3. Re:3rd party conversion by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If there's an active platform that can't run Linux, it must be very arcane. And Macs are hardly arcane. Nowadays the hardware is not that different from a PC.

      I have a Motion tablet that runs Vista. That OS is every bit as bad as its reputation, but I put up with it because it's the only tablet OS with decent handwriting recognition. If I could similar software for Linux, I'd switch tomorrow.

      And yes, I know about PenReader. Despite its claims, it does not handle handwriting. You have to draw out the letters one at a time. Easier to use an on-screen keyboard.

  11. Mounting evidence by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That evidence being, apparently, the increasing number of analysts who all parrot "Apple may be making a netbook"?

    Don't get me wrong - I'd love to see what Apple might come up with - but there are plenty of Mac rumor sites already available.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Mounting evidence by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Apple has a very carefully scripted response when asked about making netbooks. They say, "right now there doesn't seem to be much of a market for it, but we have some good ideas if it starts becoming popular." This is the response they gave on their last two conference calls with investors. It was clearly scripted.

      Not only that, on the most recent conference call, when asked, Time Cook responded in way that seemed like he was thinking, "Oh no! Wait, how do I respond to this??" The same way a kid does when he's trying to remember his cover-up story. Now, of course this isn't conclusive evidence, but I'd bet money (and will) that they have some kind of netbook/tablet in the pipeline. It's just a matter of when will it be released.

      Seriously, go listen to the conference call from April. Interesting stuff.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Mounting evidence by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Zen speaking: If you rumor it, they will build it.
      As rummors pile up, odds of it becoming a reality increase.

  12. I'll go with "untrue" by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple next year will introduce its own take on the market in the form of a tablet-based device that will sell for $700 or less.

    Put simple - Tablets suck except for a very few niche uses... And even for those few uses, netbooks do the job cheaper and more conveniently.

    So put simply, I'll consider this a completely bogus rumor, since Apple has better sense than to revive a dying-for-a-good-reason technology. They may have a few failures in trying to predict the next cool toy, but haven't made the mistake of recreating retro hardware since the Lisa.

    Now, I mentioned netbooks above - It wouldn't surprise me at all to see Apple try to jump into that market (though they will no doubt ignore the "sub $500" as a defining characteristic of that class of device). Perhaps (though by no means certain) even with a flippable screen, giving users the option of using it in notebook-style or tablet-style mode. But an outright straight-up tablet, not going to happen.

    1. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... since Apple has better sense than to revive a dying-for-a-good-reason technology. They may have a few failures in trying to predict the next cool toy, but haven't made the mistake of recreating retro hardware since the Lisa.

      Perhaps, like the iPod, they're going to actually create the next big technology? Or, being positioned where they are in the industry, they may have figured out how to do it right and create a tablet/hybrid which actually catches on ... (yes, entirely speculative, but hey, so is the original article, eh?)

    2. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by alen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      laptops are becoming the next desktop. tablets and netbooks are nice to carry around with you.

      carrying a laptop around is like going out with a baby. you need to take a bag of junk with you. a netbook or a tablet with nice battery life you just throw in your bag that you take with you anyway. and for the millions of people that commute on public transit it will be a nice way to pass the time. bigger screen to read books, better hardware for games, and you may be able to do some work and sync your docs.

      what a tablet or netbook needs to do is not have a boot up time. my wife's iphone is always on. if i want 10 minutes of net time i don't want to waste 5 minutes of it waiting for a netbook to boot up

    3. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by mr_mischief · · Score: 0, Troll

      They didn't create the portable music digital music player. They did create a market for a very sleek-looking higher-end one with its own proprietary locked-in store, which now sells un-DRMed music like everyone else was already using.

    4. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      That is certainly all true of previous tablets, but the simple addition multi-touch really can change all that.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    5. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Neil+Jansen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only reason I can see Apple doing any kind of tablet would be to get in on the eBook market. Just like the App Store, it would integrate directly into iTunes and make them even more money. That's the sort of stuff that fits Apple's style.

    6. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since you've obviously never used a tablet, I figured I should offer the perspective of someone who has. Mine's convertible, but lives in tablet mode 85% of the time.

      In point of fact, not only is it useful, but the idea that a netbook could substitute is laughable.

      Why? I take a lot of meetings. In the 8 months, I've accumulated 1000+ pages of notes. With a tablet, they're searchable, organizable, and can contain embedded scans of the business cards. Much more convenient to write, especially while standing or sitting without a table.

      Why else? I read a lot of PDFs, many running hundreds to thousands of pages. Nice to read, flag, and annotate them on a long screen, and to have them all in one place. Netbook? No thanks. Printouts? Lots to carry, and I hate wasting the paper for something I might not need again and only need to read quickly. Plus you loose searchability on your annotations. Sure, reading on a computer isn't ideal, but I have often found the tablet solution to be a good choice.

      What else? Marking up word documents w/o re-writing them can be easily done with a pen.

      Other useful features ... paging through docs with your fingers, multi-touch interface to google earth and stellarium.

      Of course, it doesn't run linux. :(

      Finally, it cost $750 (refurb) ...

    7. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by SputnikPanic · · Score: 1

      I think Apple is very much interested in going after the e-book market. Sales of e-books are growing very rapidly, and right now Amazon essentially has a stranglehold on the market, at least in the U.S. As a Kindle owner, I welcome Apple bringing some serious competition into this area. Maybe it'll put some pressure on Amazon to open up to the ePub format.

    8. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Apple makes very little money from iTunes music sales. A recent analysis of their 1 billion downloads at the app store suggests that Apple's take was only 30-40 million. Yes, that's money, but not much (relatively) iTunes sales provides value (and lock in) but doesn't provide the kind of revenue you seem to think it does.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    9. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They didn't create the portable music digital music player. They did create a market for a very sleek-looking higher-end one with its own proprietary locked-in store, which now sells un-DRMed music like everyone else was already using.

      Actually, the iPod got to where it is by basically being the right device at the right time:

      * Space - it had a lot of it. (Competitors had more, though)
      * Size - it had a lot of space for its size (The Creative Nomad was bigger than a contemporary CD player. The iPod was much smaller - slightly thicker than a pack of playing cards). Other MP3 players in the same size had a pitiful handful of songs at best.
      * Speed - Parallel port, serial port, USB1.1 suck for filling space. Great if you're only dealing with 128MB of memory, but lousy when you want to actually fill in gigabytes and have it take a reasonable amount of time. Firewire was the only option at the time.
      * Market - MP3 players were niche at the moment. MP3-CD players were the item to get, but they're big (see size), and cumbersome (burning a CD... and having huge books of MP3 CDs to pick one to play). Apple got in early and rode the wave as MP3 players started getting mainstream (no doubt helped by Apple's marketing making everyone want one).

      Apple released the iPod at the right time with the right combination of features that people wanted - a small player that holds a decent quantity of music that doesn't take all day to transfer. MP3 players were still pretty niche when the iPod was released (MP3s weren't, thanks to Napster, but people were listening via their computers). Apple got in during this time - either by luck or pure business savvy. A few years later and the iPod may have been the next Newton as the market gets flooded with new entrants.

      The iTunes store came *MUCH* later (2003-ish or so), by Apple dragging the kicking and screaming music industry into it.

      The problem is, netbooks are already mainstream, and the race to the bottom has stopped more or less because the bottom has been reached. Instead, now we see netbooks clamoring for the low-end laptop market with larger screens and higher prices. At best, Apple would be another competitor in the high-end netbook market, but probably not a very worthy one (it *IS* Apple, and they don't have the iPod advantage). Unless Apple comes up with something "must have" that redefines the market (at least that's Apple's strength... finding the few things that make people go "why didn't I think of that"?).

    10. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by kaizendojo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Put simple - Tablets suck except for a very few niche uses... And even for those few uses, netbooks do the job cheaper and more conveniently.

      Put simple - that's why you're posting on /. instead of working for a company like Apple. They've already proven that tablets - which is what the iPhone essentially is, just in a smaller form factor - don't suck, and millions of consumers agreed. Tablets with a user interface done right, that is. This is not just a move to come up with a cool new toy, this is an acknowledgment of a growing market replete with a built in catalog of available applications that users actually want. And as a bonus, they can expand to users who want a Kindle but expect a but more for their bucks than just a reader. And I'm damn glad, since I put my Dad into the stock early and it's going to be my inheritance some day.

    11. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Um, Apple didn't create HDD MP3 players.

    12. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Use hibernation. It only takes a few seconds to boot that way.

    13. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely curious to know what hardware and OS you are running.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    14. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by alen · · Score: 1

      it's still flaky even on windows 7 and there is no reason to have an OS like Windows or a distro like Ubuntu on netbooks.

      you need something like iphone OS, android or another micro linux kernel for the always on ability. these things don't need the ability to run every app. apple will do it right where it's going to be an ipod/iphone on steroids but it will be too expensive

    15. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Spatial · · Score: 1

      I haven't got any problems with it using XP on my NC10. W7 is still in RC status, so I suppose problems are to be expected there.

      I'd prefer to keep the full fledged OS, netbooks are suprisingly capable and I like the flexibility Ubuntu or Windows can offer.

    16. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Steve Jobs' famous quote about people not reading anymore?

      "Yet, when Mr. Jobs was asked two weeks ago at the Macworld Expo what he thought of the Kindle, he heaped scorn on the book industry. âoeIt doesnâ(TM)t matter how good or bad the product is; the fact is that people donâ(TM)t read anymore,â he said. âoeForty percent of the people in the U.S. read one book or less last year.â"

      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/business/27digi.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin

    17. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm genuinely curious to know what hardware and OS you are running.

      me too

    18. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by KylePflug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, but it pretty much made them saleable. If you remember back to the dawn of the MP3 era, everyone either had a small (like 128 or 256mb, tops) flash-based mp3 player, maybe with a few memory cards (I went threw several Rios before my first iPod). Almost nobody actually bought HDD MP3 players.

      Apple pulled off the look, synchronization, and most importantly the interface - I'm entirely convinced that the clickwheel is what killed the competition, just like the multi-touch is what is saving the iPhone.

      If they can do this with a tablet - combining active digitizers and capacitive input to get natural input and good handwriting recognition - and combine it with a slim bluetooth keyboard, they have a real shot at making an integrated device that goes for the Kindle/iTouch/netbook markets all at once. I'm of the opinion that it should not run OSX as we know it - I don't think the form factor is right. Give it the backbone of OSX and the ability to run those apps, but it needs a new front-end to replace Finder. The reason Tablets haven't worked before (I've owned three) is because they are pen-input devices built around a mouse/keyboard input operating system. Apple gets interfaces; I don't see them making that mistake.

    19. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "NICHE"?

      There are a LOT of computer artists in this world. I still fail to realize why Tablet PC makers continue to not market their TabletPCs to artists.

      Once you've used a Wacom Penabled to draw with, you never want to go back.

    20. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell Latitude XT, Windows XP Tablet, Intel U2100 (1.06 GHz) Core 2 Solo, 2GB

      I used OneNote heavily.

      It's not a perfect piece of hardware - even with an underpowered CPU, battery life is medicore, and some report driver issues (I've had no real problems). But the pen and finger work well, and right now I think there are only two multi-touch convertible tablets - the XT and the XT2. Both very expensive new, but deals can be had on refurbs.

      I'm planning to try Win 7's multitouch support, but haven't had the time / can't afford to screw up and loose the machine during the work week. Some say it works well.

    21. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Knara · · Score: 1

      XP had horrid hibernation, but after SP1 Vista hibernates just fine for me.

      Windows 7 isn't even released yet. Something not working on unreleased software doesn't bother me.

    22. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by pavon · · Score: 1

      Every laptop I have owned has taken just as long, if not longer, to come out of hibernation than to boot (suspend is a little faster). And for some reason it takes longer for networking to start working after coming out of hibernation compared to booting from scratch. And about a quarter of the time I come out of hibernation Client Side Caching ("Make files available offline") gets into this funky state causing any file access (offline or not) to take forever, requiring me to reboot anyway.

      I use hibernation because I'm lazy and want to keep my applications open, but if I didn't, it would be just a quick and much less troublesome to just shutdown and reboot. Comparing the hibernate time of a computer to the "instant-on" time of most consumer electronic isn't even close.

    23. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      No, but it pretty much made them saleable. If you remember back to the dawn of the MP3 era, everyone either had a small (like 128 or 256mb, tops) flash-based mp3 player, maybe with a few memory cards (I went threw several Rios before my first iPod). Almost nobody actually bought HDD MP3 players.

      Not really surprising when you think that the iPod was up against something like this Archos. It was a long time ago but I remember the Archos UI being really poor and you had to manually copy all your music across.

      It was no surprise that the iPod kicked the MP3 HD market up the arse. The competition was woeful.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    24. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Neil+Jansen · · Score: 1

      I know how much revenue Apple makes from the App Store ($95 million of $25 billion for the last three quarters, last time I checked)... I read Gizmodo' RSS feed daily, and there was story just last week - Jesus Diaz did a nice info graphic to represent it. In my opinion, the app store makes much more than that, since it makes the iPhone that much more desirable. Having the most apps makes your platform very successful, just look at Microsoft. Anyway, I stand by my point. Taking on Amazon and getting into the eBook market through through the iTunes store would be a great move for Apple.

    25. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by Spatial · · Score: 1

      I've never had any of those problems...

      I just timed my NC10 coming out of hibernation, it took nine seconds to reach the desktop from the moment I hit the power button. Much faster than booting normally. It has 2GB of RAM installed, it has a 5400RPM HDD and it's been on for days, so I'm not cheating or anything.

    26. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by dangitman · · Score: 1

      which now sells un-DRMed music like everyone else was already using.

      Excuse me, but what the fuck are you talking about? No mainstream online music store sold un-DRMed music until iTunes did it first. Apple fought hard to negotiate the right to sell major-label music without the DRM. And Apple was the only company in the industry making public statements about how futile DRM is.

      It was only because of Apple that anybody else was subsequently able to sell the DRM-free tracks. By no means was "everyone else" selling major label music without DRM before iTunes.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    27. Re:I'll go with "untrue" by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Most people weren't buying music online from mainstream music sites, and no other device maker ran a major label music store. People were buying music from MP3.com and ripping from CD -- totally non-DRMed music. Apple brought the convenience of a nice, integrated store at the expense of tying it to a particular device and having DRM.There are pros and cons to what you get with iTunes, but don't pretend all music was DRMed before Steve.

  13. I'm only suspicious about the $700 bit. by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've seen this rumor floating around from enough sources that I won't be surprised if it happens. That said, even though other rumored apple products have turned out to be true, it seems that the only thing that is off is the price -- apple prices these things for about 20% more than what analysts predict.

    If Apple comes out w/ a tablet, I can easily see them pricing it at $999.

    1. Re:I'm only suspicious about the $700 bit. by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about a Mac Mini-tower? That's what I'm waiting for.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:I'm only suspicious about the $700 bit. by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I'd jump on an ~$800 Mac somewhere between a mini and a Pro - even just a more expandable Mini. My PC finally gave up the ghost and, while my MacBook is a perfectly serviceable desktop when I plug it in, I'd love something with a real graphics card and a few hard drives.

    3. Re:I'm only suspicious about the $700 bit. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What about a Mac Mini-tower? That's what I'm waiting for.

      Say hello to the monkeys for me, when they fly out of your butt.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  14. way too expensive by alen · · Score: 1

    the iphone is a hit because it's the same price or cheaper than competing cell phones. few months ago when i bought one for my wife i looked at the BB Storm. the data plan was more expensive and once you figured the cost of the extra storage it was the same price or $200 more than the iphone when adding up the price of the 2 year contract.

    $700 for what is a netbook is way too much especially if you'll need to pay for a wireless data plan. you can buy $299 XP, Android or Ubuntu netbooks. WTF kind of magic apple pixie dust is this going to have for $700? or is this going to be another case of apple charging more for the same hardware just because it says apple?

     

    1. Re:way too expensive by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Supposing the iTablet is an upscaled iPhone with a bigger screen and hardware keyboard, the economics should be the same.

      You'll never know the true cost if you buy it on a 24-month plan, locked to a particular carrier. Apple can afford to subsidise the initial purchase cost if it makes its money through apps, music and videos you download from their online services. (cf. Console makers lose money on their hardware but make it up on each game)

  15. Why clearly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is a conventional netbook clearly out of the question? Did I miss another story where they justified that assertion?

    1. Re:Why clearly? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Even if Apple themselves were saying it is right now (I haven't heard/read anything to that effect) they can still change their minds. Depending on how popular netbooks get, I wouldn't be surprised in the least to see them come out with one in the next 1-2 years.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    2. Re:Why clearly? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple slammed netbooks as being junky.

    3. Re:Why clearly? by spikeb · · Score: 0

      yes, every story before this one.

    4. Re:Why clearly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apple slamming something is their way of saying, "We've got a prototype in the lab."

  16. apple don't do cheap by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    if you want cheap (or even IMO normal) hardware don't wait for apple to bring it, they wont!

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  17. One thing I just don't understand about Apple... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    They DO have a right to selectively license MacOS X to a vendor who agrees to use high quality, consistent hardware. They could easily get a company like Dell or Acer to license it for one particular line of netbooks.

    You know what happens if someone buys a Dell NetBook with OS X on it in this economy? When they get $1000-$3000 to blow on a real OS X laptop, they'll be more than happy to head to the Apple Store. Apple is in a licensing position to tell any vendor to kiss their shiny, solid aluminum ass if they want OS X for all laptops or nothing instead of just a netbook. Right now, I think Dell wouldn't even hesitate to agree to those terms.

  18. heres a picture of it. by onionlee · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:heres a picture of it. by actionbastard · · Score: 1

      If they made it that big, I'd buy it. I can't use an iPhone because the bloody screen is too small for me to see it without optical assistance. If I had to use one everyday, I'd go nuts putting on and taking off my glasses everytime I'd have to make a call.

      --
      Sig this!
  19. Re:One thing I just don't understand about Apple.. by n8k99 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Apple is not a software company that makes hardware. they are a hardware company that makes software because they can not stand the idea of an inferior OS soiling their little slice of hardware perfection.

    --
    For some reason my fountain pen doesn't work here.
  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Re:One thing I just don't understand about Apple.. by ToasterOven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good points, but I think the problem is that they've been there before, and it didn't work out too well for them.

    With Apple being Apple, I think if they ever do venture down that road again, it will be because they have come up with a new and different method of licensing the software.

    However, it's pretty unlikely IMO, given that Apple likes to maintain a very specific user 'experience', and allowing their OS to be used on potentially sub-standard hardware could undermine that experience and potentially turn some away from the OS.

  22. Fanny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. Been there, done that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple has been in the tablet market longer than anyone. You can still get a Newton in the sub $150 range from EBay. According to a comparison with the Samsung Q1 UMPC, they still stand up against modern tablets.

  24. What would be sweet... by wandazulu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apple's said they don't want to do a netbook, and when people think tablet, they think of a standard tablet-based laptop.

    My personal theory is that it would be a Kindle-sized iPhone, though probably without the phone part (so I guess a Kindle-sized ipod touch). With the features of the next version of the os that's publicly known, there's no reason why you couldn't use the iphone interface to do anything you'd do with a netbook. Any apps that you might expect on a netbook would likely be written and sold in the app store pretty darn quick, like a basic word-processing app. If you couldn't stand to use the on-screen keyboard (which presumably would have bigger buttons for the bigger screen), then use a bluetooth keyboard.

    That, as far as I can tell, would solve (to me, anyway), both the netbook *and* tablet issue.

    1. Re:What would be sweet... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      My personal theory is that it would be a Kindle-sized iPhone,

      I'd put my money on that, too: I've found the iPod Touch a lot more usable as a web/email/games appliance than a netbook - one with a 20-30% larger screen would be killer.

      like a basic word-processing app.

      Maybe, not even that: if its packaged as a "tablet PC" then punters would expect handwriting recognition and an office suite. If, however, its positioned as an "iPod Max" then why would you expect to write more than a brief email message on it?

      That's the problem with netbooks: they look like PCs, quack like PCs and you can do office work on them, but only if you're really, really desperate.

      The iPod Touch is something that you can grab, wake up almost instantly to check your email, look at the news headlines and check the TV schedules. If your email requires more than a twitter-esque reply then you go and wake up the proper PC. The only snag is the current screen is a tad too small for web browsing - although with the slick pan and zoom its still better than a first-gen netbook with an airline-surplus screen.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  25. it's gonna cost a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Apple introduces a Tablet it would cost $ 2000+ .

  26. Add an eInk screen and...magic. by Sabathius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first to put an eInk screen in addition to the normal screen in a Netbook or tablet form-factor will win all the prizes.

    Think about it...all the features of a netbook you love, but the eInk display from a Kindle that allows you to send documents to it. Oh, the humanity!

  27. Whining about Slashdot by Fantom42 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I'll probably get modded down for this.

    Come on, Slashdot. This "news" is so old. When you've been scooped by Leo Laporte and John C. Dvorak on This Week In Tech TWO WEEKS AGO, you know you suck. Stay out of the rumor business. You're not any good at it. Stick to the cool tech stories that made you who you are today.

    That said, this topic is kind of interesting for Apple fans. If Apple does put out a product like this, its probably going to have some pretty interesting functionality. Usually when Steve Jobs embarks on a product that he's criticized in the past, it'll have a pretty unique spin on it (not just marketing spin). For example, the iPhone was a pretty large departure in terms of user interface philosophy from previous phones and brought some new ideas to the table. So, stories like this are kind of exciting. Maybe they have some good ideas. Then again, Apple's released some real boners too. In the end, if they release a tablet-like thing, it will almost certainly be interesting, and may or may not be useful/good.

    I guess my point is I mostly pretend to ignore stories like this because in the end there really isn't much point in speculating over what any company is going to do unless you have a dog in the fight somehow. If it comes out, and its useful, and worth the price, I'll buy it. If not, I won't. No sense in getting all worked up about it now.

  28. Dell Mini 10 or 12 with Ubuntu looking better.... by mcwop · · Score: 1

    Been waiting for Apple to deal with this segment. As a Mac Fanboy, I have been disappointed. I need something between my iPhone and my 17" laptop, and I do not want to spend $1000+. The Dell minis loaded with Ubuntu look pretty sweet right now.

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  29. Since I predicted the iPhone... by copponex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=193127&cid=15847027

    Okay. That was probably dumb luck.

    But if you look at the iPod Touch, and you look at where people are going with these days, you'll notice that the sales of netbooks are absolutely skyrocketing. Apple doesn't have any product that takes advantage of this new market. So, as a company dedicated to profit, they may make one.

    My prediction: Macbook Touch. Atom Processor. Bluetooth, Wifi, also available with wireless broadband. $799 with no provider, or for $499 with a contract from AT&T or whomever. Compatible with apps made for the iPhone, running Snow Leopard.

    They'll probably fuck it up by including just one USB port and no video out. But hey, that's Apple.

    1. Re:Since I predicted the iPhone... by samkass · · Score: 1

      Considering that the current iPod Touch has video out already (although you need to buy a cable adapter to use it), I doubt they'll remove it in the upgrade.

      The iPod Touch *is* a netbook. It just doesn't have a very flexible UI for general computing tasks.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    2. Re:Since I predicted the iPhone... by copponex · · Score: 1

      I was thinking DisplayPort or something useful. It may have a cheesy video out that shows what video is playing, but you cannot use a secondary monitor as a display on any of the iPod models.

  30. Up to date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think Slashdot could get up to date on your logo for these type posts? There hasn't been a G5 since 2005.

  31. What the Apple guy told me by SteveFoerster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work for a university, and Apple recently sent a guy to talk to our faculty about the future of technology. During question time I referred to the possibility of a Mac tablet so I could try to gauge his immediate expression. No clue from that, all I had to go on was his response that Apple is obviously aware that people are talking about the possibility of a Mac tablet, and they'll come out with one as soon as they can do a good quality one for less than six hundred bucks.

    Of course, he also said our computer labs were obsolete, which was bullshit, so who knows what to believe.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    1. Re:What the Apple guy told me by iluvcapra · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course, he also said our computer labs were obsolete, which was bullshit,

      Interesting, calls for a cost-benefit analysis. How much do all the computers, wired ethernet, office space and IT compare with buying everyone a windows or linux netbook and putting in some Wifi? The ongoing IT and support staff has to be the biggest expense. Ten years ago, I was on a help desk at USC and you generally had to hold peoples hands, particularly the 40-year-olds who were coming back for their MBAs. But now, people are generally self-supporting, and if you make them have to walk a distance with the netbook in order to get support, you incentivize them helping their damnselves.

      Of course, I almost never got support calls on the Mac machines, except to replace keyboards, and was constantly having to reimage the lab PCs. But they were all running either Win98 or NT4 at the time. Times change after all.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    2. Re:What the Apple guy told me by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's pretty easy for us to determine that our computer labs are necessary, primarily because the students really like them. We know this from surveying them and from the ultimate metric: hourly head counts. Besides, our labs also get used as classrooms, for training, and for other IT-related events. There's no way we could replace them with a "Here's your laptop!" approach.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    3. Re:What the Apple guy told me by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Interestingly, Apple sells laptops, not classrooms.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    4. Re:What the Apple guy told me by profplump · · Score: 1

      It's a little unfair to say that you need to use the computer labs preferentially to other rooms, at least in this context -- if everyone already had a laptop then *every* room would be a computer lab.

      Now you might need special equipment that is best provided in the lab, or people may prefer to use the workstations there rather than their own laptops, etc. But it's disingenuous to suggest that simply because people are using the labs now means that the labs could not be largely replaced by some alternative computing solution.

    5. Re:What the Apple guy told me by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Of course, he also said our computer labs were obsolete, which was bullshit, so who knows what to believe.

      When I first got to the university I attended (late 80's), they bragged they were advanced in computers, had 4 computers per student (at ~18K undergrad), and back then, not every student had a computer. Now I've heard it claimed that they have about 20 computers per student... and the students without their own computers are impossible to find. Assuming you always have bleeding edge computers in your labs... but no one needs them because everyone has a few computers of their own, at what point do the labs become obsolete?

    6. Re:What the Apple guy told me by Me!+Me!+42 · · Score: 1

      4 computers per student in the 80's?
      20 computers per student in the 00's?
      What in the world for? Much as I like computers 360,000 computers at a medium sized university sounds "a bit excessive."
      Is this a typo? or some obscure slash dot joke?

      --
      -- My apologies if the above facts contain any opinions, or vice versa! --
    7. Re:What the Apple guy told me by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's more likely to be a suppository.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:What the Apple guy told me by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy for us to determine that our computer labs are necessary, primarily because the students really like them. We know this from surveying them and from the ultimate metric: hourly head counts.

      Yes, but that's because they are able to use the labs with zero or marginal cost. If you were to refund them the cost of the labs in their tuition (or stipend them a computation allowance, looks better on the aid applications), and then charge them to use the labs, would they make the same decision, or would they prefer independently buying their own system with the money?

      Obviously people will still need the Sun workstations and other niche rigs...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    9. Re:What the Apple guy told me by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Most of them already have their own laptops, but in surveys they insist they want the labs anyway. And, as I mentioned, we do other things with the space. We're confident they're worth it.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    10. Re:What the Apple guy told me by macshome · · Score: 1

      Unless the guy they sent was Steve Jobs, or is on a design team, he has no idea at all what Apple has in the hardware pipe.

    11. Re:What the Apple guy told me by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      but in surveys they insist they want the labs anyway

      What kind of a reason is that? Do they want a pony, too? Far be it for a tertiary educational institution to do something for the sake of efficiency that their students would disagree with, that never happens! :)

      I was thinking though that the main reason we still have labs is because it's the only effective way to control how many installs of Minitab or SPSS (let alone Office) have to be licensed. On those grounds it's probably still justifiable.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    12. Re:What the Apple guy told me by catmistake · · Score: 1

      "Bring your own box" education works very well for many tasks, but for others, it is simply not an option. Examples?

      Development, game design, animation, engineering, simulation. Anything where the word "computing" might be used. Discipline-wise, that runs the gamut: mathematics, computing, engineering, art, design, business, language.

      so... it is simply not an option that a student do (gasp) development on his/her own machine???!!!

      it is simply not an option that a student design a game on his/her own machine???!!!

      it is simply not an option that a student engage in animation, engineering, or simulation on his/her own machine???!!!

      With anything that has to do with computing, math, or art... a student CAN'T use their own computer?

      What CAN they do with their own computer?

      Glad I'm not a student anymore... because I can do ALL that on my own machine. And its like 5 years old. Insightful mod my ass. The computer labs are now and hitherto unnecessary, and... obsolete. If you get more than 5 students in your lab this month, we'll talk again... but otherwise... just keep the dust off them. Just in case. Thanks.

    13. Re:What the Apple guy told me by WillyDavidK · · Score: 1

      Of course, he also said our computer labs were obsolete, which was bullshit, so who knows what to believe.

      Well, remember that for Apple, anything more than 6 months old is considered 'obsolete'.

      --
      For lack of a better signature...
  32. I don't know... by socrplayr813 · · Score: 1

    While I don't think it's out of the question that they'd make a tablet, I think people are right that we'll just end up with a next generation iPhone/iTouch.

    The tablet market is competitive, but it's not huge. I think they'd have a good shot at the art crowd with a decent digitizer, but nothing they've shown so far (that I'm aware of) seems to be going in that direction. They seem much more focused on finger interaction and multitouch. On top of that, Apple isn't terribly desirable in business, which is the other major draw for tablets.

    I don't see a big win for them other than sheer novelty. I will admit, though, that novelty seems to be one of their biggest strengths.

    --
    The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
    1. Re:I don't know... by SpammersAreScum · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the small tablet and small clamshell choices are sadly limited. What have you really got in the 5"-to-7" screen fits-in-your-jacket-pocket space that's a PC or a PDA? Especially if you'd rather not spend $1K+? Damned little, and I've been looking: a couple Viliv models almost available, the UMID, and what else? Here's hoping that's what this will be.

  33. And why do people still pay attention to analysts? by divisionbyzero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Almost every bit of information they have is second or third hand (a guy heard from a guy who heard from a guy). They are barely one step above a rumor site. Most of them don't have the expertise to separate the wheat from the chaff.

    Industry Analysts who look at industry trends and give advice to executives can be useful but analysts for financial institutions (e.g. Gene Munster for Piper Jaffray) that are making specific predictions about product introductions have a (not so) hidden agenda. Get people to buy now on optimistic news and dump later when it proves to be bogus. Remember, they make money in both directions.

  34. Re:Please stop these posts about non-news rumours by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    You are polluting the internet with your whining. Please stop. You're hurting the internet.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  35. Re:Dell Mini 10 or 12 with Ubuntu looking better.. by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    That's why I've kept my 12.1" Powerbook, but it's EOL. Fan bearings are rumbling, audio jack doesn't work unless you get the connection just right, same with the powercord, and the backlight is extremely dim, and I'm starting to see enough Intel only stuff. Although once they went back to a dedicated video card in the new MacBook Aluminum, I've been tempted to get one this fall when 10.6 is released.

    I've found that anything less than 12" is hard to use if you're coding. Especially these 9/10" widescreens that are on the acer aspire ones and other netbooks. Fortunately I'm not doing as much coding and more management and meetings. I suspect, though, that I'm still going to need a full laptop. Hell, I didn't like the air (I mean why pay $500 more for a machine with no optical drive and no ability to replace batteries. I used to travel with 3 laptop batteries).

    If they release a 10" tablet or iPod Touch - Mega Screen Edition, I'll consider it. I set up a new production server the other day from my iPhone while on a friend's boat thanks to SSH, VNC, and Safari Mobile. It was less than ideal for the task but worked...plus the fact I was on a boat made up for the inconvenience.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  36. In other news by anonymousNR · · Score: 0

    Trusted sources say that Apple is buying Amazon Kindle and renaming it to iKindle, industry experts say it will be the biggest merge in this century.

    Citation not required. iBelieve InsideAppleHole website.

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
  37. Would You Like Some Cheeze with that Whine? by gadlaw · · Score: 1

    Just don't click on something you don't want to see, don't click on it, don't respond to it, stick your fingers in your ears and go 'La La La' if it helps you. Geez

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  38. Everything Old Is New Again by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    When the eMate came out it was educationally priced at $700. It was way too expensive at that time for me to even think about getting one. I finally got one second hand a few years ago and loved the form factor. Even though functionally it was rough around the edges. As Wikipedia shows, it was the direct forerunner to the first iBooks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMate_300 Could it be Apple actually knew what they were doing and released the iPhone/iTouch be test arenas for an iPad? Of course, this time they succeeded beyond their wildest imaginings. Unlike the poor eMate which is gone but not forgotten. Still, you have to wonderâ¦

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  39. Next-gen Newton (Digital Hub Interface) by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    How about a Next-gen Newton? Target a few niches, where large amounts of user input is not a big factor and use the same strategies as the iPhone to minimize the need to input lots of information. Just make sure the form-factor is very lightweight (A clipboard or a news magazine) and aesthetically pleasing. The form-factor will be key. People should be able to relax when they lounge about in their living rooms with this thing.

    • Planner
    • eBook Reader
    • Mobile Web Browsing
    • Remote Control (For Media and Home automation)
    • Email (Reader, primarily)
    • RSS Feeds
    • Photo Browser

    A lot of this could be done as a Remote Access to their Macintosh computer! This fits in nicely with the "Digital Hub" strategy.

    Put in a digital camera, and you can use it to inventory and organize household possessions and also use it as a videophone. Think of it as less an independent computer and more of a new kind of interface for the living room.

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. self fulfilling prophesy? by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever wonder if maybe Apple might see all these rumors, and interpret them as a large demand for a product, then create said product?

    I wouldn't rule out the possibility that inital rumors were false, but got the heads talking in Cupertino.

  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. I look forward to getting my hands on an iPadd by ethan1701 · · Score: 1

    As seen on ST:TNG. Now, with more restrictions!

  44. Oblig, by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    * Space - it had a lot of it. (Competitors had more, though)

    And no wireless. Lame.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  45. apple great by animumus1 · · Score: 1

    will be interesting to touch. i believe apple always do revolutionary products!

    --
    better small than poor sybs.ru
  46. On campus computer labs by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    "Of course, he also said our computer labs were obsolete"

    I never bought into this idea either. :)

    I'm a laptop owner who still likes using the campus labs

    Sure, an average laptop isn't an obscene cost relative to college in general, but a top-of-the-line desktop is gonna beat that laptop in performance. Having such souped-up laptops rather changes the cost metrics, eh?

    Some of the horsepower is really useful, for heavy-duty scientific-data analysis or something. In that case, the desktops are needed. Even if those desktops are being used for less-demanding tasks at any particular time, the performance boost is still appreciated, to be honest.

    Large WiFi networks seem to run into random connection issues even if the network is built decently (not to mention issues on the laptop end)

    Having several students per lab computer has got to help with costs, as well as standardization/economies of scale

    Also, I simply prefer the desktop form factor (no trackpads, better keyboard & monitor distance & angle)

    Finally, not having to carry the laptop around is useful, especially if you have a normal or over-sized one and/or need to be carrying a lot of other stuff

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  47. Re:One thing I just don't understand about Apple.. by dangitman · · Score: 1

    They DO have a right to selectively license MacOS X to a vendor who agrees to use high quality, consistent hardware. They could easily get a company like Dell or Acer to license it for one particular line of netbooks.

    Contradict yourself much? Since when has Dell or Acer made high quality hardware?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  48. Re:Mod parent up, or at least not down by tellthepeople · · Score: 1

    Would he be a troll if he didn't compliment them?

    --
    Tanto nomini nullum par elogium.