Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Bulk Deal With New Zealand Collapses

vik writes "The latest 3-year, pan-government deal that Microsoft has been establishing with the New Zealand government since 2000 has collapsed, opening the doors to the wider use of open source software in government. The NZ State Services Commission (already a prize-winning user of open source) says in a statement that it '...became apparent during discussions that a formal agreement with Microsoft is no longer appropriate.' Having lost their discount, individual government departments will now have to put their IT requirements out to tender individually."

8 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Open Formats by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The individual departments should be required to use open formats where open formats exist. It's far past the time governments should be held hostage with proprietary formats.

    1. Re:Open Formats by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that should be the number one short-term goal for governments of the world. The only problem is, what do you do about issues like OOXML, which is a standard, and which MS supports in name, but which isn't actually supported by anyone? Gaming the standards system has become too easy and corrupting standards has no penalty.

      What ever happened to the good ol' days when you put up an RFC and a reference implementation and everyone tried to make sure new stuff worked with the old stuff? If there had been a reference implementation (ahem ... OO.o), we wouldn't have the weasel ODF support in MS Office SP2.

  2. Re:RIP by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe microsoft should work on making windows more user friendly so you don't have to spend hours in the dos cli configuring irq numbers and io addresses, dealing with constant crashes and manually installing networking support just so they can get a workable graphic interface to check their mail with..

    Oh wait, it's not 1993 anymore...

    Linux these days is generally much easier to install than windows, and proprietary unix was always much easier than windows (because like macos, it came bundled with hardware designed to run it)

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  3. Re:Linux by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember that David only defeats Goliath in the movies. In real life, David usually ends up with a slingshot shoved up his ass.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Re:A small win, but MS has lobbyists by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...yet none of them are on the bid in NZ. Surprising isn't it?

    No, but not for the reasons you describe. It's called simple bribery and collusion, and it has to do with Microsoft, and big bags of money. If the corporations didn't come along with complete programs for these government pinheads to look like they were doing their jobs, they might actually have to do them.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Nothing will change though by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NZ will still buy all software from MS, just at much more inflated prices. Buying OSS from a zoo of little guys is just too much hassle for IT and the buyers.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  6. Re:RIP by fwarren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, its laziness, but we're all lazy. Sometimes we want a computer to act like a device that just works, without hassle, at all.

    It is a lie. Repeat after me. "A Computer is NOT an appliance".

    Some things are not inherently simple. A blender is simple, a toaster is simple. A telecsope is NOT simple. You have to adjust where you are pointing it and the focus, know about lenses.

    Things are moving along. Compare an SLR camera from 20 years ago to a push and click digital camera of today. There are still things to learn but the simple "point and click" "appliance" camera of today is a very powerful camera.

    Microsoft has done everyone a diservice by saying that a computer IS an appliance. Take any group of hardware and add $200 of Microsoft products and you will have a working system. Easy to use and secure.

    Everyeone wants to do word processing, but they don't want to lean how their OS stores files...so they can't find what they saved an hour from now. Everyone wants to send email, but they don't know how to read an error message that tells them why their email could not be delivered.

    Short of running a kiosk, we are not anywhere near the "appliance" stage of PC computing. Anyone saying otherwise should be swiftly kicked in the balls. Even if he is a geek with funny haircut and wears glasses.

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  7. Re:RIP by Ant+P. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now try buying an all in one printer, a USB TV Tuner, and a Wifi USB stick. Remember-NO RESEARCH. Now go to distro foo and see if device barr you just got at Walmart works.

    Having bought an overpriced prebuilt many years ago, I've been through all that and more. I still remember the five hour delay while Windows Update downloaded a 30MB bloated, shitty sound card driver over dialup because the OEM install CD didn't bother to include one. It worked on Knoppix "out of the box". Guess windows just isn't ready for the desktop.