Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla To Launch "Build Your Own Browser"

angry tapir sends in a piece from Down Under which begins "Mozilla is readying a program that will allow companies to build their own customized browsers based on the next version of Firefox, which will be out in a few weeks. ... Through the Build Your Own Browser program, which will start sometime soon after Firefox 3.5 is released at the end of June, companies can use a Web application provided by Mozilla to specify certain customizations for the browser, such as bookmarks to certain sites or corporate intranets or portals. ... The bulk of enterprises still use Internet Explorer if they mandate a browser for company use, because Microsoft provides provisioning and installation software for IE that makes it easy for enterprises to control browser settings and install across all corporate desktops, said Forrester analyst Sheri McLeish. Mozilla has not historically done this, but something like the Build Your Own Browser program is a good start to encourage enterprises to use Firefox over IE."

12 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Opera did this too by nacturation · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least they used to. Starting with Opera 7 you could import a set of bookmarks, setup the home page, etc. and then distribute your own customized version of Opera. Good to see Firefox starting to consider this as well.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Opera did this too by nacturation · · Score: 4, Informative

      Out of curiosity, when chronologically was this?

      Actually, it was back in Opera 5 days. The URL http://composer.opera.com/ seems to date back to June 30, 2001:

      http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://composer.opera.com

      Checking the main Opera site as of that date shows Opera 5.12 was released for Windows.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  2. Re:Spinning an outstanding deficiency by zonky · · Score: 3, Informative

    Firefox Community Edition already supports group policy. http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/fmfirefox.htm

  3. Fine, but... by c_g_hills · · Score: 3, Informative

    What would be more useful to enterprises who want to distribute Firefox is an MSI package and a group policy template - like the version distributed by FrontMotion (Firefox Community Edition).

  4. Re:ActiveX by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ya kidding right? The intranet/internet distinction is DEAD. Malware runs on the client, the client is on the intranet, end of story.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Re:ActiveX by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft will stop releasing security patches for Windows XP in five years. If your business relies on something that only works in IE6, you have until 2014 to figure out a new solution, or continue running an unsupported operating system with no security updates available.

    However, you may have difficulty before then, if new PCs start shipping with hardware that isn't supported by WinXP. Of course this assumes you have an existing site license that covers the use of WinXP on new PCs; Microsoft has stopped selling WinXP, so when OEMs and retailers run out of copies, you won't be able to buy it - and the option to downgrade from Vista to XP will end in less than two months.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  6. Re:ActiveX by KingMotley · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, in every web based application I've developed, the driving reason was so to avoid the installation problems and support. It's easy to tell users to go to this or that URL to use a new application, a heck of a lot easier than rolling out apps everywhere. Independance from a specific operating system or browser has NEVER EVER come up.

  7. Re:Not for us by supernova_hq · · Score: 5, Informative

    Blaming enterprise software for your inability to install FireFox is nothing but a cop-out. The solution to this problem is so simple, I can't believe people even see it as a problem anymore.

    Install Firefox, then install ieTab. ieTab can be set to do nothing until you browse to a any of a list of domains. Once you enter a domain, ieTab takes over and runs that tab inside a native IE browser. IE is seamlessly embedded inside the tab, and the user won't even notice.

    The best part is that once a lot of companies do this, the enterprise software companies can start developing their software to standards, since most companies will already be using FireFox. Using IE for every website, just because of one domain (usually local network) requiring IE is just stupid

    This whole "We can't use FireFox because of enterprise app X" is bullshit. People need to learn how to properly manage corporate computer systems without coming up with these pathetic excuses for not doing their jobs properly.

  8. Re:Spinning an outstanding deficiency by prandal · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's FirefoxADM: http://ick2.wordpress.com/

    This stuff really needs to be in the core of Firefox for it to gain corporate users.

  9. Re:Not for us by wintermute000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Er, IE tab doesn't always work seamlessly esp. if said stupid enterprise software relies on a lot of popups, it starts behaving funny. Have you tested it against all the crappy .net custom apps out there?

    Heck at work the all bling new BMC Remedy system they brought in, the web facing frontend doesn't work properly in firefox. Thats a serious $$$ app. IEtab? I refer you to my popup issues.

    Also IETab is not a fully supported product, if something doesn't work well with it, tough.

    "This whole "We can't use FireFox because of enterprise app X" is bullshit. People need to learn how to properly manage corporate computer systems without coming up with these pathetic excuses for not doing their jobs properly."

    With that kind of attitude, I take it you don't run large enterprise environments (no, medium business with some branches or shops and one or two big sites doesn't count, where you get to be the grand wizard techie who overrules all).

    Technical arguments aside there are plenty of practical reasons. Just resistance to change, lack of tangible benefits, lack of support (you already pay MS for support so thats 'free'), user inertia / retraining (yes every call to the helpdesk where they explain clicking on the orange icon not the blue E icon costs $$$). We're techies and we like our own browsers and love sh1tting on MS but that's not how management looks at it. What is the bottom line gain YOU CAN DEMONSTRATE to the company? zero, and don't start talking about security, the you can demonstrate bit is the most important bit.

  10. Isn't this already available? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Firefox CCK (Client Customization Kit) wizard of course!

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2553

    Also, Mozilla has offered the CCK for previous versions of Firefox.

    http://www.mozilla.org/projects/cck/firefox/

    So this sounds like no more than new name and an update? I don't consider this to be big news.

  11. Re:SSL CA certs! by GaryOlson · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK, for those who don't read the discussion, let's repeat the obvious
    The latest version of FirefoxADMrelease notes specifically list the feature Added: Ability to replace certificates for all user profiles.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.