Slashdot Mirror


Nanomaker's Toolkit — Methods For Self-Assembly

gabrlknght writes with this excerpt from Science News: "Because nanoparticles are small, a large proportion of their atoms are near the particle's surface. Having fewer neighbors, those relatively unconfined atoms can link in unusual ways, giving materials made of nanoparticles novel properties. But the same characteristic that makes nanostructures useful — size — also makes working with them no small task. Engineering on the nanoscale is like building a ship in a bottle while wearing mittens. It would be far cheaper and easier, researchers agree, if nanoparticles could just arrange themselves into nanomaterials — like dropping the pieces of the ship into the bottle and then sitting back to watch the ship build itself. What scientists are working on now is finding the right chemistry — creating just the right conditions so that natural properties such as charge or magnetism direct the pieces of the ship to come together just so, with the mast above the deck and never below or to the side. This idea, called self-assembly, isn't exactly new. Examples range from the simple separation of oil and vinegar in a bottle of salad dressing to the complex movements of proteins and enzymes — themselves nanosized — reacting in living cells. Scientists have long been inspired by these naturally self-assembling systems. But designing self-assembling systems in the lab, with nanoparticles, presents its own scale of difficulty. And making self-assembled nanomaterials grow large enough to actually be useful is even more challenging."

9 of 48 comments (clear)

  1. Risks involved? by santax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if this really is a good thing. Personally I don't like seeing things that I can not see reproducing on their own. I'm pretty sure this technology will work more against us instead of for us at one point. Although that 3d printer that can print its own parts is pretty cool.

    1. Re:Risks involved? by BorgDrone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally I don't like seeing things that I can not see reproducing on their own.

      The world is full of things you cannot see reproducing on their own. Your skin is crawling with them. They are in your intestines, reproducing. They are on your mouse, keyboard, monitor. They are on that sandwich you just ate.

      There is no escape!

    2. Re:Risks involved? by artor3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is not self-replication, it's self-assembly. These nanostructures will need a *very* specific set of pieces to all be placed in the same spot, under very specific conditions, in order to assemble. It will never happen without our direct intervention. Remember, because this is self-assembly, not self-replication, it does not require an instance of the structure to already exist. If it were going to happen out of control, it already would have.

    3. Re:Risks involved? by nasor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Self-assembling is not the same as self-reproducing. The nanoparticles self-assemble into new materials, films, etc, but they can't produce new nanoparticles. It's like having a pile of bricks that will arrange themselves into a house, but you have to keep adding more bricks to the pile to keep it going.

  2. self assembly of natural objects is easy by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    self assembly of natural objects is easy, it gets difficult if you want to assemble structures and items not found in nature.

    so it might be possible to find the right chemical conditions to pour chemicals into each other to produce a fractal tree structure for filters or batteries, but we will have trouble fabricating the CAD designed battery casing itself.

    We could probably one day use the self assembly inherent in crystaline structure to generate superior memory units, but would be much more difficult to get it to layout an x86 schematic.

    speaking of self assembly, I have been working on a UI which assembles itself from component pieces in a natural and innovative way
    take a look here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vt7qB37sLLo

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  3. Trial and error by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did some researchers, by chance, try such a random arrangement of nanoparticles a few weeks ago in Mexico?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  4. Re:Not exactly new... by Kotoku · · Score: 3, Funny

    We are hear because of it!

    Ear assembly is thrown in for free with your purchase of a self-replicating human.

  5. Grey goo! by irp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wasn't "gray goo" a hypothetical scenario for self assembly? A matter that were able to convert and absorb anything.

    Personally I don't believe in the possibility of a "gray goo".

    I do however believe in the green stuff... Just take a walk in the forest and you'll see self assembling nano machinery on a scale capable of covering a whole planet! :-)

  6. Ways to self-assemble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are many ways to self-assemble, normally the most usual are either gravity assembly where the particles settle in a suspension or there are chemical methods such using pH to direct assembly as well as using hydrophillic and hydrophobic groups on the surface of nanoparticles to self-assemble.