Slashdot Mirror


Sci-Fi Writers Dream Up Ideas For US Government

cheezitmike writes "This week in Washington, DC, a group of Sci-Fi writers is helping the US Department of Homeland Security envision the future at the 2009 Homeland Security Science & Technology Stakeholders Conference. The agency is hoping the interaction between writers and bureaucrats helps the government 'break old habits of thought' and 'help managers think more broadly about projects and their potential reactions and unintended consequences.' And, it's at minimal expense to taxpayers, since the writers are consulting pro bono."

123 comments

  1. George Orwell by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems like now that they've gone and made 1984 a reality, they need new material to work off of.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:George Orwell by spiffmastercow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems like now that they've gone and made 1984 a reality, they need new material to work off of.

      Really? I'd say we're closer to Brave New World these days.. Don't forget to take your soma--err, i mean Paxil.

    2. Re:George Orwell by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

      It could be worse. The writers might suggest world peace could be achieved by some extensive remodelling of New York City real estate triggered by the appearance of a giant squid.

    3. Re:George Orwell by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I was totally expecting you to go somewhere else with that in the second line, like Dr Manhattan. Wasn't expecting the giant squid.

    4. Re:George Orwell by kungfugleek · · Score: 2, Funny
      No body expects the Giant Squid!!!

      Its chief weapon is surprise. Surprise and fear. Fear and surprise are two weapons. Fear and surprise and ruthless efficiency...

    5. Re:George Orwell by rajafarian · · Score: 1

      Come on, dude, you're making us look bad. You ended your sentence with TWO prepositions. /sigh

    6. Re:George Orwell by macraig · · Score: 1

      What's this giant squid? You mean the Flying Spaghetti Monster, or Cthulu? Heck, for all I know maybe they're one and the same? Homer says, "Mmmmmm, meat balls...."

    7. Re:George Orwell by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I think they're trying to synergize the most dystopic concepts from both books. Politicians are nothing if not efficient... at making things worse.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:George Orwell by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      I was discussing Orwell with 2 women in a bar and ended with 2 propositions

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    9. Re:George Orwell by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Presumably not from those two women. Unelss they proposed that you get lost.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:George Orwell by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      when pigs fly out of my ass, only pigs will have wings

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  2. Noooooooo...... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're just giving them ideas! You don't want them to know how a dystopian future tyranny might maintain control!

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
    1. Re:Noooooooo...... by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No joke. This is the last thing we should be doing. They need a crash course in understanding factual reality, not some wacky sci fi hallucination.

    2. Re:Noooooooo...... by Jurily · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They need a crash course in understanding factual reality, not some wacky sci fi hallucination.

      The voters, too. Someone keeps electing these morons.

    3. Re:Noooooooo...... by Hanyin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The voters, too. Someone keeps electing these morons.

      You know, while I understand why government officials (particularly the ones higher up) are referred to as morons and the like, I think it's far more likely that they're well aware that they're dishonest with the public and serve themselves and come across as idiots because of their tangled web of lies which really doesn't matter that much once you consider how easy it is to sway public opinion with propaganda.

      Of course, given that the great majority of candidates are self-serving (morons) to begin with it's not surprising that people like this get elected. Oh well, I guess I'll just find a less-restrictive place to live when things become too oppressive for me =).

    4. Re:Noooooooo...... by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you find that place please let me know.

    5. Re:Noooooooo...... by selven · · Score: 1

      Screwed-up African country + $1 million for bribes and whatever else you might need can go a long way.

    6. Re:Noooooooo...... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      The voters, too. Someone keeps electing these morons.

      It is hard not to when your realistic choices consist of moron A or moron B. Look at the UK at the moment: pretty much the entire parliament has been caught with their hands in the till. This clearly shows that a majority of politicians, regardless of party, are not suitable candidates for the job. We need a system where the cost to run for office is not so high so we can persuade people with normal careers to run.

    7. Re:Noooooooo...... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Idaho, Nevada or Texas after the Union dissolves. That's my plan. Don't think that those states are going sit on their hands if the government doesn't start reining itself in. A whole bunch of states are considering, or have even passed in at least one case, legislation to reassert their 10th Amendment rights. That's long overdue.

      We are living in a time of Constituional crisis that has been building for many years. Obama is doing everything he can to push us over the edge that Clinton and Bush, etc, led us to. I for one would like to see the part of the amendment allowing for popular election of senators be repealed. It would help if some of the most powerful leaders in our country weren't elected through lowest-common-denominator elections:
      "Vote for me because Candidate B eats babies" "Vote for me because Candidate A molests wombats."

      Of course, for that matter, we should let the House of Representatives elect the president, too. It's not like they're some brilliant group of people, but maybe it's possible we could move beyond the long line of third-string Presidential candidates we've had for the last couple decades.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:Noooooooo...... by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

      You're one of the sci-fi authors they hired, aren't you? Good luck on your novel.

  3. Dreamer Fithp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    roll on the nuclear bomb powered space ships

  4. Reminds me.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... a little of the group of sci-fi writers "visiting" NORAD in Niven & Pournelle's "Footfall"

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:Reminds me.... by billybob_jcv · · Score: 1

      My first thought as well - perhaps the Fithp have arrived and the Gov't isn't telling us?

  5. I for one... by pwnies · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...welcome our soon to be skynet ran big brother government with laser beams on their heads.

  6. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have thought that the authors of the main recreational reading material of scientists and geeks (outside of p0rn) would have any good ideas about good ideas...

    1. Re:Really? by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      read pr0n? I just thought you watched it on the media player of choice or looked at the pictures.

  7. Testing for unintended consequences by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    help managers think more broadly about projects and their potential reactions and unintended consequences

    In legislative circles, do they ever run simulations? Test new laws by deploying them in MMOs first?

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Testing for unintended consequences by Stile+65 · · Score: 1

      You can also run simulations without actual human participants. Searching SourceForge for "game theory" turns up several toolkits and libraries that may be useful in that.

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  8. Sci Fi or Suspense Thriller by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 1

    It seems like they might have been better off using writers for a show like 24 or CSI where they have to be at-least realistic enough to seem "plausible" to the audience. On one of the comentaries for 24, they get their ideas from real life, but make things like repositioning satellites or breaking crypto go much quicker than it can in real life. They'd be better off getting those writers with engineers to say "what would it take to sdo x,y,z like we did in Season 4, Episode 2" to set more realistic short-term goals.

    Sci-Fi doesn't have to overcome the "realism barrier", and being so advanced that it is at present seemingly impossible (warp travel, light sabers, etc.) is part of the appeal. The problem is that it will take so long to "get there" (think computers in 50's-60's SciFi), that technology could go in a completely different direction.

    However, we're getting to the point with special effects we no longer have to do sci-fi in a way that is "easy" to produce (e.g. a computer with a futuristic GUI like Minority report is producable on screen where in the past computers always talked because it was physically easier to do). The good thing is that since Sci-Fi can produce almost anything on screen or print that it can think up, it will follow more linearly with reality rather than being as limited as to what can be generated.

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
    1. Re:Sci Fi or Suspense Thriller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point is to bring in creativity. I don't know about CSI, but 24 isn't very creative.

      The criminal can imagine the crime but the author can imagine being caught. Likewise, the legislator can imagine the legislation but the author can imagine the loopholes, caveats, and ramifications.

      Non-groupthink sources of creative brainpower are very much needed in the government, as we've seen over the past several years.

    2. Re:Sci Fi or Suspense Thriller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand the DIFFERENCE between SciFi and Fantasy.
      SciFi does have to be logical in a coherent universe even if one or two factors are skewed dramatically different from our own universe.

      When I talk with uniformed military folks about future capabilities, I always ask both
      (1) what do you need right now to make your job easier?
      and
      (2) if you had a magic wand, what SINGLE function or capability would you like the next time you deploy?

    3. Re:Sci Fi or Suspense Thriller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sure. Because when specialists in interrogations say that torture doesn't work for reliable intelligence gathering, but 24 is a show based around selling the idea that torture does work, then clearly 24 is more "plausibly" realistic than, say, Stephenson's Cryptonomicon or even The Diamond Age. For you maybe. I'll take re-reading or watching good SF over 24's torture porn any day.

    4. Re:Sci Fi or Suspense Thriller by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      1)Better personal armor. Personal armor often hinders, it might protect but it sure doesn't make the job easier.

      2)Tricorder star trek style. Having the ability to scan the area and get details on the positions/number of enemy soldiers/combatants.

      Disclaimer: I am not nor have ever been in any armed force.

    5. Re:Sci Fi or Suspense Thriller by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      More to the point, there is a difference between Science Fiction, and Science Fantasy. Star Drek is almost science fiction, but star wars is science fantasy ... Bloody book stores even put horror and pure fantasy in the section marked "Science Fiction".

  9. Look up Pandora's Box by feyhunde · · Score: 3, Informative

    Regan had a team of science fiction advisers including Larry Niven back in the 80's to help him. In his Novel Footfall he has a good fictional account of meetings between them and the government with during a crises.

    --
    I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    1. Re:Look up Pandora's Box by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Jerry Pournelle. He's definitely not entirely innocent of the SDI debacle.

    2. Re:Look up Pandora's Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. They've written a couple of books together.

    3. Re:Look up Pandora's Box by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that Larry Niven was NOT president of the SFWA, but Pournelle was. Also, Pournelle tends to have pretty crazy ideas about reality.

    4. Re:Look up Pandora's Box by maxume · · Score: 1

      No, he means Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle. There is some hilarious circle jerking in Footfall; the ideas are neat, but the rest of it is pretty much something else.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Look up Pandora's Box by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Regan had a team of science fiction advisers including Larry Niven back in the 80's to help him."

      IIRC he also had an astrologer? My beef is with anti-science writers found in the opinion columns of major papers or masqurading as experts to congress.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  10. Here's a couple wild ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    * Stop torturing people. It's good at terrorizing, but doesn't actually help catch bad people.

    * Stop locking people into iron cages because they ate a particular kind of plant.

    Here's a freebie:

    * Stop making laws based on dictates of an invisible guy in the sky who burns people for eternity because they stuck their jimmy in the wrong hole. It's just a little kooky when you think about it.

    Seriously, consulting sci-fi authors? How about consulting superheros like Captain Common Sense?

    1. Re:Here's a couple wild ideas by joepa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, consulting sci-fi authors? How about consulting superheros like Captain Common Sense?

      Unfortunately, there's good reason to believe that Captain Common Sense is a homophobic theist. To draw the kinds of enlightened conclusions that the parent does, it turns out that we need to override our common sense tendencies. Consulting sci-fi writers is actually quite a clever way of dealing with the limitations of common sense.

    2. Re:Here's a couple wild ideas by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      A big recurring theme in a lot of sci-fi i read/watch is manipulation of the invisible guy in the sky to control others.
      Foundation & Foundation and empire (the mule stuff is more straight up sci-fi, but the religion and economic control is quite insightful)
      Stargate (movie & SG1), apart from the obvious goa'uld stuff, the series regularly has local leaders keep the superstition going abuse their position even when there is no goa'uld. (not really insightful but hey it's available in tv form)

      The inefficiencies of torture have also been covered innumerable times, i am yet to come across a good book/film with a clear anti drug prohibition story, any suggestions?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  11. Consequences? by Spyware23 · · Score: 1

    Kobayashi Maru. Lets see Homeland plan(/shoot) their way out of -that- one.

    1. Re:Consequences? by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Just like Kirk. They'll hax the situation so they can win.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  12. An Improvement by Maalstrom+Aran · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ideas, created with pure thought and imagination, that are offered to the government sounds like a much better process than those offered by politicians and lobbyists. Generational ideas are what can improve our place in life, not those created from greed of power.

    --
    Truth is a matter of perspective. Wear the other guy's shoes before you dismiss him.
    1. Re:An Improvement by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Ideas, created with pure thought and imagination, that are offered to the government" sounds like the kind of insane bullshit spouted by political and religious extremists. We don't want this. We want government to be based on a factual, informed, and insightful understanding of reality. The Evangelical Talibanization of American society and government is what we should be escaping, not promoting. I know, I know, these are sci fi writers, not Commercial Christianity preachers like the last administartion. It is a slippery slope, though.

    2. Re:An Improvement by anonymousNR · · Score: 2, Informative
      At first I really freaked out then I read TFA

      Andrews recruited only sci-fi writers who had conventional science or engineering chops on their resumes. Now about a third of the writers have PhDs.

      Then I was ok

      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    3. Re:An Improvement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, an improvement but only in the entertainment value.

      These guys do best exactly what we don't need more of from the DHS - "movie plot threats."

      "Movie plot threats" are a dime a dozen, we will bankrupt ourselves trying to defend against even a fraction of a precent of them. We need to spend money on the basics like first responders, medical facilities, emergency planning, etc that apply to any threat, man-made or acts of god.

      And once that stuff is taken care of to a reasonable degree, the rest of the money needs to stay in the hands of private citizens who will make much more productive use of it - whether it is as simple as buying food and shelter for their families or running small businesses.

      The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:An Improvement by Maalstrom+Aran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's the scope of the quality idea that matters. It's one thing to work hard to build a plant in a certain district so you can get elected again next year and quite another to plan for a society using generational ideas that span more than the length of a politicians career. We need more dreams, like the Apollo program, to drive our creation and innovation or our society will stagnate and destroy itself. Until we manage our natural desires of pride and selfishness we must rely on our natural talents like curiosity and growth to protect us. Technology is an amazing part of our lives, but it can't fix everything.

      --
      Truth is a matter of perspective. Wear the other guy's shoes before you dismiss him.
    5. Re:An Improvement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      quite another to plan for a society using generational ideas that span more than the length of a politicians career.

      You seem to be unclear on exactly what the Department of Homeland Security does for a living.

      Actually, I guess that is no surprise, most people probably have no idea either since all they seem to is spend billions of tax dollars with little to no tangible benefit.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:An Improvement by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand your point, but it does not address my complaint. It is by no means a given that sci fi writers per se fulfill your point. Getting policy ideas from fiction writers is a dubious ploy at best, and utterly insane at worst.

    7. Re:An Improvement by Maalstrom+Aran · · Score: 1

      Well It's pretty clear to a lot of people that those in power are usually committed to staying in power. These people work hard to sell themselves and the ideas that they adopt so they are more popular then the other guy. Certainly these people gain skills in people/business/image management. However these skills don't necessarily prepare them to be the best at managing a society/city. Collaborative input from others with different perspectives, I believe, is essential. These writers, whether they write sci fi or science fiction, are adept at seeing a situation from a much broader perspective then the limited scope of politicians. Reality, of course, cannot be ignored and a business manager is a good first step for managing a city but if we never think of the possible big picture then we'll have a tough time changing our day to day lives. Getting policy ideas from the guy with the most money sounds utterly insane to me.

      --
      Truth is a matter of perspective. Wear the other guy's shoes before you dismiss him.
    8. Re:An Improvement by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Then I was ok

      Really? And how do you feel about investment bankers advising the government on economic policy?

    9. Re:An Improvement by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      If you knew WTF you were talking about, you'd be well aware that these people understand the stupidity of movie plot threats precisely because they spend a great deal of time trying to invent plausible scenarios themselves. Many of these guys and gals have been consulting for the government long before DHS existed.

    10. Re:An Improvement by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Umm maybe because the scientists and engineers come from several different branches of knowledge and are trained in a measurable science that human emotion has no part in? An "investment banker" isn't a man of science he's closer to a shaman or priest who gives a guess with numbers thrown in and is reliant on humans not to get too scared or fearless otherwise it becomes useless gibberish.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    11. Re:An Improvement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you knew WTF you were talking about, you'd be well aware that these people understand the stupidity of movie plot threats precisely because they spend a great deal of time trying to invent plausible scenarios themselves.

      I call bullshit. These people do not have an education or specialization in public policy or any other field applicable to non-movie-plot threats. Their entire careers are based on writing entertaining fiction and not the drudgery of high quality infrastructure planning.

      Many of these guys and gals have been consulting for the government long before DHS existed.

      Well if that's true, which I kinda doubt, then it was just as stupid to be hiring them back then as it is now.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:An Improvement by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      If you would like to challenge their credibility, all of them have an internet presence and many of them keep blogs. I'm sure they would welcome your input, given your superior knowledge of the issues. Just make sure to post links via Slashdot so we may all learn from you as well.

    13. Re:An Improvement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      If you would like to challenge their credibility,

      I'm challenging YOUR credibility. You made an assertion, put up or shut up.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:An Improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about fucking border control? Seems like keepinmg the bad guys out would be a good start. Then we can move on to finding the bad guys already here. Plus we could stop the flood of illegal beaners from coming into America to sell drugs, run prostitutes, form gangs and cause our country to head down the path of being a 3rd world shithole just like Mexico. Fucking control the borders and you cut out a lot of the need for first responders, et al. Psoted anonymously because of stupid dicksucking mexican loving faggots with mod points.

    15. Re:An Improvement by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My credibility, that derives from knowing how to read, and having read the SIGMA website and several of the blogs of its members?

      My assertion, that you don't know what you're talking about, reinforced when you betrayed that you didn't know SIGMA pre-dates DHS?

      You have nothing and you know it. You're engaged in a trolling tactic, so now I'm doing this for fun.

      As to your assertion, that a bureaucrat can anticipate threats better than science fiction authors (despite having advanced degrees, scientific or engineering experience, military or military consulting experience, and lives continually engaged in though experiments of scientific, military, political, and cultural extrapolation), let's hear what a career bureaucrat has to say:

      "Never did anybody's thought process about how to protect America, did we ever think that the evildoers would fly not one but four commercial aircraft into precious U.S. targets. Never." - George Bush, 9/16/2001.

      Funny, Tom Clancy thought of that. So did our military and intelligence services on numerous occasions. The bureaucrats overseeing the analysts who wrote those reports considered it implausible. They knew it was possible, but they lacked the imagination to believe that terrorists would actually do that.

      Is it any wonder they're now listening to people with imagination?

    16. Re:An Improvement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      My credibility, that derives from knowing how to read, and having read the SIGMA website and several of the blogs of its members?

      And yet, you are completely incapable of providing a single link to back up your claims. Funny that.

      As to your assertion, that a bureaucrat can anticipate threats better than science fiction authors

      Not at all what I wrote. What I wrote was that focusing on the billions of one-off threats is a total waste of time and money because we can't afford to protect against every single threat someone can dream up.

      But thanks for providing a perfect example of what I was talking about. So far we've had one semi-movie plot threat come true - just one. And look at the billions of dollars we've wasted on preventing it from happening again. Pick 10 more threats just like that and the war in Iraq starts to look cheap.

      But lets take a step further and look at the kind of utterly ridiculous and pointless ideas these sci-fi writers have proposed:

      Grind up and aerosolize pigs, spray it over an unruly population. Let the population know what just happened and remind them they won't go to Heaven with pork in their systems so it's not a good time to die.

      an antibiotic that cures martyrdom;

      At the Washington conference, Bear offered to put biometrics researchers in touch with movie special-effects experts. The experts might be able to help the government determine how to match the face of someone walking through an airport to a grainy photo of a known terrorist. -- Because we all know that movie special effects let you zoom in on any picture until it is clear, but only hollywood scientists know how to do that.

      Bear says the writers offer powerful imaginations that can conjure up not only possible methods of attack, but also ideas about how governments and individuals will respond and what kinds of high-tech tools could prevent attacks.

      Gee, he even comes right out and admits they aren't about broad-based planning, they are about conjuring up the improbable stuff.

      And finally, the group includes fucking Jerry Pournelle. Anyone who has ever read his columns in Byte knows the guy is a bumbling narcissist who has a completely mis
      guided view about his own technical competence.

      So yeah, I DO know WTF I'm talking about and you've proven quite well that YOU don't know jack shit.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    17. Re:An Improvement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Fucking control the borders and you cut out a lot of the need for first responders,

      Because we will never have natural disasters like hurricanes Katrina, Ike or Gustav, wildfires or tornadoes, earthquakes, or plane crashes or chemical spills or landslides or tsunamis. Good plan.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    18. Re:An Improvement by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Why should I waste my time on Google, when you are the one projecting a ridiculous personal conception of science fiction authors? This is a Socratic troll-alogue, and I'm leading you toward wisdom, but you're going to work for it.

      First, read David Brin's editorial on the SIGMA website:

      [T]he question always boils down to: "How can we better anticipate, cover, and overcome all conceivable or plausible threat envelopes?"

      While this is a worthy and admirable emphasis for protectors to take, it is also profoundly and narrowly overspecialized. It reflects a counterfactual assumption that, given sufficient funding, these communities can not only anticipate all future shocks, but prepare adequately to deal with them on a strictly in-house basis, through the application of fiercely effective professional action.

      You started preaching an aspect of his sermon, one he's been preaching well before 9/11. I was anticipating you'd find it; I guess you can only lead a horse to water.

      The budget allocated to SIGMA is minuscule. The participants are involved because they consider it a patriotic duty. Obviously they're not tasked with developing detailed contingency plans, their job is to think of the things that a specialized analyst or a managerial bureaucrat will never think of. That is not chasing movie plot threats, that is quite the opposite, because movie plot threats are just the sort of stupid things that unimaginative, politically motivated people come up when told to "think outside the box". Or to frighten the public.

      As a form of satire, security researcher Bruce Schnier holds an annual contest to come up with absurd movie plot threats that would actually justify DHS policies. I suspect that is what you're going off from. The only SIGMA authors that I can think of who wouldn't agree with, and be highly amused by, the exercise would be the paranoid right-wingers Niven and Pournelle. And it seems even they aren't fans of DHS.

      The Bear thing you quote betrays another assumption made in ignorance. Where do you think potential computer vision researchers end up after they decide they'd rather make money than make tenure? Pixar and ILM are full of PhDs. I'm not sure Bear understands the many sub-fields of computer graphics, but he is certainly correct in knowing where some of the smartest people in the industry are working.

    19. Re:An Improvement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      when you are the one projecting a ridiculous personal conception of science fiction authors?

      Yeah, now we get down to your real issues. You've got some sort of hero worship bullshit going on and when I criticized the DHS you took it personally as a criticism of "science fiction authors."

      That's why you totally misrepresented what I said and tried to portray it as some sort of endorsement of George Bush.

      Grow up fanboi.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    20. Re:An Improvement by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Most numbers people in investment banks these days have hard science training, either an engineering or physics or math degree.

      The degree is not the problem, the underlying question is do you want government to be advised by experts with a narrow and self serving focus on their own small part of the industry? This is how you get solutions like bailing banks out while letting ordinary people lose their houses. By most definitions, that's not what democratic government is all about.

    21. Re:An Improvement by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Ok, lets say they have hard science training. How can you have a 'hard' science when its based on humans emotional state? Beyond psychology that is. Unless someones developed psychohistory without the rest of us knowing about it? I'd push that investment banking isn't a science, its a ideology, or at best a study of mobs. Yes they work with big numbers, yes they use complex formulas, but at the root of all those numbers are humans with all their fears and desires. You can't give that a proper numerical value so you can't truly predict what will happen. It's all guessing, its all intuition, human skills that are far from becoming a 'hard science'.

      If our system of government was taken over by scientists and engineers I doubt they would bail out the banks. This is where I'll assume, but I'd guess that people trained in real sciences would have created a logical commerce system and it wouldn't have been made to fail like it has. Our current system of money creation isn't sustainable and I'm not talking about the new idiotic carbon bs green tree huger movement. People have to fail and lose in our current system, otherwise the rest of us can't pay the interest on our loans. It sucks. Give me technocracy over democracy any day.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
  13. Explains the lack of decent movies by russlar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Huh. So this explains the lack of decent, original movies lately: all the good writers are working on real life!

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
    1. Re:Explains the lack of decent movies by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Real life wasn't polling well among the hardcore gaming segemnt. They have decided to bring in some new writers and reboot the franchise.

      Hope it turns out of good as the latest Star Trek movie.

  14. Writers are consulting pro bono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We just have to get the bureaucrats to do the same and we're all set.

  15. Pro bono? by tepples · · Score: 0

    From the blurb: "the writers are consulting pro bono." Are you sure that by "pro bono" they don't mean "pro Sonny Bono", or "in favor of another copyright term extension"?

  16. PSI OPS in 3....2....1.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The consulting is free, the "solutions" won't be.

  17. What a waste of time by bonch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It sounds like a real waste of time. The government calling on a group of science fiction writers to come up with ideas for the future? Are they out of their own ideas or something? What are they doing working in the government then? This just seems like a way to generate a fluff media piece listing cool fantasy technologies to make everyone hopeful and temporarily forget about economic problems and Democrat in-fighting.

  18. What kind of ice cream would that be? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    "Governmint"? I know it's both off topic and random, but it just entered my mind and now I would like to know... what flavors and stuff would go into an ice cream called "Governmint"?

    1. Re:What kind of ice cream would that be? by cstdenis · · Score: 1

      Ground up thousand dollar bills (and mint flavoring)

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    2. Re:What kind of ice cream would that be? by Ignatius+D'Lusional · · Score: 1

      Other than the obvious mint flavor, it would be comprised mostly of feces.

  19. Old news by dosun88888 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've been using George Orwell as inspiration for a while now.

  20. And Tonight in the DHS channel by elnyka · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ladies and Gents, time to watch TV and make America safe!!!!(10+1)

    ...

    At 8PM, TNA Impact "Roar of the Redneck!"

    At 9PM, Shitty Monster Movie with Cheap CGI

    At 11PM, Watch an Ultimate Gamer Cry Like a Fucking Emo - Life is so fucking hard man!

    At 1AM, Another Fucking Infomercial - look, the Aussie guy is selling pills to get a 6-pack!

    At 2AM, Highlander vs Al Quaeda.

    1. Re:And Tonight in the DHS channel by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      8:30 pm - Jeeziz Crast done come agin an raptured all our asses

      9:30 pm - Sweet Sixteen with a rahfull - Al Qaeda Killer Chick

  21. IC by jman11 · · Score: 1

    That explains the fear of liquid explosives.

  22. DHS must be shut down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who works with the DHS is working against the People of America.

  23. Too bad... by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn. Too bad Robert Heinlein ain't around anymore.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  24. prior art? by nemsis21 · · Score: 1

    I think Niven and Pournelle can claim "prior art" on this one since they claim to be responsible for the collapse of the Soviet Union by advising Reagan to go ahead with the horribly expensive Star Wars initiative. Can't remember which of his books mentioned it in the footnotes.

    1. Re:prior art? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      With any luck it will work about as well as when the military got movie directors to give them ideas on South Park.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  25. Wake up! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
    This is insane rubbish! Can't you see it? From TFA:

    A federal research director fantasized about a cellphone that could simultaneously text and detect biochemical attacks. Multiple cellphones in a crowd would confirm and track the spread. The master of ceremonies for the week was Greg Bear, the sci-fi novelist whose book "Quantico" featured FBI agents battling a designer plague targeting specific ethnic groups.

    "What if we had a black box that IDs DNA on the scene?" Bear asked a panel of firefighters and police officers. "Put a swab in the box. How long would it take us to do that? Would that be of interest to anybody here?"

    Yeah sure. Detecting biochemical attacks in crowds (what crowds?) is a constant, vexing problem. It is urgent that we get cell phones with gas chromatographs that are constantly on and working or some such crap. ID DNA "on the scene?" You realize that it would only ID DNA that is already in its database, right? Not like on Heroes wher you put DNA in a gadget and a little icon appears on a Google map showing where the person is. Dou you want everyones DNA data on such devices? Your DNA?

    This is complete and utter totalitarian Roman Circus bullshit! I don't know which is more disturbing, that the government, particularly the nefarious DHS, is doing this or that so many Slashdot readers and other citizens not only believe this drivel but think it is a just dandy idea. God help us.

  26. morons huh? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Troll

    in my experience, overly judgmental and overly critical people, such as yourself, i have often found to be the biggest morons around

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:morons huh? by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      So there!

    2. Re:morons huh? by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Sounds like somebody's on a no-where town city council to me. You wouldn't happen to be the new mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, would you?

    3. Re:morons huh? by Jurily · · Score: 1

      in my experience, overly judgmental and overly critical people, such as yourself, i have often found to be the biggest morons around

      I didn't fuck up the economics of a whole planet, thank you very much.

    4. Re:morons huh? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      You must be a Republican.

  27. Fixed that for you by Nux'd · · Score: 1

    "The agency is hoping the interaction between writers and bureaucrats will inspire them to fund scientific studies"

  28. writers cheaper than experts by societyofrobots · · Score: 1

    Why hire expert consultants when you have writers making up stuff for cheap?

  29. Yeah... Great Ideas by monopole · · Score: 1

    Umm, Great Ideas From Sigma so far:

    Niven said a good way to help hospitals stem financial losses is to spread rumors in Spanish within the Latino community that emergency rooms are killing patients in order to harvest their organs for transplants.

    "free and worth every cent"

    Give me Charles Stross, John Scalzi, Rudy Rucker even David Brin and we'll talk.

    1. Re:Yeah... Great Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, Great Ideas From Sigma so far:

      Niven said a good way to help hospitals stem financial losses is to spread rumors in Spanish within the Latino community that emergency rooms are killing patients in order to harvest their organs for transplants.

      "free and worth every cent"

      Give me Charles Stross, John Scalzi, Rudy Rucker even David Brin and we'll talk.

      Yeah, that's a great idea to help stop terrorists. (insert eye-roll here.) But yeah, Niven's a bit of a kook anyway, and worse the closer he stands to Pournelle. Of course, Niven and Pournelle are right-wing, pro-military kooks, so that's why they would get an invite.

        This government-organ-harvesting thing has been rattling around Niven's head for years, (it was the subject of his very first published short story) and he brings it up any chance he can get, the loony bastard. Plus, it annoys me that he gets incorrectly pegged as a "hard science fiction" writer all the time, when his engineering is usually full of holes which have to be fixed again with every new novel, and his biology is downright laughable.

        Still, while I'm knocking Niven here, I'd like to say he writes some pretty entertaining stories. That one he and Pournelle wrote about the danger to Our Way of Life posed by Space Mexicans from the Coalsack Nebula is pretty awesome. The subconscious strata of xenophobic fear is kinda sad, but it's a rip-snortin' good adventure yarn anyway.

    2. Re:Yeah... Great Ideas by sean_nestor · · Score: 1
      I actually submitted an article covering this a little over a year ago, when Schneier talked about it on his blog. It wasn't picked up, but then again, I quoted from the more embarrassing things said at the conference, so there is little surprise to that.

      I actually used David Brin's quote in the article summary. Oops.

      "David Brin, keeping on the topic of empowering citizens with mobile phone technology, delivered a self-described 'rant' on the lack of funds being spent to support citizen reservists to back up the military, homeland security officials and first responders in times of crisis. 'It is impossible for you to succeed without us!' he shouted at the assembled officials, while banging his fist on the table and at one point jumping off his chair to wave a mobile phone in their faces."

      The original link from National Defense Magazine is dead, but you can see the comment thread on Schneier's blog here. Schneier's entire entry was just a link saying "This is embarrassing."

  30. Sigma??? Are you kidding me? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Andrews founded an organization of sci-fi writers to offer imaginative services in return for travel expenses only. Called Sigma, the group has about 40 writers. Over the years, members have addressed meetings organized by the Department of Energy, the Army, Air Force, NATO and other agencies they care not to name.

    Hm. The last book Robert Ludlum wrote was called "The Sigma Protocol". It was published the same year he died. He was 73.

    It was about a collective of creepy post-Nazi idea men commissioned by Hitler to re-envision the world. Well, after the war, these men carried on with their pursuit of Bad Science in the shadows. Central to the plot was a string of assassinations of old men who had fallen out of the club because they thought what they were about to achieve was too horrific even for a bunch of ex-Nazis. The cataclysmic ending resulted in explosions and heroic rewards, etc., but also with a young software billionaire carrying on the creepy work. . . (The book's last page makes a very deliberate jab at Bill Gates and his recent affiliation with the fucking creepy organization, Planned Parenthood.) Or maybe it wasn't deliberate. Still, an elbow in the ribs is an elbow in the ribs intended or not.

    Whatever the case, I'll leave the obvious connective threads dangling because they're rather over-dramatic in the same way that the premier episode of Lone Gunmen was just too stupidly prophetic to be taken seriously. Even though it was right on the money.

    Anyway. . . The real point I'd like to make is that any dick-head writer 'Heinlein' enough to work with the DHS needs a stern talking to or failing that, a good ass-kicking. Sci-Fi writers can be exceptional dorks sometimes.

    I mean. . , did anybody else notice the distinctive Starship Troopers feel to J.J. Abram's Star Trek? (I'm talking about the cinematic version of ST, not the book).

    And on a semi-related note. . . One interesting thing in the world of speculative fiction which totally caught me off guard was that Dollhouse has been renewed for a second season. WTF? I mean, that's cool and all, but. . , has hell frozen over?

    These thoughts may all seem disconnected, but they really aren't. Don't think too hard though. It's Friday and the week has been long.

    -FL

  31. Did they Invite Mr. Schneier? by CodeBuster · · Score: 3, Informative

    If they invited Bruce Schneier to speak instead of a gaggle of Sci-Fi "movie plot" writers then they might actually learn a thing or two about homeland security AND it wouldn't be a complete waste of the taxpayer's money or the politician's time (the former being much more valuable than the later).

  32. where is stargate? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    where is stargate?

  33. What? Again? by deprecated · · Score: 1

    The last administration already did this with results ranging from tedious to risible. Then it was the usual suspects: Larry Niven, Drake, etc, I think. I can't be bothered to read the article to see who it was this time.

    1. Re:What? Again? by deprecated · · Score: 1

      Not confidence-building. If it was done casually and with fewer buzzwords and less self-congratulation all around and not under any official auspices, I would be less appalled. As it is, it makes me a little sick to my stomach.

  34. Peace... by Ezrymyrh · · Score: 1

    How about Peace? Many SciFi movies,books have a peaceful future.

    --
    The love of good Whiskey,Woman,Weed is all i need.
  35. Sci-fi? You've GOT to be kidding me! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    You have got to be kidding. Science fiction? Could we have picked a fiction genre more devoid of factual understanding? Fantasy, maybe?

    There is a reason why sci-fi and fantasy are often grouped together. They're both factually delusional in many regards. One has space ships and perfect governments; the other has faeries and trolls. There is little difference, in most cases. Yes, some sci-fi has a political theme, but more often than not it takes the role of poor plot device or fantastical utopia (ala Star Trek - vs. Battlestar Gallactica, which is somewhat less idyllic).

    But let's make a distinction here. BSG is entirely different than something like Star Trek. It is a political, moral, and religious commentary set in a fictional world (which is more-or-less plausible - and could be substituted for any any midevil or modern setting, more or less). BSG, and a similar but small subset of science fiction (like 1984) is first and foremost political fiction. Not "science" fiction. The 'science' part in their story is merely the backdrop - an unfamiliar but physically possible world - in which things are put into motion.

    "Real" science fiction has a necessary requirement of suspended disbelief. Yes, it explores new, or different ideas. But it always starts out "Let's pretend". THAT is dangerous when we're dealing with real people with real lives, and it's terrifying that

    This kind of bullshit is what makes me think that Obama's putting Kumar (of Harold and Kumar fame - Kal Penn) in the "Associate Director in the White House Office of Public Liaison" position is going to be indicative of the kind of farce we should expect from here on out. What's next, asking the ALF how to manage our forests (hint: it'll involve many, many more forest fires than we've currently got, and a complete cease to all US wood production)?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Sci-fi? You've GOT to be kidding me! by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but you have a particular reason why Kal Penn shouldn't be a Public Liaison? I have no particular feelings on his appointment but the idea of an actor as the public face for the current administration is logical to me and not horrifying at all. After all we've been lied to for years by amateur liars called lawyers, at least Obama got a professional to do it. Gives me hope they might actually use knowledgeable professionals for other departments. Like oohhh.... I dunno scientists and engineers who happen to also be highly creative and express it by writing science fiction?

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    2. Re:Sci-fi? You've GOT to be kidding me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantasy, maybe?

      I heard that they did consult Anne McCaffrey, and are now developing anti-dragon SAMs.

    3. Re:Sci-fi? You've GOT to be kidding me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, "Let's pretend" is EXACTLY what is needed.

      "Let's pretend that someone wants to destroy {critical infrastructure element}. How could they do that? What could they use?" is the at the heart of a security think tank's mission.

      Plus, you make the argument that science fiction isn't what we want because any of the science fiction genre that actually would be helpful isn't "Real" science fiction. You're narrowly defining science fiction in order to prove your point.

      So Star Trek is real science fiction and BSG isn't? Why? Because BSG actually covers politics and morality and religion? Have you actually read any science fiction that was written to be read instead of watched on a screen? What, Heinlein didn't mention religion or morality? Ellison didn't? Heck, "RUR", the Czech book that coined the term "Robot" had more than a touch of social commentary in it.

      I'll actually buy your argument, but also by the cheap device of redefining terms. BAD science fiction is not going to help us.

    4. Re:Sci-fi? You've GOT to be kidding me! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Maybe because "Office of Public Liaison" sounds somewhat like "Office of Public Lying" - and because its largely a propaganda post. Combine this with the fact that Kal Penn was a financial and personal supporter of Obama and there is a disconcerting potential for sectarian preference and 'selective memory'.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:Sci-fi? You've GOT to be kidding me! by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      I guess the reason why I don't see an issue with that is, what do you honestly expect? Pretty much any large organization has a public relations department whose job it is to put the best light on any event. The main tool used in that sort of job is 'bending' the truth and if needed just straight up lying. Now it would be nice if we could all live in harmony but this isn't a Utopia so I accept that any government is going to lie to its people at some point. Whether for good or ill it must do so to function in the real world.

      As for Kal's personal support of the Obama ... it goes without saying that your PR guy should be a fan/loyal to you.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
  36. Awww.. c'mon, mod parent up by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

    roll on the nuclear bomb powered space ships

    There's something seriously wrong with /. when people don't get that comment.

    Maybe someone needs to make it into a movie so that the kiddies can understand it. Actually, it would make a pretty *awesome* movie..

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Awww.. c'mon, mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No mod points today.

  37. Writing is a Tough Field by ChangelingJane · · Score: 1

    And, it's at minimal expense to taxpayers, since the writers are consulting pro bono.

    Just goes to show, nobody wants to pay writers. Absolutely nobody.

  38. Nobody's offering an economic rethink by Animats · · Score: 1

    Nobody seems to be trying to re-think capitalism. I'm not talking about the current crisis. There's a more fundamental problem - increased productivity no longer results in higher real income. US per-capita real income per hour worked peaked in 1973.

    Think about that for a moment. We have incredibly good production technology. 20% of the workforce makes all the real stuff. That number was 50% in 1950 and 90% in 1900. Yet workdays have been getting longer for several decades.

    SF writers used to write about things like that. Harry Harrison did. Today, nobody touches it.

  39. Why? by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    The most successful attacks are all low tech. Even 9/11 was low tech, commander planes that practically fly themselves and point them at buildings. What they need to do is to stop thinking big and complex and start thinking big and simple. Like using truck mounted mosquito sprayers to spread salmonella infected water all over a city center. Or waiting until the dry Santa Anna Winds are just right and then creating a fire line along the highway several miles long. Think big but simple because that is what the next attack will be.

  40. Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So far 1984 was good inspiration for US and EU, i'd say.

  41. Mod parent up, his lesson is useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up, his lesson is useful.

    1. Re:Mod parent up, his lesson is useful. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Indeed. You can learn a lot from bad examples.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  42. Life follows art by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

    Sort of...

    Interesting read nonetheless.

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  43. Maybe it will help. by wtansill · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the Sci-Fi guys will help the cops and bureaucrats learn the difference between real threats and advertisements for a TV show:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Boston_Mooninite_Scare.

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
  44. From The Article by Phoghat · · Score: 1
    "Onstage in the darkened amphitheater, a Washington police commander said he'd like to have Mr. Spock's instant access to information: At a disaster scene, he'd like to say, "Computer, what's the dosage on this medication?"

    It's not voice activated but you have http://www.epocrates.com/

    And I can bet that Cory Doctorow wasn't even invited

    --
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  45. Try the seafood platter! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Q. How come Idaho has potatoes, Nevada has blackjack and hookers, and Texas has oil wells?
    A. Idaho had first pick.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  46. I wonder by Obermeister · · Score: 1

    From now on we will all travel in TUBES!