Slashdot Mirror


Google Set To Tackle eBook Market

Mike writes "Google's latest decision to try its hand selling eBooks promises to make life in the eBook world more interesting, and will likely spur a standards war that in the end may prove beneficial to many consumers. Google's eBook store will pit it directly against Amazon and Amazon's Kindle — an enormously popular eBook reader. This will push many companies to create eBook readers to take advantage of Google's new store, and will flood the market with tough choices. Google does not have a dedicated eBook reader yet, but it seems a logical next step for the search giant."

170 comments

  1. Obvious next step... by Newander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I seem to remember people saying the same thing about cell phones, but Google is not a hardware company. I'd look for an API and not much else.

    --

    Jesus saves and takes half damage.

    1. Re:Obvious next step... by mc1138 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You're right, Google's business is information and the distribution and flow of it. Why would they want to worry about the hassles of a physical product when they'll have a dozen companies all waiting in line? Google is a company of the intangible and that's their biggest strength.

    2. Re:Obvious next step... by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      > Google is not a hardware company.

      Neither is Amazon and you'll get my Kindle when you pry it from my cold, dead hands...

      Seriously, I don't care who sells them so long as they offer the content I want and the cost is right.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    3. Re:Obvious next step... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google is not a hardware company. I'd look for an API and not much else.

      Came here to say something like this.

      Since it's already been said, let me clarify:

      Google will not make a proprietary e-book reader. They want their wares on as many machines as possible. Whether it's firmware, applications, 'appliances', or whatever. Eyeballs == data == better targeting of ads == higher profits on ad sales.

      Releasing an e-book reader themselves pitches them squarely against the very companies they want to be using their wares, to enable them to sling ads to everyone.

      Google is an advertising behemoth. For all the neat-o things they produce and we use, they exist to make money by slinging ads at people. Every business move they make should be considered in light of the fact that they will choose the route that nets them the most eyeballs -- and in this case, this means making an API or firmware for other companies to use. They do not want to alienate ad targets who use other e-book readers.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Obvious next step... by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Eyeballs == data == better targeting of ads == higher profits on ad sales.

      Umm. Eyeballs == more viewers for the ads == profit. Applications that report back == better targeting.

      Think spammers emailing everyone vs. spammers with spyware.

    5. Re:Obvious next step... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I didn't separate data-collection from ad-serving, as they are both the result of more eyeballs via application use.

      Data collection is as dependent on eyeballs as ad-serving is.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Obvious next step... by Threni · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's hope this solves the standards problem as effectively as java, javascript, html, xhtml, and flash did for browser development.

    7. Re:Obvious next step... by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

      All Google needs to do is provide the online marketplace and publish an API. Then developers can write apps to interface with it - netbooks with WiFi, PDAs or Phones, laptops, Android devices, even iPhone. Then tablet computers and whatever comes next.

      While Amazon and Sony are busy paying to maintain their hardware support teams, Google can sell books without worrying about any of that. The marketplace will come up with the devices. I could envision a simple eInk device that only reads the open formats like ePub and non-DRM PDF. One of these priced at $149 plus a Google book store would cut Kindle off at the knees.

      Only thought is how they can do this without DRM. If they use DRM then they're just another shill for the publishers. But I don't see how the publishers would allow Google to sell books without DRM while forcing it upon Amazon and Sony.

    8. Re:Obvious next step... by eihab · · Score: 1

      Google is not a hardware company.

      Neither is Amazon and you'll get my Kindle when you pry it from my cold, dead hands...

      Seriously, I don't care who sells them so long as they offer the content I want and the cost is right.

      Can't you get a "Netbook" for less than a Kindle and read whatever you want on it (and then some) DRM free?

      I get the idea of free cell connection to download books (and I have yet to hold a Kindle myself and give it a go), but Amazon's deal seems over priced in my opinion.

      I've also read a review on Amazon from someone complaining about books they bought that they couldn't access anymore after moving to Kindle 2.

      How is your experience with Kindle so far?

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    9. Re:Obvious next step... by chuckymonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, they do have android. I think that it would be pretty trivial for them to make an app for it that is an ebook reader.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    10. Re:Obvious next step... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google is not a hardware company

      Not strictly true. http://www.google.com/enterprise/pdf/gsa_datasheet.pdf

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    11. Re:Obvious next step... by fafaforza · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The whole "can't you get a netbook instead" thing has been beaten to death, twice, with a dead horse tossed on top the second time. I mean, seriously. People have suggested this, the iPhone, the Nintendo DS, etc. Yeah, yeah, they do oh-so-much more. Different products. If you can read for extended periods of time on an LCD, and have a place to recharge it conveniently, then get a netbook.

      The rest of us will enjoy immitation printed paper, with weeks between charging.

    12. Re:Obvious next step... by jeffgtr · · Score: 1

      I agree, no hardware from Google. And finally, we may have ebooks that work across multiple devices. 2 things have kept me away from the Kindle. Proprietary format which goes both ways I don't want my reader or my books tied to just one company. Secondly proper handling of pdf's. I have so much documentation in pdf format and I long for an affordable e paper device that does pdf. Truly the whole ebook thing can't happen fast enough for me. One thing for sure, I have more faith in Google getting it right than say microsoft. Books are way to important to have microsofts hand in it.

    13. Re:Obvious next step... by ubrgeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Outstanding. The screen is great, the battery life is outstanding and the form factor is remarkably comfortable. Frankly, that's a huge difference between the Kindle and a netbook. The Kindle is designed for one thing and that's reading for long periods of time. Netbooks aren't. I'm curious how many people who insist "a netbook can do it and its cheaper and no DRM and and and" have ever actually held a Kindle to see just how important the form factor component really is. Frankly, I don't care that I can read the books on my iPhone (another device people are saying is a good alternative.) I've done that and other than being able to sync where I am in the book between my Kindle and iPhone, I don't enjoy the experience nor do I find reading on the phone as relaxing or comfortable. I don't care about DRM issues. There are plenty of free books out there and I tend to buy books rather than going to the library, so if I was going to buy them anyway, then buying them for a device that I own and like isn't really a big deal to me. (Whether that point of sale is at Amazon or Google.) I don't need a netbook. I bought a kindle because I needed something that I could read for hours at a time and not have to worry about recharging the thing every 3-5 hours.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    14. Re:Obvious next step... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually I see it first as an Android App.
      I have a Kindle but I honestly use my iPod Touch more. At night the screen is back lit for reading in bed when my wife is asleep. I always have it with me. And I just don't think the kindle is that much better for reading books.
      Now when I can get an 8"x11" color ebook reader all bets are off. I would love to get Cycle World, Rider, Motorcyclist, and Motortrend on the Kindle.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:Obvious next step... by WaywardGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is really, really, huge. We've had a number of articles on slashdot that clearly point out the danger Amazon poses to the e-book market. They're following an iTune-like model, with similar DRM, similarly ham-strung hardware, and they're waging a war to control e-book distribution. Google has the muscle to turn the tide in this battle, and to open the e-book market to many players, not just Amazon and Sony.

      Consider an Amazon Kindle vs an Eee PC. The Eee PC has a bigger screen, costs less, has real wifi, and is a freaking great e-book reader. The only problem? F**king Amazon and Sony have locked up rights to distribute many of the most popular e-books. Screw e-book readers, IMO. Netbooks running a real OS (Ubuntu in my case) is the way to go. E-book readers like the Kindle are just another trap for us to fall into, where we lose choice, and pay outrageous prices for massively limited hardware and software, just so we can read the book we actually want to buy.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    16. Re:Obvious next step... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Can't you get a "Netbook" for less than a Kindle and read whatever you want on it (and then some) DRM free?"

      Maybe, if I didn't already have a personal MacBook Pro and a work MacBook Pro.

      I suspect a Netbook isn't as good as a kindle for reading-while-walking, nor as good for reading-on-a-very-crowded-bus.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    17. Re:Obvious next step... by eihab · · Score: 1

      I seem to have missed those discussions. This wasn't a troll or flame-bait though, honest!

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    18. Re:Obvious next step... by eihab · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the quick Kindle review!

      I'm curious how many people who insist "a netbook can do it and its cheaper and no DRM and and and" have ever actually held a Kindle to see just how important the form factor component really is.

      I'm one of those people (although I don't insist on Netbooks over Kindles). I've played with a Netbook at Fry's and I have yet to hold a Kindle like I disclaimed earlier.

      I didn't know that the Netbook argument was (as another poster mentioned) beaten to death.

      The one thing that scares me though is DRM and losing books you've already paid for like the reviewer I linked to.

      Putting that issue aside, I'm all for a device that does one thing and does it very well.

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    19. Re:Obvious next step... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's that I read every eInk related link posted on digg, but the same comparison is made there multiple times per story. It as happens on random blogs and their comments. Even on this page, there's a similar comparison and rebuttal farther down.

    20. Re:Obvious next step... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Dunno about my Kindle, but I have an eReader. I've been reading it on the train, daily, about an hour a day. I have not recharged the battery in two weeks. It is about a tenth the weight of my Asus eee 901 and about a quarter the thickness. I can also read the screen in direct sunlight.

      People who say "can't you just use a netbook" have very clearly never used an eInk device to read a book.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    21. Re:Obvious next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The rest of us will enjoy immitation printed paper, with weeks between charging.

      There's no reason you can't have e-paper on a netbook.

    22. Re:Obvious next step... by eihab · · Score: 1

      People who say "can't you just use a netbook" have very clearly never used an eInk device to read a book.

      Yes, it's also mentioned in my post :)

      I get the idea of free cell connection to download books (and I have yet to hold a Kindle myself and give it a go), but Amazon's deal seems over priced in my opinion.

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    23. Re:Obvious next step... by mgblst · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The rest of us will enjoy immitation printed paper, with weeks between charging.

      No, some of you will enjoy that, the rest of us will enjoy reading a good old fashioned book.

    24. Re:Obvious next step... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Try using a MacBook Pro on an airplane or bus. I have the 17" model because it's a "desktop replacement" that I use for infrequent travel. There's to room to open the screen to a comfortable angle so it can be read without odd body contortioning.

    25. Re:Obvious next step... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's no reason you can't have e-paper on a netbook.

      With existing tech, it would make it pretty useless for everything but, well, reading text. With refresh rates measured in seconds, you can forget about scrolling, for example; or animations.

    26. Re:Obvious next step... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Can't you get a "Netbook" for less than a Kindle and read whatever you want on it (and then some) DRM free?

      You can read whatever you want on a Kindle, if you can get the book in a DRM-free format in the first place (which you'd have to do to read it on your netbook). Aside from that, the advantages of a dedicated eInk-based reader are: 1) screen that doesn't strain the eyes (because it's purely reflective), and 2) very long battery lives, since it only needs to physically "repaint" the screen when it actually changes, and then the picture persists.

      Note that this also applies to all other eInk readers out there: Sony, Hanlin, iRex, whatever. They all usually work as UMS devices and/or with usual SD cards on which you can just upload a bunch of .txt files and start reading. DRM only kicks in when you buy from their respective stores.

      I don't own a Kindle, but I do own Sony PRS-505, and LBook (which is essentially Hanlin with Ukrainian firmware). Both me and my wife swear by those things.

    27. Re:Obvious next step... by bemymonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And what about the battery life? The fact that the Netbook probably weighs twice as much? The free WWAN connection you get with the Kindle? Seamless integration with Amazon's eBook store? How about booting up the laptop (or even waking it from sleep), entering your password and opening the eBook every time you want to read a paragraph or two on the bus? As a matter of fact, don't you think most people would look at you pretty strangely if you pulled out a netbook on a bus? :p

      Sure, you can use a netbook as an eBook reader (I do, at least for large PDFs and other crap my smartphone can't handle), but it's always a bit of a hack. If you're only planning on reading in places where you'd have your netbook out anyway, I guess it's not a problem - but for people who like to read in the back of a taxi or in the john or on the bus, pulling out a netbook every time is just plain annoying.

    28. Re:Obvious next step... by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod-points for this statement.

    29. Re:Obvious next step... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Or, I could just use my netbook running Ubuntu

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    30. Re:Obvious next step... by garphik · · Score: 1

      They can do all that, but the real question is will it work out?

    31. Re:Obvious next step... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Been saying this all along. Why buy a one trick pony when so many choices abound? I do not need battery life measure in weeks, 9-12 hours is fine. The netbook also has many more uses and color and can dance backwards in heels.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    32. Re:Obvious next step... by janwedekind · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had a look at the E-Book Reader Matrix. I decided to buy a Bookeen Cybook. It's cheaper than the Kindle and it supports DRM-free formats as well. I am using it to read TXT, PDF, and Mobipocket documents. It's not a free software device though. The applications for displaying PDFs, MobiPocket, ... are proprietary. However you can download the source code of the customised ARMLinux (as required by GPL) from their website. The battery charge supposedly allows for 8000 page flips. But you can't help people looking at you strangely when you do anything intellectual.

    33. Re:Obvious next step... by intheshelter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Easy there champ. The simple fact is they are right in that netbooks, iPhones and the iPod Touch can all serve this function. I've been reading ebooks on my iPhone since November and I doubt I'll ever go back. I like the old books but the convenience of having my books with me in my pocket is priceless. If your only advantage is battery life (and you happen to live weeks away from a power outlet) then go for the Kindle. The rest of the world is easily served by the alternatives you listed, which cost much less and do "oh-so-much more".

    34. Re:Obvious next step... by iceperson · · Score: 1

      This exaxt comment is posted every time there's a story about a kindle, usually by someone who can't name 5 books they've read in the last year...

      I can see why people who don't read can't see a use for a kindle, but for those of us who read a book a week or more it's a real nice piece of tech.

    35. Re:Obvious next step... by slyrat · · Score: 1

      You get one of the numerous readers because of the screen and the battery life, not because of the multiple things it can do. I like having something I can leave on and not have to plug in for 2 weeks, it is very handy as far as reading goes. Something that I would need to plug in anytime I wanted to read in order to make sure it didn't die is not something I'm going to use for regular reading purposes.

    36. Re:Obvious next step... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I have a netbook and I certainly have enough money but I have long since decided that the price of a decent ebook reader, as a dedicated device, needs to drop to less than $100 before I'll consider it. It is more a matter of having multiple devices already to accomplish this task but truly wanting a viable dedicated device but personally being unwilling to invest more than a set amount into it. Most of the books that I read while on the road are either in dead tree format or are simply read with a netbook or a laptop depending on the situation.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    37. Re:Obvious next step... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      42

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    38. Re:Obvious next step... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

      Try using a MacBook Pro on an airplane or bus. I have the 17" model because it's a "desktop replacement" that I use for infrequent travel. There's to room to open the screen to a comfortable angle so it can be read without odd body contortioning.

      That's why I have a kindle. The point is, because like many people I already have laptops I use a lot (Xcode, etc), I am not in the market for a netbook. Thus the kindle fits in my life.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  2. android/touch screen? by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    I wonder if anyone else sees the possibility of using android's API's for touch screen to make devices to for ebooks? Not that I like the ebook market or care for it, but it certainly seems logical.

    If I am wrong, please feel free to correct me.

    1. Re:android/touch screen? by Ponder+Stibions · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Android based app that's free and open source even, with an essentially open standard so anyone can program nearly anything to connect up. Between an iphone/ipod touch app and an android app, there's just enough space for a dedicated ebook reader to flourish. Maybe a nice addition to a ebook reader is a way to share a book with friends, maybe via bluetooth, letting you transfer a set amount (like in Google books where you only see part of the book) and then a linking system to allow you purchase the rest. Might make it more compelling. If tracked as to who recommended it to who, it could have a new start to rating books, by number of recommendations made.

  3. This is like... by XPeter · · Score: 1

    AmazonMP3 trying to compete with Itunes.

    Few will hear about the new store, and even fewer will switch.

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:This is like... by daeley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unless Google teams their ebooks with Apple on a new tablet.

      Then, watch out Amazon.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:This is like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except they can make it part of android. Then any company can build a dedicated ebook reader and existing android devices can have access to the store.

    3. Re:This is like... by goldaryn · · Score: 1

      Unless Google teams their ebooks with Apple on a new tablet.

      Then, watch out Amazon.


      TBH, iPhone app + no DRM = curtains. Definitely.

    4. Re:This is like... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I bet Amazon's mp3 store is a lot more popular with the (reasonably large) portion of the market without iPods than iTunes is.

      Who cares about switching? Amazon went for new users. Google can do the same. How many people do you know who buy books digitally?

    5. Re:This is like... by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who cares about switching? Amazon went for new users.

      Yep. I never used iTunes because it didn't run on my OS, and it had DRM (light DRM, but DRM nevertheless). The first time I ever bought music online was from Amazon, and now I'm buying all my music on Amazon. All Amazon had to do to get my business was to offer me the opportunity to pay my money in return for an mp3 file, which nobody else was willing to let me do.

      The Kindle is exactly analogous. It has a proprietary format, with DRM. Google says they want to have a format that works on a variety of devices, which presumably means no DRM. If they execute the idea well, I'll probably buy my first electronic book from Google.

    6. Re:This is like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2008, 87% of people who bought music online used the iTunes Music store. 16% used Amazon. (The numbers don't add up because 3% or so used both).

      Long story short: "reasonably large" is a lot smaller than you think and you lost the bet.

    7. Re:This is like... by langelgjm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't the Kindle be more analogous to the iPod? Both can use a proprietary, DRMed format. But both also work with well-known, non-DRMed formats. Also, if Google's formats are really open, then won't people be able to read them on Kindles?

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    8. Re:This is like... by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      AmazonMP3 trying to compete with Itunes. Few will hear about the new store, and even fewer will switch.

      The RDF is strong in this one..

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    9. Re:This is like... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      How many of that 87% are iPod owners? I'm guessing more than 81.6%.

      I said "I bet Amazon's mp3 store is a lot more popular with the ... portion of the market without iPods than iTunes is".

      So eliminate the ipod owners from that 87% and how many do you have?

    10. Re:This is like... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      He wasn't talking about the Kindle. He was talking about Amazon's ebooks. I have never looked into them because they have DRM, but I was under the impression that they only run on the Kindle. I don't own a Kindle. AS far as I understand Amazon ebooks only work on the Kindle, so I have never considered them. I am not going to spend $300 on a Kindle and then spend as much per book as I do now. I like reading books on paper, why should I spend an additional $300 to read them in electronic format?

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    11. Re:This is like... by jecblackpepper · · Score: 1

      Of course since the Kindle is only available in USA, then Google could corner the market in the rest of the world!

      I have a Bookeen Cybook and live in the UK. If I could buy and read "Kindle Edition" books on it then I'd agree with you, but Amazon have specifically decided that they won't sell them to me. If Google offer a service that allows me to buy books from them at a reasonable price then they'll get my custom.

      Presently I buy from Baen because of their enlightened attitude about DRM (and of course because I enjoy the books they publish).

  4. Cost by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets hope they can bring the price down to 'every man'. 400 for a kindle is pretty steep for a lot people, even during the best of times.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Cost by DeadDecoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At 400$ a kindle, laptops start to look a little more attractive, especially with emerging tech like color eink and olpc's use of eink in screens to lengthen their battery life. I would love to buy a kindle, but its not cost-effective for me, and better products seem right around the corner.

    2. Re:Cost by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      The fact that they don't work outside the US and Canada is probably a bigger problem.

      But yes, if they were $200 and worked here (Australia) I'd probably buy one.

      Even though that's like my yearly book budget.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Cost by sabernet · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ummm...no.

      Kindle doesn't work outside the US, period. We Canadians don't get it either(though I suspect that has something to do with our world-renowned awful telcos and monopolistic nationally propped up book broker Indigo more then anything else.)

    4. Re:Cost by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      400 for a kindle is pretty steep for a lot people, even during the best of times.

      And during the blurst of times the quality of the writing is so low it's not worth buying the books.

      I swear it's like they get a bunch of monkeys to write these things...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    5. Re:Cost by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      The Sony PRS-505 is $250. There are also a myriad of other eInk readers, with their advantages and faults. Though I don't know if sony puts any country limitations on their store. But I use mine mostly for newspapers and converted PDFs. I got tired of tossing out bags of old newspapers every week.

    6. Re:Cost by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah.. that was dumb of me. AU$200 is about US$162.22 .. and the Sony PRS-505 is about AU$500 in Australia :)

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Cost by mgblst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really, I saw someone on the bus in Australia reading a kindle... well I assumed she was reading it, now you mention it she could have just been starring at a blank screen.

    8. Re:Cost by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Kindle doesn't work outside the US, period. We Canadians don't get it either(though I suspect that has something to do with our world-renowned awful telcos and monopolistic nationally propped up book broker Indigo more then anything else.)

      This is not an excuse. They just have to deliver it via wifi and for those who can't use that, make a little sync app. If they are not in Canada, it's because they don't want to.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    9. Re:Cost by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Though I don't know if sony puts any country limitations on their store.

      Sony has a separate online store for each country in which it operates and the ebook reader is not available on all of them.

      Also, If you happen to be out of your country and try to update your credit card information on your Sony bookstore account you're out of luck. They detect your IP and block the update so make sure you update your account or buy all your books before you leave. I know this because I'm in Thailand for 3 months (I bought the PRS-505 specifically for this trip) and the Sony bookstore for Canada blocked me. I can buy books just not update my credit card info.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    10. Re:Cost by Cymurgh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There must be some business logic to Amazon's confining their ebook sales to their own format, their own device, their own network, and their own home country. Don't know what it is though.

      I'd be buying my ebooks from Amazon if I possibly could. But I can't. They don't distribute over the Internet so I can't download to my preferred device. They don't make Whispernet available outside the US so there's no incentive for me to ditch my preferred device for a Kindle.

    11. Re:Cost by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      At 400$ a kindle, laptops start to look a little more attractive, especially with emerging tech like color eink and olpc's use of eink in screens to lengthen their battery life. I would love to buy a kindle, but its not cost-effective for me, and better products seem right around the corner.

      eInk screens are still expensive. If you shop around, you'll see that 1st gen Kindle wasn't really anymore expensive than comparable alternatives - such as Sony 505 and 700. You can get a reader for slightly above $200 now, but those are with previous generation (non-Vizplex) screens which are darker and slower.

    12. Re:Cost by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Kindle doesn't work outside the US, period.

      What do you think, it's got a magic killswitch to disable it when you cross the border?

      Of course it'll work outside the U.S., you just won't get the shop access and free wireless. Makes it pointless, since you can get the same for cheaper elsewhere at that point... but it will work.

    13. Re:Cost by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Lets hope they can bring the price down to 'every man'. 400 for a kindle is pretty steep for a lot people, even during the best of times.

      Let's hope they publish in some standard non-DRM'd format, like Baen does. That way it won't matter whether or not you buy their reader; you'll be able to read the book on any moderately capable piece of hardware.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    14. Re:Cost by JasonKChapman · · Score: 1

      I've been using a Sony Reader for a couple of years (since the PRS-500 came out) and have yet to use Sony's store. Why should I, when places like FictionWise exist?

      --
      Sorry, I'm a writer. That makes you raw material.
    15. Re:Cost by JasonKChapman · · Score: 1

      Mostly, it's the publishers that control this. Rights are still parceled out on a regional basis and sold separately, even though the model is aged far beyond any practical meaning. World rights cost a lot more than, say, North American rights.

      --
      Sorry, I'm a writer. That makes you raw material.
  5. The real questions is: by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will they be selling books with or withOUT DRM?

    I own a Hanlin V3, and to a great extent stopped using it, as I can't get the books I want for it.

    1. Re:The real questions is: by blhack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I am typically very much anti-piracy, I do draw the line at books.

      There is a large collection of books sitting on my shelf that I have never opened. This is because I bought them only to put them on my ebook reader de jour (palm -> nokia 770 -> kindle2).

      I'm sure that this violates some laws, but I feel like those laws are unjustified. If i were to take the time to scan the books that I purchased, then put them on my reader, that would be fair use, no? How is it different if I outsource the job to somebody that does it for free?

      I'm arguing with my own arguments here, I know.

      My point is: buy dead-tree versions of the books you want, then download the PDF from your favorite file network.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    2. Re:The real questions is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PDF? Ewwww. Try .mobi or ePub so the text can reflow and fit your device screen. PDF is only really useful when the form and layout is as important or more important than the content of the text.

    3. Re:The real questions is: by TheMCP · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can I have it? It apparently supports PDF, TXT, RTF, EPUB, LIT, PPT, WOLF, DOC, CHM, FB2, HTML, DJVU, MP3, TIFF, JPG, GIF, BMP, PNG, RAR, ZIP, and MOBI. I can get pretty much any book I want in one of those formats or something that can be converted into one of them by Calibre or Stanza Desktop.

    4. Re:The real questions is: by centuren · · Score: 1

      Wired had an interesting article about the typesetting (or lack of) in ebooks today. That's one area where there's a lot of room for improvement, and would definitely provide incentives for getting the ebook through official channels, even to the point of dealing with a closed format with some light DRM.

      In my experience with downloading PDFs of books I own to read in an ebook reader on my laptop, typesetting had been practically non-existent and I'm lucky to get proper paragraph and chapter breaks.

    5. Re:The real questions is: by Whillowhim · · Score: 1

      This is the major question, and I can't seem to find any info about it. If the books are sold without DRM Google is in a position to force other online publishers to follow suit, but at the same time fewer publishers will want to list books with Google (due to percieved losses from piracy). It seems like more publishers are wising up to the fact that DRM is only hurting them, but there is still a long way to go before all books are available in non-DRMed formats. I suspect that Google will end up using the middle ground again and allow publishers to choose whether the books are DRMed or not, which means that all the major publishers will continue to try to make DRM work.

      The basic issue is that all major eBook readers can handle a large number of non-DRMed files, but only 1 DRM format. If you can't find the book in that specific DRM format, you're out of luck. Typically, these are specific to the company that puts out the reader (i.e. Amazon's kindle format, Sony's reader format, etc.). The Sony store is expensive and has a limited selection. Amazon has a much better selection, but not perfect and is often expensive as well. Fictionwise has a mediocre selection (seems to be better than Sony in my area of interest), but their DRM doesn't work with the two most common kinds of ebook readers (the Sony and Amazon ones).

      Since they're not going to put out their own version of an ebook reader, I'm hoping that Google will go without DRM so that I can use their store with my Sony Reader. If not, I'll end up pirating books again and end up with free but often badly formatted books after spending 4-5x as much time looking for the book as I would with a proper store. I've already tapped out Baen's back catalog of interesting books (spent close to $1k getting the ones that looked interesting) and I read books faster than they can publish them. I'm willing to buy books online, I just can't find someone to take my money and give me something that works. Yes, this frustrates the hell out of me. I refuse to buy books then pirate them because it sends the signal that DRM is acceptable. If you're going to make me spend time looking for crappily formatted books due to fear I'm going to steal something, I'm not going to pay you for it. I don't like the fact that this means authors don't get paid, but I'm more than happy with the fact that publishers don't get paid because of this.

    6. Re:The real questions is: by BlackCreek · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the problem I have. There is a minority of old public domain books, from which I can have a custom PDF generated for it, with my own choice of fonts and font size.

      I tried downloading books from the web. Often the HTML based ones are so fragmented I can't read comfortably. The PDF based will have fonts I consider too small, and the zooming of the HanlinV3 is not very functional as you can't scroll to the side.

    7. Re:The real questions is: by jecblackpepper · · Score: 1

      I have a Bookean Cybook and I can sympathise with you about reading PDFs on ebook readers.

      In the end I wrote a rough PDF to html application and now read them as html which seems to work really well. In fact, it seems to work better than the mobi-pocket format for me at least.

  6. Not too happy with my Kindle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was right at the part of my e-novel where it said: "And the killer's name was....(Low Battery) Unfortunately, I was sitting on the commode, and could not reach the AC adapter. :(

    1. Re:Not too happy with my Kindle by daeley · · Score: 1

      I was right at the part of my e-novel where it said: "And the killer's name was....(Low Battery) Unfortunately, I was sitting on the commode, and could not reach the AC adapter. :(

      So that's what the kids are calling it nowadays? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Not too happy with my Kindle by omeomi · · Score: 1

      I thought one of the main benefits of E-Ink is that it needs no power to maintain the display state...

    3. Re:Not too happy with my Kindle by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, you misread the ending. I read the same book.

      [SPOILER ALERT]

      The killer's name really was Low Battery.

      Low had tried to frame his brother the rapper, 9V. But the power required to electrocute the victim was too high -- and 9V demonstrated he had full charge by having the detective place both his contacts on his tongue. While 9V lost a lot of street cred for getting tongued by a male detective, it did show that he was fully-charged and quite innocent.

      So then Low Battery tried to frame his sister, Anita Agatha Battery, but AA Battery simply didn't have the brute power necessary for the job.

      Out of blood relatives (and it had to be one of the siblings, as established by DC-NA testing), by process of elimination, it was Low Battery who depleted his power by committing the electrocution, with terminal results.

      So sorry. That last pun was just over the top.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Not too happy with my Kindle by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

      eBook readers take so little power. Why don't they have a solar cell in them like calculators.

      I mean, 20 years ago they used to give away crappy calculators everywhere with those little solar cells in them. Now a generation later, little solar cells should be in all devices like eBook readers.

    5. Re:Not too happy with my Kindle by centuren · · Score: 1

      eBook readers take so little power. Why don't they have a solar cell in them like calculators.

      I mean, 20 years ago they used to give away crappy calculators everywhere with those little solar cells in them. Now a generation later, little solar cells should be in all devices like eBook readers.

      It'd be pretty cool to have them under the screen, so they're hidden, but cover a large area.

    6. Re:Not too happy with my Kindle by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      So sorry. That last pun was just over the coppertop.

      Coulda been worse :-P

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    7. Re:Not too happy with my Kindle by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I have a scientific calculator that requires a connection to mains power.

      Sure it's old, but it's still a calculator.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  7. Really? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazon's Kindle an enormously popular eBook reader.

    I'm not sure the description "enormously popular" is deserved. Just because it is out selling other eBook readers doesn't make it "enormously popular"; how many of these have actually sold?

    It doesn't seem that the eBook market has really expanded to the point of anything yet being worthy of the "enormously popular" status, AFAIK.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Really? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      It's semantics, really, but the popularity of a product can be gauged across the entire population (pretty much useless), it can be gauged across the potential market (useful), or it can be gauged against the existing market (most useful [for marketing]).

      If the Kindle's share of new e-book purchases is over 85%, I'd call it enormously popular.

      What I'd like to see is an extensive used Kindle market. It bothers me to no end that every time one is purchased, it does an extra point of damage for each one that has been discarded*.

      *Ok, each one that is in the graveyard, since I don't want to get hammered by bigger MTG nerds than myself. As a side note, I wonder if MTG is still a relevant nerd topic. I don't see many references to it anymore, though I do see it is still being sold.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If the Kindle's share of new e-book purchases is over 85%, I'd call it enormously popular.

      And EverQuest was "enormously popular" before World of WarCraft came along. Even if they're currently dominating the ebook reader market, there are still a huge number of potential customers out there who don't own any. IMO, it's way too fucking expensive. Both the reader and the DRM'd books. I mean, if I could save a bundle on something like The New Cambridge Medieval History ($1600 for the full hardback set), I'd buy one in a heartbeat.

      As a side note, I wonder if MTG is still a relevant nerd topic. I don't see many references to it anymore, though I do see it is still being sold.

      CCGs, especially M:TG, have really become a money-making scam. I'd love to play the online version, because I remember it being tons of fun, but that has the same business model. Waste of money.

    3. Re:Really? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      CCGs, especially M:TG, have really become a money-making scam. I'd love to play the online version, because I remember it being tons of fun, but that has the same business model. Waste of money.

      Hmm... just like the micropayment model everyone (read: business analysts) say is the future of the web. I wonder if web producers will be able to restrain their greed enough to maintain their markets.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Really? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      It's semantics, really, but the popularity of a product can be gauged across the entire population (pretty much useless), it can be gauged across the potential market (useful), or it can be gauged against the existing market (most useful [for marketing]).

      I understand your point, but I disagree with the application of such sweeping terms as "enormously popular" for something that is currently essentially a niche product. This same kind of logic could be used to say that the Segway Human Transporter is an "enormously popular" two-wheeled electric-powered transportation device, or that the Tesla Roadster is an "enormously popular" high-performance electric car.

      For that matter, you could go in the other direction and say that the Toyota Camry is an "abysmal failure" in terms of transportation because there are more people on planet earth that do not own one than there are that do (same could be said for the iPod as a means of entertainment).

      So sure you can scale the terms as much as you want, but that doesn't mean they retain meaning indefinitely. And the eBook market wasn't developed in the hopes of selling only to the very short list of people who have purchased eBook readers so far; they want to expand in the same way that digital music has expanded. Which means they have yet to develop a device that is anywhere near qualifying as "enormously popular".

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    5. Re:Really? by Brother+Seamus · · Score: 1

      Believe me, Kindle is enormously popular with paid shills and astroturfers.

    6. Re:Really? by centuren · · Score: 1

      Amazon's Kindle an enormously popular eBook reader.

      I'm not sure the description "enormously popular" is deserved. Just because it is out selling other eBook readers doesn't make it "enormously popular"; how many of these have actually sold?

      It doesn't seem that the eBook market has really expanded to the point of anything yet being worthy of the "enormously popular" status, AFAIK.

      I may not call it "enormously popular", but I'd definitely say it's an "enormously popular eBook reader". Semantics, as someone else pointed out, but I think the latter statement indicates the market in which the popularity assessment is being made, and is a fair way to look at things that is relevant to the conversation topic.

    7. Re:Really? by Eil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not sure the description "enormously popular" is deserved. Just because it is out selling other eBook readers doesn't make it "enormously popular"; how many of these have actually sold?

      Amazon hasn't released any numbers on how many were sold. However, I frequently use the Mom Scale to informally gauge the popularity of a given technology. How it works is like this: if my 65-year-old mom has heard of a piece of technology, then it's popular. If she has purchased or downloaded a piece of technology, then it's enormously popular.

      I found out yesterday that my mom just bought a Kindle, hence the Kindle is enormously popular.

    8. Re:Really? by syousef · · Score: 1

      if my 65-year-old mom has heard of a piece of technology, then it's popular. If she has purchased or downloaded a piece of technology, then it's enormously popular.

      So a sample size of one and your mind is made up? Really???

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    9. Re:Really? by Saysys · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a social scientist I can tell you that if he where to "boot strap" his data by sampling his small sample size different ways repeatedly he could come up with something :-)

      p.s.
      After 18 PHD level hours I would not trust a sociologist to tell me where, with any degree of certainty, the bathroom is.

    10. Re:Really? by intheshelter · · Score: 1

      I kind of thought that was an exagerration myself. Considering Amazon won't tell anyone how many Kindles have sold we can't tell whether it's "enormously popular" at all. Common sense tells me not that many have been sold, because if Amazon had sold a lot they would be shouting it from the tree tops.

    11. Re:Really? by Eil · · Score: 1

      See this.

  8. Sony's eReader... by Lockblade · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this will affect their deal with Sony and their ebook store. It's not like they can just take their toys and go home, as there's probably a contract or two, but I'm sure no one would mind replacing the awful Sony store interface.

    1. Re:Sony's eReader... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Please, yes. Sony's device interface is great and super easy to use. Their store interface, on the other hand, was designed by sadists.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  9. Who buys these Ebooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously! My g/f has a Kindle, and she has about thousand of books for it. She maybe "bought" a handful of those.

    Games take up few Gigs and people pirate those. Movies take up hundreds of MBs and people pirate those. You think they won't pirate a TXT file that's few MBs in size?

  10. Forget about proprietary eBook formats by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I want an eBook device that can read the eBooks I already bought and own.

    They are in PDF and some on CHM format.

    If I am going to spend $300 or more for an eBook device I might as well buy a Netbook that can use PDF and CHM formats for the same price.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Forget about proprietary eBook formats by fafaforza · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not sure why your post was modded Insightful as you've obviously haven't looked into this at all. Most eBook readers support unencrypted PDF. There are also conversion utilities to convert PDF for various ebook formats so that your device doesn't have to do the formatting on the fly.

      I see that there's a CHM to HTML conversion app (Mac only it seems, and another commercial one), and with the HTML in hand, you can create an ePub book using a program called Calibre.

      It's pretty messy as far as formats and conversion utilities right now, and you have to sort a lot of it out, but there are ways to read your stuff which shouldn't be too difficult for a techie.

    2. Re:Forget about proprietary eBook formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The eBook device you describe is BeBook. It costs 300 EUR and reads PDF, DjVu, JPG, PNG, GIF, TXT, DOC, EPUB, Mobi PRC, HTML, CHM, LIT, FB2, and many other formats. It is Linux-based and the firmware is open-source, but there is also OpenInkpot which is openly hackable so you can even write your own reader for whatever format you want. Plus, the device works all over the world, and it accepts an SDHC card up to 32GB, but it also has 512MB of flash memory built-in. its battery lasts for about one month (yes, it's a 4 weeks battery!) and fully charges via USB within half an hour. Much better, the company that makes the firmware allows you to communicate with the software programmers and request features, fixes, etc yourself for the next version.

    3. Re:Forget about proprietary eBook formats by hidoh · · Score: 1

      I want an eBook device that can read the eBooks I already bought and own.

      They are in PDF and some on CHM format.

      If I am going to spend $300 or more for an eBook device I might as well buy a Netbook that can use PDF and CHM formats for the same price.

      That is if you are happy to read on a back-lit LCD screen. This is the main advantage of these devices. I love my electronic ink reader. It's also got a Mobibook and PDF support, so I can read pretty much anything on it ...

    4. Re:Forget about proprietary eBook formats by JerryLove · · Score: 1

      I want an eBook device that can read the eBooks I already bought and own.

      If they don't have DRM on them, you can use products like Libre' to change their format to whatever your eBook reader reads. If they are DRM'd, you'll need to find a reader that reads that format.

      They are in PDF and some on CHM format.

      Most all will read PDFs. If they are the "fixed sized" PDFs look for a large screen and something with good pan/zoom features (Sony 700 or new large kindle). If they are the "Digitial Editions" type PDFs, they can be read natively in sony 505 and 700 readers.

      If I am going to spend $300 or more for an eBook device I might as well buy a Netbook that can use PDF and CHM formats for the same price.

      That depends on your needs. My ebook reader lasts more than a week on a charge... tens of hours of actual reading at the speed I can read. How about your netbook?

      My epaper display is very easy to read on the beach. How about the netbook?

      My ebook is thinner than a pencil, weighs less than a pount, and fits in the hip-pockets on my BDUs. Your netbook?

      And in the case of the Kindle (which I don't have), one can download news and books on the fly from anywhere there's cell service, and automatically store/retrieve books through the cell system.

      Of course your netbook can do things my ebook cannot. Play games for example. It also likely has a color display. I'm likely to get a netbook in the near future; but it won't replact my ebook reader.

      You can read ebooks on a netbook. I can browse the web on my ebook reader. In neither case to I find those thoughts ideal. They have different specialities and meet the needs of different people.

    5. Re:Forget about proprietary eBook formats by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      The Kindle DX reads .pdf's natively, which was enough to get me to order one. I have a lot of eBook .pdf's purchased from Pragmatic, Manning, Packt, etc. who long ago figured out that the most effective DRM is simply embedding the purchaser's name in the files.

      A quick Google search shows that there are .chm to .pdf converters available. I have some old Microsoft eBook's in that format, now that you mention it.

      Now that I'm acutely aware of eye strain problems, Kindle's e-ink screen looks like a really good idea. So the voices in my head agreed to call the Kindle DX a medical and educational device and authorized the purchase.

  11. As it will be forever a beta... by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it will only sell unfinished books

    --
    "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  12. eBook Reader? Why bother? by nickruiz · · Score: 0, Troll

    Buying an eBook reader always seemed impractical to me when you have so many decent smartphones and PDA devices out on the market. Granted, an eBook reader has a larger screen and may be more comfortable to hold, but for the price tag, you could just purchase a better mobile phone and have more features ready at your fingertips. Not to mention the advantage of portability.

    1. Re:eBook Reader? Why bother? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2, Informative

      Always the same back and forth on this topic every time eBooks are mentioned.

      Someone says smartphones/PDAs are better, then someone else (like me) responds that the benefit of an eInk display is:

      1) There is no backlight, which helps alleviate eyestrain during long reading sessions.
      2) There is no screen refresh, so you can read for a very long time without killing your battery.

      Having read extensively on a homebrew-enabled PSP with a LCD screen and now on a Sony PRS-700, I know that the LCD screen does hurt my eyes and the eInk screen does not.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    2. Re:eBook Reader? Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read ebooks when I take the bus to work, on my Creative Zen MP3 player, even though the backlight is a huge cause of eye strain. My solution? Sunglasses! ;) You might laugh, but it kills that awful blue-white glare.

    3. Re:eBook Reader? Why bother? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      I read ebooks when I take the bus to work, on my Creative Zen MP3 player, even though the backlight is a huge cause of eye strain. My solution? Sunglasses! ;) You might laugh, but it kills that awful blue-white glare.

      That actually makes sense. I had a friend who had terrible eye strain to the point that his parents/educators thought he was dyslexic, until he started using a glare shield to read, and now he reads books recreationally.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  13. Re:Unfinished Books! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Bottom of Slashdot page:

    Woman inspires us to great things, and prevents us from achieving them. -- Dumas

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Knight_of_Sainte-Hermine
    The Last Cavalier (originally published in France in 2005 under the title Le Chevalier de Sainte-Hermine) is an unfinished historical novel by Alexandre Dumas. It is believed to be Dumas' last major work, and the story was lost until 2005, when it was announced that an almost-complete copy had been found in the form of a newspaper serial. While a number of his previously forgotten works have been unearthed, this is the largest at 900 pages.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  14. As long as.... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    As long as its a proper program, which can be download on its own, without having to be forced to install services and other bloated crap on your system.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  15. Why do we need stores? by N7DR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm probably missing something obvious, but I have yet to understand why we need to insert a middleman store into the chain between producer and consumer.

    It seems to me cheaper and more efficient for the publisher of a book (or the author himself) to provide downloads directly.

    For physical products, it makes sense to provide some kind of middleman to take care of the hassles involved with delivering the product; but for electronic products, it's not at all obvious to me why such a middleman is necessary.

    As an author, I'm still struggling with the question of whether to make electronic versions of my books available; but if were to do so, (and especially having carefully read the contract that Amazon makes you sign to make your work available for the Kindle) I wouldn't be inclined to insert another profit-making entity between me and my readers.

    1. Re:Why do we need stores? by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Attention. If I can look at and search for thousands of books in one place, I am more likely to notice your book if it is there.

      One way to look at it is like this: how much are you currently making on the books that you are not selling that Amazon is not taking a share of?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Why do we need stores? by et764 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm probably missing something obvious, but I have yet to understand why we need to insert a middleman store into the chain between producer and consumer. It seems to me cheaper and more efficient for the publisher of a book (or the author himself) to provide downloads directly.

      One benefit I can see is that it gives you a single place to go get books from. I don't have to remember the web sites for 100 authors, or 50 publishers. Instead, I can just remember a single site which aggregates all the books together. Sure, I'll end up paying a higher monetary cost due to the middleman, but presumably the time cost savings is enough to me that it is worthwhile.

      It's sort like having an iPhone App Store instead of hundreds of independent software publishers to download from. Another benefit is that the App Store provides common payment processing infrastructure, which keeps the cost of implementing this from being duplicated for every software publisher.

    3. Re:Why do we need stores? by Zerth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need the publisher less than you need a retailer.

      A publisher (mainly) provides publicity, editing, manufacturing, and, the only thing they are really good at, getting your dead tree into brick&mortars. You can contract editors, you can do publicity on the internet, and small run print options have almost reached parity with bigger presses. Most bookstores will even order PoD books now and some even take PoD returns on the theory that if you were interested enough to order it at a store, someone else might be interested enough to make a casual purchase.

      Having your publisher be your store would limit you to people who mainly read books from your publisher, as opposed to readers of your genre. Doing it directly yourself would be even worse, unless you were already a name. I'd rather not fill in my CC info on a few hundred authors' websites, or even a dozen publishers'.

      And you probably don't want to have to deal with CC payment processors, especially with the chargeback fees that retailers generally eat for you. I haven't read the Kindle contract closely, but I don't remember it being as binding as most publishers' contracts. Their PoD services seemed a little demanding on minimum quantities.

      PS, put your books online, if you are at all popular, otherwise someone else will first. Probably a "fan".

    4. Re:Why do we need stores? by centuren · · Score: 1

      I'm probably missing something obvious, but I have yet to understand why we need to insert a middleman store into the chain between producer and consumer.

      I think the obvious is having a centralised source for the search and discovery of content. It's my impression that many independent artists benefit from music stores such as iTunes which have a large user base and can lead interested consumers to the music.

      I think the biggest benefit of both physical and online book stores that sell physical books is that they provide consumers with a place to browse books and find things they would not have otherwise.

      That isn't to say one shouldn't have both options, but the store has it's benefits.

    5. Re:Why do we need stores? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      For a lot of the same reasons that people go to real world stores.
      Why would I even look for your book. A google search on Science Fiction Books would be less than useful. Even a search for C++ books would probably not do very well.
      But I can go to Amazon and search for those and maybe find your book. If that book gets good reviews I might buy it. Or it may be on sale and I would figure why not give it a shot.

      For authors it will probably mean more sales. It also means they don't have to collect the money and deal with those issues. Then you have sales tax reporting... Have you ever sold anything? Oh let me tell you it is a pain.
      And then you have to worry about securing your website and dealing with that. Keeping it up dated and all that fun.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Why do we need stores? by whiledo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Attention. If I can look at and search for thousands of books in one place, I am more likely to notice your book if it is there.

      The more you think about it, the less that actually makes sense. The more books that are there, the less likely you are to notice my specific book.

      Having tried to find decent apps in Apple's App Store (especially free games), I know that eventually volume becomes more of a negative than a positive. I wind up searching the net for people's "top X list of free iphone games", etc. So in reality, what I'm looking for is a content portal with reviews and discussion groups done by area of interest that can then directly link to a publisher or author's store.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    7. Re:Why do we need stores? by Saysys · · Score: 1
      1. Serendipity,
      2. Social function of limited network search
      3. Minimum standards set by the publisher
      4. Proper classification and identification
      5. Easy review repository

      Serendipity: The ability to have your book 'accidentally' run into while the customer is looking at another book of interest to him or her is very valuable.

      Social function of limited network search: Each person has a mental network of exploitable functions, be they computer, intellectual, inter-personal. When individuals lack full ability to find everything whenever they want they employ these functions.
      Some have a cost of time, others have a cost of money, still others cost some amount of your moral swaysion.

      Minimum standards set by the publisher: The trust necessary to spend money on data is increased when someone who has been known to do good work has looked over the work and passed it for publication.

      Proper Classification and Identification: Imagine if books categories where chosen by the authors alone? Sense we know that each book can and does fit into multiple categories then without a store to keep things organized we would quickly see whatever system by which they are self-categorized go the way of the meta-tag in the early internet.

      Easy review repository: Even if I am buying a product from somewhere else I often use the Amazon or Newegg reviews from users so that I can get a gist of weather people like or dislike the product and if the reason for negative reviews are systemic flaw or there the presence of a PFBKC (problem found between keyboard and chair).

    8. Re:Why do we need stores? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      As an author, I'm still struggling with the question of whether to make electronic versions of my books available; but if were to do so, (and especially having carefully read the contract that Amazon makes you sign to make your work available for the Kindle) I wouldn't be inclined to insert another profit-making entity between me and my readers.

      Cory Doctorow has managed to do fairly well selling books with free electronic versions available. I myself have bought paper editions of his works that I read first as a free download.

      As for the DRM issue, I buy a lot of ebooks to read on my smartphone, including some that use eReader DRM, but it's a pretty light DRM in that the books are just encrypted using a key that I provide. I can transfer the books to any device, including my laptop, or any other computer, smartphone, etc., and just have to enter the key. That level of DRM is not crippling, and I don't mind it. That being said, I'd still rather have DRM-free editions, and buy them when available.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    9. Re:Why do we need stores? by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      So what you are saying is it's easier for me to find your book on your website when I've never heard of either than to find it on amazon which already has
      • Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
      • Frequently Bought Together
      • What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?
      • Looking for "[your search here]" Products?
      • Tags Customers Associate with This Product
      • Customer Reviews
      • Customer Discussions
      • Listmania!
      • So You'd Like to...
      • Look for Similar Items by Category
      • Recommended for You

      By all means, sell your book on your website, and if I've already heard of it then I might go there to buy it. If I've not heard of it, I'm much more likely to find it on Amazon. But that's not all. Even if I have heard of it, I'd much rather have on place to go to buy stuff. If my options are

      • Go to two different websites
        • neither of which I've been to before
        • enter my credit card info twice
        • be unsure of how secure either really is
      • Go to one place, buy both and be done

      Guess which most people would rather do?

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    10. Re:Why do we need stores? by whiledo · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is it's easier for me to find your book on your website when I've never heard of either than to find it on amazon which already has [...]

      Nope, didn't say that. It was in response to the previous poster who wrote,

      Attention. If I can look at and search for thousands of books in one place, I am more likely to notice your book if it is there.

      The most effective way to get people to notice your books isn't just by listing them on Amazon. It's through a lot of other advertising methods. Unless either of us has a study to back this up, we're just going off of opinion. My opinion is that the number of people that buy an author based on those things you listed is very low. It helps Amazon in that it probably sells some number of books, but for any given author, I'm guessing the fraction of sales driven by these methods is negligible.

      All that said, I never wrote that you should NOT be on Amazon. I simply pointed out that just being on Amazon isn't what's going to drive your book sales.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    11. Re:Why do we need stores? by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      I simply pointed out that just being on Amazon isn't what's going to drive your book sales.

      Then you aren't on the same topic. The original question was: why have a store? You are talking about what will get you the most sales. Nobody is saying put your stuff for sale (whether on Amazon or your website) and call it good. The question is why should you sell an ebook on Amazon at all. If all you did was list your ebook for sale, then you'll get dismal sales at best. If you list it for sale and advertise it everywhere you'll make decent sales. But that's irrelevant to the topic at hand. You have to make the comparison with all other things being equal. Advertise it the same amount, but sell it exclusively on your website or exclusively on Amazon. I doubt that you will make more sales on your website than you would by selling it on Amazon because of the things I listed above.

      On Amazon, more people will find it, and of those that find it, more are willing to buy. All other things being equal, more people will accidentally find your book on Amazon than will accidentally find it on your website and it is because of those things I listed. Also, of the people that accidentally find it, a greater percentage will be willing to buy it from Amazon than from your unknown (and thus untrusted) website.

      And before we get into the fees Amazon charges, remember you have to compare those to the cost of implementing your own secure website store, hosting costs, etc. The OP may or may not be able to do it on his own. The vast majority of authors would have to hire others to do it for them.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    12. Re:Why do we need stores? by whiledo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the point of your continued posts are, considering you're arguing a different point that I was talking about. I simply pointed out how the more titles are available, the less likely it is that I'll pick any one title at random (example being the itunes app store). As such, I'm afraid I really have very little interest in reading the rest of your post.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
  16. baen has no drm by rico33 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have been buying ebooks directly from the publisher Baen: www.baen.com For 4 years now. There prices are reasonable $7.99 for a typical release of book that is available in hard cover or 5.99 for a book that is available in paper back. They release the books in multiple formats including HTML. So the books that I bought 4 years ago and read with my palm I can now download again to my iphone and continue to read it. The prices are reasonable so I do not even think about looking for alternative sources for the book *cough bittorrent cough* I have been extremely happy with there products. I just wish other publishers would follow suit so I can continue buying ebooks of other authors that I enjoy. Curiously I just sent an email to Amazon.ca early today at how (since I am in Canada) I cannot get the kindle app or kindle books and how I have not bought any books from them for 4 years because I only buy ebooks. Well everyone says that the customer should decide and I have decided to only buy books as ebooks and I prefer without drm; baen meets those requirements so they get my business and thus far they are my sole source of fantasy/science fiction books that I have bought in the last 4 years.

  17. Beneficial to consumers? by sy5t3m · · Score: 1

    With the DOJ and possibly the EU looking into googles book settlement for antitrust reasons, consumers will not be better off if the settlement is allowed to stand. They never are when dealing with a monopoly.

    If google enters the market as a fair competitor to amazon, then sure, it should lead to lower prices and more choice, but I don't think google is even remotely interested in fair competition.

  18. Re:Fatality! by centuren · · Score: 1

    Format war?

    PDF wins. It's free, implemented on all platforms, and does everything you need. It even does Javascript, which nobody needs.

    Well, that was a fun war. Let's fight video formats now.

    We won't see a real format war until typesetting becomes a prevalent aspect of ebook publishing.

  19. i can see it now by ionix5891 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    along the right side of each page in the ebook.... yep "ads by google" :D

    1. Re:i can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more sensible choice would be full page ad inserts, in a sane proportion to the number of pages. One full page ad per 100 pages seems alright to me. Even 50, if it will drive down the price of the book under $5.

    2. Re:i can see it now by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Could be more interesting than that. Say, the name of the soft drink the main character sips in the scene changes over time, and depends on the highest bidder at the moment...

    3. Re:i can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, that may be one of the ways they sell books - but if you could pick up older books for free with ads, or the hot new bestseller for $10 or $5 with ads... the ads may not seem so bad any more.

  20. Speaking of Kindle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kindle has no future, here is why:

    By the time Kindle become popular, the cost of tablet PCs will be much lower than what it is today.

    Why buy a ebook reader when you can get a full featured tablet pc, same size, low price.

    1. Re:Speaking of Kindle by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 1

      Yep, eInk technology is pretty much doomed if they keep prices so high. Check out the OLPC, it has two modes for it's LCD screen. The person behind this technology founded Pixel Qi and in no time (fall 2009?) we will see plenty of netbooks and tablets using their technology... so yes, I'll keep waiting for this technology to either be used on it's full potential or eInk technology dropping it prices down.

    2. Re:Speaking of Kindle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of humanity, how many times does this have to be said:

      LCD != eInk

      LCD = Backlit screen which is bad for your eyes!
      eInk = No backlight, similar experience to reading normal paper

      The two are not interchangeable - not even close!

    3. Re:Speaking of Kindle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zero

      what are u on?
      nobody even said they are the fcuking same

  21. ePub is already there. by boombaard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, we will see a format war once Amazon has to start considering implementing ePub on the Kindle (because they can no longer ignore other stores, that only carry their books in ePub or DRMed mobi (which doesn't work on the Kindle, because its mobi DRM implementation is different from the standard mobi implementation, even though they own Mobipocket. Can you spell "lock-in"?), or because they want to be able to sell books to people who don't own a Kindle.
    Anyway, ePub can technically already do typesetting, as far as that goes in reflowable formats, through CSS. Mobipocket's typesetting possibilities suck. The format is outdated, and although it can be upgraded, it should just go the way of the dodo.
    That said, for any book requiring footnotes (endnotes work in ePub), you will need PDF, as I know of no other format that will display them. Reflowable footnotes would be really neat, and are technically possible in ePub, but there is no working implementation yet.

  22. Re:Fatality! by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    Some of the books I've bought on my Kindle have clearly had their typography specified. Alberto Manguel's "The Library At Night" was set in a sans-serif font, maybe Optima. And Peter L. Bernstein's "Against The Gods: The Remarkable Story Of Risk" somehow managed to have a typeface that looked like it had been printed on a press with worn plates - occasional letters were malformed as if they had too little or too much ink. An 'A' on one screen might be a little wrong, but not every 'A' on every page, as would be the case if the problem were with the font.

    It actually matched the paperback pretty well - perhaps they were both produced from a scan of a hardcover. Wasn't the best reading experience, however.

    I don't know what kind of format they used to get that level of detail.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  23. PDF is a print format by Homburg · · Score: 4, Informative

    PDF is a terrible format for ebooks. It's designed to instruct a printer how to draw on paper of a specifc, fixed size. An ebook format needs to deal with different screen sizes (possibly wildly different - I read ebooks on my 1280x800 laptop screen and my 177x220 phone screen) and different text sizes (my long-sighted father is going to want larger text in his ebooks than I do). PDF doesn't allow for the kind of reflow that a good ebook reader is going to employ.

    1. Re:PDF is a print format by locofungus · · Score: 1

      You are right but ...

      I convert stuff to LaTeX and then I can convert it to whatever size/format I'm comfortable with.

      Ironically, despite the fact that LaTeX is almost exclusively used in the technical fields, it's almost perfect for novels because there's almost nothing other than plain text required. At the most you might need the odd \part{PART HEADING}, \chapter{CHAPTER HEADING} that isn't just plain text. There are a few odd characters that cannot be used directly - '&' is probably the only one that actually occurs in a typical novel (Oh, and, of course, you don't want to double space your work)

      Here's my default.tex that gets included into anything I want to format for my PRS-505

      Well it was here in all it's glory but I cannot waste any more time trying to defeat the "Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 38.3)." so I've joined all the lines together. Hopefully this is equivalent


      \usepackage{graphics} \usepackage{calc} \usepackage{ifpdf} \newcommand{\dofontscale}[3]{\setlength{#1}{#2 * 10 / \real{#
      \clearpage \thispagestyle{empty}%
      \@tempswafalse \null\vfil \secdef\@part\@spart} \renewcommand\chapter{\clearpage \thispagestyle{empty}%
      \@afterindentfalse \secdef\@chapter\@schapter} \def\@makechapterhead#1{%
      {\parindent \z@ \raggedright \normalfont \ifnum \c@secnumdepth >\m@ne \if@mainmatter \centering\Large\bfseries \@chapapp
      \typeout{pdftex: Hy@DestName `#1' `#2' #1.\arabic{Hy@uniquemark}}%
      \pdfdest name{#1.\arabic{Hy@uniquemark}}#2\relax } \def\Hy@writebookmark#1#2#3#4#5{%
      section number, text, label, level, file %
      \typeout{pdftex: writebookmark `#1' `#2' `#3.\arabic{Hy@uniquemark}' `#4' `#5'}%
      \ifx\WriteBookmarks\relax%
      \else \ifnum#4>\Hy@bookmarksdepth\relax \else \@@writetorep{#1}{#2}{#3.\arabic{Hy@uniquemark}}{#4}{#5}%
      \addtocounter{Hy@uniquemark}{1} \fi \fi} \makeatother \newcommand{\misctext}[1]{}

      (All that Hy stuff at the end is to fix problems with pdflatex where it cannot correctly handle repeated chapter numbers - e.g. if you have a book with Part I, Part II etc with each part starting with chapter 1 then pdflatex cannot handle it. There are some disadvantages with what I've done - adding a new chapter, section etc causes every link to change name forcing you to run pdflatex twice - but it always works)

      \setsize{8} sets the font size to 8pt. That's the size that comes closest to line lengths approximately the same as a paperback with a comfortable (for me) easy to read font in low light.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    2. Re:PDF is a print format by locofungus · · Score: 1

      No. It's not even close to being right. I've messed up when joining all the lines. You'll just have to imagine that a bit of LaTeX that is as irrelevant to an Author as the source code of Word (or whatever editor they typically use) was included there.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
  24. Netbook + FBreader by greg.collver · · Score: 1

    For my money, the 10" netbooks plus FBreader makes a great book reader. (Add Sage and you have a great offline dictionary too)

    1. Re:Netbook + FBreader by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1

      Good for you. Personally, I'd rather have an eInk device. Like iLiliad or Kindle (not available here in Europe).

  25. CC1600 media chip PMPs by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    I'll keep my non-drm text file books and my Chuwi 7" PMP media player. There's a good Ebook app out for it and with a 7" screen plus the ability to play a ton of music formats and video formats up to 720p with TV out for $120 I'm happy.

  26. I thought we knew this already by Paulminary · · Score: 1

    wasn't this announced like two years ago, when they had legal issues about it.

  27. More DRM Free Publishers by Nakor+BlueRider · · Score: 1

    The best change I can imagine for eBooks would be more DRM-free publishers. The only reason I even buy eBooks is that I discovered Fictionwise legitimately sold many of their eBooks DRM-free. But many publishers still don't allow it, and that is what I'd like to see change.

  28. Should raise some eyebrows at DOJ by dbkluck · · Score: 1

    Beneficial to many consumers? Healthy competition? Maybe in the short run, but what about the pending Book Search settlement? If that gets approved in its current form, Google gets exclusive access to scan and digitize millions of orphan works. Even if the settlement eventually gets cut back somewhat, Google has an enormous head start in its catalog from the books it's scanned already. Is there any doubt that the eBook format it chooses to market this huge selection of digital books will easily crush all other competitors? TFA seems to suggest that Google is planning on selling these eBooks only in cooperation with publishers and not from its settlement spoils at the moment, but given the potential to leverage the settlement monopoly to monopolize the market for eBooks and eReaders, I would be pretty surprised if this announcement doesn't pique the interest of the Justice Department.

  29. One word by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

    Android...

    --
    I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
  30. No Kindle outside the US by krischik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The original article seem to focus entirely on a Amazon vs Google battle. But in that article is missing one point: Kindle is not available outside the US. That is: you need an USA registered Credit Card with a USA address to buy one. Yes there are work around - but why should I support a flawed business model.

    So for me living outside the US I had to look else where for for eBooks. And if you do you will soon notice that there are better eBook reader then Kindle and that there are better eBook shops then Amazon. Amazon is largely capitalising there good name here. In fact currently it is more like Amazon vs the rest of the world.

    For me there is no doubt who is going to win in the long run. While USA is a large marked but it does only represent 5% of human population. Well, unless Amazon changes there business model that is.

  31. Amazon is not the only one. by krischik · · Score: 1

    Amazon is not the only eBook store in existence. And while Amazon is a international company there eBooks are only sold in the the US. You should consider other eBook stores. I suggest Fictionwise.

  32. 85% in the US? by krischik · · Score: 1

    Well, I take it you mean 85% of the market Amazon targets. But Kindle only sells in the US. But you know what: We living outside the US are not an-alphabets! We can read as well. I would guess that Google will go for the World market. And there Kindle becomes unimportant.

  33. Screw any fancy format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say screw these fancy formats. For novels, give me TXT any day, period. HTML tops (and that only for italic, since TXT can do line breaks and paragraphs just fine). A novel should not need more than plain text (and perhaps italics) to get its message across. But in the eventuality that something more fancy is needed, I see no reason for anything more than RTF. PDF tops, for stuff that needs perfect typesetting and images.

    I'd much rather set my own font type and size, depending on whatever factors are relevant for me (eyesight, reader screen size etc.) And reader software will have a much simpler time wrapping and reflowing plain text or simple HTML.

    I see no need for any other format. Yes, that means screw DRM. Tough luck, publishers. Give me cheap plain text books easy to find and buy in one place and I'll give you my money. How much depends only on how many books you can throw at me and how fast I can read them. You don't wanna? Fine, I'll get them free off the net and you can kiss my ass.

  34. Its the software stupid!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone noticed a small thing called stanza? Or maybe the store that started of the whole thing back in the 90s, fictionwise and the palm reader? Small device (then palm now iphone) == eBook happiness...

  35. mod parent down by Saysys · · Score: 1

    "Wouldn't the Kindle be more analogous to the iPod?"
    That IS what he said:
    "I never used iTunes because it didn't run on my OS, and it had DRM...The Kindle is exactly analogous. It has a proprietary format, with DRM."

    1. Re:mod parent down by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      That IS what he said:

      iPod != iTunes.

      I don't even think he meant that, b/c you don't "run" the iPod on an OS. I don't care for iTunes, so I use Winamp to manage mine; iPods can be used with Linux, etc. (except for the very newest ones); and you can load Rockbox on many of them.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  36. PDF Is readable everywere. by Saysys · · Score: 1

    I use PDFs as e-book content 4+ hours a day for my research, I have no trouble with it on my 42inch 1080P display, my 14inch 768 display my 10inc 1024 X 600 or my 3.5 420x380 display.

    Having a set size with no ability to zoom in on text and out on graphs, on the other hand, makes for an entirely useless product no matter what document format is being used.

    1. Re:PDF Is readable everywere. by Homburg · · Score: 1

      For some value of "readable," I suppose. But, on a 3.5in 420x380 display, a PDF with 10pt text on letter paper is going to either have tiny text or require a lot of cumbersome sideways scrolling.

  37. Competing with Stanza? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they getting ready to complete with Stanza on the iPhone by releasing an ebook app for the Android? Stanza, incidently, has just been purchased by Amazon.

  38. capitalising your good name by krischik · · Score: 1

    I forgot to mention: If you capitalising your good name then you have less "good name" afterwards:

    http://www.mobipocket.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15520

    Only one example of an article I did myself - If you look true the forum you will find several dozed similar articles.

  39. Both Publisher and Shop by krischik · · Score: 1

    The problem is that both the Shop and the Publisher need to agree on DRM free. I know of at least one publisher which does not insist on DRM yet Mobipocket.com still add DRM to the books anyway. Of course Mobipocket is owned by Amazon which might explain it. And yes: Amazon has more then one eBook store.

    1. Re:Both Publisher and Shop by Nakor+BlueRider · · Score: 1

      That would be nice, but the difference is if there is only one DRM free shop, but all publishers go DRM free, then we can buy everything from that one shop. Conversely if all shops offer DRM free, but only one publisher, we still can only get that publisher's books, no matter where we look. So the publishers are the more important factor here I'd say.

  40. Amazon is the evil one here. by krischik · · Score: 1

    I see you have not followed the scene. Otherwise you would know that Amazon is the evil one here who did not enters the market as a fair competitor.

    Amazons evil master plan is of course is bog standard: buy the competition (Mobipocket, Stanza) and the Embrace (Kindle file format is the same as Mobipocket), Extent (with a useless "Read on Kindle / Mobipocket only flag) and Extinguish (don't create new Mobipocket software and wait for the hardware to become obsolete). Kim Possibles Dr.D has more inspiring plans.

    Anyway: I as a European - who can not even buy Kindle - welcome any stiff competition to Amazon.

  41. Kindle vs Mobipocket by krischik · · Score: 1

    Actually the Kindle and Mobipocket format and DRM is the same save for a "read in Kindle / Mobipocket only" flag. Google "Kindle Mobipocket conversion" for details.

    Of course this only supports your "Vendor-Lock-In" argument and Mobipocket will soon go the way of the Dodo since Amazon halted development of new readers. Now they only have to wait for the hardware to become obsolete.

  42. Reflow by krischik · · Score: 1

    But does not do reflow which is needed for ultra portable devices - like mobile phones.

  43. More complicated. by krischik · · Score: 1

    In theory you are right but in praxis there are two thing to consider:

    1) not all publishers have contracts with all eBook shops.
    2) not all shops carry all file formats.

    With my particular example with VPM [1] and Perry Rhodan [2] the net result is that you can get DRM free PDF from one Shop and DRM infected Mobipocket from other Shops. PDF is not suitable for ultra portable devices (i.E. Smart phones) and Mobipocket is dying out. And also not all shops offer subscriptions. After readers have issued concerns VPM is now looking for new eBook options when subscriptions renews are due for issue 2500.

    My favourite option option would be Fictionwise multiformat [3]. But that particular combination might fail because VPM is a German publisher and Fictionswise is USA based eBook store.

    Martin

    PS: note that outside the US we are pretty pissed of with Amazon in general and Kindle in particular.

    [1] http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pabel-Moewig
    [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Rhodan
    [3] http://forum.perryrhodan.net/index.php?showtopic=17183