Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

University Gives Away iPhones To Curb Truancy

Posted by timothy on from the give-me-lobster-and-I-won't-skip-dinner dept.

Norsefire writes "A Japanese University is giving away iPhones to its students to use the phones' GPS functionality to catch students who skip classes. The University claims students currently fake attendance by having other students answer for them during rollcall, they also said that while this can be abused by giving other students the phone, they are much less likely to do this due to the personal information, such as email, a phone generally contains."

11 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. There is always an easier solution... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay. Umm.. Who the fuck cares if students show up to class or not. At university we are old enough to decide if class is a waste of time or not. I skipped tons of classes during my undergrad degree and this enabled me to actually assignments that I wouldn't have otherwise had time for.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:There is always an easier solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article states that attendance at this university is a necessary requirement to graduate:

      Truants in Japan often fake attendance by getting friends to answer roll-call or hand in signed attendance cards. That's verging on cheating since attendance is a key requirement for graduation.

      Having said that, smart students would probably be able to figure out a way of disabling this 'feature' or spoofing it to show them as being in a different location pretty quickly. Also GPS often fails to get a usable signal in some buildings.

      So what?

      They just give the phone to whoever is going to be signing in for them.

      If they want to stop truancy, just give a quiz at the beginning of every class.

      Of course if what they're interested in is giving the students an education, stop taking roll and just crack down on academics.

    2. Re:There is always an easier solution... by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay. Umm.. Who the fuck cares if students show up to class or not. At university we are old enough to decide if class is a waste of time or not. I skipped tons of classes during my undergrad degree and this enabled me to actually assignments that I wouldn't have otherwise had time for.

      Japan isn't America. Apparently they care. Perhaps it's because universities have a limited number of spaces that they would prefer to give to successful students and truancy may correlate with success. It's been my observation that students who are truant a lot, even if successful and breeze by the first round of classes, tend to crash and burn later on as when they don't change their habits. Or it may be that some classes require a team effort and truant students disrupt that (but for whatever reason, the team is reluctant to report it.... or it counts against them anyway).

      There could be a lot of reasons. Your experience doesn't mean it takes into account everything.

      Anyway, this sounds like a technical solution to a human problem that will ultimately fail to a determined truant. Perhaps the teacher should enlist a trusted assistant and they work some system. Perhaps they should give out one ticket to each student with serial number at the end of each class as they walk out the door that will enable them to sign in on the "was here last time" sheet the next class. Then they just count tickets given out to signatures to ensure accuracy and that no one is cheating. Or something like that. Anyone without a ticket just signs a sheet indicating they were present that time but absent last time (and whatever preceding times).

      If they want to get fancy technologically, I guess they could use several retina scanners (to avoid traffic jams, fingerprints scanners would be duped too easily these days) that allow you to sign in at the beginning and then out of each class at the end.

    3. Re:There is always an easier solution... by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The article states that attendance at this university is a necessary requirement to graduate

      So? It's still a dumb requirement for graduation. Unless it's different over there, University is optional, paid for entirely by the attendee, and generally not started until one's about 18. There's absolutely no reason to make attendance part of the requirements for graduation, if you choose not to attend, that's completely up to you.

      --
      Game! - Where the stick is mightier than the sword!
    4. Re:There is always an easier solution... by dov_0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that attendance is often mandatory (certainly in tertiary studies that I've done in Australia it has been) because soaking in the subject during lecture, hearing questions answered and participating in group discussions are actually part of the educational process. It's not just about the essays or exams.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    5. Re:There is always an easier solution... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Last time I looked at the statistics from my university, there was a correlation between attendance and mediocre results. The worst students didn't turn up all the time, and failed because they didn't know the material. The good students didn't turn up all the time, and did well because they learned enough in the lectures they did attend to learn the rest on their own time.

      The purpose of a university is not to teach, it's to provide an environment where a student can learn, and to let them know what they should learn to be considered an expert in a particular field. There is a reason we don't call lecturers and professors teachers; the teacher in a university should always be the student. The lecturer is a guide on the path to education, not a leader.

      You don't need to go to lectures to be surrounded by people interested in the subject. When I was a student, I spent a couple of hours each day in a coffee shop on campus, and spent a lot of this time discussing various aspects of the subject with my peers. Part of university is learning to build your own structure, not requiring it to be rigidly enforced externally.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. This is sure to boost attendance. by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now that every student will be able to browse the web and chat with their friends in class, I'm sure fewer will cut.

  3. I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... how about making the classes worth attending, and making testing difficult enough that poor attendance matters?

  4. Re:What? by viyh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My point is that attendance is irrelevant as long as the student learns the material (measured by testing and finals).

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." --Mark Twain
  5. You expect students to be organized? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And what if students forget their iPhone at home?

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  6. Re:Let me explain the situation over here... by kklein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To think that Japanese schools at a similar level are worse is painful, especially since the uninformed (myself until this) generally hear the reverse is true.

    It depends a lot on the university, of course. The university I'm at now is really hard to get into, and I have to say that these kids are pretty bright. That does not, however, mean they are as serious or emotionally invested in their studies as typical US students.

    They tend to be very involved in club activities (sports, music, whatever), and this is not because they are lazy; this is what employers want to see. They want to see that you have worked hard in a group organization for 4 years and have come up through that system to train new students, which is basically exactly what they'll be doing at work.

    But yeah, the US system, compared to the Japanese, ain't too shabby. Well, it wasn't, until we started copying the Japanese. As I said, I am a tester. I believe that with sound statistics and applied psychology, we really can figure out what someone knows. That being said, I don't think that's the point of education. Education is supposed to teach you how to think. It's supposed to stretch you and challenge you and give you a safe environment in which to fail, and in which to learn how you get things done. As the US moves to a more testing-based system, I just groan. It's not good. Standardized tests should be few and far between. In fact, I can't think of a single psychometrician I know who doesn't agree. We design tests and tell people what it will tell them, and then watch administrators try to use them for something else (then complain that they don't do that something else well!).