Slashdot Mirror


What Free IDE Do You Use?

postermmxvicom writes "I program only occasionally and mostly for personal interest. I went to update my favorite free IDE, Dev C++, yesterday and noticed that it had not been updated since 2005! I went looking for other free IDEs and came across Code::Blocks and Visual Studio Express. I work from a Windows machine, use C++, and make mostly console apps; but have written a few Windows apps and D3D or OpenGL apps. I wanted to know what free IDEs you use and recommend. What do you like about them? What features do they lack? What about them irritate you (and what do you do to work around these annoyances)? For instance, when I used Visual C++ 6.0 in college, there was an error in getline that had to be fixed, and the code indenting in DevC++ needed to be tweaked to suit my liking."

5 of 1,055 comments (clear)

  1. VI by 1s44c · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Just vi. It's all about function not cuteness.

    But lets not start the whole vi V emacs thing again, I'm sure lots of people are happy with emacs.

  2. LOL! 10K?? Big deal! by Viol8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've did a 60K C project back in the day using vi, gcc and dbx. Never had any issues. Perhaps you're just not up to being a developer and would be happier doing web design or other pointy clicky type IT roles?

  3. Some of us build more than just Windows apps by BattyMan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    and if you think that emacs, and all those vi variants for that matter, aren't usable and productive just because _you_ can't work them, that sounds quite ignorant to me. Several of us here find emacs (and vi*) highly productive. IMNSHO emacs, gcc and Perl are the "killer apps" of *nix (even if they are ported to the monopoly platform - they lose something in the move).

    If you think that the software monopolist is morally acceptable, I suggest you go read this, and this, and this. And then go develop yer Micro$oft apps on V$ (if you can still stomach them). See if I care.

    The application I'm presently working on is actually targeted for Winbloze XP (against _my_ will). That doesn't keep me from writing it in Perl/Tk with emacs. When it's done, I expect it to run equally well in any environment (that supports Perl & Tk, which is A LOT). Try that with Visual Studio. I bet you can't, because V$ was deliberately engineered to make it as difficult as possible to develop for any non-Imperial target.

    When I abandoned the Evil Empire, V$, VC++, MFC, and all of that rot in favor of Free software, I was overjoyed not only by the ideology but by the quality of the tools. I've never looked back.

    And since when did astroturfers get mod points?

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  4. Re:Eclipse and Notepad++ by mario_grgic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You mean it's the best primitive editor that does not require learning? You do know that gVim is available for windows right? And I can guarantee it's better than Notepad++.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  5. Re:Newsflash: The 1980's are over. by Murpster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No, no... Windows programmers actually ARE quite stupid.