Slashdot Mirror


Canada's Conference Board Found Plagiarizing Copyright Report

An anonymous reader writes "There is a storm brewing in Canada as the prestigious Conference Board of Canada has been caught plagiarizing US copyright lobby group documents in a report on copyright reform. The report was funded by the Canadian copyright lobby as well as by the Ontario government. The Conference Board has acknowledged some errors, but stands by the report, while the Ontario government admits spending thousands of dollars and it now wants some answers."

7 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. What is the Conference Board of Canada? by thirty-seven · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a Canadian, my first reaction to reading this story on /. was "what is the prestigious Conference Board of Canada?" I mean, I know what the "Ontario government" is and the "US copyright lobby" and "Canadian copyright lobby" are self-explanatory terms, but I'm not familiar with the Conference Board of Canada. When I read it here, I thought maybe it was an agency of the federal government.

    Anyway, I little digging turns up that the Conference Board of Canada is basically a non-profit think-tank, that is funded on a per-service basis. So private groups and governments will pay it to research a topic and publish a paper on it. It also holds conferences and does research reports on its own. According to their official website, their areas of expertise are "running conferences", "conducting, publishing, and disseminating research", "economic trends", and "public policy issues". It is affiliated, but legally separate from, the U.S./international "The Conference Board, Inc. of New York".

    They state: "Objective and non-partisan. We do not lobby for specific interests."

    --

    Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

  2. Re:Funny by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's redundant. Canadian's ARE American's. They just aren't US American's

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  3. Incorrect Summary by ColonelBobo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary is incorrect in that at this time, the Ontario Government has yet to seek answers into how the funds it provided were used. The questions posed are by Michael Geist as to what the Minister responsible should be asking.

  4. Re: Correct Summary by davecb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Michael Geist writes: Update (5:15): Brian Jackson of IT Business reports that the Minister's office acknowledges spending $15,000 on the report. It plans to follow up on the issues raised in my post.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  5. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hockey is our national sport.

    Actually, it's Lacrosse.

  6. Re:Funny by pnewhook · · Score: 4, Informative

    Contrary to popular Canadian belief....no Canadians were ever involved in the attack on Washington. The members of that attack were all from the British Isles. Stop believing this crap, and we'll stop saying you eat whale blubber and live in igloos all year round.

    Semantics. Obviously since Canada didn't exist as an independent country until 1867 and the White House burned in 1814, Canada as it is now could not have been involved.

    However, if you think there were no people involved that were born on what is now Canadian soil, then you are mistaken. Yes, it was British soldiers simply because Upper and Lower Canada were British colonies, and not all were sent from Britain itself.

    --
    Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  7. Additional Information by psema4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Additional information has come to light since the original posting. Some interesting blog posts from: