Slashdot Mirror


WHO Declares H1N1's Spread Officially a Pandemic

juggledean writes "The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared a global flu pandemic after holding an emergency meeting, according to reports. It means the swine flu virus is spreading in at least two regions of the world with rising cases being seen in the UK, Australia, Japan and Chile." Whether it's called a pandemic or not, there's a hopeful note in the story about H1N1's spread: "...there were people who believed we might be in a kind of apocalyptic situation and what we're really seeing now with H1N1 is that in most cases the disease is self-limiting."

43 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious by smcn · · Score: 5, Funny

    WHO Declares H1N1's Spread Officially a Pandemic

    I don't know, I'm asking YOU!

    1. Re:Obvious by Intron · · Score: 4, Funny

      CDC?
      No. I'm too far inland.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  2. WHAT's on second by SoupGuru · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... and I DON'T KNOW is on third.

    Let's just get that out of the way first and foremost.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    1. Re:WHAT's on second by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... and I DON'T KNOW is on third.

      Let's just get that out of the way first and foremost.

      But what's the name of the band on stage?

      Who.

      The name of the band.

      Who.

      No, I want to know who's on stage.

      Yes.

      So you're saying Yes is on stage?

      No, Yes isn't even at this concert.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:WHAT's on second by cheezitman2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait, let's try this again. Do you see the band on stage?

      No I don't see The Band, that's a different group entirely.

      On stage, Skippy. Look, see the band?

      No I don't.

      Get rid of those John Lennon glasses and look! There, there's the band!

      No, that's not The Band. The Band is performing later on. Who's on stage.

    3. Re:WHAT's on second by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obscure? Nothing's obscure on slashdot.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:WHAT's on second by Sen.NullProcPntr · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe they are referred to as knock-knock jokes;

      Person #1 - Knock knock.
      Person #2 - Who's there?
      Person #1 - Yes, and they just declared a global flu pandemic after holding an emergency meeting.

      ...I don't get it.

  3. "H1N1" by plus_M · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I admit I'm not the most knowledgeable about this topic, but I *do* know that H1N1 is not a very specific name for this influenza strain. In the past, we have named influenza outbreaks such as these after their country of origin (see Spanish Flu, Hong Kong Flu, Asian Flu), and in light of this I think a more appropriate name would be "Mexican Flu".

    1. Re:"H1N1" by TinBromide · · Score: 4, Funny

      I want it to be called swine flu again. That way bacon will be super cheap again.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    2. Re:"H1N1" by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With the politically correct liberal media, we can't have that name or it will possibly hurt the tourism in Mexico.

      You mean more than their continual reporting of violence including beheadings in Mexico, which has claimed only one tourist life... and there are indications that he was actually there on some sort of nefarious business?

      The liberal news media is a conservative myth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:"H1N1" by werfu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Naming it Mexican flu wouldn't not be right, because, for now, the strain is not higly virulent and doesn't kill really much. The WHO as declared it pandemic, but it's more in a move to try to stop the viral spread and help reduce the chance of a mutation. If the virus mutate and mix with H5N1, then we could be in serious trouble. And even then, lets just hope it doesn't mix with something even more deadly.

    4. Re:"H1N1" by MrMista_B · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to mention, didn't the virus origionaly originate in the US?

      I vote we call it 'Freedom Flu'. :)

    5. Re:"H1N1" by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The liberal news media is a conservative myth" is a liberal media myth.

      The "liberal media news is a conservative myth is a liberal media myth" is a conservative myth.

      OH NO! WE'VE ENTERED INFINITE RECURSION!

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    6. Re:"H1N1" by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The news media is an entertainment media myth.

    7. Re:"H1N1" by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think naming it the "Mexican Flu" is going to hurt the tourism to Mexico any more than the knowledge that the strain did, in fact, originate in Mexico and the massive number of reported cases in Mexico already have. And besides, as I mentioned, there is a precedent.

      plus_M, I've talked to people who still think that you can get it from eating pork products. People in general are stupid, and these same people are the ones who avoided Toronto when SARS hit.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    8. Re:"H1N1" by dzfoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> Fun! Who's got the next one?

      No. Who Declared H1N1's Spread Officially a Pandemic.

      Pay attention!

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    9. Re:"H1N1" by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've talked to people who still think that you can get it from eating pork products. People in general are stupid, and these same people are the ones who avoided Toronto when SARS hit.

      Over the last 5 years more people have been killed in the US by swine flu than by terrorists. If you buy into terrorism fear-mongering, as so many people seem to do along with just about the entire news reporting industry, it's no surprise people would buy into all kinds of crazy fears about swine flue.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:"H1N1" by RDW · · Score: 3, Informative

      'Infuenza A H1N1' is really no more specific than just 'H1N1', since all H1N1 flu viruses are Influenza A. There doesn't seem to be a generally agreed name that's both snappy and specific, so you'll see things like 'Novel H1N1 Influenza' and '2009 A/H1N1'. Virologists use more detailed identifiers for individual isolates, like 'A/New York/3002/2009(H1N1)'.

    11. Re:"H1N1" by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just ask the majority of reporters and news producers, who explicitly identify themselves as left-leaning and left-voting.

      Just ask the majority of owners of news organizations, who explicitly identify themselves as right-leaning and right-voting.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    12. Re:"H1N1" by sexconker · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least make it semi-readable.

      recText() {

          if [ $1 -gt 1 ];

          then

              i=`expr $1 - 1`

              if [ $(($1 % 2 )) -eq 0 ];

                  then j=`echo \"$2 is a liberal myth\"`

                  else j=`echo \"$2 is a conservative myth\"`

              fi

              k=`recText $i "$j"`

              echo $k

          else echo $2

      fi

      }

      echo "The `recText 10 "liberal media news"`"

    13. Re:"H1N1" by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yay for corrupt protectionism! We have to make it illegal to call things what they are to protect the industrialists who own Congress! Yay!

  4. Think of the Trees... by localman57 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For years, and years in the United States we fought forest fires in an absolute manner. When you see a fire, put it out completely, ASAP. And slowly fuel that should have burned built up. Until eventually the fires that did break out were so intense that they couldn't fight them anymore. Now that the world population is approaching 7 billion, am I the only one who finds this analogy terrifying?

    1. Re:Think of the Trees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its the worst in California with all the lawyers masquerading as environmentalists.

      Honestly the best thing for the environment is the CONSERVATIONISTS rather than the environmentalists who live in LA or San Francisco and take weekend trips to the napa valley to "be one with nature", nevermind the fact that the "No tree should be cut ever, no brush should be cleared ever" policy they screech and sue for has cost millions of dollars of taxpayer money (the money California spends fighting the yearly fires caused by uncleared brush is staggering, and if we used 1/10th of that to clear the aforementioned brush and prevent the majority of fires all together) and lives.

      Totally lost my train of thought.

      Personally, I think its all a dystopian plot - If the fires burn hot enough it'll literally just glass the forestland and then nothing will grow there for 5-10 years, I saw this once growing up - scary. When it was glassed it was suddenly not considered forestland anymore and the developers can move right on in with no meaningful environmental impact report required.

      Thank god for the do-gooders at the sierra club.

    2. Re:Think of the Trees... by Pebble · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes you are...

      Because when we save an infant or an elderly person from the flu they don't wait for the next flu to come around. They either grow up and get a better immune system or they eventually die of something else.

      We don't have a backlog of pensioners and infants who didn't die of the flu before just waiting until the flu comes round again so they can die of it, They don't pile up like dry old logs and brush.

  5. Symptoms by WillKemp · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can tell if you've got swine flu, because you come out in rashers.

  6. 2010 - Year of the **** by JustASlashDotGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't know if this is just a sick coincidence but....

    2007 - Chinese year of the Chicken - Bird Flu Pandemic devastates parts of Asia
    2008 - Chinese year of the Horse - Equine Influenza decimates Australian racing
    2009 - Chinese year of the Pig - Swine Flu Pandemic kills hundreds of pigs around the globe.

    Has any one else noticed this?

    It gets worse........

    next year......

    2010 - Chinese year of the Cock - what could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:2010 - Year of the **** by Convector · · Score: 5, Informative

      That would be a great observation except that:

      2007 - Chinese year of the Boar
      2008 - Chinese year of the Rat
      2009 - Chinese year of the Ox

      So next year, we should be worried about Tiger Flu.

    2. Re:2010 - Year of the **** by AioKits · · Score: 4, Funny

      So next year, we should be worried about Tiger Flu.

      Don't worry, I hear it's gonna be GRRRRRREAT!

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  7. Re:Ya well by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Funny

    Although it will probably hurt your chances of getting some thick Mexican pipe, consider avoiding the virus entirely and not applying rouge.

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  8. News for alarmist douches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Douches,

    Pandemics refer to a disease's spread, not its severity.

    The common cold is also a pandemic.

  9. Re:Let's play a word game by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

    While we're talking about animal diseases, what about german measles?

    ...That wasn't really fair, I apologize in advance to any germans who may have been offended by that.

  10. Overreaction by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But it IS an overreaction. It's only NOT an overreaction if you're: a politician who is desperately trying to get the public to look the other way, to funnel more public money into private hands... a bureaucrat who is trying to get a promotion by "doing something" and is also very concerned about being labeled as passive if the final tally is 1% higher than normal... or a scientist who is desperately trying to grab more funding or a contract for his very own vaccine-making company.

    It's a paradise for self-interest (and OF self-interest, as well).

    With something like less than 500 deaths worldwide, this is the average equivalent of 3 days worth of seasonal flu... and considering that this virus has had a chance to spread for the past 2 months, I simply cannot fathom it being any more damaging than whatever seasonal flu strain is circulating in the world right now.

    Yet all we get are headlines such as "27'000 infected". Well... how about 500'000 dead?! Cause that's what seasonal flu did last year. Put that in a headline and smoke it.

    1. Re:Overreaction by Allicorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Pandemic" is not a word which implies anything about lethality or how "damaging" the strain is.

      The WHO declaring H1N1 pandemic is not overreaction, hyperbole or scaremongering. The particular strain has reached a specified spread at which point it qualifies for that label.

      Now, the news media's choice of tone and language in reporting on H1N1 is another matter entirely.

      --
      OMG!!! Ponies!!!
  11. Re:Swine flu rap. by Eddy+Luten · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone get this delirious person a flu shot.

  12. Re:/. vs. WHO by megamerican · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The WHO claims they are making this level 6 because it is spreading globally and it has nothing to do with the severity. So why don't they do this for any seasonal flu that spreads globally every year?

    If you read the legal definitions of what the WHO can do when it is level 6 is very scary. They can take your property, forcibly vaccinate you, quarantine you for an indefinite amount of time all with zero proof of anything.

    The few people who have actually died and had swine flu were all very ill before they were infected.

    Now for some comedy.

    --
    If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  13. Stop being such whiny babies by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it a pandemic in the disease spread methodology? Yes.

    Is it killing millions of people each year? No.

    Is it killing thousands of people each year? No.

    Is it killing slightly more than any typical flu does? Yes.

    Solution? Wash your hands with hot water (not scalding) and non-antibiotic soap (e.g. Ivory hand soap). Cover your mouth and nose when you sneeze, using a sleeve if you have no tissue.

    That literally cuts the infection rate dramatically.

    Now, if you don't mind, I'm going back to my medical research.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  14. Re:Jumping the gun by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Informative

    Er, the 1918 flu pandemic started as a mild but very infectious disease. Then, come autumn, it killed more people than WW1. And mostly young people at that.

    Furthermore, maybe you should look up what the word "pandemic" actually means. They're using it correctly. You're not.

    --
    Azural - instrumentals
  15. it IS a pandemic by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    just not particularly lethal

    in 1918, the same thing happened: the flu appeared in the spring, outside its usual pattern of appearing in the fall, and then percolated all summer, just below the radar, expanding stealthily but inevitable everywhere

    http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no01/05-0979.htm

    then (in the northern hemisphere, it would explode in the cold months of the spring in the southern hemisphere) the flu exploded in the fall, and killed millions that winter. this is inevitable with flu because the flu virus actually survives in cold air for a longer period of time

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/health/05flu.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print&oref=login

    so the summer months deaden its spread (really, just slow down its spread) so that it spreads stealthily but inevitably, while the winter months allow it to flourish and explode, seemingly everywhere at the same time (because the summer months allowed to actually go everywhere, just in small little clusters everywhere)

    its also important to note that flu in 1918 killed at a very low rate, like under 1% of its victims. whatever strain dominates this winter, will be the real issue. will it have a 0.0003% mortality rate? or a 0.3% mortality rate? we're talking about the difference of tens of millions of lives in that difference, and no one knows what that mortality rate will be, since its such tiny little variations and random chance of one mutation dominating or another at work here

    so beware false alarmism, and beware false complacency. this virus is a genuine unknown quantity. it really could kill a lot this winter, it could really completely fizzle out. both anyone freaking out, or completely blase and lackadaisacal about the whole thing, are fooling themselves

    an unknown is an unknown is an unknown. neither false complacency or false alarmism is an appropriate response to that

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  16. Re:I work at a hospital... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm worried about all those too. This store is about H1N1 though. Just because it's not the top of the list doesn't mean it isn't worthy of mass hysteria.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  17. Re:Jumping the gun by Neon+Aardvark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The vast majority of infection and death happened after WW1, so you're wrong about that.

    Another difference from those times to now is air travel, which can see infection spread vastly quicker.

    Regarding the meaning of the word "pandemic", I'll take the technical description of people working in that field, thanks very much, and not yours.

    The reason I stated that your definition of the word was wrong was not the mentioned of the Black Death, but the "REAL" (sic, in caps) qualifier, suggesting that in your head you have a cut-off death toll for your special definition of the word. This was sorta the point of your post.

    But aside from the ad hominems, caps and lack of logic, keep it up, you're doing great.

    --
    Azural - instrumentals
  18. wrong category for story by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly, this should have been an "Ask Slashdot"

  19. disinformation by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've talked to people who still think that you can get it from eating pork products.

    We've got to put a stop to this ignorance. You cannot get the disease that way -- but you CAN get revenge!

  20. Re:Let's play a word game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Careful. We Germans aren't all smiles and sunshine.