Slashdot Mirror


Sorry For the Detainment, Here's a Laptop

A select group of 17 Uighur Muslims held in Guantánamo, and waiting for a nation to grant them asylum are getting laptops and web training from the US military. Their web training will take place in a virtual computer lab the military has set up. The lessons will be limited to DVD language training as well as a basic users skill — set to help in any future employment options. Nury Turkel, an Uighur rights activist, said the training would help the men "be reintroduced into a modern society," adding that it "also would give hope to the men that their freedom is nearing." This special group already gets to order fast food and use a phone booth for weekly calls. I think the government is on to something here. Nothing keeps a man pacified like an occasional phone call, a cheeseburger, and surfing for a little porn.

14 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. Surfing a little porn by notarockstar1979 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing keeps a man pacified like an occasional phone call, a cheeseburger, and surfing for a little porn.

    Tell my boss that. He won't let me surf porn or make personal calls at work. Cheeseburgers are alright though.

  2. Uighurs by wiggles · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those not in the know, these prisoners are a tough case. The Chinese don't want them back (they're nasty separatist rebels to them), and they don't want to go back to China as it is for fear of waking up one morning with a bullet in their heads. They really don't belong in Gitmo -- they're not full-on Al Qaeda. Nobody in the US wants to grant them asylum because they're former gitmo detainees. The last thing the US wants is to release them to somebody like Yemen or Saudi Arabia, where they can become full-on Al Qaeda. A US judge said they have to be released, but didn't specify to which country. This whole thing is just a mess...

  3. Sorry? by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

    As waterboarding wasnt giving enough answers, they changed tactics and now are giving them laptops with Windows ME and Microsoft Bob. I'm sure there are international laws against that inhuman methods of torture.

  4. Maybe they could work in IT by Atrox666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they don't mind being treated a little worse than a terror suspect they could get corporate IT jobs.

  5. Re:Right. by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Give a terrorist the tools and knowledge to conspire against us with people around the globe, instantly. What could possibly go wrong?

    These people are not considered terrorists. That's why they have to be released sooner rather than later.

    They are currently being held because they can't go back to China, and they haven't yet found a place that can give them asylum.

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Re:These ARE FUCKING TERRORISTS what don't you get by danking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think a lot of people there are detained as POW. They are not terrorists, they simply lived in a country and were part of an army that the USA decided to invade.

  7. OLPT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    One laptop per terrorist!

    Mod me down you wonderful bastards, it's called comedy!

  8. Re:These ARE FUCKING TERRORISTS what don't you get by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Coalition military intelligence officials estimated that 70% to 90% of prisoners detained in Iraq since the war began last year 'had been arrested by mistake,' according to a confidential Red Cross report given to the Bush administration earlier this year." http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0511-04.htm "In February, an American military official disclosed that the Afghan guerrilla commander whose men had arrested Mr. Dilawar and his passengers had himself been detained. The commander, Jan Baz Khan, was suspected of attacking Camp Salerno himself and then turning over innocent "suspects" to the Americans in a ploy to win their trust, the military official said. The three passengers in Mr. Dilawar's taxi were sent home from Guantánamo in March 2004, 15 months after their capture, with letters saying they posed 'no threat' to American forces." http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/20/international/asia/20abuse.html?ei=5088&en=4579c146cb14cfd6&ex=1274241600&pagewanted=all

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  9. Re:Right. by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Informative

    Give a terrorist the tools and knowledge to conspire against us with people around the globe, instantly. What could possibly go wrong?

    And herein lies the problem with my dumbass countrymen. So obnoxiously opinionated with an inversely proportional knowledge of the subject at hand. Guess you hadn't heard that we've already released hundreds of innocent "terrorists" from Gitmo?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  10. Re:Computers?...put them to work! by rev_sanchez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kidnapping people and putting them to work against their will is called slavery.

    --
    If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
  11. a political problem, not legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is not a real problem here. I'm a former refugee (along with my family), lived with tortured persons, and families of political prisoners and know there are international laws and conventions that define what to do when you have people not welcomed in their own country. This false problem is because the US don't have the political will to apply those conventions after the mess they have created.

  12. Re:Clearly full of spy tools. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 4, Informative

    RTFA. They are Uighurs (an ethnicity). Chinese government policy (China is their home country) is to execute them on sight.

    It only makes you wonder why we won't send them there if you're an idiot.

    They fled China to escape persecution, and were in the wrong place at the wrong time, and so wound up at Gitmo.

    China has no problem with us sending them back, we have a problem with handing them over for summary execution.

  13. His goats on the other hand... by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... hard core killers.

  14. Re:These ARE FUCKING TERRORISTS what don't you get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Simple shooters were either shot or imprisoned locally.

    To persist in your dream world you have to explain why only A FEW were sent half way around the world.

    Talk to someone who has served in country. If you can refrain from insulting them long enough to actually listen to what they tell you.

    These were not shop keepers. Get over yourself.

    Served in country, lead ground patrols, cleared buildings, and called in aerial strikes in and around Fallujah as part of the 1st MEF portion of Operation Vigilant Resolve. Our platoon commander filed numerous reports and we have combat video documentation of almost all combatants that we captured. I doubt anyone that we captured was sent to Gitmo. Most were scrawny, under trained kids defending what they thought of as their home.

    It's pretty fucking simple. Either you have evidence to prosecute those in Gitmo or you do not. I believe in our Constitution, have fought and bleed to protect it. It says all men are created equal, not all men except those we call terrorists. If we can't produce a report, a video, a witness, a letter, or anything that shows those men in Gitmo are terrorists, then why the fuck are we still holding them? Just because they hate us? I missed the part of the Constitution that lays out the principle of jailing people just because they hate you. And I'm pretty sure that actions such as those we are taking in Gitmo are some of the very same actions (Re: British imprisonment of dissenters) that led to our founding fathers forming a more perfect union.

    We have become that which our founding fathers despised.